CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2014:0101
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-0101.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2014:0101
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2014-0101.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
Just want to let you guys know that, although it may have been around
for a bit, bringing Xen back to CentOS is awesome and I really
appreciate it. I was very disappointed when RedHat dropped support as
Xen is awesome.
Thanks for the effort!
___
Hello,
we have a strange problem on a fresh install of CentOS 6.5. On the
server we want to use Xen to host paravirtualised guests (the system has
no hardware virtualization support). To manage the domain we would like
to use libvirt. Xen and libvirt are set up as described here:
On Tue, 28 Jan 2014, Jens Pelzetter wrote:
Hello,
we have a strange problem on a fresh install of CentOS 6.5. On the
server we want to use Xen to host paravirtualised guests (the system has
no hardware virtualization support). To manage the domain we would like
to use libvirt. Xen and
Thanks for pointing me to xm dmesg. That was the missing part. The
server has one of the AMD CPUs affected by this:
http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-announce/2012-06/msg2.html
So we had to add allow_unsafe to the boot line. Now Xen works fine.
Best regards,
Jens Pelzetter
Am
I've used both Xen and KVM and at least in benchmarks of applications I
did here I didn't see much difference and since KVM is natively supported by
RedHat, that's what I've been using.
Obviously on this list there is mostly Xen users, and I feel like I must
be missing some great
I have used xen over kvm and others for a while. It was what I just
started using first years ago. With Xen I could manage domains and my
system seemed like a real server. KVM just seemed like a command line
trick to me. (I know it is not especially since its integration into
the kernel.)
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Robert Dinse nan...@eskimo.com wrote:
I've used both Xen and KVM and at least in benchmarks of applications I
did here I didn't see much difference and since KVM is natively supported by
RedHat, that's what I've been using.
I used to use Xen. As far as I
El 27/1/14, Carlos Garcia cgarcia01...@gmail.com escribió:
Buenos dias listeros
Tengo un proyecto para montar un servidor de correo para una empresa
de aproximadamente 100 usuarios con sus cuentas de correo con clientes
en windows. Quisiera montarles ese servidor de correo bajo centos pero
no
Muchas gracias armando por tu información.
Seguramente me será de muchas ayuda.
Saludos.
Claudio
-Mensaje original-
De: centos-es-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-es-boun...@centos.org] En
nombre de J. Armando Uch
Enviado el: Jueves, 23 de Enero de 2014 15:03
Para:
Hola David
Tanto postfix como centos son buenas opciones, postfix es más sencillo
de configurar que Sendmail
En www.alcancelibre.org tienes mucha información y manuales para
configurar un servidor como dios manda!
Saludos
El 28/01/14 00:58, David González Romero escribió:
El sistema más
ZIMBRA es también es una excelente opcion,
Sl2.
2014-01-28 Alex ( Servtelecom ) alex.and...@servtelecom.com:
Hola David
Tanto postfix como centos son buenas opciones, postfix es más sencillo
de configurar que Sendmail
En www.alcancelibre.org tienes mucha información y manuales para
Tengo un cyber y cada año escogo una distro para usar en dicho local, este
año le toco a CentOS, he podido instalar algunas cosas pero me falta la
instalación de juegos para niños (Gcompris, Childsplay...) , espero q la
ultima opción sea compilar y si ese es el caso seria bueno aprovechar para
CentOS es una distribución orientada a Servidores, si vas a usar en las PCs
para el público, podrías elegir alguna otra más orientada a Escritorios (en
lo personal uso Fedora)
Saludos,
Edwin
El 28 de enero de 2014, 10:42, Ricardo rico...@gmail.com escribió:
Tengo un cyber y cada año escogo
con todo respeto, prefiero compilar y empaquetar a tener que cambiar de
distro, ps ya la tengo instalada en todos los equipos
El 28 de enero de 2014, 10:54, Edwin Boza ebo...@gmail.com escribió:
CentOS es una distribución orientada a Servidores, si vas a usar en las PCs
para el público,
On 27/01/14 22:12, Mihamina RKTMB wrote:
On 01/27/2014 09:41 PM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
And the yumex problems have cleared! I tried again and everything
appears to be working, dunno why?
In fact, nothinf was broken.
That depends on your definition of broken. When it
On 1/28/2014 12:34 AM, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
When it doesn't work out of the box it is broken even though it eventually
underwent a miracle and began to do what I asked.
a miracle implies magic.
they say any sufficient advanced technology is indistinguishable from
magic.
On 28/01/14 03:43, John R Pierce wrote:
i say its only magic if you don't understand it.
Yes, very true.
--
http://www.qrz.com/db/w2bod
Box10 Fedora-20/64bit Linux/XFCE
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Hi all,
We're getting to a point in our linux environment where it's starting to be
cumbersome to keep shadow and passwd-files up-to-date for the users to login
on each computer. Scripts can only get us so far. 8-/
I've looked a bit into central login systems for linux, and NIS and LDAP seem
I've moved most of my user's PCs from OpenSuse (11.x, unmaintainend now) to
CentOS 6.4. On my old OpenSuse latex was texlive-latex-2010 and current
version on CTAN is texlive-2013.
But on CentOS 6.4 I've only the old texlive-latex-2007 and several sty files
available on my previous config are
From: Patrick Begou patrick.be...@legi.grenoble-inp.fr
I've moved most of my user's PCs from OpenSuse (11.x, unmaintainend now)
to CentOS 6.4. On my old OpenSuse latex was texlive-latex-2010 and
current version on CTAN is texlive-2013.
But on CentOS 6.4 I've only the old texlive-latex-2007
Hi Sorin
we use here LDAP authentication and mail-control since more than 10 years.
At that time, we did the conversion from passwd/shadow to LDAP using the
tools on
http://www.padl.com/download/
which are still available, probably in a newer version...
To represent a person or a service in
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
2014-01-28 Sorin Srbu sorin.s...@orgfarm.uu.se
Hi all,
We're getting to a point in our linux environment where it's starting to be
cumbersome to keep shadow and passwd-files up-to-date for the users to
login
on each computer. Scripts can only get us so far. 8-/
I've looked a bit into
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of anax
Sent: den 28 januari 2014 12:24
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] NIS or not?
Hi Sorin
we use here LDAP authentication and mail-control since more than 10 years.
At
Hello,
It is possible to switch from Red Hat 7 Beta to CentOS 7 (beta or final)
when it exist? I would like to test newer software than CentOS 6.5
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind regards
Andreas Reschke
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Hi Sorin
of course: you may omit the mail cocacho and realize only the
authentication cocacho in LDAP. For us, however, it has proven to be
most advantageous to have both on LDAP.
You may also select to do first the authentication in LDAP and later on,
if you are familiar with LDAP, realize the
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Darod Zyree
Sent: den 28 januari 2014 13:00
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] NIS or not?
Use IPA. It combines LDAP with Kerberos, a server-client environment is
easily
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of anax
Sent: den 28 januari 2014 13:45
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS] NIS or not?
Hi Sorin
of course: you may omit the mail cocacho and realize only the
authentication
On 01/28/2014 04:02 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
Hi all,
We're getting to a point in our linux environment where it's starting to be
cumbersome to keep shadow and passwd-files up-to-date for the users to login
on each computer. Scripts can only get us so far. 8-/
I've looked a bit into central
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Pete Geenhuizen
Sent: den 28 januari 2014 14:12
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] NIS or not?
I used NIS for many years while working on Sun Solaris and it worked
We have been using NIS for over a decade on our network, and it has been an
effective solution.
The network spans several subnets, and we have been able to deploy slave NIS
servers on the various
subnets. The reason for this is several fold:
Quicker response for login and other domain requests
Where I work we use NIS + Kerberos (Active Directory). We have about 150
machines at our site. It works quite well, as someone said, the big draw
back to NIS is that it sends passwords insecurely, but if you use Kerberos
for authentication it's really quite easy to manage.
On Jan 28, 2014 6:23 AM,
Security is a major consideration, and even though as you say most of
the traffic is local, most problems are internal as opposed to external.
Pete
On 01/28/2014 08:22 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
Yeah, that last bit made me squirm over here. I don't feel good about that,
even though the linux
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Kaplan, Andrew H.
Sent: den 28 januari 2014 14:31
To: 'CentOS mailing list'
Subject: Re: [CentOS] NIS or not?
We have been using NIS for over a decade on our network, and it has been
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Logan McNaughton
Sent: den 28 januari 2014 14:33
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] NIS or not?
Where I work we use NIS + Kerberos (Active Directory). We have about 150
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 8:56 AM, Sorin Srbu sorin.s...@orgfarm.uu.se wrote:
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Logan McNaughton
Sent: den 28 januari 2014 14:33
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] NIS or not?
centos-boun...@centos.org schrieb am 28.01.2014 14:56:53:
Von: Sorin Srbu sorin.s...@orgfarm.uu.se
An: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Datum: 28.01.2014 14:57
Betreff: Re: [CentOS] NIS or not?
Gesendet von: centos-boun...@centos.org
-Original Message-
From:
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 3:02 AM, Sorin Srbu sorin.s...@orgfarm.uu.se wrote:
The only thing I'm trying to accomplish is a system which will allow me to
keep user accounts and passwords in one place, with one place only to
administrate. NIS seems to be able to do that.
Comments and insights are
Matt Garman matthew.gar...@gmail.com a écrit :
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 3:02 AM, Sorin Srbu sorin.s...@orgfarm.uu.se wrote:
The only thing I'm trying to accomplish is a system which will allow me to
keep user accounts and passwords in one place, with one place only to
administrate. NIS seems
2014-01-28 Laurent Wandrebeck l.wandreb...@quelquesmots.fr
Matt Garman matthew.gar...@gmail.com a écrit :
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 3:02 AM, Sorin Srbu sorin.s...@orgfarm.uu.se
wrote:
The only thing I'm trying to accomplish is a system which will allow me
to
keep user accounts and
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Darod Zyree darodzy...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-01-28 Laurent Wandrebeck l.wandreb...@quelquesmots.fr
Matt Garman matthew.gar...@gmail.com a écrit :
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 3:02 AM, Sorin Srbu sorin.s...@orgfarm.uu.se
wrote:
The only thing I'm trying to
On 28 January 2014 @12:30 zulu, Andreas Reschke wrote:
Hello,
It is possible to switch from Red Hat 7 Beta to CentOS 7 (beta or final)
when it exist? I would like to test newer software than CentOS 6.5
Have you tried fedora?
CentOS 6.5 is about equivalent to fedora 14.
If I recall correctly,
2014-01-28 Mauricio Tavares raubvo...@gmail.com
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 9:47 AM, Darod Zyree darodzy...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-01-28 Laurent Wandrebeck l.wandreb...@quelquesmots.fr
Matt Garman matthew.gar...@gmail.com a écrit :
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 3:02 AM, Sorin Srbu
Laurent Wandrebeck wrote:
Matt Garman matthew.gar...@gmail.com a écrit :
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 3:02 AM, Sorin Srbu sorin.s...@orgfarm.uu.se
wrote:
The only thing I'm trying to accomplish is a system which will allow me
to keep user accounts and passwords in one place, with one place only to
Darr247 wrote:
On 28 January 2014 @12:30 zulu, Andreas Reschke wrote:
Hello,
It is possible to switch from Red Hat 7 Beta to CentOS 7 (beta or final)
when it exist? I would like to test newer software than CentOS 6.5
Have you tried fedora?
CentOS 6.5 is about equivalent to fedora 14.
If
On 28 January 2014 @15:20 zulu, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
If you enjoy a beta o/s, and fixes pretty much daily, and often
dropping support for older hardware, and
Well, there IS that... but you have to admit, without fedora's testing
there would be no stable RH/CentOS.
centos-boun...@centos.org schrieb am 28.01.2014 16:03:18:
Von: Darr247 darr...@gmail.com
An: CentOS mailing list centos@centos.org
Datum: 28.01.2014 16:03
Betreff: Re: [CentOS] Switch from Red Hat 7 Beta to CentOS
Gesendet von: centos-boun...@centos.org
On 28 January 2014 @12:30 zulu,
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of Mauricio Tavares
Sent: den 28 januari 2014 15:20
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] NIS or not?
We do have Active Directory as well, but only for the Windows clients.
On 28 January 2014 @15:07 zulu, Reindl Harald wrote:
Fedora is a complete different topic because you need
two dist-upgrades each year sometimes with heavy changes
i am using Fedora in production for many years but i would
never recommend it to somebody where i want not have the
On Tue, 28 Jan 2014 16:31:47 +0100
Andreas Reschke wrote:
My question is, can I switch afterwards the test from Red Hat 7 Beta to
CentOS without reinstall the system?
No.
While it may (or may not) be technically possible to do that, it not a
supported method and is guaranteed to be far more
Sorin Srbu wrote:
Behalf Of Mauricio Tavares
We do have Active Directory as well, but only for the Windows clients.
But I'd rather keep them separated.
Kerberos on linux. Is that a pain or a bigger pain?
Whenever I've worked with Kerberos on Windows I've come out all sweaty
On Mon, January 27, 2014 12:58, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
On 27/01/14 12:44, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
You need 3rd party repositories. For these two you need EPEL.
Yes, I know that from Google but I need to know where and how to get it?
I first downloaded 6.5 minimal but
On 28/01/14 11:54, James B. Byrne wrote:
I first downloaded 6.5 minimal but could never get it connected to my
Ethernet/LAN!
RedHat now disables Ethernet by default in RHEL6+. You will need to run ifup
eth0 to connect after your first install.
I did not discover that in my googling, I
Does anyone here use a Samba4 setup for single sign-on for MS_Win workstations
and CentOS-6 boxes? Does anyone here use it for imap and/or smtp
authentication? We are experimenting with replacing our existing Microsoft
domain controllers with Samba4 based controllers and are contemplating
James B. Byrne wrote:
On Mon, January 27, 2014 12:58, Bob Goodwin - Zuni, Virginia, USA wrote:
On 27/01/14 12:44, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
You need 3rd party repositories. For these two you need EPEL.
Yes, I know that from Google but I need to know where and how to get it?
I first
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 9:18 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
At this late date, I'd be really, *REALLY* leery of using NIS. You say
that *most* of your traffic is local, suggesting that some of it is *not*.
And, for that matter, how good are the firewalls keeping other traffic
out?
I'd say no
On 28 January 2014 @16:54 zulu, James B. Byrne wrote:
RedHat now disables Ethernet by default in RHEL6+. You will need to run ifup
eth0 to connect after your first install.
Maybe in RHEL, but I did not observe that behavior on the numerous
installs I've done of CentOS 6.x desktop.
Matt Garman wrote:
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 9:18 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
snip
We have an in-house written set of scripts that administer relevant
configuration files, including /etc/passwd. It copies the correct
version of that file (among many others) to each host, and shell of
On 01/28/2014 10:11 AM, Patrick Begou wrote:
I've moved most of my user's PCs from OpenSuse (11.x, unmaintainend now) to
CentOS 6.4. On my old OpenSuse latex was texlive-latex-2010 and current
version on CTAN is texlive-2013.
But on CentOS 6.4 I've only the old texlive-latex-2007 and
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 11:38 AM, Matt Garman matthew.gar...@gmail.com wrote:
Here you may not realize you're distinguishing between authentication and
authorization.
Yeah, I forgot to mention that we already have Kerberos in place for
authentication. It's authorization that is currently
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Darr247 darr...@gmail.com wrote:
On 28 January 2014 @16:54 zulu, James B. Byrne wrote:
RedHat now disables Ethernet by default in RHEL6+. You will need to run ifup
eth0 to connect after your first install.
Maybe in RHEL, but I did not observe that behavior
Am 27.01.2014 um 20:50 schrieb m.r...@5-cent.us:
Adrian Sevcenco wrote:
On 01/27/2014 08:42 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 12:33 PM, Adrian Sevcenco
adrian.sevce...@cern.ch wrote:
Does that all work the same for drives 2 TB?
i have no idea .. it should .. my use cases at
Anyone know what package my user can use to read .xlsx files with python
in CentOS 6?
mark
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
Leon Fauster wrote:
Am 27.01.2014 um 20:50 schrieb m.r...@5-cent.us:
Adrian Sevcenco wrote:
On 01/27/2014 08:42 PM, Les Mikesell wrote:
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 12:33 PM, Adrian Sevcenco
adrian.sevce...@cern.ch wrote:
Does that all work the same for drives 2 TB?
i have no idea .. it should
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 5:15 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Anyone know what package my user can use to read .xlsx files with python
in CentOS 6?
I believe xlrd does.:
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/xlrd/0.9.2
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On 1/28/2014 2:24 PM, Larry Martell wrote:
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 5:15 PM,m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Anyone know what package my user can use to read .xlsx files with python
in CentOS 6?
I believe xlrd does.:
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/xlrd/0.9.2
I suspect any such package will just read
Larry Martell wrote:
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 5:15 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Anyone know what package my user can use to read .xlsx files with python
in CentOS 6?
I believe xlrd does.:
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/xlrd/0.9.2
That's 0.9.2. I just installed the latest package from the
On 1/28/2014 1:35 PM, Leon Fauster wrote:
As I noted in a previous post, it's got to be GPT, not MBR - the latter
doesn't understand 2TB, and won't.
IMHO this applies only to partitions (eg. 3TB HD with MBR 1x1TB, 1x2TB
Partition).
it also applies to 3TB drive with 3TB partition, such as
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 5:37 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Larry Martell wrote:
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 5:15 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Anyone know what package my user can use to read .xlsx files with python
in CentOS 6?
I believe xlrd does.:
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/xlrd/0.9.2
John R Pierce wrote:
On 1/28/2014 1:35 PM, Leon Fauster wrote:
As I noted in a previous post, it's got to be GPT, not MBR - the
latter
doesn't understand 2TB, and won't.
IMHO this applies only to partitions (eg. 3TB HD with MBR 1x1TB, 1x2TB
Partition).
it also applies to 3TB drive with
Christo Larsen wrote:
Running Centos 6.4
6.5 is current, nobody cares for 6.4 anymore.
Any Idea´s?
Put it into a Windows machine to switch it once. Then send it something
like
AT^U2DIAG=0
over the serial line to switch it permanently.
-Michael
On 01/28/2014 11:43 PM, Larry Martell wrote:
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 5:37 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Larry Martell wrote:
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 5:15 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Anyone know what package my user can use to read .xlsx files with python
in CentOS 6?
I believe xlrd does.:
- Original Message -
| Does anyone here use a Samba4 setup for single sign-on for MS_Win
| workstations
| and CentOS-6 boxes? Does anyone here use it for imap and/or smtp
| authentication? We are experimenting with replacing our existing
| Microsoft
| domain controllers with Samba4
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of m.r...@5-cent.us
Sent: den 28 januari 2014 17:09
To: CentOS mailing list
Subject: Re: [CentOS] NIS or not?
Hmm, yes. It would seem most everybody recomends Kerberos. Will have to
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
Behalf Of James B. Byrne
Sent: den 28 januari 2014 18:13
To: centos@centos.org
Subject: [CentOS] Single sign-on for CentOS-6
Does anyone here use a Samba4 setup for single sign-on for MS_Win
Hi friend -
what is your end goal with this effort to obtain security with your
nodes over the 'wire' -
there are some other solutions -- kerberos is now used heavily by
microsoft so that's enough to make me
run for the hills... just saying..
i've set up other solutions to be sure -- even
78 matches
Mail list logo
