On 13/08/2012 07:25, Gregory Machin wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I'm look for an enterprise quality Anti-virus / Malware for my Linux
> machines . Mostly Ubuntu on the desktop, CentOS and RHEL servers. I
> must have real time scanning, on demand scanning, and centralized
> management.
>
> Is there anything out
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 1:25 AM, Gregory Machin wrote:
> Is there anything out there that can do this ?
for desktops, free
http://free.avg.com/us-en/download.prd-alf
for severs, not cheap
http://www.avg.com/ww-en/avg-linux-email-server-edition
not sure if any provides what you call "centralized
On Mon, 13 Aug 2012 16:25:02 +1200
Gregory Machin wrote:
> I'm look for an enterprise quality Anti-virus / Malware for my Linux
> machines . Mostly Ubuntu on the desktop, CentOS and RHEL servers. I
> must have real time scanning, on demand scanning, and centralized
> management.
>
> Is there anyt
Hi.
I'm look for an enterprise quality Anti-virus / Malware for my Linux
machines . Mostly Ubuntu on the desktop, CentOS and RHEL servers. I
must have real time scanning, on demand scanning, and centralized
management.
Is there anything out there that can do this ?
GM
___
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Yves Bellefeuille wrote:
> I've been unable to access the forums as an unregistered user for
> several hours; I get "Sorry, you don't have the permission to access
> this area".
I can confirm this. Perhaps, certain CentOS admin(s) are playing with
the site ... ?
I've been unable to access the forums as an unregistered user for
several hours; I get "Sorry, you don't have the permission to access
this area".
Yves Bellefeuille
--
Yves Bellefeuille
"Simply put, E=mc^2 is liberal claptrap." -- Conservapedia.com
___
>
> Whatever you do, don't use bemchmarks to compare Linux with other OS,
> Linux cheats.
>
> A benchmark tries to do something completed and then get the time for
> that but
> I've seen Linux to try it's best to prevent this completed set of
> actions to
> happen withing a known time.
>
>
Aug 2012 16:32:51 -0500
Everyone,
I have two x86_64 servers with CentOS 6.3 that seem to have some
difficulty with the last version of bind :
32:bind-9.8.2-0.10.rc1.el6_3.2.x86_64
When I run htop I am getting a CPU usage of 70 to 80% all of the time.
I am not seeing problems identified in the
Aug 2012 16:32:51 -0500
Everyone,
I have two x86_64 servers with CentOS 6.3 that seem to have some
difficulty with the last version of bind :
32:bind-9.8.2-0.10.rc1.el6_3.2.x86_64
When I run htop I am getting a CPU usage of 70 to 80% all of the time.
I am not seeing problems identified in the
On 11/08/12 22:17, James B. Byrne wrote:
> I am trying to transport a dd image between to hosts over a cross
> linked gigabit connection. Both hosts have an eth1 configured to a
> non routable ip addr on a shared network. No other devices exist on
> this link.
>
> When transferring via sftp I re
>The idea actually came from Dell. It's frequently described as a method
>to prevent the device name from changing during a reboot, but that was
>already in place. What biosdevname does is make names *predictable* on
>Dell systems. It shouldn't be enabled anywhere else.
It is not at all exclusi
Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 08/04/2012 07:01 AM, ashkab rahmani wrote:
> > i want to share it on network via nfs.
> > which file system is better for it?
>
> I have a hard time imagining that you'd get useful information from
> cross-posting this to the FreeBSD and CentOS lists. Their
> impleme
Greetings,
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 9:28 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 08/1
> The actual problem is that there are 3 things that provide libotf.so.0
> and one of them is openmpi-psm. There is a newer version of openmpi
> that obsoletes that rpm and yum can handle it, but anaconda can not
> handle
13 matches
Mail list logo
