1 4 499492 150392 4496 476338000 192 552 1227 1094 2 0 75 24 0
0 5 499492 150656 4500 476352800 0 160 465 263 1 0 68 30 0
0 5 499492 150468 4500 476353200 0 0 177 93 1 0 69 31 0
1 5 499492 151020 4500 476354000 0
On 10/8/2014 8:48 PM, Mingfei Hua wrote:
1 4 499492 150392 4496 476338000 192 552 1227 1094 2 0 75 24 0
...
1 2 499520 135936 4428 477085200 27144 120 2428 2449 9 1 85 6 0
2 1 499520 148336 4428 476166800 19072 192 2281 2420 8 1 83 8 0
0 2
Hi John,
The first two number of vmstat is running process and blocked process, the sum
of the two number should equal to system load. But it's inconsistent in this
case.
Regards,
Mingfei
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of
Who are you and who is John you braive behind computer tell me your name and
everything will be taking care of what scared
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 10/02/2014 06:57 AM, Frank Cox wrote:
I went to Staples and tried booting it on every model of laptop that
they had in the store. They all come with Windows 8 installed, and
for the edification of anyone who doesn't know this (I didn't until
today) you have to conduct a real song and dance
On 10/07/2014 02:27 PM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
Thanks for your response.
But have you actually done this?
If so, could you be a bit more explicit, please?
In DD-WRT, there is a menu scheduled reboot in the Administration tab.
If this isn't working (e.g. in Client Mode), you have to setup a
Hello;
I've run into a rather interesting problem on CentOS 7. According to
sysconfig.txt (part of the initscripts documentation), I can set the
following variables in ifcfg-ethX:
DHCPV6C=yes
DHCPV6C_OPTIONS=-S
I've done so, but nothing is populated to /etc/resolv.conf and so DNS does
not
Thats is not me dont listen
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 10/8/2014 9:00 PM, Mingfei Hua wrote:
The first two number of vmstat is running process and blocked process, the sum
of the two number should equal to system load. But it's inconsistent in this
case.
linux load average counts processes that are doing disk IO or network IO
as being
On 09/10/14 12:02 AM, Victoria Svitovenko wrote:
Who are you and who is John you braive behind computer tell me your name and
everything will be taking care of what scared
Mods?
--
Digimer
Papers and Projects: https://alteeve.ca/w/
What if the cure for cancer is trapped in the mind of a
On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 07:16:16PM -0700, Keith Keller wrote:
I can't speak for John, but presumably you were singled out for making
your complaint in a completely ridiculous and inappropriate way.
Please take this pissing contest off-list if you would all be so kind.
Just wait ho you just wait i care less what you did its all long time
investigating and one thing left what is the name of that rat. Now i will start
real hunt time to get rid of cockroaches
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
___
CentOS mailing list
Opps i dont have ssc yet who was that over on the photos of mine i guess its
Federal case now
Stoll my photos my family friends magazine's property photos disiers movies
directors i dont even need to hunt you they will get you first and fester
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
The man interpretation of vmstat running and blocked process:
Procs
r: The number of processes waiting for run time.
b: The number of processes in uninterruptible sleep.
The blocked here is not process waiting user input, it should include process
waiting IO and network. It
On 10/8/2014 10:01 PM, Mingfei Hua wrote:
The man interpretation of vmstat running and blocked process:
Procs
r: The number of processes waiting for run time.
b: The number of processes in uninterruptible sleep.
The blocked here is not process waiting user input, it should
Hi John,
Followed line is quoted from “man vmstat”, it means r+b=running process +
uninterruptible sleep process. So, what’s the definition of system load,
doesn’t it include running process and process in uninterruptible sleep. Which
part is wrong? Please explicitly denote.
Procs
On 10/8/2014 10:29 PM, Mingfei Hua wrote:
Hi John,
Followed line is quoted from “man vmstat”, it means r+b=running process +
uninterruptible sleep process. So, what’s the definition of system load,
doesn’t it include running process and process in uninterruptible sleep. Which
part is wrong?
101 - 117 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
