On Sat, 2015-01-10 at 13:03 -0800, John R Pierce wrote:
On 1/10/2015 12:56 PM, F. Mendez wrote:
We need that same with IPv6 since we have a /48 and we need to have
all IPv6s available for usage.
Do you realize that a ipv6 /48 is a septillion IP addresses? thats
On 01/11/2015 01:16 AM, Jason S. Evans wrote:
On 2015-01-10 23:31, Robert Nichols wrote:
On 01/10/2015 07:39 PM, Robert Nichols wrote:
Anyone else seeing this? This is happening on a straight Desktop install
of CentOS 6.6 fully updated. I have made no changes other than installing
Thunderbird.
On 01/11/2015 10:08 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 7:21 AM, Robert Nichols
rnicholsnos...@comcast.net wrote:
On 01/11/2015 01:42 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
Are you referring to this thread by any chance?
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2014-December/148445.html
The
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11.01.2015 03:42, James B. Byrne wrote:
What does systemd buy the enterprise that sysinit did not provide?
Well (re)starting services in a reliable way?
Ensuring that services are up and running?
About which sysinit are you talking btw?
The
On 01/11/2015 01:42 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 6:56 PM, Mark LaPierre marklap...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/10/15 20:39, Robert Nichols wrote:
Anyone else seeing this? This is happening on a straight Desktop install
of CentOS 6.6 fully updated. I have made no changes other than
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 7:21 AM, Robert Nichols
rnicholsnos...@comcast.net wrote:
On 01/11/2015 01:42 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
Are you referring to this thread by any chance?
http://lists.centos.org/pipermail/centos/2014-December/148445.html
The upstream bugzilla referenced in there is now
The normal usage for a /48 block is to divide it into /64 sub-networks
and use DHCP to issue addresses to each subnet from the corresponding
/64 segment.
I would recommend taking the IPv6 certification course from Hurricane
Electric at https://ipv6.he.net/certification/ as a start.
Mike
On 01/11/2015 01:04 PM, Sven Kieske wrote:
On 11.01.2015 19:05, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
That sounds like you have collected and counted votes pro and
against systemd.
How could it sound like I collected votes? I don't care about votes
when it comes to technical superiority.
As far as
On Sun, 2015-01-11 at 20:04 +0100, Sven Kieske wrote to Valeri Galtsev
I can't take this serious as it seems you didn't research any of the
design goals of systemd and any of the shortcomings of old init systems.
Design goals ? Compatibility with and/or minimum disruption to existing
On 01/11/2015 03:02 PM, Always Learning wrote:
On Sun, 2015-01-11 at 20:04 +0100, Sven Kieske wrote to Valeri Galtsev
I can't take this serious as it seems you didn't research any of the
design goals of systemd and any of the shortcomings of old init systems.
Design goals ?
On Sun, January 11, 2015 2:05 pm, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. wrote:
On 01/11/2015 03:02 PM, Always Learning wrote:
On Sun, 2015-01-11 at 20:04 +0100, Sven Kieske wrote to Valeri Galtsev
I can't take this serious as it seems you didn't research any of the
design goals of systemd and any of
On 01/11/2015 03:09 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Sun, January 11, 2015 2:05 pm, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. wrote:
On 01/11/2015 03:02 PM, Always Learning wrote:
On Sun, 2015-01-11 at 20:04 +0100, Sven Kieske wrote to Valeri Galtsev
I can't take this serious as it seems you didn't research
On Sun, January 11, 2015 11:22 am, Sven Kieske wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11.01.2015 03:42, James B. Byrne wrote:
What does systemd buy the enterprise that sysinit did not provide?
Well (re)starting services in a reliable way?
Ensuring that services are up and
On Sun, January 11, 2015 10:08 am, Akemi Yagi wrote:
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 7:21 AM, Robert Nichols
rnicholsnos...@comcast.net wrote:
On 01/11/2015 01:42 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote:
Are you referring to this thread by any chance?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11.01.2015 19:05, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
That sounds like you have collected and counted votes pro and
against systemd.
How could it sound like I collected votes? I don't care about votes
when it comes to technical superiority.
As far as
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
You guys can't just ignore the advantages of systemd and even ignore the
points like they don't exist.
Anyone who already has 'enterprise' software already running on a
distribution without systemd (e.g. any earlier
On Fri, 2015-01-09 at 19:42 -0500, Fred Smith wrote:
On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 07:07:38PM -0500, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote:
snip
Well, that's the limit of my offerings. I'm still trying to find the
thing I used back in C5(?) that raised the panels when the mouse hovered
over it for X
On 2015-01-11, Valeri Galtsev galt...@kicp.uchicago.edu wrote:
Indeed. Or another system altogether (sihg). I'm just extending your
thought half a step farther ;-)
Or going even farther, if you like CentOS but not systemd, do the work
to get CentOS working without it. Unhappy Debian users are
On 2015-01-12, Valeri Galtsev galt...@kicp.uchicago.edu wrote:
PS I guess I just mention it. I'm quite happy about CentOS (or RedHat if I
look back). One day I realized how happy I am that I chose RedHat way
back, - that was when all Debian (and its clones like Ubuntu,...) admins
were
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 05:12:48PM -0500, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote:
On Fri, 2015-01-09 at 19:42 -0500, Fred Smith wrote:
On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 07:07:38PM -0500, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote:
snip
Well, that's the limit of my offerings. I'm still trying to find the
thing I used back in
On Sun, January 11, 2015 5:16 pm, Keith Keller wrote:
On 2015-01-11, Valeri Galtsev galt...@kicp.uchicago.edu wrote:
Indeed. Or another system altogether (sihg). I'm just extending your
thought half a step farther ;-)
Or going even farther, if you like CentOS but not systemd, do the work
On 01/11/2015 04:19 PM, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote:
On Fri, 2015-01-09 at 21:02 -0600, Robert Nichols wrote:
I presume you're talking about panels with Autohide set. If you have
the GUI gconf-editor installed, it's under apps/panel/global/panel_show_delay.
You can also set it from the command
On 01/11/2015 08:50 PM, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. wrote:
On 01/11/2015 09:38 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Sun, January 11, 2015 8:29 pm, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. wrote:
On 01/11/2015 09:24 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Sun, January 11, 2015 7:29 pm, Keith Keller wrote:
On 2015-01-12, Valeri Galtsev
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 9:54 PM, Tim Dunphy bluethu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey guys,
Got a quick question and I hope this is an easy one!
In my /etc/logrotate.conf file I have the following entry:
# rotate all of the apache logs -- we'll rotate them here
/var/log/mysqld.log {
weekly
On 01/11/2015 09:24 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Sun, January 11, 2015 7:29 pm, Keith Keller wrote:
On 2015-01-12, Valeri Galtsev galt...@kicp.uchicago.edu wrote:
PS I guess I just mention it. I'm quite happy about CentOS (or RedHat if
I
look back). One day I realized how happy I am that I
On 01/11/2015 09:38 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Sun, January 11, 2015 8:29 pm, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. wrote:
On 01/11/2015 09:24 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Sun, January 11, 2015 7:29 pm, Keith Keller wrote:
On 2015-01-12, Valeri Galtsev galt...@kicp.uchicago.edu wrote:
PS I guess I just
On Sun, January 11, 2015 7:29 pm, Keith Keller wrote:
On 2015-01-12, Valeri Galtsev galt...@kicp.uchicago.edu wrote:
PS I guess I just mention it. I'm quite happy about CentOS (or RedHat if
I
look back). One day I realized how happy I am that I chose RedHat way
back, - that was when all
On Sun, 2015-01-11 at 17:00 -0500, Jonathan Billings wrote:
I know conspiracy theories are fun but your argument is simply
absurd and insulting. At least try to assemble a convincing argument
other than ad hominem and change = bad.
Disruption = BAD
Gentle change / gradual change = GOOD
On Sun, January 11, 2015 8:29 pm, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. wrote:
On 01/11/2015 09:24 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Sun, January 11, 2015 7:29 pm, Keith Keller wrote:
On 2015-01-12, Valeri Galtsev galt...@kicp.uchicago.edu wrote:
PS I guess I just mention it. I'm quite happy about CentOS (or
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 08:02:26PM +, Always Learning wrote:
Design goals ? Compatibility with and/or minimum disruption to existing
systems ?
It was arrogant change with absolutely no regard for the existing
Centos/RHEL users. That *is* a strange design goal (or 'objective' in
On Fri, 2015-01-09 at 21:02 -0600, Robert Nichols wrote:
On 01/09/2015 06:07 PM, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote:
I'm still trying to find the
thing I used back in C5(?) that raised the panels when the mouse hovered
over it for X seconds. With C6 I can't find it anymore and it switches
way too
On 01/11/2015 12:13 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
Oh, boy. We do seem to have to treat Linux like Windows these days and
_reboot_ after any update, not only kernel or glibc update. So much for
Unix-like, sigh ;-(
When you are trying to track down unexplained and only semi-repeatable
behavior, you
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 07:49:02PM -0600, Robert Nichols wrote:
On 01/11/2015 04:19 PM, Bill Maltby (C4B) wrote:
On Fri, 2015-01-09 at 21:02 -0600, Robert Nichols wrote:
I presume you're talking about panels with Autohide set. If you have
the GUI gconf-editor installed, it's under
On 01/11/2015 10:25 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 01/11/2015 08:50 PM, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. wrote:
On 01/11/2015 09:38 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Sun, January 11, 2015 8:29 pm, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. wrote:
On 01/11/2015 09:24 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
On Sun, January 11, 2015 7:29 pm, Keith
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/01/15 02:25, PatrickD Garvey wrote:
Every wiki page contains a link to
http://wiki.centos.org/Newsletter/Latest in the navibar at the top
and bottom of the page. Currently that redirects to
http://wiki.centos.org/Newsletter/1005 which is
On 1/11/2015 9:28 PM, Emmett Culley wrote:
I have mostly succeeded in getting master and slave DNS servers operational.
Mostly, because the zone file is not written when a zone is updated on the
master server when the notify and transfer process happens.
The slave DNS server gets the changes
I have mostly succeeded in getting master and slave DNS servers operational.
Mostly, because the zone file is not written when a zone is updated on the
master server when the notify and transfer process happens.
The slave DNS server gets the changes to the modified zone, but the slave zone
37 matches
Mail list logo
