Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7.2 - Fast TSC calibration failed.

2015-12-18 Thread Earl A Ramirez
On 19 December 2015 at 12:18, Steven Tardy wrote: > > > On Dec 17, 2015, at 11:58 PM, Earl A Ramirez > wrote: > > I get > > the following error: > > > > [ 0.00] tsc: Fast TSC calibration failed > > TSC is a high accuracy CPU clock. TSC can fail due to motherboard hardware > fault on multi pr

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7.2 - Fast TSC calibration failed.

2015-12-18 Thread Steven Tardy
> On Dec 17, 2015, at 11:58 PM, Earl A Ramirez wrote: > I get > the following error: > > [ 0.00] tsc: Fast TSC calibration failed TSC is a high accuracy CPU clock. TSC can fail due to motherboard hardware fault on multi processor servers. But the kernel usually fails back to the less accu

Re: [CentOS] "installation source" specification for netinstall

2015-12-18 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 15/12/15 23:46, ken wrote: > On 12/15/2015 04:22 PM, John R Pierce wrote: >> On 12/15/2015 12:29 PM, ken wrote: >>> Trying to specify the "installation source" in the configuration of >>> netinstall for centos 7 (7.1). Three places on the web said >>> >>> mirror.centos.org/centos/7/os/x86_64/ >

Re: [CentOS] yum/RPM and Trust on First Use

2015-12-18 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 16/12/15 03:05, Alice Wonder wrote: > I'm not on the yum / RPM list and I don't know that I want to join just > to discuss this but with respect GPG keys - it is a classic example of > trust on first use. > > The first time yum installs a package, it asks to import the GPG key > used to sign th

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 7 installer bug?

2015-12-18 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 16/12/15 17:47, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > The other admin I work with seems to have found a bug in the installer. > The setup is: two internal SSD drives. Once the GUI gets to "select drive > to install on", he goes to , creates a RAID 1, and > partitions it, regular MBR (they're small). 1G for

Re: [CentOS] google chrome future / centos 7

2015-12-18 Thread Alice Wonder
On 12/18/2015 10:02 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Yep. There IS NO REASON for *any* logfile (or configuration file, for that matter) to be XML. Logs - if your machine is borked, cat or more may work, when no other way to view it does. Configuration... XML is for GUI. If the GUI's already hiding s

Re: [CentOS] google chrome future / centos 7

2015-12-18 Thread Richard
> Date: Friday, December 18, 2015 13:02:37 -0500 > From: m.r...@5-cent.us > > Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> >> On Fri, December 18, 2015 10:27 am, Jonathan Billings wrote: >>> On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 09:55:39AM -0600, Valeri Galtsev wrote: This item, which I opened, seems to be getting *way* off-t

Re: [CentOS] wifi on servers and fedora [was Re: 7.2 kernel panic on boot]

2015-12-18 Thread Always Learning
On Mon, 2015-12-07 at 14:27 -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: > I've been pleased that the folks on this list have been solicited > several times in the last six months for our opinions. ??? -- Regards, Paul. England, EU. England's place is in the European Union.

Re: [CentOS] google chrome future / centos 7

2015-12-18 Thread m . roth
Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > On Fri, December 18, 2015 10:27 am, Jonathan Billings wrote: >> On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 09:55:39AM -0600, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >>> >>> I guess we all are divided into two categories >>> >>> 1. If google [something] doesn't work on the operating system of my >>> choice, t

Re: [CentOS] google chrome future / centos 7

2015-12-18 Thread Always Learning
On Fri, 2015-12-18 at 10:49 -0600, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > Indeed, the first thing that happens, UNIX IT heads of institution are > being replaced with Windows brew ones. Then, most of the central services > are outsourced to external companies. Then all central IT everything is > converted t

Re: [CentOS] google chrome future / centos 7

2015-12-18 Thread Always Learning
On Fri, 2015-12-18 at 09:55 -0600, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > I guess we all are divided into two categories > > 1. If google [something] doesn't work on the operating system of my > choice, the hell with that crap (and google itself). > > 2. If google [something] doesn't work on the operating

Re: [CentOS] playing DVDs on C7

2015-12-18 Thread Alice Wonder
On 12/18/2015 06:32 AM, Lamar Owen wrote: On 12/17/2015 08:33 PM, Fred Smith wrote: Hi all! I'm trying to finish setting up my newly upgraded C7 system. It's on the same hardware I ran C6 on for several years. on C6 I had no trouble playing DVDs (after installing tons of packages and libdvdcss

Re: [CentOS] playing DVDs on C7

2015-12-18 Thread Fred Smith
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 09:32:53AM -0500, Lamar Owen wrote: > On 12/17/2015 08:33 PM, Fred Smith wrote: > >Hi all! > > > >I'm trying to finish setting up my newly upgraded C7 system. > > > >It's on the same hardware I ran C6 on for several years. on C6 I had no > >trouble playing DVDs (after instal

Re: [CentOS] google chrome future / centos 7

2015-12-18 Thread Valeri Galtsev
On Fri, December 18, 2015 10:27 am, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 09:55:39AM -0600, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> >> I guess we all are divided into two categories >> >> 1. If google [something] doesn't work on the operating system of my >> choice, the hell with that crap (and goo

Re: [CentOS] google chrome future / centos 7

2015-12-18 Thread Jonathan Billings
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 09:55:39AM -0600, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > I guess we all are divided into two categories > > 1. If google [something] doesn't work on the operating system of my > choice, the hell with that crap (and google itself). > > 2. If google [something] doesn't work on the opera

Re: [CentOS] google chrome future / centos 7

2015-12-18 Thread Valeri Galtsev
On Fri, December 18, 2015 7:34 am, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 09:38:40PM +, Richard wrote: >> On the linked-to help page: >> >> >> >> they show fedora-21[+] as supported. If I remember correctly, >> RHEL/CentOS-7 is base

Re: [CentOS] playing DVDs on C7

2015-12-18 Thread Lamar Owen
On 12/17/2015 08:33 PM, Fred Smith wrote: Hi all! I'm trying to finish setting up my newly upgraded C7 system. It's on the same hardware I ran C6 on for several years. on C6 I had no trouble playing DVDs (after installing tons of packages and libdvdcss). I have found that whether VLC will

Re: [CentOS] google chrome future / centos 7

2015-12-18 Thread zep
On 12/18/2015 08:34 AM, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 09:38:40PM +, Richard wrote: > "Ubuntu 12.04+, Debian 7+, OpenSuSE 13.1+, or Fedora Linux 21" No plus > (+) after the 21. I assume it must be a typo, since f21 left support > on the 1st of this month. The fact that their

Re: [CentOS] google chrome future / centos 7

2015-12-18 Thread Richard
> Date: Friday, December 18, 2015 08:34:36 -0500 > From: Jonathan Billings > > On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 09:38:40PM +, Richard wrote: >> On the linked-to help page: >> >> >> >> they show fedora-21[+] as supported. If I remember correctly, >>

Re: [CentOS] google chrome future / centos 7

2015-12-18 Thread Jonathan Billings
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 09:38:40PM +, Richard wrote: > On the linked-to help page: > > > > they show fedora-21[+] as supported. If I remember correctly, > RHEL/CentOS-7 is based against fedora-19. Actually, in two places on that page they say

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-7 Security Updates

2015-12-18 Thread Karanbir Singh
On 18/12/15 09:34, Дмитрий Тесёлкин wrote: > > This makes me think that there will be no security updates for 1503 and the > only way to get them is to upgrade to 1511, but I'd like to find any proof. > Unfortunately, there is nothing about this in Release Notes :( > Thats right, there are no po

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 130, Issue 7

2015-12-18 Thread centos-announce-request
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-annou...@centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-requ.

Re: [CentOS] "installation source" specification for netinstall

2015-12-18 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 12/17/2015 07:02 AM, ken wrote: What I described was plenty enough for anyone who's been through the netinstall configuration before. There's no point in explanation a simple gui for those who don't what I'm talking about. It might look that way to you, as a new user, but all along the wa

Re: [CentOS] Network services start before network is up since migrating to 7.2

2015-12-18 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 12/17/2015 07:59 AM, Sylvain CANOINE wrote: Well it looks like you are using the network service rather than the recommended NetworkManager ... Yes. That's the way our security experts made the models I use to setup my servers. I'll test a migration to NetworkManager, and take their advice o

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-7 Security Updates

2015-12-18 Thread Gordon Messmer
On 12/18/2015 01:34 AM, Дмитрий Тесёлкин wrote: This makes me think that there will be no security updates for 1503 and the only way to get them is to upgrade to 1511, but I'd like to find any proof. That's correct. CentOS treats minor releases as just a label for a point in time. There are,

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-7 Security Updates

2015-12-18 Thread James Hogarth
On 18 December 2015 at 09:34, Дмитрий Тесёлкин wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm trying to clarify the security updates policy for older CentOS-7 > releases. > > There is a number of servers I'm supporting that are running CentOS-7 1503. > When 1511 was released several days ago I've tried to upgrade seve

Re: [CentOS] CentOS-7 Security Updates

2015-12-18 Thread Alice Wonder
On 12/18/2015 01:34 AM, Дмитрий Тесёлкин wrote: Hi all, I'm trying to clarify the security updates policy for older CentOS-7 releases. There is a number of servers I'm supporting that are running CentOS-7 1503. When 1511 was released several days ago I've tried to upgrade several of those, but

[CentOS] CentOS-7 Security Updates

2015-12-18 Thread Дмитрий Тесёлкин
Hi all, I'm trying to clarify the security updates policy for older CentOS-7 releases. There is a number of servers I'm supporting that are running CentOS-7 1503. When 1511 was released several days ago I've tried to upgrade several of those, but failed. I've got some strange errors with e1000 vi