On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 10:10 AM, Giles Coochey wrote:
> On 25/01/2013 15:00, Toralf Lund wrote:
>
>> Hi.
>>
>> Does anyone know of a way to add a "new mail" notification icon to the
>> panel/system tray under CentOS 6?
>> On CentOS 5, I used the "mail-notification" software package provided by
>
On 26/01/13 14:59, Bry8 Star wrote:
> CentOS webpage/site should also show to all users, some example of
> using multiple repos and how to implement effective includepkgs,
> exclude, priority etc directives properly for some certain last &
> STABLE app(s) (which is by default not in CentOS), so
On 01/26/2013 05:57 PM, Nux! wrote:
> On 26.01.2013 22:51, James Freer wrote:
>> Not sure how word perfect got into the thread. I used the letters WP
>> for word processing and now Word Perfect is being discussed
>
> LOL! Legendary ... I love this mailing list!
>
Yah, I know, it's off topic a bit.
On 26.01.2013 22:51, James Freer wrote:
> Not sure how word perfect got into the thread. I used the letters WP
> for word processing and now Word Perfect is being discussed
LOL! Legendary ... I love this mailing list!
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
__
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 10:43 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 1/26/2013 2:06 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
>> There was a WordPerfect included in Red Hat Linux around about release 5
>> or so. To get it to work on later releases you had to install the
>> required dependency packages from the install CD
On 1/26/2013 2:06 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
> There was a WordPerfect included in Red Hat Linux around about release 5
> or so. To get it to work on later releases you had to install the
> required dependency packages from the install CD along with the
> WordPerfect package. I bet it would still r
On 01/25/2013 04:22 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> James Freer wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 8:32 PM, wrote:
>>> James Freer wrote:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 1:34 PM, John Doe wrote:
> From: James Freer
>
>>> i do not recommend to use this two repos simultaniuous (or use
>
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 9:12 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 26.01.2013 22:07, schrieb James Freer:
>> From what i have seen of fedora and centos in the rpm world the repos
>> are very much better in the debian world. To me the stability comes
>> from the distro and it's repos. Not being able to
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 3:07 PM, James Freer wrote:
>
> >From what i have seen of fedora and centos in the rpm world the repos
> are very much better in the debian world. To me the stability comes
> from the distro and it's repos. Not being able to install Abiword or
> yumex, having to spend time
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 4:22 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 1:44 AM, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
>>>
>> There is no such thing as a 100% reliable system if you don't do things
>> right. You can easily screw (in terms of security and reliability) your
>> Vanilla RHEL/CentOS with one w
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 1:44 AM, Nikolaos Milas wrote:
>>
> There is no such thing as a 100% reliable system if you don't do things
> right. You can easily screw (in terms of security and reliability) your
> Vanilla RHEL/CentOS with one wrong setting, even using your safe repos.
>
Breaking it you
On Sat, Jan 26, 2013 at 12:32:32PM +, James Pearson wrote:
> fred smith wrote:
> >
> > For example, I don't think you want it to be on the release update
> > channel,... wouldn't that cause the firefox update logic to automatically
> > clobber your build with the next automatic update? which r
fred smith wrote:
>
> For example, I don't think you want it to be on the release update
> channel,... wouldn't that cause the firefox update logic to automatically
> clobber your build with the next automatic update? which resulting
> Firefox then won't work--the whole reason why we're doing our
13 matches
Mail list logo
