Ya me di cuenta de un post anterior que los DVD pueden ser de 4,7 Gb y
al parecer ya yo me estoy adelantando al 6.2 jajaja cierto que es la
6.1, disculpen mi error al escribir...
73
El 12/12/2011 12:00, centos-es-requ...@centos.org escribió:
hola colega;-)
fue un horrible lapsus brutus mío
Hello there,
since yersterday, there's a massive update ready for my CentOS 6 (kept
up-to-date, including w/ cr updates).
The yum update lists many packages from 'base' and 'update' and 2 deps
from 'cr' then fails, see:
[snip]
Installing for dependencies:
perl-CGI
Am 13.12.2011 09:40, schrieb wwp:
Hello there,
since yersterday, there's a massive update ready for my CentOS 6 (kept
up-to-date, including w/ cr updates).
The yum update lists many packages from 'base' and 'update' and 2 deps
from 'cr' then fails, see:
With the release of 6.1 packages
wwp wrote:
The yum update lists many packages from 'base' and 'update' and 2 deps
from 'cr' then fails, see:
It's yum. It's fragile.
Whenever it doesn't do what you think it should, run yun clean all and
try again.
___
CentOS mailing list
Hello Nicolas, Alexander,
On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 10:11:36 +0100 Nicolas Thierry-Mieg
nicolas.thierry-m...@imag.fr wrote:
wwp wrote:
The yum update lists many packages from 'base' and 'update' and 2 deps
from 'cr' then fails, see:
It's yum. It's fragile.
Whenever it doesn't do what you
Hello all, I'm having an issue with group permissions which I really find hard
to understand why. I have created a group called smbusers which I am a part of
by doing the following: # groupadd smbusers# usermod -G smbusers michael I then
created a directory called foodir, owned by adm with
Hello all,
Re-sending due to incorrect mapping of linefeeds from hotmail.
I'm having an issue with group permissions.
I have created a group called smbusers which I have added myself to,
with the following commands:
# groupadd smbusers
# usermod -G smbusers michael
I then create a directory
On Tuesday, December 13, 2011 12:10:47 PM Michael Velez wrote:
$ groups michael
michael: michael, smbusers
This seems to be ok but these:
$ groups
michael adm
$ id
uid=500(michael) gid=500(michael) groups=4(adm), 500(michael)
Say otherwise.
Might sound stupid but... did you make sure
В Втр, 13/12/2011 в 12:10 +0100, Michael Velez пишет:
I'm having an issue with group permissions.
I have created a group called smbusers which I have added myself to,
with the following commands:
# groupadd smbusers
# usermod -G smbusers michael
usermod -G smbusers,adm michael
--
С
I'm having an issue with group permissions.
I have created a group called smbusers which I have added myself to,
with the following commands:
# groupadd smbusers
# usermod -G smbusers michael
usermod -G smbusers,adm michael
I understand what this command does; however, it
This seems to be ok but these:
$ groups
michael adm
$ id
uid=500(michael) gid=500(michael) groups=4(adm), 500(michael)
Say otherwise.
Might sound stupid but... did you make sure to logoff and back in with your
user?
Regards
Ok. I did not know I needed to log back off and
Hi,
I'm using system-config-firewall (C6 x86_64, fully up to date) to
configure a gateway/firewall box. 2 nics, eth0 (configured as bridge0,
mtu 7200) connected to the lan, eth1 being connected directly to the
internet (public ip, mtu 1500). ssh port is open and accessible. nat is
working fine.
Can you fpaste your firewall rules? I would omit the actual public IP's for
security sake.
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 8:53 AM, Laurent Wandrebeck
l.wandreb...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
I'm using system-config-firewall (C6 x86_64, fully up to date) to
configure a gateway/firewall box. 2 nics, eth0
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Michael Velez
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2011 8:14
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Group permission problems [RESEND]
This seems to be ok but these:
$ groups
On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 09:44:11 -0500
cliff here c4iff...@gmail.com wrote:
Can you fpaste your firewall rules? I would omit the actual public IP's for
security sake.
http://fpaste.org/wE0L/
If you need anything else, ask :)
Thanks,
Laurent.
pgpIxvcjsW6sV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
actually if you could cat /etc/sysconfig/iptables, i find it easier to
read. also try this to troubleshoot
watch n 1 'iptables -t nat -L -n -v'
it will show you the when a packet hits a rule I find it very helpful when
troubleshooting.
But if not mistake about what your intent is your
sorry that's watch -n 1 'iptables -t nat -L -n -v'
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 10:04 AM, cliff here c4iff...@gmail.com wrote:
actually if you could cat /etc/sysconfig/iptables, i find it easier to
read. also try this to troubleshoot
watch n 1 'iptables -t nat -L -n -v'
it will show you the
On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 10:07:41 -0500
cliff here c4iff...@gmail.com wrote:
sorry that's watch -n 1 'iptables -t nat -L -n -v'
snip
But if not mistake about what your intent is your forwarding rules that
you have in prerouting should be in INPUT chain.
You're trying to come in from an outside
My best guess would be to move your forwarding rules to the INPUT chain
instead of being in the PREROUTING.
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Laurent Wandrebeck l.wandreb...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 10:07:41 -0500
cliff here c4iff...@gmail.com wrote:
sorry that's watch -n 1
I am just trying out Zabbix and I have to say it sure is easy to set
up (once you get beyond a few minor quirks). I'm pretty impressed so
far with my evaluation.
--
“Don't eat anything you've ever seen advertised on TV”
- Michael Pollan, author of In Defense of Food
With Unix unless you are changing X or the kernel, you can most times
just start a new instance of you. :)
i.e., `xterm -ls -sb` or
(in gnome)
start a terminal
click Edit - Current Profile
click 'Title and Command'
make sure Run command as login shell** is checked, and click close.
On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 10:23:45 -0500
cliff here c4iff...@gmail.com wrote:
My best guess would be to move your forwarding rules to the INPUT chain
instead of being in the PREROUTING.
Will try that once I figure out iptables syntax.
Is it me or I hit a system-config-firewall bug in rules generation
On 12/13/2011 03:28 PM, Alan McKay wrote:
I am just trying out Zabbix and I have to say it sure is easy to set
up (once you get beyond a few minor quirks). I'm pretty impressed so
far with my evaluation.
I've use zabbix quite extensively over the last 2 odd years ( we even
use Zabbix to
Laurent Wandrebeck wrote:
On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 10:23:45 -0500
cliff here c4iff...@gmail.com wrote:
My best guess would be to move your forwarding rules to the INPUT chain
instead of being in the PREROUTING.
Will try that once I figure out iptables syntax.
Is it me or I hit a
Also to note, if you edit your /etc/sysconfig/iptables file manually there
is a line in /etc/init.d./iptables at line number 300 that will save on
service iptables restart; meaning if you run that command the buffer will
save over the file and basically revert any changes you just made to the
Hello list,
With my latest proftpd server graphical client error on list (ls) directory:
Error: Could not read from socket: ECONNRESET - Connection reset by peer
Error: Disconnected from server
Error: Failed to retrieve directory listing
So far I've tried both filezilla and cyberduck.
Here's a really good overview of how the iptables process works
http://fedoraunity.org/Members/kanarip/iptables-howto
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 10:53 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Laurent Wandrebeck wrote:
On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 10:23:45 -0500
cliff here c4iff...@gmail.com wrote:
My best
On Tue, 13 Dec 2011, cliff here wrote:
Also to note, if you edit your /etc/sysconfig/iptables file manually there
is a line in /etc/init.d./iptables at line number 300 that will save on
service iptables restart; meaning if you run that command the buffer will
save over the file and basically
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
On 12/12/2011 07:44 PM, Ned Slider wrote:
On 12/12/11 18:47, Anne Wilson wrote:
For a while now I've been seeing skipped-package notices, which I
don't really understand. I know it's a version mis-match, but all
my attempts to sort it out have failed, so I need help, please.
The current
@John, yea good catch thanks =)
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 11:59 AM, John Hodrien j.h.hodr...@leeds.ac.ukwrote:
On Tue, 13 Dec 2011, cliff here wrote:
Also to note, if you edit your /etc/sysconfig/iptables file manually
there
is a line in /etc/init.d./iptables at line number 300 that will
# yum update
...
-- Running transaction check
-- Processing Dependency: libxerces-c.so.27 for package: phc
--- Package xerces-c.i386 0:2.8.0-1.el5.centos set to be updated
-- Finished Dependency Resolution
phc-0.1.7-1.el5.rf.i386 from installed has depsolving problems
-- Missing Dependency:
On 13 December 2011 19:17, ken geb...@mousecar.com wrote:
# yum update
...
-- Running transaction check
-- Processing Dependency: libxerces-c.so.27 for package: phc
--- Package xerces-c.i386 0:2.8.0-1.el5.centos set to be updated
-- Finished Dependency Resolution
phc-0.1.7-1.el5.rf.i386
Vreme: 12/13/2011 06:47 PM, Anne Wilson piše:
To avoid similar problems in the future, can you give me some guidelines
for priority settings? It seems I got it wrong somewhere:-) Thanks
It is not wise to have third-party repositories overwriting base
packages. This should only be used by
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 11:50 PM, Michael Velez mikev...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hello all, I'm having an issue with group permissions which I really find
hard to understand why. I have created a group called smbusers which I am a
part of by doing the following: # groupadd smbusers# usermod -G
On 12/13/2011 02:30 PM Lucian wrote:
On 13 December 2011 19:17, ken geb...@mousecar.com wrote:
# yum update
...
-- Running transaction check
-- Processing Dependency: libxerces-c.so.27 for package: phc
--- Package xerces-c.i386 0:2.8.0-1.el5.centos set to be updated
-- Finished Dependency
On 12/13/2011 06:05 PM, Philip Manuel wrote:
Hi
We use mrepo to keep a local repository. I downloaded the CentOS6.1 iso
and used that as the base. We also have the CR repo added.
I was expecting this change to cause no issues but the following
packages have version issues between the
On 12/14/2011 11:17 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 12/13/2011 06:05 PM, Philip Manuel wrote:
Hi
We use mrepo to keep a local repository. I downloaded the CentOS6.1 iso
and used that as the base. We also have the CR repo added.
I was expecting this change to cause no issues but the
On 12/13/2011 06:26 PM, Philip Manuel wrote:
On 12/14/2011 11:17 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 12/13/2011 06:05 PM, Philip Manuel wrote:
Hi
We use mrepo to keep a local repository. I downloaded the CentOS6.1 iso
and used that as the base. We also have the CR repo added.
I was expecting
On 12/14/2011 11:49 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 12/13/2011 06:26 PM, Philip Manuel wrote:
On 12/14/2011 11:17 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 12/13/2011 06:05 PM, Philip Manuel wrote:
Hi
We use mrepo to keep a local repository. I downloaded the CentOS6.1 iso
and used that as the base. We
On 12/13/2011 06:54 PM, Philip Manuel wrote:
On 12/14/2011 11:49 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 12/13/2011 06:26 PM, Philip Manuel wrote:
On 12/14/2011 11:17 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 12/13/2011 06:05 PM, Philip Manuel wrote:
Hi
We use mrepo to keep a local repository. I downloaded the
Vreme: 12/14/2011 01:54 AM, Philip Manuel piše:
OK but why when there are no i686 packages installed on the machine is
it trying to look for them? If I remove the offending x86_64 packages
and put the base equivalent on then the issue goes away, but I shouldn't
have to do this step.
Your
On 12/13/2011 06:58 PM, Dave Stevens wrote:
Quoting Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 12/13/2011 02:36 PM, ken wrote:
On 12/13/2011 02:30 PM Lucian wrote:
On 13 December 2011 19:17, ken
On 12/14/2011 12:07 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 12/13/2011 06:54 PM, Philip Manuel wrote:
On 12/14/2011 11:49 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
You do have i686 packages on that machine ... that is what the error you
posted is.
create (or edit( a file called:
/root/.rpmmacros
put this in the
On 12/13/2011 07:12 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 12/13/2011 06:58 PM, Dave Stevens wrote:
Quoting Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 12/13/2011 02:36 PM, ken wrote:
On 12/13/2011 02:30 PM Lucian wrote:
Trying to build a more secure version of a desktop with virtualization
enabled. Goal is to perform most Internet surfing and on-line banking
from a special-built and hardened Linux load.
Have built a bunch of complete Desktop versions of CentOS 5.5, 5.6,
and 6.0 with this capability. This is
On Monday 12 December 2011, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
There are known Collision Attacks for the MD5SUM method of hashing,
so it is possible to modify a file and make it have the same MD5SUM
as another file. See this link for details on Collision Attacks:
47 matches
Mail list logo
