Re: [CentOS] Fresh installation using usb

Hi Ask grub for more output. Press tab will at grub menu and remove "quiet" and "rhgb". Maybe the output will say something more. In regards, On 11/13/2015 08:54 AM, Siva Prasad Nath wrote: > ​ > 20151113_123827.mp4 >

Re: [CentOS] Fresh installation using usb

Hi, Please first boot to lifecycle controller (I think it was f11 or f10 key on boot). Then update all firmware versions to latest. Then try installing from DVD. this system is supported by RHEL, so I should work fine with Centos too. -- Eero 2015-11-13 9:54 GMT+02:00 Siva Prasad Nath

Re: [CentOS] Poor perfmance of bridged interfaces

2015-11-12 18:07 GMT-03:00 James A. Peltier : > - Original Message - > | Hi, > | > | I've created a bridge using 2 interfaces and have a lot of messages as > | follows: > | > | nov 12 15:30:22 localhost kernel: br0: received packet on enp0s3 with own > | address as source

Re: [CentOS] Poor perfmance of bridged interfaces

2015-11-13 8:22 GMT-03:00 Sergio Belkin : > > > 2015-11-12 18:07 GMT-03:00 James A. Peltier : > >> - Original Message - >> | Hi, >> | >> | I've created a bridge using 2 interfaces and have a lot of messages as >> | follows: >> | >> | nov 12 15:30:22

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 129, Issue 6

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-annou...@centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to

Re: [CentOS] Poor perfmance of bridged interfaces

2015-11-12 15:56 GMT-03:00 Ulf Volmer : > On 11/12/2015 07:42 PM, Sergio Belkin wrote: > > I've created a bridge using 2 interfaces and have a lot of messages as >> follows: >> >> nov 12 15:30:22 localhost kernel: br0: received packet on enp0s3 with own >> address as source

Re: [CentOS] Rsync and differential Backups

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 13/11/15 01:52, Benjamin Smith wrote: > I did exactly this with ZFS on Linux and cut over 24 hours of > backup lag to just minutes. > > If you're managing data at scale, ZFS just rocks... > > > On Tuesday, November 10, 2015 01:16:28 PM Warren

Re: [CentOS-virt] CentOS 6 Xen package update (including XSA-156)

On 11/12/2015 04:44 PM, George Dunlap wrote: Do you have the centos-extras repo enabled? The key in question is in the centos-release-virt-common package, which is in the centos-extras repo I've just updated, so far so good. ___ CentOS-virt mailing

Re: [CentOS] Differences from upstream RHEL

In my experience software compiled for RHEL "just work" with Centos and I don't remember any case where it didn't. I have however heard whisperings on a grapevine that RH may want to try and make future versions of Centos slightly incompatible with RHEL but these are probably just whisperings. If

Re: [CentOS] Differences from upstream RHEL

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/13/2015 09:17 PM, Andrew Holway wrote: > In my experience software compiled for RHEL "just work" with Centos > and I don't remember any case where it didn't. I have however heard > whisperings on a grapevine that RH may want to try and make

Re: [CentOS] About IPv6 Link-Local Address(CentOS5)

On Fri, 13 Nov 2015, 米山陽介 wrote: Try ping6 -I eth1 2000:8000:12:6:192:168:11:8 Thanks for the response. I tried. However, It did not resolve # ping6 -I eth1 2000:8000:12:6:192:168:11:8 PING 2000:8000:12:6:192:168:11:8(2000:8000:12:6:192:168:11:8) from fe80::a00:27ff:fe03:5b8a

Re: [CentOS] Poor perfmance of bridged interfaces

2015-11-13 12:32 GMT-03:00 Ulf Volmer : > On 11/13/2015 12:57 PM, Sergio Belkin wrote: > > When I enable stp: >> >> [root@localhost ~]# brctl show br0 >> bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces >> br0 8000.080027a398e6 yes

Re: [CentOS] Poor perfmance of bridged interfaces

On 11/13/2015 12:57 PM, Sergio Belkin wrote: When I enable stp: [root@localhost ~]# brctl show br0 bridge name bridge id STP enabled interfaces br0 8000.080027a398e6 yes enp0s3 enp0s8

Re: [CentOS] Poor perfmance of bridged interfaces

2015-11-13 13:52 GMT-03:00 Gordon Messmer : > On 11/13/2015 03:22 AM, Sergio Belkin wrote: > >> I'm trying to create virtualized linux bridge >> > > Well, you can't do that by putting two interfaces on the same LAN. A > bridge should be used to connect two separate

Re: [CentOS] Poor perfmance of bridged interfaces

On 11/13/2015 03:22 AM, Sergio Belkin wrote: I'm trying to create virtualized linux bridge Well, you can't do that by putting two interfaces on the same LAN. A bridge should be used to connect two separate LANs. ___ CentOS mailing list

Re: [CentOS] Rsync and differential Backups

On 11/13/2015 01:46 AM, J Martin Rushton wrote: If you really_need_ the guarantee of a snapshot, consider either LVM or RAID1. Break out a volume from the RAID set, back it up, then rebuild. FFS, don't do the latter. LVM is the standard filesystem backing for Red Hat and CentOS systems, and

Re: [CentOS] Poor perfmance of bridged interfaces

On 11/13/2015 09:15 AM, Sergio Belkin wrote: But AFAIK, routers divide broadcast domains, and switches (and therefore bridges) divide collision domains. Oh good, Cisco terminology. :) I'll be more specific than I was earlier, then. It's possible to unify two collision domains into a

Re: [CentOS-virt] CentOS 6 Xen package update (including XSA-156)

Just applied the repo update rpm and the 4.4.3-6 updates - no problems. I only saw one unexpected message in the 4.4.3-6 update - snippet below: Running Transaction Updating : xen-licenses-4.4.3-6.el6.x86_64 1/10 Updating : xen-libs-4.4.3-6.el6.x86_64 2/10 Updating :

Re: [CentOS] Rsync and differential Backups

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 13/11/15 17:55, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 11/13/2015 01:46 AM, J Martin Rushton wrote: >> If you really_need_ the guarantee of a snapshot, consider either >> LVM or RAID1. Break out a volume from the RAID set, back it up, >> then rebuild. > >

[CentOS] Fwd: After installation

-- Forwarded message -- From: *Siva Prasad Nath* Date: Saturday, November 14, 2015 Subject: After installation To: centos-de...@centos.org Hi, I installed Centos. After login as root I can see the config file. Please advice me about the next step.

Re: [CentOS] Fwd: After installation

How about reading the documentation and learning the basics. You are not going to get step by step instructions. Eero 14.11.2015 4.16 ap. "Siva Prasad Nath" kirjoitti: > -- Forwarded message -- > From: *Siva Prasad Nath*

Re: [CentOS] After installation

Agree with you. Can you email me the link? On Saturday, November 14, 2015, Eero Volotinen wrote: > How about reading the documentation and learning the basics. You are not > going to get step by step instructions. > > Eero > 14.11.2015 4.16 ap. "Siva Prasad Nath"

Re: [CentOS] After installation

On Nov 13, 2015, at 9:16 PM, Siva Prasad Nath wrote: > I installed Centos. After login as root I can see the config file. > Please advice me about the next step. Please give us a better explanation of what you want to know. In the mean time, I suggest reading over

Re: [CentOS] Rsync and differential Backups

On 11/13/2015 12:59 PM, J Martin Rushton wrote: Maybe I should have been clearer: use (LVM) OR (RAID1 and break). I took your meaning. I'm saying that's a terrible backup strategy, for a list of reasons. For instance, it only works if you mirror a single disk. It doesn't work if you use

Re: [CentOS] Rsync and differential Backups

On 11/11/15 02:46, Gordon Messmer wrote: ... the process you described is likely to miss files that are modified while "find" runs. That's just being picky for the sake of it. A backup is a *point-in-time* snapshot of the files being backed up. It will not capture files modified after

Re: [CentOS] After installation

Www.centos.org or use google for 'rhel documentation' Eero 14.11.2015 5.43 ap. "Siva Prasad Nath" kirjoitti: > Agree with you. Can you email me the link? > > On Saturday, November 14, 2015, Eero Volotinen > wrote: > > > How about reading the

Re: [CentOS] Poor perfmance of bridged interfaces

2015-11-12 18:17 GMT-03:00 John R Pierce : > On 11/12/2015 10:42 AM, Sergio Belkin wrote: > >> DEVICE=enp0s8 >> HWADDR=08:00:27:A3:98:E6 >> BOOTPROTO=none >> ONBOOT=yes >> NM_CONTROLLED=no >> BRIDGE=br0 >> DEVICE=lo >> TYPE=loopback >> IPADDR=127.0.0.1 >> NETMASK=255.0.0.0 >>

Re: [CentOS] Differences from upstream RHEL

> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On > Behalf Of Peter > > Anyways, the vendor is also free to support > whatever OS they want, and you're free to choose not to use their > software. Except when you're not. Because for whatever reason, the choice of software