I am attempting to use libvirtd/kvm on CentOS 5.latest to migrate a SCO
OpenServer 5.0.6a VM from the old VMware server.
I have converted the multiple vmdk disk files to a single file, then used
qemu-img convert to create files for libvirtd, both qcow2 and raw formats.
After many attempts to get
how about this?
virt-v2v -ic 'esx://my-vmware-hypervisor.example.com' -os default --network
default my-vm
via http://irclog.perlgeek.de/crimsonfu/2012-05-24#i_5632151
On Sep 27, 2012, at 8:20 PM, Bill Campbell cen...@celestial.com wrote:
I am attempting to use libvirtd/kvm on CentOS
Nico Kadel-Garcia
Email: nico.ka...@tufts.edu
Sent from iPhone
On Sep 27, 2012, at 20:41, Philip Durbin philipdur...@gmail.com wrote:
how about this?
virt-v2v -ic 'esx://my-vmware-hypervisor.example.com' -os default --network
default my-vm
via
es para video!! voy a ver que puedo hacer ¿alguna otra sugerencia?
El 27 de septiembre de 2012 09:49, Normando Hall nh...@unixlan.com.arescribió:
El streaming lo hacés con icecast. http://www.icecast.org/
Ahora la fuente que alimenta al servidor de streaming lo podés hacer con
muchas cosas.
Agrego que es mucho mas complicado instalarlos en centos, ya que
requiere la compilación de paquetes porque no existen para esta distro.
Si el uso va a ser de streaming, por cuestiones de facilidad te
recomiendo ubuntu o cualquier distro basada en debian.
Yo lo tengo funcionando en centos
Bueno, ya sea para video o audio, el servidor es icecast. Sólo
necesitaría buscar algún cliente que alimente al icecast con el tipo de
materia que quieras (video o sólo audio).
En la página de icecast vas a encontrar mucho, y en youtube.
El 27/09/2012 09:52 a.m., Hector Martínez Romo escribió:
gracias, si bien compilarlo no es mucho problema en las actualizaciones si,
voy a probarlo con UBUNTU, aunque sea la lista de CENTOS :)
El 27 de septiembre de 2012 09:57, Normando Hall nh...@unixlan.com.arescribió:
Agrego que es mucho mas complicado instalarlos en centos, ya que
requiere la
Y el último eslabón, para no tener el usuario que utilizar un
reproductor propio de su SO, es agregar el reproductor en la página web.
Hay varios también, dependiendo del formato de transmisión del video.
El 27/09/2012 09:52 a.m., Hector Martínez Romo escribió:
es para video!! voy a ver que
On 09/27/2012 07:57 AM, Normando Hall wrote:
Agrego que es mucho mas complicado instalarlos en centos, ya que
requiere la compilación de paquetes porque no existen para esta distro.
Si el uso va a ser de streaming, por cuestiones de facilidad te
recomiendo ubuntu o cualquier distro basada en
El día 27 de septiembre de 2012 06:34, Hector Martínez Romo
pela...@gmail.com escribió:
Estimados
alguien de ustedes tiene experiencia en implementar un servidor de
streaming para que me recomiende que herramienta utilizar y algun howto?
Tengo uno montado en CentOS 5, solo le regale $10 al
Me ha confirmado que si se puede instalar en CentOs 6.2 y RHEL
6.3...así que al tajo.
Saludos.
El día 27 de septiembre de 2012 01:05, Jimmy Bersoza
jimmybers...@hotmail.com escribió:
lo voy a probar gracias por su ayuda
Atte.
Jimmy Bersoza
Pasaje - El Oro- Ecuador
Date:
gracias EPE.
El 27 de septiembre de 2012 10:50, Ing. Ernesto Pérez
cen...@ecualinux.com escribió:
On 09/27/2012 07:57 AM, Normando Hall wrote:
Agrego que es mucho mas complicado instalarlos en centos, ya que
requiere la compilación de paquetes porque no existen para esta distro.
Si el
Gracias a todos por sus sugerencias.
El 27 de septiembre de 2012 11:02, cheperobert jrobertoa...@gmail.comescribió:
El día 27 de septiembre de 2012 06:34, Hector Martínez Romo
pela...@gmail.com escribió:
Estimados
alguien de ustedes tiene experiencia en implementar un servidor de
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 05:36:36AM +, KNOPS Manfred wrote:
Hi digimer,
Sorry, I made a mistake.
... After rebooting centos generates a device called /dev/et0. ...
should be
... After rebooting centos generates a device called /dev/eth0. ...
CentOS made it. I got what I want.
Where
Hi All.
I have a CentOS server:
CentOS 5.6 x86_64
2.6.18-238.12.1.el5.centos.plus
e4fsprogs-1.41.12-2.el5.x86_64
which has a 11TB ext4 filesystem. I have problems with running fsck on it
and would like to change the filesystem because I do not like the
possibility of running long fsck on it,
On 27.09.2012 09:10, Rafał Radecki wrote:
Hi All.
I have a CentOS server:
CentOS 5.6 x86_64
2.6.18-238.12.1.el5.centos.plus
e4fsprogs-1.41.12-2.el5.x86_64
which has a 11TB ext4 filesystem. I have problems with running fsck
on it
and would like to change the filesystem because I do not
We have a computing cluster running Sun Grid Engine, which
considers this value to check if a process exceeds the memory
limit or not. So somehow I'm bound to consider it.
I installed a machine from scratch with CentOS 6.2 x64, nothing
else, I open a terminal, I run this simple bash script and
Dear all,
Dear support and users:
Sorry to trouble you! I configure the shorewall firewall to forward ftp and
ssh port to another server, but failed. Can you help me check?
I cannot login both SSH and ftp!
Below is my environment: (attachment is shorewall dump)
1. Gateway
On 09/27/12 1:52 AM, Nux! wrote:
Never had to deal with such a large filesystem, yet, but I'd try XFS on
it.
XFS is fairly memory intensive.11TB file systems tend to mean
millions and millions of files.
frankly, I wouldn't run this on CentOS 5.6, I would upgrade to CentOS
6.latest and
Which other mature and stable filesystem can you recommend for such
large
storage?
Never had to deal with such a large filesystem, yet, but I'd try XFS on
it.
Alternatively you can look at less supported filesystems such as BTRFS.
Or even http://zfsonlinux.org/.
Since its for
Am 27.09.2012 um 10:10 schrieb Rafał Radecki:
Hi All.
I have a CentOS server:
CentOS 5.6 x86_64
2.6.18-238.12.1.el5.centos.plus
e4fsprogs-1.41.12-2.el5.x86_64
which has a 11TB ext4 filesystem. I have problems with running fsck on it
and would like to change the filesystem because I
Am 27.09.2012 um 10:58 schrieb muiz:
Dear support and users:
Sorry to trouble you! I configure the shorewall firewall to forward ftp and
ssh port to another server, but failed. Can you help me check?
I cannot login both SSH and ftp!
Below is my environment: (attachment is
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 5:52 AM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
Alternatively you can look at less supported filesystems such as BTRFS.
What do you mean by less suported ?
https://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/linuxcon-japan/bo
---
LinuxCon Japan 2012 | Presentations
On The Way to a Healthy
On 9/27/12, Fernando Cassia fcas...@gmail.com wrote:
So, again, what´dya mean by less supported?. It´s in the mainline
kernel since February so with the adoption by RHEL 7, it´ll become
mainstream sooner rather than later...
Just my $0.02...
Thats the whole point isn't it. Until RHEL
You should upgrade to a newer kernel - there are lots of improvements
to ext4 since the rhel5 kernel...
rhel/centos 6 is a start but if you don't need rhel/centos you could
try Ubuntu 12.04 to see how the 3.2.x kernel handles it.
cheers
On 27 September 2012 10:47, joel billy
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 10:10 AM, Rafał Radecki radecki.ra...@gmail.comwrote:
Which other mature and stable filesystem can you recommend for such large
storage?
I recommend XFS
BR Bent
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On 27.09.2012 10:08, John R Pierce wrote:
On 09/27/12 1:52 AM, Nux! wrote:
Never had to deal with such a large filesystem, yet, but I'd try XFS
on
it.
XFS is fairly memory intensive.11TB file systems tend to mean
millions and millions of files.
frankly, I wouldn't run this on CentOS
Definitely shoot for CentOS 6.3 ...
XFS with a kernel _more recent_ than 2.6.36 (currently shipped with
CentOS6) has more improvements to the XFS code. Youtube video on XFS
[0] - I believe the kernel version noted is 2.6.39 (watch the video!)
[2].
And there's also a Youtube video on BTRFS [1]
On 09/26/2012 11:57 PM, Manish Kathuria wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 7:46 AM, Gordon Messmer yiny...@eburg.com wrote:
On 09/26/2012 09:15 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
Is there a way to make this work correctly?
In addition, you should ideally applying the following patches for
Static,
On 09/26/2012 10:16 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 09/26/2012 09:15 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
Is there a way to make this work correctly?
Shorewall will generate a proper configuration if you specify the
track option in the providers file. It might be a good idea to use
that to generate your
From: muiz m...@163.com
Sorry to trouble you! I configure the shorewall firewall to forward ftp
and
ssh port to another server, but failed. Can you help me check?
I cannot login both SSH and ftp!
http://www.shorewall.net/FAQ.htm#faq1a
JD
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 7:04 PM, Steve Clark scl...@netwolves.com wrote:
On 09/26/2012 11:57 PM, Manish Kathuria wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 7:46 AM, Gordon Messmer yiny...@eburg.com wrote:
On 09/26/2012 09:15 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
Is there a way to make this work correctly?
In
On 09/27/2012 06:36 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
I was trying to figure out what criteria to use to mark the connection.
FTP is such a
braindead application, using to channels and active and passive mode.
What really
needs to happen is someway to tell the kernel to recheck the routing
after SNAT.
On 09/27/2012 11:01 AM, Manish Kathuria wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 7:04 PM, Steve Clark scl...@netwolves.com wrote:
On 09/26/2012 11:57 PM, Manish Kathuria wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 7:46 AM, Gordon Messmer yiny...@eburg.com wrote:
On 09/26/2012 09:15 AM, Steve Clark wrote:
The
On 09/27/2012 01:57 AM, Jérémie Dubois-Lacoste wrote:
We have a computing cluster running Sun Grid Engine, which
considers this value to check if a process exceeds the memory
limit or not. So somehow I'm bound to consider it.
I installed a machine from scratch with CentOS 6.2 x64, nothing
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Gordon Messmer yiny...@eburg.com wrote:
I understand it may not be very precise, however I still don't
understant the difference compared to other x64 ditributions,
under CentOS the value is 7 times higher!
This might explain it:
On 2012-09-27, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
XFS is fairly memory intensive.11TB file systems tend to mean
millions and millions of files.
frankly, I wouldn't run this on CentOS 5.6, I would upgrade to CentOS
6.latest and then I would use XFS support for EXT4 and XFS
On 09/27/12 11:15 AM, Keith Keller wrote:
I have also run xfs_repair on a 17TB XFS filesystem on a machine with
about 4GB of memory. It ran fine in less than one hour (~30m IIRC; that
filesystem is on CentOS 6).
with XFS at least (and probably ext4) what counts is how many files are
in the
On 2012-09-27, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 09/27/12 11:15 AM, Keith Keller wrote:
I have also run xfs_repair on a 17TB XFS filesystem on a machine with
about 4GB of memory. It ran fine in less than one hour (~30m IIRC; that
filesystem is on CentOS 6).
with XFS at least (and
kernel 2.6.32-279.9.1.el6.x86_64 does not build from the source rpm's
using the UNmodified config file and following the directions explicitly.
Previous kernels build fine from the same directions. A little help from
the developers would be greatly appreciated.
while building I get this output:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 3:03 PM, Seth Bardash
s...@integratedsolutions.org wrote:
kernel 2.6.32-279.9.1.el6.x86_64 does not build from the source rpm's
using the UNmodified config file and following the directions explicitly.
Previous kernels build fine from the same directions. A little help
Current CentOS 6 is 2.6.32, not 2.6.36
In that XFS Youtube video, Dave Chinner says upstream 3.0 kernel or
RHEL 6.2 [at 45:20 of the video].
Other sources [0] [1] agree.
[0] http://lwn.net/Articles/476616/
[1] http://jira.funtoo.org/browse/FL-38
---~~.~~---
Mike
// SilverTip257 //
On Thu,
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Steve Clark scl...@netwolves.com wrote:
On 09/27/2012 11:01 AM, Manish Kathuria wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 7:04 PM, Steve Clark scl...@netwolves.com wrote:
On 09/26/2012 11:57 PM, Manish Kathuria wrote:
On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 7:46 AM, Gordon Messmer
Hi.
On one of my servers aide just reported inode changes to a large bunch of files
in a variety of directories, e.g. /usr/bin, /usr/sbin etc. This machine sits
behind a couple of firewalls and it would be hard to get to.
The day before I updated clam* and updated the aide database right after
I have some clients that run centos6 and I need to have users be able to
access the failsafe terminal from the login screen. The old options (from
4/5) for choosing your session aren't present. I've googled a bit on this
but don't seem to be using a good search string as most of the hits have
thanks very much. JD
I study this FAQ 1a/1b before. but still failed:(
在 2012-09-27 21:51:32，John Doe jd...@yahoo.com 写道：
From: muiz m...@163.com
Sorry to trouble you! I configure the shorewall firewall to forward ftp
and
ssh port to another server, but failed. Can you help me check?
46 matches
Mail list logo
