On Jun 12, 2014, at 11:27 AM, Warren Young war...@etr-usa.com wrote:
[*] The absolute XFS filesystem size limit is about 8 million terabytes,
which requires about 500 cubic meters of the densest HDDs available today.
I’ve been wondering what 500 TB looks like, so I worked it out. It requires
Hi list,
I'm new to clustering, and I'm running a little cluster@home. The
cluster is running on a workstation hardware and running on Centos 6.5.
Component: corosync, pacemaker, drbd and pcs. All works good.
This cluster has different resources:
1) drbd0
2) drbd1
3) drbd0_fs
4) drbd1_fs
5)
On 15/06/14 08:54 AM, Alessandro Baggi wrote:
Another question is about fencing. I've ridden that a cluster must have
fencing to be considered as such. On CentOS 6.5 there is stonith that
concerns node level fencing. For this type of fencing I must have ilo,
ilom, drac, and other. It's
Reinstall the package versions which are already registered in your
rpm_db and not the old ones: elfutils*-0.137-3.el5. All at the same time.
Reinstall the package versions which are already registered in your
rpm_db and not the old ones: elfutils*-0.137-3.el5. All at the same time.
Hi
Am 15.06.2014 05:43, schrieb Tim Dunphy:
First of all, please stop this nasty top-posting. There is no need on a
mailinglist to repeat content of the previous mailing which you do not
directly reply to. You already select the part you want to respond to,
that's good. So just strip off the
On 06/15/2014 04:23 AM, Warren Young wrote:
On Jun 12, 2014, at 11:27 AM, Warren Young war...@etr-usa.com wrote:
[*] The absolute XFS filesystem size limit is about 8 million terabytes,
which requires about 500 cubic meters of the densest HDDs available today.
I’ve been wondering what 500
On 6/15/2014 1:23 AM, Warren Young wrote:
I assume we’re climbing out of the doubling doldrums brought on by the Taiwan
floods by now.
The floods that knocked out WDC were in Thailand, not Taiwan.
and I do believe the spinning media industry is running into physics and
much further progress
On 06/15/2014 09:46 AM, Tim Dunphy wrote:
Hi thanks for your input. I should've realized the versions were different.
But when I try that suggestion you made, this is the result I get:
[root@host1 i386]# rpm -Uvh elfutils-libs-0.137-3.el5.i386.rpm
elfutils-0.137-3.el5.i386.rpm
You are
... and I kind of feel dumb asking this, but couldn't you just restore
whatever was deleted from a backup?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Sun, Jun 15, 2014 at 1:46 PM, Gordon Messmer gordon.mess...@gmail.com
wrote:
... and I kind of feel dumb asking this, but couldn't you just restore
whatever was deleted from a backup?
Or since it was a development machine, just rescue what data you really
need and re-image the machine from
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=541130
The bug I see is using thunderbird 24.6 which is the latest update on
centos 6.5.
The issue is that every time I open an email with some + somewhere in
the source (which I didn't traced yet) I get annoying message:
An error occurred while
11 matches
Mail list logo
