Hola estimados,
todos podemos equivocarnos en nuestro intento de ayudar,
ademas es cuestion de gustos, apoyo el criterio de Carlos Martinez.
Es cierto es circunstancial nuestro paso, a algunos talvez les guste lo
mejor o lo peor, cada uno decide, por capricho o sabiduria, simple eleccion.
Por
Gracias!
Ya lo hice y funcionó.
Vaya que secretos tiene todo esto! :-)
Saludos
r.lara
-Mensaje original-
De: centos-es-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-es-boun...@centos.org] En
nombre de Carlos Restrepo
Enviado el: Jueves, 24 de Enero de 2013 08:05 p.m.
Para: centos-es@centos.org
Hola amigos , necesito ayuda. No puedo ver mi correo de la bandeja de
entrada, creo q pase el tamaño de almacenamiento. Necesito aumentar el
tamaño de mi carpeta en el servidor de correo. Utilizo linux-centos. y
tengo el webmin 1.4 centos 5.3 administrador. soy nuevo en esto. por favor
necesito
On 23/01/13 17:04, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Toralf Lund wrote:
Ned Slider wrote:
On 22/01/13 14:32, Toralf Lund wrote:
How exactly are you supposed to configure the display (i.e. set up
X11) on a CentOS 6 system? I mean, in the past, there was
system-config-display, but that's not supported
You can install a separate python 2.6 stack - e.g:
http://pkgs.org/centos-5-rhel-5/epel-i386/python26-2.6.8-2.el5.i386.rpm.html
This won't interfere with the default CentOS 5 python 2.4 install
I think the firefox build process looks for a 'python2.6' binary - if
not, then just add a
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
lheck...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
You can install a separate python 2.6 stack - e.g:
http://pkgs.org/centos-5-rhel-5/epel-i386/python26-2.6.8-2.el5.i386.rpm.html
This won't interfere with the default CentOS 5 python 2.4 install
I think the firefox build process looks for a 'python2.6'
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:32:57AM +, lheck...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
You can install a separate python 2.6 stack - e.g:
http://pkgs.org/centos-5-rhel-5/epel-i386/python26-2.6.8-2.el5.i386.rpm.html
This won't interfere with the default CentOS 5 python 2.4 install
I think
From: James Freer jessejazza3...@gmail.com
i do not recommend to use this two repos simultaniuous (or use
priorities!).
hmmm - well what is one supposed to do?
I use priorities and did not run into much problems so far...
base = 1
rpmforge = 2 (just watch out for rfx packages)
elrepo = 3
fred smith wrote:
the build process explicitly checks for python 2.7 or greater, so how
does 2.6 succeed?
from the mach build tool:
#!/usr/bin/env python
# This Source Code Form is subject to the terms of the Mozilla Public
# License, v. 2.0. If a copy of the MPL was
Hi.
Does anyone know of a way to add a new mail notification icon to the
panel/system tray under CentOS 6?
On CentOS 5, I used the mail-notification software package provided by
the Fedora EPEL distribution, but this is gone from the version 6
repository, and the one from version 5 won't
Hi.
Does anyone know of a way to add a new mail notification icon to the
panel/system tray under CentOS 6?
On CentOS 5, I used the mail-notification software package provided by
the Fedora EPEL distribution, but this is gone from the version 6
repository, and the one from version 5 won't
On 22/01/13 19:33, SilverTip257 wrote:
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 3:47 AM, Toralf Lundtoralf.l...@pgs.com wrote:
Hi,
Does anyone know a way to access rpm packages on the CentOS 6 install
DVD after booting into rescue mode from the same DVD? I mean, I can't
immediately see the Packages
On 25/01/2013 15:00, Toralf Lund wrote:
Hi.
Does anyone know of a way to add a new mail notification icon to the
panel/system tray under CentOS 6?
On CentOS 5, I used the mail-notification software package provided by
the Fedora EPEL distribution, but this is gone from the version 6
repository,
I am adding a line like:
iptables -I INPUT -p udp -m state --state NEW -m multiport --dports
6550 -j ACCEPT
to /etc/sysconfig/iptables
before the REJECT line...
to allow my multicast port 6550 traffic.
I then restart iptables and it is still not passing through.
If I stop iptables it works.
OK, What's the best CentOS platform for KVM? CentOS 5 or CentOS 6?
TIA,
Gene
It's impossible for everything to be true at the same time.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 01/25/2013 05:09 PM, Gene Poole wrote:
OK, What's the best CentOS platform for KVM? CentOS 5 or CentOS 6?
At this time you should only install CentOS 5 when you absolutely have to
for compatibility reasons. For new Installations you should always use
CentOS 6.
Regards,
Dennis
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 02:03:17PM +, James Pearson wrote:
fred smith wrote:
the build process explicitly checks for python 2.7 or greater, so how
does 2.6 succeed?
from the mach build tool:
#!/usr/bin/env python
# This Source Code Form is subject to the terms of
OKay I did not find a way to enable multicast on the lokkit command line,
however, this did work below. The big issue that it did not work the
first time
was the module was not loaded.
modprobe xt_pkttype
iptables -I INPUT -m pkttype --pkt-type multicast -j ACCEPT
jerry
fred smith wrote:
Are you sure that is used?
It is if you follow Mozilla's build instructions, which are to build with
mach. I think that doing what you did will bypass mach. I tried it and
got an error further into the build regarding some missing python stuff
(but I haven't installed a
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:19 AM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn
denni...@conversis.de wrote:
On 01/25/2013 05:09 PM, Gene Poole wrote:
OK, What's the best CentOS platform for KVM? CentOS 5 or CentOS 6?
At this time you should only install CentOS 5 when you absolutely have to
for compatibility
On Wed, 2013-01-23 at 09:33 -0500, Scot P. Floess wrote:
I think you can also use
X --config
That should build an /etc/X11/xorg.conf file for you...
That's a good start (the command is actually Xorg -configure) but it
may leave open questions to the OP and others who may consult this
It seems there's no way to transfer files to/from 5.9 to/from Android
4.1.1 using bluetooth, at least that's what the web and my attempts have
been telling me for the past few days. Or has someone found a way...?
___
CentOS mailing list
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 05:45:45PM +, James Pearson wrote:
fred smith wrote:
Are you sure that is used?
It is if you follow Mozilla's build instructions, which are to build with
mach. I think that doing what you did will bypass mach. I tried it and
got an error further into the
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 1:34 PM, John Doe jd...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: James Freer jessejazza3...@gmail.com
i do not recommend to use this two repos simultaniuous (or use
priorities!).
hmmm - well what is one supposed to do?
I use priorities and did not run into much problems so far...
On 25.01.2013 20:15, James Freer wrote:
Thanks for that suggestion. I'll look into it all again in a couple of
days. I'm just surprised that Centos risk the stability issue using
other repos.
This goes for any distro; once you start adding 3rd party stuff you get
further and further from the
James Freer wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 1:34 PM, John Doe jd...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: James Freer jessejazza3...@gmail.com
i do not recommend to use this two repos simultaniuous (or use
priorities!).
hmmm - well what is one supposed to do?
I use priorities and did not run into much
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 2:32 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I wouldn't agree with the priorities above. As I mentioned earlier in this
thread, our standard repos, in addition to the base, are rpmfusion and
epel. Other than *sigh* 386 vs x86_64 issues, we've never had dependency
conflicts. It all
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 8:32 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
James Freer wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 1:34 PM, John Doe jd...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: James Freer jessejazza3...@gmail.com
i do not recommend to use this two repos simultaniuous (or use
priorities!).
hmmm - well what is one
Les Mikesell wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 2:32 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I wouldn't agree with the priorities above. As I mentioned earlier in
this thread, our standard repos, in addition to the base, are
rpmfusion and
epel. Other than *sigh* 386 vs x86_64 issues, we've never had
James Freer wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 8:32 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
James Freer wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 1:34 PM, John Doe jd...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: James Freer jessejazza3...@gmail.com
i do not recommend to use this two repos simultaniuous (or use
priorities!).
hmmm -
Am 25.01.2013 um 21:15 schrieb James Freer jessejazza3...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 1:34 PM, John Doe jd...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: James Freer jessejazza3...@gmail.com
hmmm - well what is one supposed to do?
I use priorities and did not run into much problems so far...
base = 1
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 3:13 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Have you used rpmforge since the split into conflicting and
non-conflicting sections?
Didn't know they had...
I think it was a couple of years ago. See the note here about rpmforge-extras:
On 25/1/2013 11:28 μμ, Leon Fauster wrote:
not the CentOS(-Team) but the user it self is risking this …
True. CentOS/RHEL are using the least-risk policy by rarely updating
packages, except for serious bug/security fixes and that helps provide
peace of mind from the base OS.
Yet, I have come
Nikolaos Milas wrote:
On 25/1/2013 11:28 μμ, Leon Fauster wrote:
not the CentOS(-Team) but the user it self is risking this …
snip
You must balance availability of features, stability, manageability,
security, package dependencies, application/service deployment and
maintenance and more.
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 02:58:45PM -0500, fred smith wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 05:45:45PM +, James Pearson wrote:
fred smith wrote:
Are you sure that is used?
It is if you follow Mozilla's build instructions, which are to build with
mach. I think that doing what you did
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Nikolaos Milas nmi...@noa.gr wrote:
No systems are identical. The sysadmins have to *study* their
environment and needs and then design the proper solution on each case.
As a simple example, if there is a requirement to run OpenLDAP *as a
server* on a CentOS
fred smith wrote:
OK, I've got all that installed. now when I run configure I get:
checking For gcc visibility bug with class-level attributes (GCC bug
26905)... no
checking For x86_64 gcc visibility bug with builtins (GCC bug 20297)...
no
checking for gcc PR49911...
Received from Nikolaos Milas, on 2013-01-25 10:05 PM:
On 25/1/2013 11:28 μμ, Leon Fauster wrote:
not the CentOS(-Team) but the user it self is risking this …
True. CentOS/RHEL are using the least-risk policy by rarely
updating packages, except for serious bug/security fixes and that
helps
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 11:17:01PM +, James Pearson wrote:
fred smith wrote:
OK, I've got all that installed. now when I run configure I get:
checking For gcc visibility bug with class-level attributes (GCC bug
26905)... no
checking For x86_64 gcc visibility bug with
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 9:59 PM, Bry8 Star bry8s...@yahoo.com wrote:
I find it very very annoying that, CentOS lacks STABLE+last
releases. It is not only CentOS, ther Linux as well. But this RHEL
close/derivative, is very very behind.
If you don't want stability and don't mind installing all
On 26/1/2013 7:42 πμ, Les Mikesell wrote:
If you find a 100% reliable solution, please post it.
I suggest very carefully selecting particular packages (and groups
thereof) from whatever repos (or from individual experienced users'
efforts), testing them thoroughly on test systems (usually a
42 matches
Mail list logo
