Holas lista!!
Tengo un problema, y lo publico aquí por si me pueden ayudar. Estoy
configurando un servidor DHCP (una cosa simple, nada del otro mundo) para
una red interna. Estoy siguiendo el ejemplo de AlcanceLibre.org [1]
pero no logro hacer que me entregue una IP dinámica a un equipo con Win7.
Que tal:
Instale OpenVpn en Centos...todo bien
Pero existe 2 modos de conexión mediante llave estática y mediante
certificados TLS SSL
La pregunta es cual es mas conveniente
Gracias.
___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
Que tal:
Instale OpenVpn en Centos...todo bien
Pero existe 2 modos de conexión mediante llave estática y mediante
certificados TLS SSL
La pregunta es cual es mas conveniente
Gracias.
--
___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
Hi,
I'm planing to setup a new samba fileserver as a member to an existing
samba 3.x SMB.
The old server is still nss-pam-ldapd configured (historic left overs).
As I dont have any pressure to have the new server up and running within
the next few hours, I liked to set up sssd with our existing
On 21/02/2013 10:20 AM, Götz Reinicke - IT Koordinator wrote:
Hi,
I'm planing to setup a new samba fileserver as a member to an
existing
samba 3.x SMB.
The old server is still nss-pam-ldapd configured (historic left
overs).
As I dont have any pressure to have the new server up and
On 21 February 2013 01:28, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
It looks like no system, internal or external could access the DNS on my
new server. IPTABLES was set for 53 both UDP and TCP. Firewall was OK.
In fact a local system on the same subnet, thus NOT going through my
Hi there.
I'm currently configuring a brand new email server(IMAP) which will run
CentOS 6.3 x64.
So lots of files on the data volume.
I'm confused about stripe size for my data volume.
I'm using 2x500GB for OS in RAID1 and 2x2TB SAS for DATA in RAID1 which is
hosted on a HP Smart Array P420
On 2/21/2013 3:09 AM, Svavar Örn Eysteinsson wrote:
I'm currently configuring a brand new email server(IMAP) which will run
CentOS 6.3 x64.
So lots of files on the data volume.
I'm confused about stripe size for my data volume.
I'm using 2x500GB for OS in RAID1 and 2x2TB SAS for DATA in
On 02/21/2013 04:30 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
On 21 February 2013 01:28, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com wrote:
It looks like no system, internal or external could access the DNS on my
new server. IPTABLES was set for 53 both UDP and TCP. Firewall was OK.
In fact a local system on the
Oks. thanks allot.
I'l go with the defaults.
Best R,
Svavar
On 21.2.2013, at 11:21, John R Pierce wrote:
On 2/21/2013 3:09 AM, Svavar Örn Eysteinsson wrote:
I'm currently configuring a brand new email server(IMAP) which will run
CentOS 6.3 x64.
So lots of files on the data volume.
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
Great. I have to make notes on how to test about selinux reporting.
audit2allow is useful to generate custom modules etc too - just don't be to
blind in using them ;)
other useful things are semange boolean and so on - centos has a good wiki
page on selinux
I assume that 'getenforce
On Thursday 21 February 2013 11:25:44 Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 02/21/2013 04:30 AM, James Hogarth wrote:
On 21 February 2013 01:28, Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com
wrote:
It looks like no system, internal or external could access the
DNS on my new server. IPTABLES was set for 53
On 02/20/2013 08:28 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
It looks like no system, internal or external could access the DNS on my
new server. IPTABLES was set for 53 both UDP and TCP. Firewall was OK.
In fact a local system on the same subnet, thus NOT going through my
firewall was denied access to
On Feb 20, 2013, at 4:50 PM, Wes Modes wrote:
I am trying to configure NIS, PAM, LDAP on a CentOS 6.2 host. I've
previously installed a similar configuration on RHEL4, but CentOS now
uses nss-pam-ldapd and nslcd instead of nss_ldap, so the configurations
are a little different.
Robert Moskowitz rgm@... writes:
It looks like no system, internal or external could access the DNS on my
new server. IPTABLES was set for 53 both UDP and TCP. Firewall was OK.
In fact a local system on the same subnet, thus NOT going through my
firewall was denied access to the
On 02/21/2013 10:16 AM, David G. Miller wrote:
Robert Moskowitz rgm@... writes:
It looks like no system, internal or external could access the DNS on my
new server. IPTABLES was set for 53 both UDP and TCP. Firewall was OK.
In fact a local system on the same subnet, thus NOT going through
Can anyone tell me if the current libtiff-3.9.4-9.el6_3.x86_64 RPM has
bigtiff support built into it? I need this for tiling rather large
images for the Virtual Microscope project I am working on, and I am
having issues building the 4x versions that only seem to be available
for F18.
Thank you
On Thu, 21 Feb 2013, Götz Reinicke - IT Koordinator wrote:
Dose anybody has a working example file to share with me?
Sure.
- % -
[sssd]
config_file_version = 2
reconnection_retries = 3
sbus_timeout = 30
services = nss, pam
domains = blah.com
[nss]
filter_groups = root
filter_users =
On 21/02/13 16:39, Weiner, Michael wrote:
Can anyone tell me if the current libtiff-3.9.4-9.el6_3.x86_64 RPM has
bigtiff support built into it? I need this for tiling rather large
images for the Virtual Microscope project I am working on, and I am
having issues building the 4x versions that
I have read that v 6.3 is about Fedora 12. Now that v 6.4 has shipped
(no I won't be dumb enough to ask when C6.4 we ship), what version of
Fedora does it match up with?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On 02/21/2013 03:27 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I have read that v 6.3 is about Fedora 12. Now that v 6.4 has shipped
(no I won't be dumb enough to ask when C6.4 we ship), what version of
Fedora does it match up with?
It's not changed. Think of y-stream releases as service packs of a
type.
Minor packaging bug: with the new xulrunner (at least for 32-bit):
When running the /usr/bin/xulrunner script, it looks for the binary in
/usr/lib/xulrunner-17.0.3, but all of the files are actually installed
in /usr/lib/xulrunner. Creating a symlink:
cd /usr/lib
ln -s xulrunner
I am getting the following on my 'new box' for my DNS server:
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 13:58:04 -0500
From:
To:
Subject: [abrt] full crash report
User-Agent: Heirloom mailx 12.4 7/29/08
abrt_version: 2.0.8
cmdline:ro root=/dev/mapper/vg_onlo3-root_01 rd_NO_LUKS
On 02/21/2013 03:30 PM, Digimer wrote:
On 02/21/2013 03:27 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I have read that v 6.3 is about Fedora 12. Now that v 6.4 has shipped
(no I won't be dumb enough to ask when C6.4 we ship), what version of
Fedora does it match up with?
It's not changed. Think of
On 02/21/2013 03:45 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 02/21/2013 03:30 PM, Digimer wrote:
On 02/21/2013 03:27 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I have read that v 6.3 is about Fedora 12. Now that v 6.4 has shipped
(no I won't be dumb enough to ask when C6.4 we ship), what version of
Fedora does it
On 02/21/2013 02:45 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 02/21/2013 03:30 PM, Digimer wrote:
On 02/21/2013 03:27 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I have read that v 6.3 is about Fedora 12. Now that v 6.4 has shipped
(no I won't be dumb enough to ask when C6.4 we ship), what version of
Fedora does it
On 02/21/2013 04:46 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 02/21/2013 02:45 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 02/21/2013 03:30 PM, Digimer wrote:
On 02/21/2013 03:27 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I have read that v 6.3 is about Fedora 12. Now that v 6.4 has shipped
(no I won't be dumb enough to ask when
On 2/21/2013 2:31 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
I only use the GUI when setting up a new environment, then change
inittab to 3 before launch, so this is not so much an issue for me
anymore. Just curious.
I never even install the GUI on a server. minimal install, then add
required packages.
2013/2/21 Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com:
I am getting the following on my 'new box' for my DNS server:
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 13:58:04 -0500
From:
To:
Subject: [abrt] full crash report
User-Agent: Heirloom mailx 12.4 7/29/08
abrt_version: 2.0.8
cmdline:ro
On 02/21/2013 06:13 PM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
2013/2/21 Robert Moskowitz r...@htt-consult.com:
I am getting the following on my 'new box' for my DNS server:
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 13:58:04 -0500
From:
To:
Subject: [abrt] full crash report
User-Agent: Heirloom mailx 12.4 7/29/08
Hello everyone,
I hope you are having a good day. However, I am concerned by this:
https://isc.sans.edu/diary/SSHD+rootkit+in+the+wild/15229
Has anyone heard yet what the attack vector is, if 5.9 and 6.4 are
affected, and if a patch is coming out?
Thanks!
Gilbert
On 2/21/2013 3:20 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
:Hardware name: HP Compaq dc7800 Small Form Factor
...
Should I worry?
yes.
You should update bios .
hmmm, thats a 2007 vintage economy business desktop ?
looks to be a December 2011 rev 1.32A BIOS, here
On 02/21/2013 05:32 PM, Gilbert Sebenste wrote:
Hello everyone,
I hope you are having a good day. However, I am concerned by this:
https://isc.sans.edu/diary/SSHD+rootkit+in+the+wild/15229
Has anyone heard yet what the attack vector is, if 5.9 and 6.4 are
affected, and if a patch is
On 02/21/2013 06:55 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 2/21/2013 3:20 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
:Hardware name: HP Compaq dc7800 Small Form Factor
...
Should I worry?
yes.
You should update bios .
hmmm, thats a 2007 vintage economy business desktop ?
looks to be a December 2011 rev 1.32A
Thank you, Johnny, for that clarification, I appreciate it! I can relax a
little now. :-)
Gilbert
***
Gilbert Sebenste
(My opinions only!)
any experiences with centos 5/rhel 5 install? machine is rhel 6.1
certified laptop?
--
Eero
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
37 matches
Mail list logo
