-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
We would like to announce the general availability of CentOS Linux 7
for 64 bit x86 compatible machines.
This is the first release for CentOS-7 and is version marked as 7.0-1406
First, please read through the release notes at :
The following SRPM packages were built and included as Zero Day Updates
as part of the CentOS-7.0.1406 Release in the updates directory.
To get all updates, use this command after installing CentOS 7:
yum upgrade
Updates:
NetworkManager-0.9.9.1-22.git20140326.4dba720.el7_0.src.rpm
On Thu, Jul 03, 2014 at 11:42:25AM -0400, Karl Johnson wrote:
Thanks for the reply George. Is there any other easy way in the domU to
know if it's a pv or hvm with Xen 4.2+ and the right hardware?
Did you try dmidecode?
-- Pasi
Karl
I've got a first cut of the rebase here:
git://github.com/gwd/sig-virt-xen out/update-4.4.1-rc1-ee81dda-RFC
To build it, you'll need to download the polarssl tarball:
http://xenbits.xen.org/xen-extfiles/polarssl-1.1.4-gpl.tgz
And you'll need a tarball based on (unfortunately) a private tree,
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 5:21 PM, George Dunlap dunl...@umich.edu wrote:
I've got a first cut of the rebase here:
git://github.com/gwd/sig-virt-xen out/update-4.4.1-rc1-ee81dda-RFC
To build it, you'll need to download the polarssl tarball:
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 5:21 PM, George Dunlap dunl...@umich.edu wrote:
I've got a first cut of the rebase here:
git://github.com/gwd/sig-virt-xen out/update-4.4.1-rc1-ee81dda-RFC
To build it, you'll need to download the polarssl tarball:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
bueno, ya desde anoche estaban sincronizando los mirrors pero nos
pidieron paciencia hasta que sacaran el anuncio oficial.
Y ya es oficial!
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2014-July/020393.html
CentOS-7 ha sido liberado.. en estos
Que gran noticia!
veo que ya no es 7.0 sino que es 7.0.1406, como lo aran ahora, que irán
actualizando más que antes o se regulara para que sea simplemente
7.1 7.2. es que yo apunto el fichero repo a 6.x y ahora en la
7.x no se como lo tendré que hacer... es para probar las
El 7 de julio de 2014, 14:12, Aland Laines aland.lai...@gmail.com
escribió:
Una buena noticia, llegando a casa hago mi prueba.
¿Sabes si habria problemas instalandolo en una particion GPT?
Un abrazo,
No debería, esos problemas los tenia el instalador de Fedora 18 y REHL se
basa es Fedora
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/07/2014 02:46 PM, Alex ( Servtelecom ) wrote:
Que gran noticia!
veo que ya no es 7.0 sino que es 7.0.1406, como lo aran ahora, que
irán actualizando más que antes o se regulara para que sea
simplemente 7.1 7.2. es que yo apunto el
Lo que no veo es versión de 32bits... o sea el directorio i386 no está
disponible o será el Repo del que estoy bajando.
Saludos,
David
2014-07-07 16:19 GMT-04:00 Ernesto Pérez Estévez ernesto.pe...@cedia.org.ec:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/07/2014 02:46 PM, Alex (
El 7 de julio de 2014, 14:55, David González Romero dgrved...@gmail.com
escribió:
Lo que no veo es versión de 32bits... o sea el directorio i386 no está
disponible o será el Repo del que estoy bajando.
RHEL no saco versión de 32 bits del OS :(, CentOS tampoco la tendrá :(
Hola, alguna diferencia notable entre la 6.5 y 7, es recomendable bajar e
instalar la 7 ó actualizar la 6.5 ? hace dos semanas que levante 6.5, no
pensé que saldría ya la 7.
-Mensaje original-
De: centos-es-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-es-boun...@centos.org] En
nombre de William
Lo cual me parece excelente.
Muy caro mantener versiones de 32 bits en pleno 2014.
2014-07-07 14:56 GMT-06:00 William Moreno williamjmore...@gmail.com:
El 7 de julio de 2014, 14:55, David González Romero dgrved...@gmail.com
escribió:
Lo que no veo es versión de 32bits... o sea el
Pues hay mucha gente que hace sus prácticas con el de 32 bits (me incluyo)
además de muchos estudiantes, así que no reniegue de 32 bits, es necesario.
-Mensaje original-
De: centos-es-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-es-boun...@centos.org] En
nombre de Diego Chacón
Enviado el: lunes, 07
Me sorprende que hoy alguien use 32 bits ... cuando ya hasta los celulares
estan migrando a 64.
Y no es decisión mía, por algo lo hizo RH.
2014-07-07 15:19 GMT-06:00 Nilton Morales morales.nil...@gmail.com:
Pues hay mucha gente que hace sus prácticas con el de 32 bits (me incluyo)
además de
El 7 de julio de 2014, 15:19, Nilton Morales morales.nil...@gmail.com
escribió:
Pues hay mucha gente que hace sus prácticas con el de 32 bits (me incluyo)
además de muchos estudiantes, así que no reniegue de 32 bits, es necesario.
De acuerdo, pero no fue una decisión que la tomara la gente de
Pues entiendo muy bien que HT decidió así, pero no es correcto, hay muchos
estudiantes que tiene un pc vieja de 32 y allí se practica, no se ensalcen o
enojen...pero que HT debe entender ese punto, la idea es masificar Centos,
pero teniendo en cuenta a esos estudiantes, lástima que no haya 32
2014-07-07 16:32 GMT-05:00 Nilton Morales morales.nil...@gmail.com:
Pues entiendo muy bien que HT decidió así, pero no es correcto, hay muchos
estudiantes que tiene un pc vieja de 32 y allí se practica, no se ensalcen o
enojen...pero que HT debe entender ese punto, la idea es masificar Centos,
2014-07-07 16:41 GMT-05:00 Erick Ocrospoma zipper1...@gmail.com:
2014-07-07 16:32 GMT-05:00 Nilton Morales morales.nil...@gmail.com:
Pues entiendo muy bien que HT decidió así, pero no es correcto, hay
muchos
estudiantes que tiene un pc vieja de 32 y allí se practica, no se
ensalcen o
Deje de llorar por una opinión y verlo todo como un negocio, tengo claro lo
de RHEL, no te pongas a lo peleonero, la base de un buen negocio es el buen
funcionamiento, si los estudiante no saben Centos o cualquier otra
distribución de Linux y lo hacen mal ( levantar sus servicios) pues la gente
o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/07/2014 03:55 PM, David González Romero wrote:
Lo que no veo es versión de 32bits... o sea el directorio i386 no
está disponible o será el Repo del que estoy bajando.
el upstream sacó solamente de 64bits.. CentOS dice que intentará hacer
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/07/2014 04:08 PM, Nilton Morales wrote:
Hola, alguna diferencia notable entre la 6.5 y 7, es recomendable
bajar e instalar la 7 ó actualizar la 6.5 ? hace dos semanas que
levante 6.5, no pensé que saldría ya la 7.
la verdad: no.. centos-6
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/07/2014 04:51 PM, Nilton Morales wrote:
Deje de llorar por una opinión y verlo todo como un negocio, tengo
claro lo de RHEL, no te pongas a lo peleonero, la base de un buen
negocio es el buen funcionamiento, si los estudiante no saben
Centos
seguimos usando 32bits , sin embargo simpre hay un punto de quiebre para esto ,
asi que hoy se da con centos 7 .
Feliz instalacion y a probarlo.
saludos
WRC
___
CentOS-es mailing list
Pensaba dedicarme este fin de semana a hacer una instalacion limpia de
Centos 7 en mi Laptop pero he caido en la cuenta que en RPM Fusion no se
han puesto al día con EL7 :( y yo no quiero tener una instalaciòn sin
soporte multimedia.
Los repos de Epel si tienen un repositorio para EL7.
Pues en
Ya hay gente que estan trabajando en compilar para i686, quizas puedas
contribuir en el esfuerzo
Cu
Roger
Sent from Yahoo! Mail on Android
___
CentOS-es mailing list
CentOS-es@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-es
On 2014-07-04 23:58, Michael Hennebry wrote:
Is there a way to get firefox to not print all that
useful data at the top and bottom of a web page.
For me, that oftem makes one web page into two printed pages.
There is rarely a good place for the split.
My google-fu got me this:
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic cen...@plnet.rs wrote:
Whatever we do, we need the ability to create a point-in-time history.
We commonly use our archival dumps for audit, testing, and debugging
purposes. I don't think PG + WAL provides this type of capability. So at
On 07/07/2014 02:35 PM, SilverTip257 wrote:
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic cen...@plnet.rs wrote:
Whatever we do, we need the ability to create a point-in-time history.
We commonly use our archival dumps for audit, testing, and debugging
purposes. I don't think PG + WAL
And, no mourn. Took three-quarters of an hour, which someone
inconvenienced Beecher, but the server I came in so early to reboot did
it's thing (think DOS or Windows chkdisk, except with a *lot* more disk),
and I got the memory that Dell shipped me last Thurs into the other
server, and
Sorry folks, for some reason that was misaddressed. Please ignore
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 07/07/2014 02:56 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 07.07.2014 14:53, schrieb Ljubomir Ljubojevic:
Also, check needs to be made if xz supports multitrheading like pk7zip
enter xz --help would have answered this
--threads=NUM
use at most NUM threads; the default is 1;
set to 0 to use the
On Fri, July 4, 2014 17:15, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
On 07/04/2014 07:43 PM, James B. Byrne wrote:
I downloaded the Live DVD for CentOS-6.5 and burned a DVD-R using a
CentOS-6.5
desktop. To test the validity of the new DVD I then rebooted the same
desktop
using the same Live DVD. No
Hi,
Friday, July 4, 2014, 7:43:03 PM, you wrote:
Kernel panic - Not syncing - Attempting to kill init!
Pid: 1, comm: init Not tainted 2.6.32-431.el6.x86_64 # 1
related problem here, although I have this kernel panic after updating
to the most recent kernel. The machine starts fine using the
Friday, July 4, 2014, 6:11:43 PM, Michael wrote:
On Fri, 4 Jul 2014, Frank Cox wrote:
On Fri, 4 Jul 2014 16:58:24 -0500 (CDT)
Michael Hennebry wrote:
Is there a way to get firefox to not print all that
useful data at the top and bottom of a web page.
I usually highlight what I want,
On 07/06/2014 02:55 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote:
The last couple time I tried to hibernate, I got an error message:
PM: Not enough free swap
I find that hard to believe:
[hennebry@localhost doc]$ free -m
total used free sharedbuffers cached
Mem:
Am 07.07.2014 um 16:42 schrieb Diana Calder dcal...@essexcountylibrary.ca:
Friday, July 4, 2014, 6:11:43 PM, Michael wrote:
On Fri, 4 Jul 2014, Frank Cox wrote:
On Fri, 4 Jul 2014 16:58:24 -0500 (CDT)
Michael Hennebry wrote:
I usually highlight what I want, paste it into libreoffice
On 07/05/2014 02:46 AM, wwp wrote:
Hello Michael,
On Fri, 4 Jul 2014 16:55:51 -0500 (CDT) Michael Hennebry
henne...@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu wrote:
On Fri, 4 Jul 2014, wwp wrote:
On Fri, 4 Jul 2014 11:25:33 -0500 (CDT) Michael Hennebry
henne...@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu wrote:
On Thu, 3 Jul
On 07/06/2014 11:09 PM, Alexandru Cardaniuc wrote:
John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com writes:
On 7/1/2014 9:40 PM, James A. Peltier wrote:
inode64 is a mount time option and it is a one way option as well.
Once you mounted a filesystem with inode64 you can't go back. It has
to do with inode
- Original Message -
| John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com writes:
|
| On 7/1/2014 9:40 PM, James A. Peltier wrote:
| inode64 is a mount time option and it is a one way option as well.
| Once you mounted a filesystem with inode64 you can't go back. It
| has
| to do with inode
On 07.Jul.2014, at 06:51, John R Pierce pie...@hogranch.com wrote:
On 7/6/2014 9:09 PM, Alexandru Cardaniuc wrote:
Yes, I run XFS on ~1T (900G) partition, so I don't think I need to
consider inode64 for that. What is the official situation with XFS and
CentOS 5? It was in technology preview
Thanking everyone most sincerely for giving us C 7.0.
London, West (near LHR) Dojo ?
--
Regards,
Paul.
England, EU.
Centos, Exim, Apache, Libre Office.
Linux is the future. Micro$oft is the past.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
Always Learning wrote:
Thanking everyone most sincerely for giving us C 7.0.
I missed that notice over the weekend. 1++
And thanks to all for no huge thread of WHEN'S IT GOING TO BE RELEASED!!! g
mark
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On 07 July 2014 @19:26 zulu, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote:
Always Learning wrote:
Thanking everyone most sincerely for giving us C 7.0.
I missed that notice over the weekend. 1++
Well, not only did I miss it over the weekend, but so did everyone else.
/i.e./ A copy of the starter message with
2014-07-07 21:42 GMT+02:00 Darr247 darr...@gmail.com:
On 07 July 2014 @19:26 zulu, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote:
Always Learning wrote:
Thanking everyone most sincerely for giving us C 7.0.
I missed that notice over the weekend. 1++
Well, not only did I miss it over the weekend, but so
On 07 July 2014 @19:44 zulu, Jitse Klomp wrote:
It's on centos-announce and seven.centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2014-July/020393.html
Thanks for the clarification. Torrents running; currently only 3 peers. :(
___
On 07/07/2014 02:44 PM, Jitse Klomp wrote:
2014-07-07 21:42 GMT+02:00 Darr247 darr...@gmail.com:
On 07 July 2014 @19:26 zulu, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote:
Always Learning wrote:
Thanking everyone most sincerely for giving us C 7.0.
I missed that notice over the weekend. 1++
Well, not only
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 09:44:24PM +0200, Jitse Klomp wrote:
2014-07-07 21:42 GMT+02:00 Darr247 darr...@gmail.com:
On 07 July 2014 @19:26 zulu, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote:
Always Learning wrote:
Thanking everyone most sincerely for giving us C 7.0.
I missed that notice over the
yay...
Congratulations to CentOS development team and other user who use CentOS on
their desktop, servers and etc...
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 12:14 AM, Jitse Klomp jitsekl...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-07-07 21:42 GMT+02:00 Darr247 darr...@gmail.com:
On 07 July 2014 @19:26 zulu, m.roth at
On 07 July 2014 @19:50 zulu, Johnny Hughes wrote:
Good job, everyone involved.
Icon cursor.
Except for the link in
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos-announce/2014-July/020393.html
to the Live GNOME torrent (it points to the Live KDE torrent, instead).
The correct link should be
On 07/07/2014 03:50 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
Yes, CentOS 7 is released ... Good job, everyone involved. Thanks,
Johnny Hughes
Great to see. Now how long to wait for C7-i386 and perhaps more
importantly C7-arm (for the v7s)?
:)
No really. I DO have some i386 platforms and I DO have this
2014-07-07 22:19 GMT+02:00 Max Pyziur p...@brama.com:
On Mon, 7 Jul 2014, Always Learning wrote:
Thanking everyone most sincerely for giving us C 7.0.
London, West (near LHR) Dojo ?
From what release of Fedora is CentOS7 derived.
As I understand,
C5 == FC6,
C6 == FC14,
C7 ==
It's derived from Redhat 7,.. CentOS is always derived from Redhat
Enterprise Linux. Fedora is normally a preview of the next upcoming RHEL
release.
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 8:19 PM, Max Pyziur p...@brama.com wrote:
On Mon, 7 Jul 2014, Always Learning wrote:
Thanking everyone most
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 07/07/2014 03:50 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
Yes, CentOS 7 is released ... Good job, everyone involved. Thanks,
Johnny Hughes
Great to see. Now how long to wait for C7-i386 and perhaps more
importantly C7-arm (for the v7s)?
:)
No really. I DO have some i386
You're right.. RHEL includes things that get pushed and tested in Fedora,
but I guess I looked at the question a different way. That's all.
On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 8:35 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
wrote:
Am 07.07.2014 22:28, schrieb Jeremy Hoel:
It's derived from Redhat 7,..
On 07/07/2014 04:28 PM, Jeremy Hoel wrote:
It's derived from Redhat 7,.. CentOS is always derived from Redhat
Enterprise Linux. Fedora is normally a preview of the next upcoming RHEL
release.
Until recently, RHEL really lagged behind Fedora. With RHEL 7, they
seemed to have taken on
hey all,
I am serving up a couple of sites using apache with varnish sitting in
front of it.
When I check the headers for the site, this is what I'm seeing:
[root@ops:~] #curl -I http://ref.mydomain.com/
HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Server: Apache/2.2.15 (CentOS)
X-Powered-By: PHP/5.6.0-dev
Set-Cookie:
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 07/07/2014 04:28 PM, Jeremy Hoel wrote:
It's derived from Redhat 7,.. CentOS is always derived from Redhat
Enterprise Linux. Fedora is normally a preview of the next upcoming
RHEL release.
Until recently, RHEL really lagged behind Fedora. With RHEL 7, they
On Mon, 7 Jul 2014, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 07.07.2014 22:19, schrieb Max Pyziur:
On Mon, 7 Jul 2014, Always Learning wrote:
Thanking everyone most sincerely for giving us C 7.0.
London, West (near LHR) Dojo ?
From what release of Fedora is CentOS7 derived.
As I understand,
C5 ==
On 07.Jul.2014, at 14:53, Ljubomir Ljubojevic cen...@plnet.rs wrote:
On 07/07/2014 02:35 PM, SilverTip257 wrote:
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic cen...@plnet.rs wrote:
I am inclined to use xz utils as opposed to 7zip since 7zip comes from a
3rd party repo.
check
On 07/07/2014 04:51 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 07/07/2014 04:28 PM, Jeremy Hoel wrote:
It's derived from Redhat 7,.. CentOS is always derived from Redhat
Enterprise Linux. Fedora is normally a preview of the next upcoming
RHEL release.
Until recently, RHEL
On 07/07/2014 04:53 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 07.07.2014 22:48, schrieb Robert Moskowitz:
On 07/07/2014 04:28 PM, Jeremy Hoel wrote:
It's derived from Redhat 7,.. CentOS is always derived from Redhat
Enterprise Linux. Fedora is normally a preview of the next upcoming RHEL
release.
Until
On Mon, 7 Jul 2014, Elias Persson wrote:
On 2014-07-04 23:58, Michael Hennebry wrote:
Is there a way to get firefox to not print all that
useful data at the top and bottom of a web page.
For me, that oftem makes one web page into two printed pages.
There is rarely a good place for the split.
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 07/07/2014 04:53 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 07.07.2014 22:48, schrieb Robert Moskowitz:
On 07/07/2014 04:28 PM, Jeremy Hoel wrote:
It's derived from Redhat 7,.. CentOS is always derived from Redhat
Enterprise Linux. Fedora is normally a preview of the next
On boot, my computer has been beeping at me and
showing the BIOS screen for almost two minutes.
During that time, it does not respond to tab or delete.
Where do I find the beep codes for a
MSI K9N SLI Platinum Series motherboard?
My google-fu has failed me.
--
Michael
On 07/07/2014 05:04 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 07/07/2014 04:53 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 07.07.2014 22:48, schrieb Robert Moskowitz:
On 07/07/2014 04:28 PM, Jeremy Hoel wrote:
It's derived from Redhat 7,.. CentOS is always derived from Redhat
Enterprise Linux.
Michael Hennebry wrote:
On boot, my computer has been beeping at me and
showing the BIOS screen for almost two minutes.
During that time, it does not respond to tab or delete.
Where do I find the beep codes for a
MSI K9N SLI Platinum Series motherboard?
My google-fu has failed me.
google
--On Monday, July 07, 2014 04:38:34 PM -0400 m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I'm waiting for 7.0.1, with all the upstream fixes that were missed.
mark don't trust x.0 of anything
Meh.
Normally, when putting things into production, I would agree with you.
However, as I recently commented to a
On 07/07/2014 10:51 PM, Max Pyziur wrote:
On Mon, 7 Jul 2014, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 07.07.2014 22:19, schrieb Max Pyziur:
On Mon, 7 Jul 2014, Always Learning wrote:
Thanking everyone most sincerely for giving us C 7.0.
London, West (near LHR) Dojo ?
From what release of Fedora is
On 07/07/2014 10:54 PM, Markus Falb wrote:
On 07.Jul.2014, at 14:53, Ljubomir Ljubojevic cen...@plnet.rs wrote:
On 07/07/2014 02:35 PM, SilverTip257 wrote:
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic cen...@plnet.rs wrote:
I am inclined to use xz utils as opposed to 7zip since
On 07/07/2014 05:54 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
On 07/07/2014 10:51 PM, Max Pyziur wrote:
On Mon, 7 Jul 2014, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 07.07.2014 22:19, schrieb Max Pyziur:
On Mon, 7 Jul 2014, Always Learning wrote:
Thanking everyone most sincerely for giving us C 7.0.
London, West
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 11:56:08PM +0200, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
On 07/07/2014 10:54 PM, Markus Falb wrote:
On 07.Jul.2014, at 14:53, Ljubomir Ljubojevic cen...@plnet.rs wrote:
On 07/07/2014 02:35 PM, SilverTip257 wrote:
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 4:50 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic
On 07/08/2014 12:48 AM, Fred Smith wrote:
On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 11:56:08PM +0200, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote:
On 07/07/2014 10:54 PM, Markus Falb wrote:
On 07.Jul.2014, at 14:53, Ljubomir Ljubojevic cen...@plnet.rs wrote:
On 07/07/2014 02:35 PM, SilverTip257 wrote:
On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at
On Mon, 7 Jul 2014, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Michael Hennebry wrote:
On boot, my computer has been beeping at me and
showing the BIOS screen for almost two minutes.
During that time, it does not respond to tab or delete.
Where do I find the beep codes for a
MSI K9N SLI Platinum Series
Reading about systemd, it seems it is not well liked and reminiscent of
Microsoft's put everything into the Windows Registry (Win 95 onwards).
Is there a practical alternative to omnipresent, or invasive, systemd ?
--
Regards,
Paul.
England, EU.
Centos, Exim, Apache, Libre Office.
Linux
On Jul 7, 2014 5:40 PM, Michael Hennebry henne...@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu
wrote:
On Mon, 7 Jul 2014, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Michael Hennebry wrote:
On boot, my computer has been beeping at me and
showing the BIOS screen for almost two minutes.
During that time, it does not respond to tab
On 07/08/2014 02:00 AM, Pete Travis wrote:
On Jul 7, 2014 5:40 PM, Michael Hennebry henne...@web.cs.ndsu.nodak.edu
wrote:
On Mon, 7 Jul 2014, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Michael Hennebry wrote:
On boot, my computer has been beeping at me and
showing the BIOS screen for almost two minutes.
On 07/07/2014 07:47 PM, Always Learning wrote:
Reading about systemd, it seems it is not well liked and reminiscent of
Microsoft's put everything into the Windows Registry (Win 95 onwards).
Is there a practical alternative to omnipresent, or invasive, systemd ?
So you are following the
On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 12:47:38AM +0100, Always Learning wrote:
Reading about systemd, it seems it is not well liked and reminiscent of
Microsoft's put everything into the Windows Registry (Win 95 onwards).
Is there a practical alternative to omnipresent, or invasive, systemd
To the tune
On Mon, 2014-07-07 at 20:46 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 07/07/2014 07:47 PM, Always Learning wrote:
Reading about systemd, it seems it is not well liked and reminiscent of
Microsoft's put everything into the Windows Registry (Win 95 onwards).
Is there a practical alternative to
On Mon, 2014-07-07 at 20:59 -0400, Scott Robbins wrote:
On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 12:47:38AM +0100, Always Learning wrote:
Reading about systemd, it seems it is not well liked and reminiscent of
Microsoft's put everything into the Windows Registry (Win 95 onwards).
Is there a practical
On 07/07/2014 08:46 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote:
On 07/07/2014 07:47 PM, Always Learning wrote:
Reading about systemd, it seems it is not well liked and reminiscent of
Microsoft's put everything into the Windows Registry (Win 95 onwards).
Is there a practical alternative to omnipresent, or
On Tue, Jul 08, 2014 at 02:26:59AM +0100, Always Learning wrote:
On Mon, 2014-07-07 at 20:59 -0400, Scott Robbins wrote:
To the tune of YMCA
So young man, if you want to stick
To something, that more resembles Unix
And young man, if you want to sing
Goodbye to Poettering,
On Mon, 2014-07-07 at 21:34 -0400, Scott Robbins wrote:
No systemd in FreeBSD. It isn't Linux, and like any O/S, has its own
oddities.
It would take more adjustment, IMHO, to go from CentOS 6.x to FreeBSD than
to go to 7.x. (I'm saying this as someone who uses both FreeBSD and
Fedora
On Jul 7, 2014, at 6:34 PM, Scott Robbins scot...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
No systemd in FreeBSD. It isn't Linux, and like any O/S, has its own
oddities.
It would take more adjustment, IMHO, to go from CentOS 6.x to FreeBSD than
to go to 7.x. (I'm saying this as someone who uses both FreeBSD
86 matches
Mail list logo
