On 10/29/2012 05:00 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
> I see a package "x246-0.120-5.20120303.el6 (i686)" available in my
> Add/Remove Software tool. I can't find said package in any of the repos
> I've searched through.
>
> Can anyone point me to a link where I can download that package to my
> local rep
On 10/29/2012 07:16 PM, Stephen Harris wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 06:45:18PM -0400, Mark LaPierre wrote:
>> Found that one a couple of days ago. I don't like the idea of mixing
>> repos either that's why I was looking for the one that the package
>> manager found, "x264-0.120-5.20120303.el6.
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 06:45:18PM -0400, Mark LaPierre wrote:
> Found that one a couple of days ago. I don't like the idea of mixing
> repos either that's why I was looking for the one that the package
> manager found, "x264-0.120-5.20120303.el6.i686.rpm" , not the one from
> the nux repo.
"y
On 10/29/2012 06:11 PM, Nux! wrote:
> On 29.10.2012 21:00, Mark LaPierre wrote:
>> I see a package "x246-0.120-5.20120303.el6 (i686)" available in my
>> Add/Remove Software tool. I can't find said package in any of the
>> repos
>> I've searched through.
>>
>> Can anyone point me to a link where I
On Monday 29 October 2012, Mark LaPierre wrote:
> I see a package "x246-0.120-5.20120303.el6 (i686)" available in my
> Add/Remove Software tool. I can't find said package in any of the
> repos I've searched through.
If "Add/Remove Software" sees it, that means that yum can also see it.
Simply
On 29.10.2012 21:00, Mark LaPierre wrote:
> I see a package "x246-0.120-5.20120303.el6 (i686)" available in my
> Add/Remove Software tool. I can't find said package in any of the
> repos
> I've searched through.
>
> Can anyone point me to a link where I can download that package to my
> local rep
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 05:00:40PM -0400, Mark LaPierre wrote:
> I see a package "x246-0.120-5.20120303.el6 (i686)" available in my
> Add/Remove Software tool. I can't find said package in any of the repos
> I've searched through.
>
> Can anyone point me to a link where I can download that pack
I see a package "x246-0.120-5.20120303.el6 (i686)" available in my
Add/Remove Software tool. I can't find said package in any of the repos
I've searched through.
Can anyone point me to a link where I can download that package to my
local repo?
--
_
°v°
/(_)\
^ ^ Mark LaPierr
On 28 October 2012 15:36, Madhurranjan Mohaan wrote:
> I've had issues over the last few days trying to create a Centos server
> image . I've tried with Vmware fusion and Vmware server and it skips
> directly to the default desktop install and doesn't give me the option to
> run the linux server.
On 10/28/2012 03:36 PM, Madhurranjan Mohaan wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I've had issues over the last few days trying to create a Centos server
> image . I've tried with Vmware fusion and Vmware server and it skips
> directly to the default desktop install and doesn't give me the option to
> run the linu
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
centos-announce-requ..
On 29/10/2012 13:26, Jerry Geis wrote:
ck your duplex. I have had two recent problems with duplex:
One, with a Cisco router - it auto-negotiated every time to half duplex, even
though it really -was- full. Use mii-tool to find out.
Just a note, auto-negotiation of 10/100 links will not work r
On 10/27/2012 02:13 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
> Hey Y'all,
>
> Recently my sound has been misbehaving. The issue exists when I play
> sound using Rhythmbox, Totem Movie Player, or even Youtube video in
> Firefox or Chrome. The sound stutters and drops out. Sounds very
> rough. On Youtube the sou
> ck your duplex. I have had two recent problems with duplex:
>
> One, with a Cisco router - it auto-negotiated every time to half duplex, even
> though it really -was- full. Use mii-tool to find out.
>
> Two, with a RR modem - the speed was forced to 10mb half duplex instead of
> 100mb full dupl
Am 29.10.2012 08:46, schrieb C. L. Martinez:
> Yes, all clients are configured to tuse nfsv4. Strange, if rpcbind
> process is stopped after nfs services are up, all works, but if
> rpcbind is stopped, nfs services doesn't go up ... I don't understand
> why rpcbind service needs to be up to start n
Am 28.10.2012 18:30, schrieb Bob Puff:
> One, with a Cisco router - it auto-negotiated every time to half duplex, even
> though it really -was- full. Use mii-tool to find out.
That's the typical effect when one side is configured
to "full duplex" and the other side to "auto negotiate".
The side w
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 12:32:28PM +0330, Ashkan Rahmani wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need some benchmarks, ie samba vs windows 2008 file server benchmarks,
> IIS 7 vs Apache/httpd,
> and iptables vs pf.
Google's your friend.
John
--
IRC - Where
Hi,
I need some benchmarks, ie samba vs windows 2008 file server benchmarks,
IIS 7 vs Apache/httpd,
and iptables vs pf.
It's very good Linux side be Centos 6.
--
Best Regards,
Ashkan R
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org
On 10/27/12 21:54, xrx wrote:
> I am having an extremely strange issue with a BL460c1 (G1) blade on a
> c7000 enclosure. I could not for the life of me get the machine to ping
> the gateway or any other blade on the same enclosure (yes, the subnet
> mask was correct & quadruple-checked); although p
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 6:26 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 10/24/2012 03:25 AM, C. L. Martinez wrote:
>> I have setup a CentOS6.3 x86_64 host to act as a nfs server.
>> According to RHEL6 docs, portmap is not needed when you use NFSv4, but
>> in my host I need to start rpcbind service to make N
20 matches
Mail list logo
