[CentOS-es] Ayuda Asterisk Off Topic

2015-04-05 Thread César Martinez
[s@sub-record-check:18] Set(SIP/4504-0046, __TIMESTR=20150405-220911) in new stack -- Executing [s@sub-record-check:19] Set(SIP/4504-0046, __FROMEXTEN=4504) in new stack -- Executing [s@sub-record-check:20] Set(SIP/4504-0046, __CALLFILENAME=out-31X-4504-20150405-220911

Re: [CentOS] NFS Stale file handle drives me crazy (Centos 6)

2015-04-05 Thread Ted Miller
On 04/02/2015 09:03 AM, Götz Reinicke - IT Koordinator wrote: Hi folks, I have a Centos 6 NFS server, which dirves me crazy. The directory I try to export cant be accessed by different clients. I tried a centos 7, centos 6 and a pool of vmware esxi 5.5 systems. At the client side I get

Re: [CentOS] video problem since 2015-04-01 update

2015-04-05 Thread Jay Warren
I am getting the same problem as the OP but I am on nvidia.   -Original message- From:Bill Maltby (C4B) centos4b...@gmail.com Sent:Sat 04-04-2015 12:32 pm Subject:Re: [CentOS] video problem since 2015-04-01 update To:centos@centos.org; On Sat, 2015-04-04 at 11:24 -0500, Francis Gerund

Re: [CentOS-es] Lentitud en acceso a discos en VM alojadas en IPLAN

2015-04-05 Thread Normando Hall
Buenas noches Angel. Tomada debida nota de tus sugerencias. Ya he escalado el reclamo que ya tiene 15 días de permanentes pruebas. Doy fe que hemos realizado muchas pruebas con los ingenieros del datacenter, salvo que todos me estén mintiendo. En esta oportunidad les he propuesto algo

Re: [CentOS-es] Lentitud en acceso a discos en VM alojadas en IPLAN

2015-04-05 Thread Normando Hall
Si, esa suma es mensual. No deberían negarse, porque les demostraría que nuestra aplicacion no es la que causa el problema, porque en 1 de los 3 esa aplicación no existe. Como tienen una VM de pruebas chica, que ellos luego pueden destruir y reconfigurar, no debería tener inconvenientes.

Re: [CentOS] Access Problem after update to CentOS 7.1

2015-04-05 Thread Andrea Dell'Amico
On 05 Apr 2015, at 14:35, Gregory P. Ennis po...@pomec.net wrote: I sure need some help on this one, if any of you have ideas of what to do next I would surely appreciate it. An additional aspect of this scenario is that when I have used ssh to connect to this mail server via the internal

Re: [CentOS] Access Problem after update to CentOS 7.1

2015-04-05 Thread Gregory P. Ennis
On Sat, 2015-04-04 at 16:47 -0500, Gregory P. Ennis wrote: Everyone, This morning I did a manual yum update on our a mail server to 7.1 without any incident or problems. A new kernel was installed, and I rebooted after the update. When I rebooted the machine I could not gain ssh

[CentOS] perf trace

2015-04-05 Thread Александр Кириллов
# perf trace perf: 'trace' is not a perf-command. See 'perf --help'. Should 'perf trace' work in C6.6 or this is a bug related to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892893? # rpm -qa perf perf-2.6.32-504.12.2.el6.x86_64 ___ CentOS mailing

Re: [CentOS] Access Problem after update to CentOS 7.1

2015-04-05 Thread Gregory P. Ennis
On Sun, 2015-04-05 at 16:53 +0200, Andrea Dell'Amico wrote: On 05 Apr 2015, at 14:35, Gregory P. Ennis po...@pomec.net wrote: I sure need some help on this one, if any of you have ideas of what to do next I would surely appreciate it. An additional aspect of this scenario is that when I

Re: [CentOS] The future of centos

2015-04-05 Thread Valeri Galtsev
On Sat, April 4, 2015 10:12 pm, John R Pierce wrote: On 4/4/2015 8:10 PM, dE wrote: If you guys have that much of a problem with CentOS/RedHat collaboration, why not just move on things like Debian, arch, Suse etc... they just like to whine. Some did move to other systems (even away from

Re: [CentOS] Fail2Ban Centos 7 is there a trick to making it work?

2015-04-05 Thread Andrea Dell'Amico
On 30 Mar 2015, at 13:35, John Horne john.ho...@plymouth.ac.uk wrote: On Tue, 2015-03-10 at 14:43 +0100, Andrea Dell'Amico wrote: #= logrotate_t == allow logrotate_t fail2ban_client_exec_t:file { ioctl read execute execute_no_trans open }; Looks like this was

Re: [CentOS] The future of centos

2015-04-05 Thread Eero Volotinen
2015-04-04 4:01 GMT+03:00 Francis Gerund ranr...@gmail.com: Almost everyone here has probably read this by now. If so, move along, nothing new here. But just in case you haven't, please take the time to read this. Here it is, in their own words: what Redhat thinks of Centos, and it's

Re: [CentOS] The future of centos

2015-04-05 Thread Always Learning
On Sun, 2015-04-05 at 21:27 +0300, Eero Volotinen wrote: If this is a problem, just pick another RHEL clone like Scientific Linux ? I thought I read on this List the intention of Scientific to base its future distribution on Red Hat's Centos product. -- Regards, Paul. England, EU. Je

[CentOS] Selinux issues with 7.1 update

2015-04-05 Thread Joseph L. Casale
I am trying to update some local policies for bacula that allow a series of clients with pre run scripts to su in order to perform some preparatory work for a backup. With selinux enforcing, the su is denied obviously execute as bacula_t tries su_exec_t. You only see this with enforcing enabled?

Re: [CentOS] The future of centos

2015-04-05 Thread Always Learning
On Sat, 2015-04-04 at 20:12 -0700, John R Pierce wrote: On 4/4/2015 8:10 PM, dE wrote: If you guys have that much of a problem with CentOS/RedHat collaboration, why not just move on things like Debian, arch, Suse etc... they just like to whine. If the *whole* truth had been told to