On 14/08/2012 00:46, Gregory Machin wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Thanks for the feed back.
>
> To clarify , all viruses / Malware no matter to the OS ... A user
> downloads (Web site, USB , cd rom , etc) an infected file via his
> Linux machine , the infected file only attacks M$ OS's User saves
> the fi
On 13.08.2012 22:46, Gregory Machin wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Thanks for the feed back.
Why not Clamav?
It has othe n-access thingy as well.
http://www.clamav.net/doc/latest/html/node21.html
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
__
On 13/08/12 19:50, James B. Byrne wrote:
>
> On Mon, August 13, 2012 10:37, Ned Slider wrote:
>
>> Faulty hardware maybe? Try a reboot and see if it reappears. If it's
>> located on a card try reseating the card (although I suspect this is
>> an integrated NIC on the motherboard?).
>>
>> The chipse
Hi.
Thanks for the feed back.
To clarify , all viruses / Malware no matter to the OS ... A user
downloads (Web site, USB , cd rom , etc) an infected file via his
Linux machine , the infected file only attacks M$ OS's User saves
the file to a samba share .. a windows user opens the file bang
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 4:17 PM, Dan Carl wrote:
> >>
> #mount -t ext3 /dev/sda1 /mnt/myboot
> mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sda1,
> missing codepage or other error
> In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try
> dmesg | tail or so
>
> I h
On 8/13/2012 4:07 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Dan Carl wrote:
Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
/dev/sda1 * 1 13 104391 83 Linux
/dev/sda2 14 658 5180962+ 82 Linux
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 2:41 PM, Dan Carl wrote:
> >>>
>>> Device Boot Start End Blocks Id System
>>> /dev/sda1 * 1 13 104391 83 Linux
>>> /dev/sda2 14 658 5180962+ 82 Linux swap /
>>> Solaris
>>> /dev/sda3
> Well, this machine is 11 years old now.
> This explains the large amount of CPU time.
Quad 900MHz UltraSparc III processors are more than
enough to handle a simple filesystem.
> > The server runs fine, is patched up to date. The UFS filesystem that
> was
> > used is actually the root fil
Dennis Clarke wrote:
>
> > > Comparison numbers are only valid of the tests run are the same.
> > >
> > > So here is the UFS test once more without the compression and
> > > with -no-fifo :
> > >
> > > jupiter-sparc-SunOS5.10 # ptime /opt/schily/bin/star -x -xdir -xdot
> > -no-fifo -U file=../
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 12:46:44PM -0700, Alan Batie wrote:
> it's interacting badly with centos 6 is a good question. It could be a
> bug in vmware tools/the ethernet driver. At least it's narrowed down now...
Are you using vmxnet3 drivers? That had a known bug with small udp
packets, but it s
On 8/13/12 12:35 PM, James Hogarth wrote:
> Hmm this is especially weird given the 5.8 systems are working -
> otherwise I'd have moved the troubleshooting up to vmware or the
> switch next...
Migrating one of the vms to the same physical host made them start
talking to each other, so it's defini
On 13 August 2012 20:37, Alan Batie wrote:
> I found another CentOS 6 system that not only is talking ipv6 properly,
> but the test system that can't even talk to the router can talk to it.
> That indicates it's probably something wonky with the network itself...
>
Hmm...
I don't have a C6 ipv6
On 8/13/2012 2:24 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Dan Carl wrote:
>> I have a power edge with raid5 that contains Centos 5.4.
>> I had a drive failure, anyway the array is optimal now but the server
>> won't boot.
>> I can boot from a Centos 5.3 liveCD and all the data is still there.
>>
>> There is
I found another CentOS 6 system that not only is talking ipv6 properly,
but the test system that can't even talk to the router can talk to it.
That indicates it's probably something wonky with the network itself...
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.o
>
> Yes, the test system has the default ip6tables, but we always permit icmp:
>
Hmm this is especially weird given the 5.8 systems are working -
otherwise I'd have moved the troubleshooting up to vmware or the
switch next...
Without access to the machines/switches to traffic dump and check in
wi
Dan Carl wrote:
> I have a power edge with raid5 that contains Centos 5.4.
> I had a drive failure, anyway the array is optimal now but the server
> won't boot.
> I can boot from a Centos 5.3 liveCD and all the data is still there.
>
> There is no grub.conf just shows a broken link.
> Is fixing thi
On 8/13/12 12:00 PM, James Hogarth wrote:
> Are you allowing ICMPv6? I don't just mean echo and echo-reply (the
> pings above) but most of the rest of it too?
Yes, the test system has the default ip6tables, but we always permit icmp:
# Firewall configuration written by system-config-firewall
# M
>
> Love gratuitous changes to long standard toolsets... sigh...
>
It's not a recent change and is far from gratuitous
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2009/03/msg00780.html
Features such as traffic shaping, policy routing and multiple IPs on
an interface (not virtual interfaces) either
I have a power edge with raid5 that contains Centos 5.4.
I had a drive failure, anyway the array is optimal now but the server
won't boot.
I can boot from a Centos 5.3 liveCD and all the data is still there.
There is no grub.conf just shows a broken link.
Is fixing this as simple as gub-install |
On Mon, August 13, 2012 10:37, Ned Slider wrote:
> Faulty hardware maybe? Try a reboot and see if it reappears. If it's
> located on a card try reseating the card (although I suspect this is
> an integrated NIC on the motherboard?).
>
> The chipset is not necessarily the same in the second exampl
On 08/13/2012 10:44 AM, Lars Hecking wrote:
> Is there any chance the system-config-netboot* rpms upstream removed from
> CentOS6 could be provided in extras? The CentOS5 SRPM builds cleanly under
> CentOS6, and upstream's workaround is insufficient as it only covers
> diskless clients, not hel
On 8/11/12 2:17 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
> With ipv6 in the picture stop using net-tools - they were deprecated a long
> time ago and there's multiple edge cases and bugs where they don't work
> properly or lack features... learn to use the iproute2 toolset - ip, ss and
> tc being the key ones.
L
On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 13:30 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Sorry, can't do that with servers whose websites are open to the world,
> and when folks here have collaborators around the world.
Well if those people have to log in using SSH from all across the world
white listing would not be feasibl
> > Comparison numbers are only valid of the tests run are the same.
> >
> > So here is the UFS test once more without the compression and
> > with -no-fifo :
> >
> > jupiter-sparc-SunOS5.10 # ptime /opt/schily/bin/star -x -xdir -xdot
> -no-fifo -U file=../linux-3.5.1.tar
> > star: 46849 blocks
Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> Hello Gé,
>
> On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 09:41 -0700, Gé Weijers wrote:
>> Some attack programs are too stupid to give up even if they find that
>> password and keyboard interactive authentication is turned off. One
>> kept trying for weeks.
>
> Well I guess one *could* f
Hello Gé,
On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 09:41 -0700, Gé Weijers wrote:
> Some attack programs are too stupid to give up even if they find that
> password and keyboard interactive authentication is turned off. One
> kept trying for weeks.
Well I guess one *could* filter on the disconnect string to block s
Dennis Clarke wrote:
> > Given the fact, that you did not run star -no-fifo, you compare an
> > insecure
> > implementation (gtar never calls fsync(2)) with a secure by default
> > implementation (star).
>
> Comparison numbers are only valid of the tests run are the same.
>
> So here is the U
> Dennis Clarke wrote:
>
> >
> > A little data never hurts. Even if the numbers mean little.
> >
> > test 1 - Debian Linux 6.0.5 on x86_64
>
> Given the fact, that you did not run star -no-fifo, you compare an
> insecure
> implementation (gtar never calls fsync(2)) with a secure by default
Gé Weijers wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Leonard den Ottolander
> wrote:
>> Hello Mark,
>>
>> On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 11:30 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>>> Aug 10 17:44:56 sshd[12350]: Connection from
>>> 114.113.199.142 port 511 871
>>> Aug 10 17:44:57 sshd[12341]: Received disconn
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 9:01 AM, Leonard den Ottolander
wrote:
> Hello Mark,
>
> On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 11:30 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Aug 10 17:44:56 sshd[12350]: Connection from 114.113.199.142
>> port 511
>> 871
>> Aug 10 17:44:57 sshd[12341]: Received disconnect from
>> 114.113.199.1
Hello Mark,
On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 11:30 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Aug 10 17:44:56 sshd[12350]: Connection from 114.113.199.142
> port 511
> 871
> Aug 10 17:44:57 sshd[12341]: Received disconnect from
> 114.113.199.144
> 2: 11: Bye Bye
I'm confused, what exactly is the problem? Fail2ban o
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
yep. did the trick. Thanks
2012/8/13, John Doe :
> From: Richard Reina
>
>>I did a minimal install and my mouse does not work in console mode.
>>Is there is some package that I need to install?
>
> gpm
>
> JD
>
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@cento
Is there any chance the system-config-netboot* rpms upstream removed from
CentOS6 could be provided in extras? The CentOS5 SRPM builds cleanly under
CentOS6, and upstream's workaround is insufficient as it only covers
diskless clients, not helpful if you need pxeos.
https://access.redhat.co
From: Richard Reina
>I did a minimal install and my mouse does not work in console mode.
>Is there is some package that I need to install?
gpm
JD
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> Hello Mark,
>
> On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 10:48 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Remember reading about that, and on the server I happen to be looking
>> at,
>> it's been set that way since 18 May. Any other ideas?
>
> The first thing I can think of is you forgot to res
I did a minimal install and my mouse does not work in console mode.
Is there is some package that I need to install?
Thanks,
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Hello Mark,
On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 10:48 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Remember reading about that, and on the server I happen to be looking at,
> it's been set that way since 18 May. Any other ideas?
The first thing I can think of is you forgot to restart the service
after making the configura
Leonard den Ottolander wrote:
> Hello Mark,
>
> On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 09:26 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> We're seeing on a few of our servers - and sometimes it's only
>> occasionally on some of those - where fail2ban's running happily, AFAIK,
>> but there's an attack (from China, Brazil, etc)
James,
James B. Byrne wrote:
> On Sun, August 12, 2012 12:00, Ned Slider wrote:
>> On 11/08/12 22:17, James B. Byrne wrote:
> The network card for eth1 seems to have disappeared somehow.
> On the problem host:
>
> # /sbin/lspci -nn | grep -i net
> 00:19.0 Ethernet controller [0200]: Intel Corpora
Hello Mark,
On Mon, 2012-08-13 at 09:26 -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> We're seeing on a few of our servers - and sometimes it's only
> occasionally on some of those - where fail2ban's running happily, AFAIK,
> but there's an attack (from China, Brazil, etc) on ssh, and they don't
> seem to be b
On 13/08/12 14:08, James B. Byrne wrote:
>
> On Sun, August 12, 2012 12:00, Ned Slider wrote:
>> On 11/08/12 22:17, James B. Byrne wrote:
>>> I am trying to transport a dd image between to hosts over a cross
>>> linked gigabit connection. Both hosts have an eth1 configured to a
>>> non routable ip
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 11:47 AM, Blackburn, Marvin <
mblackb...@glenraven.com> wrote:
> This was taken out of RHEL in 5 and was to be replaced.
> However, I've not seen where, though I've not looked at 6 yet
>
>
6 has a subsystem called plymouth that takes care of this. It updates
/var/log/boot.
We're seeing on a few of our servers - and sometimes it's only
occasionally on some of those - where fail2ban's running happily, AFAIK,
but there's an attack (from China, Brazil, etc) on ssh, and they don't
seem to be banned; I see many, many sorries for wrong username or
password.
It *seems* to w
On Sun, August 12, 2012 12:00, Ned Slider wrote:
> On 11/08/12 22:17, James B. Byrne wrote:
>> I am trying to transport a dd image between to hosts over a cross
>> linked gigabit connection. Both hosts have an eth1 configured to a
>> non routable ip addr on a shared network. No other devices ex
On 08/13/2012 02:09 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Yves Bellefeuille wrote:
>> I've been unable to access the forums as an unregistered user for
>> several hours; I get "Sorry, you don't have the permission to access
>> this area".
>
> I can confirm this. Perhaps, certai
Dennis Clarke wrote:
>
> A little data never hurts. Even if the numbers mean little.
>
> test 1 - Debian Linux 6.0.5 on x86_64
Given the fact, that you did not run star -no-fifo, you compare an insecure
implementation (gtar never calls fsync(2)) with a secure by default
implementation (star).
Try kaspersky
It's best one
———
Ashkan R
On Aug 13, 2012 8:55 AM, "Gregory Machin" wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I'm look for an enterprise quality Anti-virus / Malware for my Linux
> machines . Mostly Ubuntu on the desktop, CentOS and RHEL servers. I
> must have real time scanning, on demand scanning, and c
48 matches
Mail list logo
