On 04/09/12 6:09 PM, Jeff Cen wrote:
> My machine is a box sitting away from me and doesn't have a ambient light
> sensor.
>
>
> Can the problem be gnome or the LCD monitor related?
I'm not sure what 'a box sitting away from me' means. the light sensor
would be a feature of the LCD monitor,
Is your monitor an LED type? It could have dynamic brightness. My tv does the
same thing - also annoying.
-Allan
On 04/09/2012 07:09 PM, Jeff Cen wrote:
> Hi Nate,
>
> Thank you for the reply. My machine is a box sitting away from me and
> doesn't have a ambient light sensor.
>
>
> Can the pro
Hi,
I have server that has been running 5.x - 5.8 for a few years without issue and
decided to move it to a fresh install of 6.2. First thing I noticed is a good
part of the log has these mtrr messages finally ending with
"mtrr_cleanup: can not find optimal value" and "please specify
mtrr_
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 2:48 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 04/11/12 9:36 AM, sri wrote:
>> 4) Have you checked if your motherboard IPMI is not pulling an address
>> during boot?
>> -- Frankly, not sure how to check motherboard IPMI messages. Verified
>> dmesg output. Following is the dmesg output.
On Apr 11, 2012, at 8:20 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
> On 04/12/2012 12:57 AM, Patrick Lists wrote:
>> On 04/12/2012 12:46 AM, aurfalien wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Taken from this link;
>>>
>>> https://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/print.php?form=1&topic_id=34988&forum=55&order=ASC&start=0
>>>
On 04/12/2012 12:57 AM, Patrick Lists wrote:
> On 04/12/2012 12:46 AM, aurfalien wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Taken from this link;
>>
>> https://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/print.php?form=1&topic_id=34988&forum=55&order=ASC&start=0
>>
>> Seems like I am having the same issue.
>>
>> I assigned my boot
On 4/11/2012 6:46 PM, aurfalien wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Taken from this link;
>
> https://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/print.php?form=1&topic_id=34988&forum=55&order=ASC&start=0
>
> Seems like I am having the same issue.
>
> I assigned my boot loader to be on /dev/md0 rather then the default of
> /de
On 04/12/2012 12:46 AM, aurfalien wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Taken from this link;
>
> https://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/print.php?form=1&topic_id=34988&forum=55&order=ASC&start=0
>
> Seems like I am having the same issue.
>
> I assigned my boot loader to be on /dev/md0 rather then the default of
> /
Hi all,
Taken from this link;
https://www.centos.org/modules/newbb/print.php?form=1&topic_id=34988&forum=55&order=ASC&start=0
Seems like I am having the same issue.
I assigned my boot loader to be on /dev/md0 rather then the default of /dev/sda1
Does any one have insight to this?
Thanks in ad
On Apr 11, 2012, at 11:48 AM, Bowie Bailey wrote:
> On 4/11/2012 11:34 AM, John Doe wrote:
>> From: aurfalien
>>
>>> I vaguely recall being able to auto set various /etc/rc levels based on
>>> /etc/init.d/scriptname.
>>> I am about to create the sym links by hand but wondering if any one has a
I noticed the donations page has never recovered, what is the prefered way of
giving back these days?
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
- -
- Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.pdinc.
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org
> [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Alexander Dalloz
> Sent: Wednesday, April 11, 2012 17:12
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] How to fix a chown oops...
>
> Am 11.04.2012 23:02, schrieb Jason Pyeron:
> >
Am 11.04.2012 23:02, schrieb Jason Pyeron:
> chown -R 7.0 /sbin/
> chown -R 98.98 //
>
> Is there a rpm way fix all the permissions of files managed by rpms?
http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/YumAndRPM#head-20a3ecce3d0762b9cdd3307ef2632e0c274a2bfd
Alexander
___
chown -R 7.0 /sbin/
chown -R 98.98 //
Is there a rpm way fix all the permissions of files managed by rpms?
--
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
- -
- Jason Pyeron PD Inc. http://www.
Steve Thompson wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Apr 2012, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
>> Steve Thompson wrote:
>>> On Wed, 11 Apr 2012, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>>
Been seeing that on 6.2, also, though I've not noticed them locking up
(the ones that have were in a cluster, and someone could have hosed
>
On 04/11/12 9:36 AM, sri wrote:
> 4) Have you checked if your motherboard IPMI is not pulling an address
> during boot?
> -- Frankly, not sure how to check motherboard IPMI messages. Verified
> dmesg output. Following is the dmesg output.
> Please share any way to check motherboard IPMI is pulling
On Wed, 11 Apr 2012, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Steve Thompson wrote:
>> On Wed, 11 Apr 2012, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>
>>> Been seeing that on 6.2, also, though I've not noticed them locking up
>>> (the ones that have were in a cluster, and someone could have hosed
>>> memory). It got less with t
Steve Thompson wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Apr 2012, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>
>> Been seeing that on 6.2, also, though I've not noticed them locking up
>> (the ones that have were in a cluster, and someone could have hosed
>> memory). It got less with the latest kernel, but I'm still seeing them
>> occasi
On Wed, 11 Apr 2012, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Been seeing that on 6.2, also, though I've not noticed them locking up
> (the ones that have were in a cluster, and someone could have hosed
> memory). It got less with the latest kernel, but I'm still seeing them
> occasionally.
This is most likely
Ali Corbin wrote:
> We've been having the same problem on centos 5.8, with a
> 2.6.18-308.1.1.el5 kernel. It locked up twice and became unresponsive
and had to be
> rebooted. After it came back up we discovered a number of instances of
> the 'task blocked' message - happening several times a day.
We've been having the same problem on centos 5.8, with a 2.6.18-308.1.1.el5
kernel. It locked up twice and became unresponsive and had to be
rebooted. After it came back up we discovered a number of instances of the
'task blocked' message - happening several times a day.
We reflashed the raid co
Thanks for the responses.
Please see my answers to your questions:
1) What I want is to locate exactly where the psuedo IF and get rid of
it. Is there a way to prohibit the pseduo IF not to get DHCP answer?
2) Output of Ifconfig -a:
##
eth0 Link encap:Et
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 9:22 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 04/11/2012 09:19 AM, Phil Schaffner wrote:
>> Vinay Nagrik wrote on 04/10/2012 12:36 PM:
>>> How could I build complete 5.7 centos VM with two different Centos DVDs.
>>>
>> In addition to other viable suggestions, you can also combine the
On 4/11/2012 11:34 AM, John Doe wrote:
> From: aurfalien
>
>> I vaguely recall being able to auto set various /etc/rc levels based on
>> /etc/init.d/scriptname.
>> I am about to create the sym links by hand but wondering if any one has a
>> shortcut to auto set the links?
> chkconfig?
And the i
From: aurfalien
> I vaguely recall being able to auto set various /etc/rc levels based on
> /etc/init.d/scriptname.
> I am about to create the sym links by hand but wondering if any one has a
> shortcut to auto set the links?
chkconfig?
JD
___
CentO
Hi all,
I vaguely recall being able to auto set various /etc/rc levels based on
/etc/init.d/scriptname.
I am about to create the sym links by hand but wondering if any one has a
shortcut to auto set the links?
Thanks in advance,
- aurf
___
CentOS ma
On 04/11/2012 09:19 AM, Phil Schaffner wrote:
> Vinay Nagrik wrote on 04/10/2012 12:36 PM:
>> How could I build complete 5.7 centos VM with two different Centos DVDs.
>>
> In addition to other viable suggestions, you can also combine the two
> images into one.
>
> http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTri
Vinay Nagrik wrote on 04/10/2012 12:36 PM:
> How could I build complete 5.7 centos VM with two different Centos DVDs.
>
In addition to other viable suggestions, you can also combine the two
images into one.
http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/CDtoDVDMedia
Phil
Have you checked if your motherboard IPMI is not pulling an address during boot?
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Markus Falb wrote:
> On 11.4.2012 12:35, sri wrote:
> ...
>> My linux box, running with Centos-5.5, is showing up (??) a pseudo
>> network interface for Eth0.
>> On Switch where my E
On 11.4.2012 12:35, sri wrote:
> Group,
>
> My linux box, running with Centos-5.5, is showing up (??) a pseudo
> network interface for Eth0.
> On Switch where my Eth0 is connected, observed 2 MAC-Addresses.
> If a DHCP server present in LAN, the second pseudo interface is
> picking up a DHCP IP Ad
On 11.4.2012 12:35, sri wrote:
...
> My linux box, running with Centos-5.5, is showing up (??) a pseudo
> network interface for Eth0.
> On Switch where my Eth0 is connected, observed 2 MAC-Addresses.
> If a DHCP server present in LAN, the second pseudo interface is
> picking up a DHCP IP Address to
On 04/11/2012 01:35 PM, sri wrote:
> Is there anything that I have to check to nail down the issue.
> Any pointers are highly appreciated.
I did not understand your issue:
- Do you want to get rid of the peudo interface?
- Do you want the pseudo interface not to get a DHCP answer?
- Do you want th
Group,
My linux box, running with Centos-5.5, is showing up (??) a pseudo
network interface for Eth0.
On Switch where my Eth0 is connected, observed 2 MAC-Addresses.
If a DHCP server present in LAN, the second pseudo interface is
picking up a DHCP IP Address too.
Furthermore you can ping both Eth0
The host is:
Linux server 2.6.18-238.19.1.el5 #1 SMP Fri Jul 15 07:32:29 EDT 2011 i686
i686 i386 GNU/Linux
CentOS release 5.6 (Final)
dovecot 1.2.16
Best regards,
R.
W dniu 11 kwietnia 2012 11:48 użytkownik Rafał Radecki <
radecki.ra...@gmail.com> napisał:
> Hi All.
>
> I have a server which han
Hi All.
I have a server which hanged two times because we could not connect to the
box, it was not responding. In /var/log/messages I saw:
Apr 11 10:13:29 server kernel: INFO: task imap:5855 blocked for more than
120 seconds.
Apr 11 10:13:29 server kernel: "echo 0 >
/proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_tim
On 04/07/2012 04:46 PM David Hrbáč wrote:
> Dne 7.4.2012 21:31, ken napsal(a):
>> "yum update" output:
>>
>> ...
>> --> Running transaction check
>> --> Processing Dependency: libgoffice-1.so.2 for package: gnumeric
>> ---> Package goffice.i386 0:0.6.6-1.el5.rf set t
37 matches
Mail list logo
