Hello,
I posted a question over at xenproject.org but it was recommended that I
send out a message here for help.
My post there:
http://www.xenproject.org/help/questions-and-answers/vanilla-pv-centos-guest-via-kickstart-centos-6-6,-xen-4-4.html
The TL;DR is: Everything I've found to kickstart a
Am 30.07.2015 um 12:53 schrieb Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org:
On 07/30/2015 04:37 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
Because we do CR, CentOS users had access to the 6.7 updates a full 3
days before anyone else made them available and CR was released less
than 5 days after the release of RHEL 6.7.
On 07/29/2015 11:38 AM, Nathan March wrote:
Hi All,
I'm seeing clock issues with live migrations on the latest kernel
packages, migrating a VM from 3.10.68-11 to 3.18.17-13 results in the VM
clock being off by 7 hours (I'm PST, so appears to be a timezone issue).
This is also between
Note that qemu-kvm-ev is built within Virt SIG too in kvm-common-testing
CBS repo
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 8:34 PM, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
Yes, you can. In fact you can use the binaries from the ovirt repo itself,
no need to rebuild.
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
On 07/30/2015 06:38 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 07/29/2015 11:38 AM, Nathan March wrote:
Hi All,
I'm seeing clock issues with live migrations on the latest kernel
packages, migrating a VM from 3.10.68-11 to 3.18.17-13 results in the VM
clock being off by 7 hours (I'm PST, so appears to
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 5:37 AM, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
On 07/29/2015 07:27 PM, Nathan Duehr wrote:
On Jul 29, 2015, at 18:20, Nathan Duehr denverpi...@me.com wrote:
On Jul 28, 2015, at 18:48, Peter pe...@pajamian.dhs.org wrote:
On 07/29/2015 11:51 AM, Noam Bernstein
On 07/29/2015 07:40 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Warren Young w...@etr-usa.com wrote:
Security is *always* opposed to convenience.
False. OS X by default runs only signed binaries, and if they come
from the App Store they run in a sandbox. User gains significant
On 07/30/2015 10:24 AM, Wes James wrote:
What’s even more irritating to me than top posting is when someone replies to a
message that takes two page scrolls to get to the bottom then there’s only a
few words that are unrelated to the actual message! What’s worse, top posting
or no snipping?
On 07/29/2015 05:19 PM, Nathan Duehr wrote:
fail2ban isn’t in the stock package repo for CentOS 7, much less installed and
configured default. Until it is, it’s off-topic for this thread.
Didn’t realize that. Brilliant move, removing it… (rolls eyes at RH)…
I don't think it was removed... I
On 07/28/2015 03:06 PM, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Warren Young w...@etr-usa.com said:
Much of the evil on the Internet today — DDoS armies, spam spewers, phishing
botnets — is done on pnwed hardware, much of which was compromised by previous
botnets banging on weak SSH passwords.
On 30 July 2015 at 09:25, Жељко Миловановић
zeljko.milovanovic@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
my name is ZeljkoMilovanovic and i would like to contribute primarily to
Serbian localization.
Please, create my personal homepage.
Thanks!
Željko Milovanović
Done. A home page has now been
What’s even more irritating to me than top posting is when someone replies to a
message that takes two page scrolls to get to the bottom then there’s only a
few words that are unrelated to the actual message! What’s worse, top posting
or no snipping?
-wes
Thank you!
чет, 30. јул 2015. 16.41 Alan Bartlett a...@elrepo.org је написао/ла:
On 30 July 2015 at 09:25, Жељко Миловановић
zeljko.milovanovic@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
my name is ZeljkoMilovanovic and i would like to contribute primarily to
Serbian localization.
Please, create
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
There have been some questions about how the GSoC project interacts
with the existing documentation work that happens around the wiki.
Let's get all the open questions in to this thread and discuss them.
Lei, Kunaal -- What other open questions do
On 7/30/2015 12:17 PM, Warren Young wrote:
No, what happens is that you call up your ISP to ask them for help blocking off
the DDoS attack, and you either get blown off or transferred to their sales
department to buy a “solution” to a problem they allow to exist because it
brings in extra
Tom Bishop wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Warren Young w...@etr-usa.com wrote:
On Jul 29, 2015, at 5:40 PM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com
wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Warren Young w...@etr-usa.com
wrote:
Security is *always* opposed to convenience.
False.
Pero eso es solo una forma muy basica de darle seguridad .Tendrias que
enfocarte en otros aspectos de la seguridad.Como actualizaciones del SO y de
apache, php y mysql si es que usas estos ultimos.Que ocultar, por ejemplo las
versiones de apache, php o mysqlLos privilegios de los
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 12:20 PM, Warren Young w...@etr-usa.com wrote:
On Jul 29, 2015, at 5:40 PM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Warren Young w...@etr-usa.com wrote:
Security is *always* opposed to convenience.
False. OS X by default runs
claro, evitar posibles ataques
pero si el puerto antiguo lo redireccionas al nuevo el ataque igual llega.
obvio.
La idea de cambiar el puerto es que sea Secreto o difícil de encontrar
Pablo Flores
El 30 de julio de 2015, 16:10, Walter Cervini wcerv...@gmail.com escribió:
Evitar posibles
Great, thanks.
qemu-kvm-rhev is ok, qemu-kvm-ev is basically the same thing.
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
From: Gena Makhomed g...@csdoc.com
To: centos-virt@centos.org
Sent: Thursday, 30 July, 2015 20:04:39
Subject:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 07:10:08PM +0100, Nux! wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to deploy some non-linux OS via pxe and I was thinking to
just launch CentOS in RAM and then run dd or qemu-img or something
like this in order to complete the other OS install via template
imaging. My first idea was to
Hola Pablo el problema es que al pasar al puerto 80 existe un problema
con una aplicación que esta haciendo conflicto por eso se necesita pasar
al puerto 88
--
Saludos Cordiales
|César Martínez | Ingeniero de Sistemas | SERVICOM
|Tel: (593-2)554-271 2221-386 | Ext 4501
|Celular: 0999374317
On Jul 30, 2015, at 12:20, Warren Young w...@etr-usa.com wrote:
Meanwhile over here in CentOS land, you still see SSH password guessers
banging on every public IP that responds to port 22. Why? Because it still
occasionally works. Increase the password strength minima, and this class
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:1526 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1526.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
hello,
host: centos6 64bit (dell desktop)
guest: windows 7 64bit
virtualbox: 4.3.30
problem: host has audio but guest does not.
i.e. when virtualbox comes up, it says:
No audio devices could be opened.
ErrorID: HostAudioNotResponding
#lspci -nn | grep -i audio
00:1b.0 Audio device
On 07/30/2015 12:35 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
No fail2ban, no firewall rules, sshd by default, challengeresponseauth
by default,
ChallengeResponseAuth is not on by default, on Red Hat derived systems.
I'm pretty sure that was already clarified, much earlier in this thread.
and a 9 character
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:1526 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1526.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
On Tue, 2015-07-28 at 14:27 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
The reality is all the bad practices happen because this
quickly provisioned machine is forgotten about for one reason or
another, and then it gets owned.
Linux users take a lot more care, and pride, in maintaining their
systems well and
On 7/30/2015 2:23 PM, Nathan Duehr wrote:
On Jul 30, 2015, at 12:20, Warren Youngw...@etr-usa.com wrote:
Meanwhile over here in CentOS land, you still see SSH password guessers
banging on every public IP that responds to port 22. Why? Because it still
occasionally works. Increase the
On Tue, 2015-07-28 at 14:46 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
Windows Server has power shell disabled by default. The functional
equivalent, sshd, is typically enabled on Linux servers. So I think
it's overdue that sshd be disabled on Linux servers by default,
especially because the minimum
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:1526 Important
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-1526.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:1521
Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-1521.html
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
On Thu, 2015-07-30 at 12:46 -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
Google has always been in making profit on information [about us] they
can collect. But in general you are right. Likelihood wise, I'll stick
to my opinion ;-)
Hey, don't be greedy. Its our opinion too ;-)
--
Regards,
Paul.
On Thu, 2015-07-30 at 10:54 -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
More secure only to the level one can trust google ;-)
Trust and Google are mutually incompatible ;-)
Just my $0.02
That's my €0.02
--
Regards,
Paul.
England, EU. England's place is in the European Union.
On Jul 30, 2015, at 4:27 PM, Gordon Messmer gordon.mess...@gmail.com wrote:
On 07/30/2015 12:35 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
No fail2ban, no firewall rules, sshd by default, challengeresponseauth
by default,
ChallengeResponseAuth is not on by default, on Red Hat derived systems. I'm
pretty
On Thu, 2015-07-30 at 11:45 -0600, Nathan Duehr wrote:
Honestly I don’t know how you guys do it…
By not using Windoze ?
--
Regards,
Paul.
England, EU. England's place is in the European Union.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Jul 30, 2015, at 20:09, Always Learning cen...@u64.u22.net wrote:
On Thu, 2015-07-30 at 11:45 -0600, Nathan Duehr wrote:
Honestly I don’t know how you guys do it…
By not using Windoze ?
I meant the time… the time… involved… so much time…
:-)
--
Nate Duehr
denverpi...@me.com
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 1:20 PM, Warren Young w...@etr-usa.com wrote:
On Jul 29, 2015, at 5:40 PM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Warren Young w...@etr-usa.com wrote:
Security is *always* opposed to convenience.
False. OS X by default
Hello,
my name is ZeljkoMilovanovic and i would like to contribute primarily to
Serbian localization.
Please, create my personal homepage.
Thanks!
Željko Milovanović
___
CentOS-docs mailing list
CentOS-docs@centos.org
Then you should definitely submit a bug with redhat about this, seems like a
serious one.
--
Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
Nux!
www.nux.ro
- Original Message -
From: Gena Makhomed g...@csdoc.com
To: centos-virt@centos.org
Sent: Wednesday, 29 July, 2015 23:09:14
hi all,
i have a general question (a bit surprised ti's not on the centos faq):
we found a bug in a package in a centos install, and we are wondering
what the best approach is to get TUV to fix it (and release an update),
so it gets fixed in centos rebuild and thus on our nodes. or at the
Lamar Owen wrote:
On 07/30/2015 10:24 AM, Wes James wrote:
What’s even more irritating to me than top posting is when someone
replies to a message that takes two page scrolls to get to the bottom
then there’s only a few words that are unrelated to the actual message!
What’s worse, top
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 9:10 AM, Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu wrote:
On 07/29/2015 07:40 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Warren Young w...@etr-usa.com wrote:
Security is *always* opposed to convenience.
False. OS X by default runs only signed binaries, and if they come
-Original Message-
From: centos-virt-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-virt-
boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Johnny Hughes
Sent: Thursday, July 30, 2015 4:41 AM
To: centos-virt@centos.org
Subject: Re: [CentOS-virt] Timezone issues with migrations between host
kernel 3.10 and 3.18
On Jul 29, 2015, at 5:40 PM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Warren Young w...@etr-usa.com wrote:
Security is *always* opposed to convenience.
False. OS X by default runs only signed binaries, and if they come
from the App Store they run in a
Pregunto; Hay alguna restriccion de tu isp para que apache no escuche en el
puerto estandar o sea el 80?Ahi solo estas cambiando el puerto por el 8080 y es
logico que debas agregarle al el puerto a la url.Cual es el problema que no te
permite usar el puerto 80?Saludos.
--
de curioso
cual es la idea de cambiar el 80 por otro puerto si de todas formas el
antiguo puerto lo redireccionaras el nuevo puerto?
El 30 de julio de 2015, 15:06, César Martinez cmarti...@servicomecuador.com
escribió:
Gracias David hice lo que mencionas y se solucionó, gracias a todos
On Wed, July 29, 2015 4:16 pm, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Warren Young w...@etr-usa.com wrote:
Just because one particular method of prophylaxis fails to protect
against all threats doesnât mean we should stop using it, or increase
its strength.
Actually it
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 8:32 AM, Lamar Owen lo...@pari.edu wrote:
From a hacked Linux server which was brute-forced and
conscripted into being a slow bruteforcer node back in 2009 or so.
...
Better enforcement of password policy on that server would have prevented
the attack from succeeding
Saludos amigos acudo a ustedes con un problema que tengo cambiando el
puerto 80 del apache por otro, cambio la linea Listen por el puerto 8080
abro en el firewall el puerto 8080, reinicio el apache y tambien el
firewall, luego digito www.misitio.com y no funciona pero si coloco
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 9:54 AM, Valeri Galtsev
galt...@kicp.uchicago.edu wrote:
Now I use Google. They offer MFA opt in. And now I'm more secure than
I was with the myopic ISP.
More secure only to the level one can trust google ;-)
Yes I know, but I put them in approximately the same
*:: Osea ... que en tu casa bloqueas la puerta principal, y
abres otra puerta secundaria.
Y cuando quieres entrar por la puerta principal ¿ Te extraña no
poder entrar ?
Disculpa la reflexion en voz alta, pero ... tengo muy claro
donde no contratar
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 10:48:51AM -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
On 7/30/2015 8:13 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
No snipping with bottom posting is worse than any top posting,
IMHO. It wastes space and time and is equally bad in digests. But
you're not likely to get the worst offenders to change.
Hi,
I'm trying to deploy some non-linux OS via pxe and I was thinking to just
launch CentOS in RAM and then run dd or qemu-img or something like this in
order to complete the other OS install via template imaging.
My first idea was to build a custom CentOS livecd and use that in combination
deben ser dos lineas
Listen 80
Listen 8080
ademas si dos puertos distintos llevan a dos paginas distintas deber
habilitar virtualhost casi al final del mismo archivo.
Saludso
El 30 de julio de 2015, 13:39, César Martinez cmarti...@servicomecuador.com
escribió:
Saludos amigos acudo a ustedes
On Jul 30, 2015, at 03:37, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
Of course it makes sense. Those security updates are not released in a
vacuum, and all the things they are built on/against also need to be
released and installed for them to work.
The source code for the ssecurity
On Thu, July 30, 2015 11:54 am, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 9:54 AM, Valeri Galtsev
galt...@kicp.uchicago.edu wrote:
Now I use Google. They offer MFA opt in. And now I'm more secure than
I was with the myopic ISP.
More secure only to the level one can trust google ;-)
Yes
On 7/30/2015 8:13 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
No snipping with bottom posting is worse than any top posting, IMHO.
It wastes space and time and is equally bad in digests. But you're
not likely to get the worst offenders to change.
totally concur but as long as people are going to use cell phones
On 07/30/2015 05:29 AM, Elliot Fox wrote:
The TL;DR is: Everything I've found to kickstart a new vanilla rhel/centos
guest points to specifying a kernel and initrd- for RHEL/Centos 5. But
where is the xen initrd for Centos 6? The Xen4Quickstart instructions are
awesome, but after install
A ver hay que entender algo
El protocolo HTTP, salvo que se indique lo contrario : usa
SOLAMENTE el puerto 80. Significa esto que cualquier dirección en tu
navegador www.midominio.com irá al puerto 80.
Si en tu apache cierras el cambias el 80, ok puedes hacerlo
Si en tu firewall abres el
Gracias David hice lo que mencionas y se solucionó, gracias a todos
nuevamente
--
Saludos Cordiales
|César Martínez | Ingeniero de Sistemas | SERVICOM
|Tel: (593-2)554-271 2221-386 | Ext 4501
|Celular: 0999374317 |Skype servicomecuador
|Web www.servicomecuador.com Síguenos en:
|Twitter:
On 30.07.2015 10:49, Nux! wrote:
Then you should definitely submit a bug with redhat about this, seems like a
serious one.
Ok, done:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1248758
P.S.
As I can see - bugzilla.redhat.com for oVirt Product
does not contain qemu-kvm-ev Component at all
Evitar posibles ataques, para hacerse la vida mas facil, yo habitualmente
cambio mis servicios de puerto para evitar ese tipo de inconvenientes.
*Walter Cervini*
El 30 de julio de 2015, 19:30, Pablo Alberto Flores pabfl...@uchile.cl
escribió:
de curioso
cual es la idea de cambiar el 80 por
On Jul 29, 2015, at 6:19 PM, Nathan Duehr denverpi...@me.com wrote:
On Jul 28, 2015, at 6:32 PM, Warren Young w...@etr-usa.com wrote:
Now we have entrenched commercial interests that get paid more when you get
DDoS’d. I’ll give you one guess what happens in such a world.
What happens?
On 07/30/2015 04:37 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
On 07/29/2015 07:27 PM, Nathan Duehr wrote:
On Jul 29, 2015, at 18:20, Nathan Duehr denverpi...@me.com wrote:
On Jul 28, 2015, at 18:48, Peter pe...@pajamian.dhs.org wrote:
On 07/29/2015 11:51 AM, Noam Bernstein wrote:
Hi CentOS developers -
On 07/30/2015 09:00 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
Re the kernel, how do the Springdale/PUIAS handle this issue? It might
be worth copying their approach and/or coordinating.
I dont believe they do either, they are disabling/enableing stuff in the
kernel's to be different from the x86_64 upsteam
On 30/07/15 00:20, Ian Pilcher wrote:
On 07/29/2015 04:53 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
the biggest blocker to going GA on the x86 build is the kernel; the
distro kernel we end up with isnt going to be the same as the upstream
x86_64 kernel configs. However, there hasent been a huge level of
On Wed, 29 Jul 2015 12:48:14 +1200
Peter pe...@pajamian.dhs.org wrote:
On 07/29/2015 11:51 AM, Noam Bernstein wrote:
Hi CentOS developers - I’ve been happily using CentOS for several
years now, so thanks for all the good work. In the last week,
however, I noticed that while the items in
Am 30.07.2015 um 02:27 schrieb Nathan Duehr denverpi...@me.com:
On Jul 29, 2015, at 18:20, Nathan Duehr denverpi...@me.com wrote:
On Jul 28, 2015, at 18:48, Peter pe...@pajamian.dhs.org wrote:
On 07/29/2015 11:51 AM, Noam Bernstein wrote:
It's currently in the CentOS CR repository and
On 07/29/2015 07:27 PM, Nathan Duehr wrote:
On Jul 29, 2015, at 18:20, Nathan Duehr denverpi...@me.com wrote:
On Jul 28, 2015, at 18:48, Peter pe...@pajamian.dhs.org wrote:
On 07/29/2015 11:51 AM, Noam Bernstein wrote:
Hi CentOS developers - I’ve been happily using CentOS for several
years
On 07/30/2015 03:37 AM, Stijn De Weirdt wrote:
hi all,
i have a general question (a bit surprised ti's not on the centos faq):
we found a bug in a package in a centos install, and we are wondering
what the best approach is to get TUV to fix it (and release an update),
so it gets fixed in
On 30 July 2015 at 13:22, Andrew Holway andrew.hol...@gmail.com wrote:
The Redhat guys are normally responding very well to bug reports from
Centos users. They don't seem to differentiate. Using bugs.centos.org seems
quite pointless. I normally just use https://bugzilla.redhat.com/.
Sorry
The Redhat guys are normally responding very well to bug reports from
Centos users. They don't seem to differentiate. Using bugs.centos.org seems
quite pointless. I normally just use https://bugzilla.redhat.com/.
On 30 July 2015 at 13:12, Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote:
On 07/30/2015
On 07/30/2015 06:22 AM, Andrew Holway wrote:
The Redhat guys are normally responding very well to bug reports from
Centos users. They don't seem to differentiate. Using bugs.centos.org seems
quite pointless. I normally just use https://bugzilla.redhat.com/.
That is true, using bugs.centos.org
74 matches
Mail list logo
