CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:0373
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0373.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:0372
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0372.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2012:0376 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0376.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:0371
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0371.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2012:0376 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2012-0376.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
Tenemos uno en mi trabajo pero con debian y solo tiene un servidor web, ftp
y postfix y esta yendo bien :)
El 8 de marzo de 2012 14:22, Ricardo Martinez harisel...@gmail.comescribió:
Buenas lista!!!
estamos pensando en adquirir un server IBM
SYSTEM X 3400 M3
Express x3400 M3, Xeon 4C
muchas gracias!!! a los dos!!! :)
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 8:24 PM, aldoco...@gmail.com wrote:
Yo tengo dos de esos server's ambos raid 5 con 12TB uno tiene centos 5.7 y
otro ubuntu server, andan muy bien
--Mensaje original--
De: Ricardo Martinez
Remitente:
El día 7 de marzo de 2012 21:29, Fermin Francisco abc...@yahoo.com escribió:
Gracias por tu respuesta chepeRobert!!
disculpa, soy nuevo en Centos, pero con eso q enviaste se podra loguearse
desde la parte grafica??
¿A que te refieres?
JOSE FERMIN
--- El mié, 3/7/12, cheperobert
El 08/03/2012 4:37, Paúl Vizuete escribió:
PHP Fatal error: Call to undefined function sys_get_temp_dir() in
/var/www/html/care2x/installer/config.php
El error es claro: la versión de PHP que estás utilizando no tiene
soporte para la función sys_get_temp_dir(), que según la documentación
Me refiero a q si un usuario puede introducir su nombre de usuario y su
contrasena en ambiente grafico. de la misma forma como un usuario en MS Windows
2008 puede hacerlo??
JOSE FERMIN
--- El jue, 3/8/12, cheperobert jrobertoa...@gmail.com escribió:
De: cheperobert jrobertoa...@gmail.com
El día 8 de marzo de 2012 20:30, Fermin Francisco abc...@yahoo.com escribió:
Me refiero a q si un usuario puede introducir su nombre de usuario y su
contrasena en ambiente grafico. de la misma forma como un usuario en MS
Windows 2008 puede hacerlo??
Pues no se porque nunca lo he instalado y
Le 08/03/12 03:32, Devin Reade a écrit :
John R Piercepie...@hogranch.com wrote:
I don't understand how ANYTHING you do on a single server could be
called 'cloudy'.
Well, if it catches fire and produces lots of white smoke ...
AHaha this, sir, is the best cloud definition I heard in the
Another smooth update. Thanks CentOS-team!
--
BW,
Sorin
---
# Sorin Srbu[Sysadmin, Systems Engineer]
# Dept of Medicinal Chemistry, Phone: +46 (0)18-4714482 3 signals GSM
# Div of Org Pharm Chem,Mobile: +46
any idea when will firefox 10 be available for centos 5?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 3/7/2012 9:32 PM, Devin Reade wrote:
John R Piercepie...@hogranch.com wrote:
I don't understand how ANYTHING you do on a single server could be
called 'cloudy'.
Well, if it catches fire and produces lots of white smoke ...
ROFL
___
CentOS
On 03/08/2012 10:14 AM, Janez Kosmrlj wrote:
any idea when will firefox 10 be available for centos 5?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Most likely never. At least as far as I know. I think
On 8.3.2012 10:14, Janez Kosmrlj wrote:
any idea when
will firefox 10 be available for centos 5?
CentOS 5.8 was announced today and it includes firefox 10 AFAICS.
https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2012-0327.html
--
Kind Regards, Markus Falb
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital
Hi.
I just upgraded to CentOS 5.8 and got Thunderbird and Firefox 10, and I
regret it already... I find that reading texts in these new versions is
much more straining to the eyes than it used to be, as something must
have changed with the font rendering - simply put, all letters appears
to
On 03/08/2012 03:55 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
On 03/08/2012 10:14 AM, Janez Kosmrlj wrote:
any idea when will firefox 10 be available for centos 5?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 03/08/2012 02:48 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
Another smooth update. Thanks CentOS-team!
Thanks! Lots of very hard work by the QA team.
Everyone needs to look at their /var/log/messages if they have an SAS
hard drive.
This is a very big (and potentially dangerous) problem:
On 03/08/2012 12:27 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 03/08/2012 03:55 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
On 03/08/2012 10:14 AM, Janez Kosmrlj wrote:
any idea when will firefox 10 be available for centos 5?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Toralf Lund
Sent: den 8 mars 2012 11:36
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: [CentOS] Thunderbird and Firefox 10 font rendering
Does anyone else experience this? Any idea how to fix it (besides
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Toralf Lund
Sent: den 8 mars 2012 12:40
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Thunderbird and Firefox 10 font rendering
BTW, besides the bluryness, the fonts also look thinner somehow;
I see it now. I checked the packages in the base repository and there is
still ff 3.6.x. Now i see it is in the updates repository.
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic off...@plnet.rswrote:
On 03/08/2012 12:27 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 03/08/2012 03:55 AM, Ljubomir
On 03/08/12 3:33 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 03/08/2012 02:48 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
Another smooth update. Thanks CentOS-team!
Thanks! Lots of very hard work by the QA team.
Everyone needs to look at their /var/log/messages if they have an SAS
hard drive.
This is a very big (and
John R Pierce wrote:
On 03/07/12 2:09 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Heh. Many of the new servers we are getting are all on the order of 48 or
64 cores, and they eat and drink power. The same UPS that would handle six
4 or 8 core boxes can handle*three*, if we're lucky, when a clustering
job's
On 03/08/12 4:39 AM, mark wrote:
VM's? Sorry, we're doing very serious scientific computing - the couple
or so VMs we had are going away. I mean, when, for example, one guy I
support gets on a 48 core box, and proceeds to fire up an R job, and
uses*all* of them Plus, we're running out of
Am 08.03.2012 12:33, schrieb Johnny Hughes:
On 03/08/2012 02:48 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
Another smooth update. Thanks CentOS-team!
Thanks! Lots of very hard work by the QA team.
Everyone needs to look at their /var/log/messages if they have an SAS
hard drive.
This is a very big (and
On Mar 7, 2012, at 7:48 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic off...@plnet.rs wrote:
We are talking about *software* /boot partition on RAID1! that can have
any number of member partitions. And the rest of the disk here discussed
is *software* mdraid RAID10 with 1,2,3,4,... member partitions, not
On 08/03/12 12:46, Sorin Srbu wrote:
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of Toralf Lund
Sent: den 8 mars 2012 12:40
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] Thunderbird and Firefox 10 font rendering
BTW, besides the
I use both 3.6.26 (from centOS 5) and 10.0.2 (binary from mozilla).
And, after setting the same font settings in both, I cannot see any real
differences...
Only tiny difference I could find if I screenshot both and zoom a lot is
lighter pixels in the anti-aliasing of 10.x.
But that might just
On 08/03/12 14:35, John Doe wrote:
I use both 3.6.26 (from centOS 5) and 10.0.2 (binary from mozilla).
And, after setting the same font settings in both, I cannot see any real
differences...
Only tiny difference I could find if I screenshot both and zoom a lot is
lighter pixels in the
From: Toralf Lund toralf.l...@pgs.com
Like I said elsewhere, I looks like the version 10 applications do not
pick up the settings from System-Preferences-Fonts-Details... in
GNOME. I've just verified that Firefox does on a system with an older
CentOS version, although there are no direct
John R Pierce wrote:
On 03/08/12 4:39 AM, mark wrote:
VM's? Sorry, we're doing very serious scientific computing - the couple
or so VMs we had are going away. I mean, when, for example, one guy I
support gets on a 48 core box, and proceeds to fire up an R job, and
uses*all* of them Plus,
From: John Doe jd...@yahoo.com
Hum... playing with the gnome font settings does not change anything
in either firefoxes...
But if you meant changing something else than rendering: if change
the Application font, it changes in both firefoxes instantaneously...
Maybe check in
On 8.3.2012 13:44, Rainer Traut wrote:
Am 08.03.2012 12:33, schrieb Johnny Hughes:
On 03/08/2012 02:48 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
Another smooth update. Thanks CentOS-team!
Thanks! Lots of very hard work by the QA team.
Everyone needs to look at their /var/log/messages if they have an SAS
hard
been playing with my host machine and thought some might want to see
what I have on and the full list of chkconfig
I have installed desktop and x windows system to bring up a desktop when
I want one with startx.
I turned 'off' quite a bit and yum removed quite a bit.
These set of programs
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 2:55 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic off...@plnet.rs wrote:
On 03/08/2012 10:14 AM, Janez Kosmrlj wrote:
any idea when will firefox 10 be available for centos 5?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On 03/08/2012 06:37 AM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 03/08/12 3:33 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 03/08/2012 02:48 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
Another smooth update. Thanks CentOS-team!
Thanks! Lots of very hard work by the QA team.
Everyone needs to look at their /var/log/messages if they have an SAS
CentOS 6. T-bird 3.1.18
Is there *ANY* way to search message on message *CONTENT*, not header? I
used to do that all the time
mark or maybe I'll dump t-bird
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 8:33 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
VM's? Sorry, we're doing very serious scientific computing - the couple
or so VMs we had are going away. I mean, when, for example, one guy I
support gets on a 48 core box, and proceeds to fire up an R job, and
uses*all* of them
On 03/08/2012 04:45 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
CentOS 6. T-bird 3.1.18
Is there *ANY* way to search message on message *CONTENT*, not header? I
used to do that all the time
Edit menu - Find - Search Messages? I have T-bird 9 at the moment.
--
Ljubomir Ljubojevic
(Love is in the Air)
On Thursday, March 08, 2012 10:52:02 AM Les Mikesell wrote:
Yes, part of the power savings are deceptive - they only kick in when
the CPUs are idle and your users would be one of the rare cases that
peg them for long intervals. I think this is getting better in the
current generation but
On Thursday, March 08, 2012 10:45:26 AM m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
CentOS 6. T-bird 3.1.18
Is there *ANY* way to search message on message *CONTENT*, not header? I
used to do that all the time
mark or maybe I'll dump t-bird
Hmm.
[root@migration ~]# repoquery thunderbird
On 03/08/2012 07:49 AM, Toralf Lund wrote:
On 08/03/12 14:35, John Doe wrote:
I use both 3.6.26 (from centOS 5) and 10.0.2 (binary from mozilla).
And, after setting the same font settings in both, I cannot see any real
differences...
Only tiny difference I could find if I screenshot both and
On 03/08/2012 09:45 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
CentOS 6. T-bird 3.1.18
Is there *ANY* way to search message on message *CONTENT*, not header? I
used to do that all the time
mark or maybe I'll dump t-bird
Please upgrade your Thunderbird to the officially released 10.0.1
version
On 03/08/2012 06:44 AM, Rainer Traut wrote:
Am 08.03.2012 12:33, schrieb Johnny Hughes:
On 03/08/2012 02:48 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
Another smooth update. Thanks CentOS-team!
Thanks! Lots of very hard work by the QA team.
Everyone needs to look at their /var/log/messages if they have an SAS
Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
On 03/08/2012 04:45 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
CentOS 6. T-bird 3.1.18
Is there *ANY* way to search message on message *CONTENT*, not header? I
used to do that all the time
Edit menu - Find - Search Messages? I have T-bird 9 at the moment.
Or ctrl-shift-F,
Lamar Owen wrote:
On Thursday, March 08, 2012 10:45:26 AM m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
CentOS 6. T-bird 3.1.18
Is there *ANY* way to search message on message *CONTENT*, not header? I
used to do that all the time
mark or maybe I'll dump t-bird
Hmm.
[root@migration ~]#
Hi Lamar,
i tried their free version today.
at first it did look promising but as soon i was to perform actions on
files with acl's on them the whole system came down hard and leaving my
external HDD corrupted.
after several hours i've decided to give up and go with ext4
but still thanks!
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
On Thursday, March 08, 2012 11:59:31 AM Wessel van der Aart wrote:
Hi Lamar,
i tried their free version today.
at first it did look promising but as soon i was to perform actions on
files with acl's on them the whole system came down hard and leaving my
external HDD corrupted.
after
On Mar 8, 2012, at 11:06 AM, Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu wrote:
On Thursday, March 08, 2012 10:52:02 AM Les Mikesell wrote:
Yes, part of the power savings are deceptive - they only kick in when
the CPUs are idle and your users would be one of the rare cases that
peg them for long intervals. I
on 3/8/2012 1:44 AM Jonathan Vomacka spake the following:
On 3/7/2012 9:32 PM, Devin Reade wrote:
John R Piercepie...@hogranch.com wrote:
I don't understand how ANYTHING you do on a single server could be
called 'cloudy'.
Well, if it catches fire and produces lots of white smoke ...
On 03/08/2012 02:03 PM, Ross Walker wrote:
On Mar 7, 2012, at 7:48 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevicoff...@plnet.rs wrote:
We are talking about *software* /boot partition on RAID1! that can have
any number of member partitions. And the rest of the disk here discussed
is *software* mdraid RAID10 with
I see the two distribution points for each release, they seem very alike, what
is the difference?
-Ross
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Thursday, March 08, 2012 12:37:45 PM Scott Silva wrote:
on 3/8/2012 1:44 AM Jonathan Vomacka spake the following:
ROFL
When you let all the magic smoke out of a server it will usually stop
working... ;)
I try to procure ones with redundant magic smoke bottles.
Seriously, though, I have
On Wednesday, March 07, 2012 05:06:13 PM Les Mikesell wrote:
It's not such a big deal for desktops, but you can get small low power
systems if you look around - or just use a laptop that will sleep when
you close the lid.
FWIW, Aleutia (www.aleutia.com) makes some nice really low power units.
On Thursday, March 08, 2012 12:37:30 PM Ross Walker wrote:
On Mar 8, 2012, at 11:06 AM, Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu wrote:
I live in the same sort of world, just on a smaller scale, and my biggest
power consumer is storage, not compute, but I thoroughly understand Mark's
points.
So, get
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 11:37 AM, Ross Walker rswwal...@gmail.com wrote:
I live in the same sort of world, just on a smaller scale, and my biggest
power consumer is storage, not compute, but I thoroughly understand Mark's
points.
So, get more power and UPS.
The specs are published, so
On Thursday, March 08, 2012 01:15:59 PM Les Mikesell wrote:
Usually your whole building is designed around a certain amount of
heat load and data centers designed a few years back are probably
already maxed out due to the earlier rounds of density increases. So
you will need at least more A/C
on 3/8/2012 9:59 AM Lamar Owen spake the following:
On Thursday, March 08, 2012 12:37:45 PM Scott Silva wrote:
on 3/8/2012 1:44 AM Jonathan Vomacka spake the following:
ROFL
When you let all the magic smoke out of a server it will usually stop
working... ;)
I try to procure ones with
On Thursday, March 08, 2012 01:38:33 PM Scott Silva wrote:
on 3/8/2012 9:59 AM Lamar Owen spake the following:
I have hydrogen alarms available, but has anyone seen an H2S alarm?
http://www.allgasdetectors.com/hydrogensulfidedetectors.shtml
On 3/7/2012 1:20 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 03/07/12 10:06 AM, John Hinton wrote:
I'm looking into adding a cloud to one of my servers.
what does a cloud mean in this context ?
to me, a cloud is a set of homogenous servers running distributed
applications. classic cloud is google.the
On 03/08/12 6:33 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
ok, so 3 x 48/64 core servers uses the same power as 6 x 4/8 core ?
thats still major win.
Um, no - that's what I'm saying is*not* the case. The new suckers drink
power - using a UPS that I could hang, say, 6 Dell 1950's off of,*if* I'm
John R Pierce wrote:
On 03/08/12 6:33 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
ok, so 3 x 48/64 core servers uses the same power as 6 x 4/8 core ?
thats still major win.
Um, no - that's what I'm saying is*not* the case. The new suckers drink
power - using a UPS that I could hang, say, 6 Dell 1950's
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 1:29 PM, John Hinton webmas...@ew3d.com wrote:
It seems however that the definition is an online infrastructure which may:
provide applications
provide file storage
calendar
contacts
collaboration
communication
among a number of other things
and that these
On Thu, 8 Mar 2012, Sorin Srbu wrote:
Another smooth update. Thanks CentOS-team!
+1
I'll note that I didn't start the updates until earlier this morning,
so I went straight to the 2.6.18-308.1.1.el5 kernel.
--
Paul Heinlein
heinl...@madboa.com
45°38' N, 122°6'
On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 02:51:58PM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
John R Pierce wrote:
On 03/08/12 6:33 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
ok, so 3 x 48/64 core servers uses the same power as 6 x 4/8 core ?
thats still major win.
Um, no - that's what I'm saying is*not* the case. The new
On 03/08/12 11:51 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I'm sorry, but to me, the above is a non sequitur. I was talking about how
much power the servers drink, and that the UPSs that I have can barely,
barely handle half as many or less, and I'm running out of UPSs, and out
of power outlets for them in
On Mar 8, 2012, at 12:29 PM, John Hinton wrote:
On 3/7/2012 1:20 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 03/07/12 10:06 AM, John Hinton wrote:
I'm looking into adding a cloud to one of my servers.
what does a cloud mean in this context ?
to me, a cloud is a set of homogenous servers running
On Mar 8, 2012, at 1:12 PM, Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu wrote:
On Thursday, March 08, 2012 12:37:30 PM Ross Walker wrote:
On Mar 8, 2012, at 11:06 AM, Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu wrote:
I live in the same sort of world, just on a smaller scale, and my biggest
power consumer is storage, not
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Craig White craig.wh...@ttiltd.com wrote:
I have so far found eyeOS and am also looking at ownCloud. Thanks Devin
for that link.
I must be getting old because I vaguely recall these things being called
workgroup collaboration software.
Check out...
On Mar 8, 2012, at 2:29 PM, John Hinton webmas...@ew3d.com wrote:
Perhaps the definition of cloud has gone lower and should be called
fog now?
Totally, it has been taken way out of context and blown completely out of
proportion.
Cloud, is what is depicted as a cloud on the topology diagram.
On 03/08/2012 11:56 AM, Ross Walker wrote:
I see the two distribution points for each release, they seem very alike,
what is the difference?
-Ross
CR is something that the CentOS team will use IF we are having issues at
point release time getting some of the updates ready (like we had with
On 03/08/2012 01:29 PM, John Hinton wrote:
On 3/7/2012 1:20 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 03/07/12 10:06 AM, John Hinton wrote:
I'm looking into adding a cloud to one of my servers.
what does a cloud mean in this context ?
to me, a cloud is a set of homogenous servers running distributed
On Mar 8, 2012, at 4:18 PM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
On 03/08/2012 11:56 AM, Ross Walker wrote:
I see the two distribution points for each release, they seem very alike,
what is the difference?
-Ross
CR is something that the CentOS team will use IF we are having issues at
I fetchmail on my CentOS-6.2 from 4 servers.
One always gives the warning
-
[tim@grover cron.d]$ fetchmail -a go.tcd.ie
fetchmail: Error exchanging credentials
6 messages for tmurphy at go.tcd.ie.
reading message tmur...@go.tcd.ie:1 of 6 (2978 header octets) (2639 body
Hello,
I was wondering if anyone could tell me why so many processes are started on
my system? Here is a list of them. I am trying to figure out why they are
running and if I can stop them. Thnx.
USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND
root2 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S
Hello,
I was wondering if anyone could tell me why so many processes are started
on
my system? Here is a list of them. I am trying to figure out why they
are
running and if I can stop them. Thnx.
USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME COMMAND
root2 0.0 0.0 0 0 ?
On Thursday 08 March 2012 20:44, the following was written:
From the looks of things, you have 8 CPUs (or cores), and these standard
processes are being started on a 1 per core basis.
I have a quad-core proc, and have 4 of each of those processes (0-3).
That is what I was thinking but
On 03/08/12 5:20 PM, Robert Spangler wrote:
I was wondering if anyone could tell me why so many processes are started on
my system? Here is a list of them. I am trying to figure out why they are
running and if I can stop them. Thnx.
USER PID %CPU %MEM VSZ RSS TTY STAT START TIME
Hi,
Do we need HT enabled on CentOS release 5.5 (Final) and Kernel Version :-
2.6.18-194.el5
Please help me understand the pros and cons of having HT enabled or
disabled on the Server Dell R 710.
cat /proc/cpuinfo - http://fpaste.org/K2dT/
Do let me know if anyone needs more information.
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 11:15:29AM +0530, Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
Hi,
Do we need HT enabled on CentOS release 5.5 (Final) and Kernel Version :-
2.6.18-194.el5
I don't think it harms anything to have it enabled, and there may be
some small performance gains in some cases. I'd leave it on.
Hi! i have a problem with iotop :
root@alien: ~ # iotop
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/bin/iotop, line 16, in ?
main()
File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/iotop/ui.py, line 567, in main
main_loop()
File /usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/iotop/ui.py, line 557, in
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf
Of fred smith
Sent: den 9 mars 2012 07:17
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] HT (Hyper Threading) on CentOS 5.5
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 11:15:29AM +0530, Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
Hi,
On 03/08/12 11:44 PM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
I know there might be some negative performance issues with certain
applications, but would you notice it in day-to-day use?
if you're using the server for pure floating point compute, don't run
more threads than you have actual cores. high concurrency
87 matches
Mail list logo
