Saludos amigos @listeros esperando que todos se encuentren bien,
quisiera ver si alguien me ayuda con este peque problema, tengo un
servidor centos 6.5 y vsftp, los usuarios estan enjaulados por ende
cuando se conectan solo pueden ver sus archivos en su carpeta
/home/usuario, ahora tengo la
Creo que en lugar de usar un enlace simbólico podrías montar el directorio
html dentro del home del usuario, algo como:
mount -o bind /var/www/html /home/usuario/html
Saludos,
Edwin Boza
El 17 de mayo de 2014, 12:19, César Martinez
cmarti...@servicomecuador.comescribió:
Saludos amigos
Que es lo que no funciona?
No ve el directorio? No puede escribir?
Que dice el log?
Enviado desde mi teléfono semi inteligente Sony Xperia™
Edwin Boza ebo...@gmail.com escribió:
Creo que en lugar de usar un enlace simbólico podrías montar el directorio
html dentro del home del usuario, algo
Gracias por responder probé con la opción que menciona Edwin y funciona
a la perfección, pero cuando elimino al usuario por defecto se va a
elimnar la carpeta, traté de desmontar la carpeta con unmount pero no me
funciona cual sería la forma correcta para desmontarla.
Gracias nuevamente
--
On 05/17/2014 12:19 PM, César Martinez wrote:
Saludos amigos @listeros esperando que todos se encuentren bien,
quisiera ver si alguien me ayuda con este peque problema, tengo un
servidor centos 6.5 y vsftp, los usuarios estan enjaulados por ende
cuando se conectan solo pueden ver sus
POR FAVOR NECESITO AYUDA CON SAMBA 4 ACTIVE DIRECTORY, PUEDEN AYUDARME
ENVIANDO INFORMACION DE COMO HACERLO
___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
Saludos,
Y por que no crear un usuario especifico para la administración del sitio
web y asignarle como directorio: */var/www/html*, Quedaría chorotiado a
esta ruta y seria posible ser emplearlo por varios usuarios sin comprometer
su información personal.
El 17 de mayo de 2014, 15:50, César
Saludos,
Para responder: Configuración de Squid: Opciones básicas para servidor de
intermediación
(Proxy)http://www.alcancelibre.org/staticpages/index.php/19-0-como-squid-general
.
Para Culturizar:*Cómo hacer preguntas* de manera
Gracias a todos en realidad con lo que menciono Edwin me funcionó
perfecto, ahora debo ver la forma de desmontar la carpeta cuando ese
usuario ya no deba usar el path del web, tomaré en cuenta la opción que
me menciona Epe que igual me parece genial gracias a todos nuevamente
por la ayuda.
--
New compilation of firefox (v. 29.0)
build with
1) devtools-2 (http://people.centos.org/tru/devtools-2/readme)
2) python27 (from SCL) (
http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6.5/i386/external_products/softwarecollections/
)
3) icu-last-50.1.2 from remi
This idea is intruiging...
Suppose one has a set of file servers called A, B, C, D, and so forth, all
running CentOS 6.5 64-bit, all being interconnected with 10GbE. These file
servers can be divided into identical pairs, so A is the same
configuration (diks, processors, etc) as B, C the same
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 10:30 AM, Steve Thompson s...@vgersoft.com wrote:
This idea is intruiging...
Suppose one has a set of file servers called A, B, C, D, and so forth, all
running CentOS 6.5 64-bit, all being interconnected with 10GbE. These file
servers can be divided into identical
On Sat, 17 May 2014, SilverTip257 wrote:
Sounds like you might be reinventing the wheel.
I think not; see below.
DRBD [0] does what it sounds like you're trying to accomplish [1].
Especially since you have two nodes A+B or C+D that are RAIDed over iSCSI.
It's rather painless to set up
How about glusterfs?
17.5.2014 20.01 kirjoitti Steve Thompson s...@vgersoft.com:
On Sat, 17 May 2014, SilverTip257 wrote:
Sounds like you might be reinventing the wheel.
I think not; see below.
DRBD [0] does what it sounds like you're trying to accomplish [1].
Especially since you have
On Sat, 17 May 2014, Eero Volotinen wrote:
How about glusterfs?
I have tried glusterfs; the large file performance is reasonable, but
the small file performance is too low to be useable.
Steve
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
New compilation of firefox (v. 29.0)
build with
1) devtools-2 (http://people.centos.org/tru/devtools-2/readme)
2) python27 (from SCL)
(http://ftp.scientificlinux.org/linux/scientific/6.5/i386/external_products/softwarecollections/)
3) icu-last-50.1.2 from remi
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 1:00 PM, Steve Thompson s...@vgersoft.com wrote:
On Sat, 17 May 2014, SilverTip257 wrote:
Sounds like you might be reinventing the wheel.
I think not; see below.
DRBD [0] does what it sounds like you're trying to accomplish [1].
Especially since you have two
Top posting ALWAYS makes sense when the poster has included nearly 200
lines of redundant and time-wasting waffle from previous posters.
Scrolling down - all the way down - to read a few words is time wasting
and irritating.
Until posters ruthlessly exclude all redundant material, top posting
On 05/16/2014 06:40 PM, Original Woodchuck wrote:
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 03:27:23PM -0400, Steve Clark wrote:
Could someone explain again why we are not suppose to top post?
It's polite and shows you are a gentleman. It's in the same category of
consideration for others as keeping to your
Am 17.05.2014 23:22, schrieb Always Learning:
Top posting ALWAYS makes sense when the poster has included nearly 200
lines of redundant and time-wasting waffle from previous posters.
False argument.
Top-posting is nearly always combined with fully quoting the previous
mailing. That is
On 2014-05-17, Always Learning cen...@u62.u22.net wrote:
Top posting ALWAYS makes sense when the poster has included nearly 200
lines of redundant and time-wasting waffle from previous posters.
No, it doesn't. Just trim the excess.
--keith
--
kkel...@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us
On May 17, 2014, at 3:29 PM, Alexander Dalloz ad+li...@uni-x.org wrote:
Am 17.05.2014 23:22, schrieb Always Learning:
Top posting ALWAYS makes sense when the poster has included nearly 200
lines of redundant and time-wasting waffle from previous posters.
False argument.
In reading
On Sat, May 17, 2014 at 03:36:16PM -0700, Russell Miller wrote:
One of the adages that drove the creation of the Internet is thus: Be
conservative in what you
send, and liberal in what you accept.
... says the person sending 100 character width emails :-)
--
rgds
Stephen
On 17.05.2014 19:00, Steve Thompson wrote:
On Sat, 17 May 2014, SilverTip257 wrote:
Sounds like you might be reinventing the wheel.
I think not; see below.
DRBD [0] does what it sounds like you're trying to accomplish [1].
Especially since you have two nodes A+B or C+D that are RAIDed
On Sun, 18 May 2014, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
Why specifically do you care about that? Both with your solution and the
DRBD one the clients only see a NFS endpoint so what does it matter that
this endpoint is placed on one of the storage systems?
The whole point of the exercise is to end
On Sun, 2014-05-18 at 00:29 +0200, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
Am 17.05.2014 23:22, schrieb Always Learning:
Top posting ALWAYS makes sense when the poster has included nearly 200
lines of redundant and time-wasting waffle from previous posters.
False argument.
I am against TOP POSTING.
On Sat, 2014-05-17 at 15:33 -0700, Keith Keller wrote:
On 2014-05-17, Always Learning cen...@u62.u22.net wrote:
Top posting ALWAYS makes sense when the poster has included nearly 200
lines of redundant and time-wasting waffle from previous posters.
No, it doesn't. Just trim the
Have you looked at parallel filesystems such as Lustre and fhgfs?
On 18 May 2014 01:14, Steve Thompson s...@vgersoft.com wrote:
On Sun, 18 May 2014, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
Why specifically do you care about that? Both with your solution and the
DRBD one the clients only see a NFS
Quoting Alexander Dalloz ad+li...@uni-x.org:
Am 17.05.2014 23:22, schrieb Always Learning:
Top posting ALWAYS makes sense when the poster has included nearly 200
lines of redundant and time-wasting waffle from previous posters.
False argument.
+1
29 matches
Mail list logo
