[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2015:2017 CentOS 6 coreutils BugFix Update

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:2017 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-2017.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386:

[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2015:2010 CentOS 6 pacemaker BugFix Update

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:2010 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-2010.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386:

Re: [CentOS] Rsync and differential Backups

On 11/09/2015 09:22 PM, Arun Khan wrote: You can use "newer" options of the find command and pass the file list to rsync or scp to "backup" only those files that have changed since the last run. You can keep a file like .lastbackup and timestamp it (touch) at the start of the backup process.

[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2015:1999 CentOS 6 ipmitool BugFix Update

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:1999 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-1999.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386:

[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2015:2003 CentOS 6 gawk BugFix Update

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:2003 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-2003.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386:

[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2015:2012 CentOS 6 postfix BugFix Update

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:2012 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-2012.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386:

[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2015:2016 CentOS 6 cronie BugFix Update

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:2016 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-2016.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386:

[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2015:2018 CentOS 6 perl BugFix Update

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:2018 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-2018.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386:

[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2015:2004 CentOS 6 initscripts BugFix Update

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:2004 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-2004.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386:

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2015:2019 Low CentOS 6 sssd Security Update

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2015:2019 Low Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2015-2019.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386:

Re: [CentOS-docs] Resending: Requesitng wiki editing ermission

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 2:22 AM, Leslie Hawthorn wrote: > Resending > > Also, related feedback - I got no "permission to post this list is only for > list members" notification from Mailman in response to my first post to this > list so I did not know the mail was

[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2015:1994 CentOS 6 logrotate BugFix Update

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:1994 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-1994.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386:

[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2015:2015 CentOS 6 system-config-lvm BugFix Update

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:2015 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-2015.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386:

[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2015:2000 CentOS 6 libvirt BugFix Update

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:2000 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-2000.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386:

[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2015:2007 CentOS 6 zsh BugFix Update

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:2007 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-2007.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386:

[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2015:1993 CentOS 6 openldap BugFix Update

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:1993 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-1993.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386:

[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2015:2011 CentOS 6 grep BugFix Update

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:2011 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-2011.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386:

[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2015:2013 CentOS 6 kdebase-workspace BugFix Update

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:2013 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-2013.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386:

[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2015:2006 CentOS 6 selinux-policy BugFix Update

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:2006 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-2006.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386:

[CentOS] Samsung evo 840 fixes

Queued TRIM seems to be a problem with this kind of drive (with the latest firmware), and a "recent" kernel (4.1.x) seems to have this fixed this without disabling NCQ completely. Is that patch backported to the "mainline" CentOS 6 or CentOS7 kernel? -- chs

Re: [CentOS] centos 6 and super jumbo frames

> On Nov 9, 2015, at 11:34 AM, Steve Clark wrote: > > IP 10.79.4.53.64327 > 10.79.2.53.24294: Flags [.], seq 16060:29200, ack 1, > win 32767, length 13140 Do you have RSS enabled? With RSS the software/tcpdump sees larger "packets" but the physical NIC chunks down to

Re: [CentOS] Samsung evo 840 fixes

On 11/10/2015 10:14 AM, Christer Solskogen wrote: Queued TRIM seems to be a problem with this kind of drive (with the latest firmware), and a "recent" kernel (4.1.x) seems to have this fixed this without disabling NCQ completely. Is that patch backported to the "mainline" CentOS 6 or CentOS7

Re: [CentOS] OT: bacula question

On Mon, 9 Nov 2015, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Hi, folks, Question, for those that use/have used bacula: I've been setting up backups for one team, the server on CentOS 6, but they're on Windows. If we install the director on Windows, is it possible for the users to restore files from the

Re: [CentOS] Differences from upstream RHEL

On 11/11/2015 09:03 AM, Edward Ned Harvey (centos) wrote: > At work, we use some commercial software, that names RHEL6 as a > supported OS, but not Centos6. I would like to know the difference > between Centos and RHEL, in order to claim (or not) that we can > support our users on Centos instead

Re: [CentOS] Rsync and differential Backups

On 11/10/2015 12:16 PM, Warren Young wrote: Well, be fair, rsync can also miss files if files are changing while the backup occurs. Once rsync has passed through a given section of the tree, it will not see any subsequent changes. I think you miss my meaning. Consider this sequence of

Re: [CentOS] Samsung evo 840 fixes

We have used that drive for 2 years with no issues. Amazing how much trouble people can get into when they tweak stuff... -Joe -Original Message- From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Christer Solskogen Sent: Tuesday, November 10, 2015 03:01 PM

Re: [CentOS] Differences from upstream RHEL

--On Tuesday, November 10, 2015 12:53:20 PM -0800 Gordon Messmer wrote: That depends on what you mean by "support." It's almost certainly possible to run the binaries on CentOS, but if you need any technical support from the vendor of that application, they might

Re: [CentOS] Samsung evo 840 fixes

On 10.11.2015 20.18, Gordon Messmer wrote: On 11/10/2015 10:14 AM, Christer Solskogen wrote: Queued TRIM seems to be a problem with this kind of drive (with the latest firmware), and a "recent" kernel (4.1.x) seems to have this fixed this without disabling NCQ completely. Is that patch

[CentOS] Differences from upstream RHEL

At work, we use some commercial software, that names RHEL6 as a supported OS, but not Centos6. I would like to know the difference between Centos and RHEL, in order to claim (or not) that we can support our users on Centos instead of RHEL. I see the release notes, that say "Packages modified

Re: [CentOS] Rsync and differential Backups

On Nov 10, 2015, at 8:46 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > > On 11/09/2015 09:22 PM, Arun Khan wrote: >> You can use "newer" options of the find command and pass the file list > > the process you described is likely to miss files that are modified while > "find" runs.

[CentOS-es] [VirtualBox] Hacerlo parte de mi red ?

Buen dia. En mi servidor CentOS monte una windows 7 en VirtualBox, ya cree la interface virutal *vboxnet0*, al encender VirtualBox en el apartado de REDES especifique como *Host-only Adapter* e indique el interface *vboxnet0* . Cuando inicio la maquina veo que *vboxnet0* tomo la ip:

Re: [CentOS] Differences from upstream RHEL

On 11/10/2015 02:03 PM, Edward Ned Harvey (centos) wrote: > At work, we use some commercial software, that names RHEL6 as a supported OS, > but not Centos6. I would like to know the difference between Centos and RHEL, > in order to claim (or not) that we can support our users on Centos instead

Re: [CentOS] Samsung evo 840 fixes

On 11/10/2015 12:00 PM, Christer Solskogen wrote: This is the first I found. http://linux.slashdot.org/story/15/07/30/1814200/samsung-finds-fixes-bug-in-linux-trim-code That bug isn't specific to Samsung drives. It affected all SSDs used in raid0 and raid10 configurations. and

Re: [CentOS] Differences from upstream RHEL

On 11/10/2015 12:03 PM, Edward Ned Harvey (centos) wrote: At work, we use some commercial software, that names RHEL6 as a supported OS, but not Centos6. I would like to know the difference between Centos and RHEL, in order to claim (or not) that we can support our users on Centos instead of

[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2015:1992 CentOS 6 kernel BugFix Update

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:1992 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-1992.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386:

Re: [CentOS] OT: bacula question

On Tue, 10 Nov 2015, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Paul Heinlein wrote: On Mon, 9 Nov 2015, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Question, for those that use/have used bacula: I've been setting up backups for one team, the server on CentOS 6, but they're on Windows. If we install the director on Windows, is it

Re: [CentOS] OT: bacula question

--On Tuesday, November 10, 2015 02:14:56 PM -0500 m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: 'Friad not. My users are saying they'd like the ability, from their Windows machines, to restore, without having to ask me to do something from the server. And they want to be able to chose the files to restore As

Re: [CentOS] OT: bacula question

Paul Heinlein wrote: > On Mon, 9 Nov 2015, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: >> >> Question, for those that use/have used bacula: I've been setting up >> backups for one team, the server on CentOS 6, but they're on >> Windows. If we install the director on Windows, is it possible for >> the users to restore

Re: [CentOS] OT: bacula question

Am 10.11.2015 um 22:36 schrieb Devin Reade : > > bat is a native GUI, so UNIX only. we use bat GUI on windows ... -- LF ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] OT: bacula question

--On Tuesday, November 10, 2015 11:58:33 PM +0100 Leon Fauster wrote: Am 10.11.2015 um 22:36 schrieb Devin Reade : bat is a native GUI, so UNIX only. we use bat GUI on windows ... I stand corrected. So it's either install bat on each client

Re: [CentOS] Rsync and differential Backups

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/11/15 21:05, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 11/10/2015 12:16 PM, Warren Young wrote: >> >> Well, be fair, rsync can also miss files if files are changing >> while the backup occurs. Once rsync has passed through a given >> section of the tree, it

Re: [CentOS] OT: bacula question

Correction: this is actually about bareos, not bacula. mark "it's been a long day" ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Rsync and differential Backups

On Monday, November 09, 2015 09:50:52 AM Gordon Messmer wrote: > > How I can perform a diff backup? > > Save yourself a lot of trouble and use a front-end like rsnapshot or > backuppc. If I may, I'd like to put in a plug for ZFS: Combining rsync and ZFS, you can rsync, then make a ZFS

Re: [CentOS] OT: bacula question

--On Tuesday, November 10, 2015 05:22:51 PM -0500 m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: But is there any way for the clients to run their console, which connects to the director on the server, and tell the director on the server to restore files x,y, & z on the client's machine? Yes. Per Leon's email, I

Re: [CentOS] Rsync and differential Backups

On 11/10/2015 03:38 PM, J Martin Rushton wrote: That's plain bad system analysis. Read the start date, record the current date and THEN start processing. You will get the odd extra file but will not loose any. That's my point. "find" doesn't do that and naïve implementations of the

Re: [CentOS] Rsync and differential Backups

Folks I have been using rsnapshot for years now. The only problem I've found is that it is possible to run out of inodes. So my heads-up is that when you create the file system, ensure you have more than the default inodes - I usually multiply the default by 10. Otherwise you can find your 1Tb

Re: [CentOS] Rsync and differential Backups

On 11/10/2015 12:18 AM, John Logsdon wrote: I have been using rsnapshot for years now. The only problem I've found is that it is possible to run out of inodes. So my heads-up is that when you create the file system, ensure you have more than the default inodes - I usually multiply the default by

Re: [CentOS] Rsync and differential Backups

On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 10:52 AM, Arun Khan wrote: > On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 9:31 PM, Alessandro Baggi > wrote: >> Hi list, >> how to perform a differential backup using rsync? >> >> On web there is a great confusion about diff backup concept when

Re: [CentOS] Rsync and differential Backups

Thanks John - I haven't used XFS. This issue arose on ext3 I think some years ago on a rather elderly system. If XFS avoids this that's great but if someone is still using legacy systems, they need to be warned! > On 11/10/2015 12:18 AM, John Logsdon wrote: >> I have been using rsnapshot for

[CentOS-docs] Resending: Requesitng wiki editing ermission

Resending Also, related feedback - I got no "permission to post this list is only for list members" notification from Mailman in response to my first post to this list so I did not know the mail was discarded. Would be very nice to attend to that setting in Mailman so folks know that

Re: [CentOS-es] [VirtualBox] Hacerlo parte de mi red ?

Sabes de algun link o recomendacion para CentOS en el proceso ? El 10 de noviembre de 2015, 15:03, Death User escribió: > *Host-only Adapter* indica que ese adaptador de red solo puede ser usado > para comunicarse entre el host y el guest, en tu caso necesitas editar la >

Re: [CentOS] Rsync and differential Backups

On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 5:39 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 11/10/2015 03:38 PM, J Martin Rushton wrote: >> >> That's plain bad system analysis. Read the start date, record the >> current date and THEN start processing. You will get the odd extra >> file but will not

Re: [CentOS] Rsync and differential Backups

On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 5:08 AM, J Martin Rushton wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 10/11/15 21:05, Gordon Messmer wrote: >> On 11/10/2015 12:16 PM, Warren Young wrote: >>> >>> Well, be fair, rsync can also miss files if files are

[CentOS-announce] CEBA-2015:2009 CentOS 6 SDL BugFix Update

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2015:2009 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2015-2009.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386:

Re: [CentOS] Rsync and differential Backups

Alessandro Baggi wrote: how to perform a differential backup using rsync? On web there is a great confusion about diff backup concept when searched with rsync. I think the answer to this question is Rsnapshot, which is an old and well proven tool:

Re: [CentOS] OT: bacula question

Devin Reade wrote: > --On Tuesday, November 10, 2015 02:14:56 PM -0500 m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > >> 'Friad not. My users are saying they'd like the ability, from their >> Windows machines, to restore, without having to ask me to do something >> from the server. And they want to be able to chose

Re: [CentOS] Samsung evo 840 fixes

On 10.11.2015 22.00, Joseph L. Brunner wrote: We have used that drive for 2 years with no issues. Amazing how much trouble people can get into when they tweak stuff... Huh, like upgrading the firmware? -- chs ___ CentOS mailing list

Re: [CentOS] CentOS6: missing kernel module?

On 11/09/2015 03:46 PM, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Mon, Nov 9, 2015 at 1:29 PM, Benjamin Smith > wrote: >> Testing out tipc for cluster development, and running into an immediate snag. >> tipcutils was found in EPEL but despite having a "compatible" kernel, it >> doesn't