Re: [CentOS] CentOS-6.7, kvm bridges, virtual interfaces, and routes

In article <55ae6ce7fe2cbdba1514f1072281c006.squir...@webmail.harte-lyne.ca>, James B. Byrne wrote: > I have been looking at this problem on and off for a considerable > period. Given my lack of knowledge I have been unable to resolve this > quickly and in consequence it

[CentOS] Centos 3.8 Server Questions, SeaMonkey Mozilla and Java

In order to run a certain software package that runs as a java applet I had to install Centos 3.8 on a 32-bit server. After installation I upgraded the installation using yum after repointing the configuration file to vault.centos.org. This worked fine, however, I still have to resolve two

Re: [CentOS] Centos 3.8 Server Questions, SeaMonkey Mozilla and Java

On 09/01/16 10:08, H wrote: > In order to run a certain software package that runs as a java applet I had > to install Centos 3.8 on a 32-bit server. After installation I upgraded the > installation using yum after repointing the configuration file to > vault.centos.org. This worked fine,

Re: [CentOS] Yum Weird Message

On 12/28/15 15:24, Alice Wonder wrote: > I ran into this exact issue last night - > > http://www.iotti.biz/?p=433 > > When a computer is connected via IPv4 but the IPv4 a repo host connects > to is not available, yum then tries the IPv6 address and will fail with > a confusing message telling

Re: [CentOS] Centos 3.8 Server Questions, SeaMonkey Mozilla and Java

That was not helpful - I explained that I had to run this version. On January 8, 2016 5:18:36 PM EST, Peter wrote: >On 09/01/16 10:08, H wrote: >> In order to run a certain software package that runs as a java applet >I had to install Centos 3.8 on a 32-bit server. After

Re: [CentOS] Centos 3.8 Server Questions, SeaMonkey Mozilla and Java

On 1/8/2016 2:21 PM, H wrote: That was not helpful - I explained that I had to run this version. you WANT to run something completely unsupported from about 10 years ago which apparently requires software thats known to be insecure and buggy as all heck. its 2015, not 2005, 10 years is

[CentOS] yum-cron / email sending problem

I want to use yum-cron with email notificaton. The upgrade runs, but i get no message. yum-cron aborted with this message: [root@h1 yum]# yum-cron Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/sbin/yum-cron", line 711, in main() File "/usr/sbin/yum-cron", line 708, in main

Re: [CentOS] MATE question

On Sat, 9 Jan 2016 01:03:12 -0500 Fred Smith wrote: > There is one minor nit left, perhaps you can suggest a solution: > the right-click menu on the desktop wallpaper used to have an entry for > "open in terminal" but it now doesn't. Any idea how to re-add it? yum install caja-open-terminal --

Re: [CentOS] Centos 3.8 Server Questions, SeaMonkey Mozilla and Java

On 2016-01-08, H wrote: > That was not helpful - I explained that I had to run this version. That was probably partly Peter's point: you are very unlikely to get any helpful responses if you are running 3.8, and you are therefore likely on your own. That's probably not

Re: [CentOS] MATE question

hi there I'm currently testing mate desktop on epel 7, I don't find issue yet. I'm sure than your issue is mix of packages testing and stable packages. feedback is welcome. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] MATE question

On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 10:59:37PM -0600, Peter Q. wrote: > hi there > I'm currently testing mate desktop on epel 7, I don't find issue yet. > I'm sure than your issue is mix of packages testing and stable packages. probably you're right. I did find some more 1.12 stuff lurking in dark corners,

Re: [CentOS] MATE question

On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 08:27:01PM -0700, Brandon Vincent wrote: > On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 8:22 PM, Fred Smith > wrote: > > Anyone know what I've missed (or messed) ? > > It might be an issue with a version mismatch of configuration files > and settings. > > I'd

[CentOS] dhcpd and centos 7 network burps

Folks I have noticed that my Centos 7 systems which use DHCPD from a router or gateway all seem to fail when the DHCP client asks for a renewal. After issuing systemctl restart NetworkManger the connectivity resumes until the lease renewal time occurs again. As part of my research, I set

[CentOS] MATE question

I know I should go to EPEL with this, but thought to ask here in case anyone else uses Mate and may know more about it than I do. I had installed the MATE 1.12 packages from epel testing a few days ago, but since that did not include some of the devel packages, I just removed it and reinstalled

Re: [CentOS] MATE question

On Fri, 8 Jan 2016 22:22:23 -0500 Fred Smith wrote: > they all installed fine, but now my desktop has a background, and top > and bottom panels and nothing else. right-click on the desktop produces > no context menu. add caja to startup applications if desktop icons are missing -- MELVILLE

Re: [CentOS] Centos 3.8 Server Questions, SeaMonkey Mozilla and Java

On 01/09/2016 11:43 AM, John R Pierce wrote: On 1/8/2016 2:21 PM, H wrote: That was not helpful - I explained that I had to run this version. you WANT to run something completely unsupported from about 10 years ago which apparently requires software thats known to be insecure and buggy as

Re: [CentOS] MATE question

On Fri, Jan 8, 2016 at 8:22 PM, Fred Smith wrote: > Anyone know what I've missed (or messed) ? It might be an issue with a version mismatch of configuration files and settings. I'd log out of the graphical environment, switch to a text console (or boot to a

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 131, Issue 2

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-annou...@centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to

[CentOS] CentOS-6.7, kvm bridges, virtual interfaces, and routes

I have been looking at this problem on and off for a considerable period. Given my lack of knowledge I have been unable to resolve this quickly and in consequence it has been constantly shoved to the background as other issues arise. Here is the situation: I have two dual-homed kvm hosts both

[CentOS] SELinux context change on /etc/posfix/main.cf

This morning I received this report of a change to the SELinux context of /etc/posfix/main.cf on one of our hosts. from: system_u:object_r:postfix_etc_t:s0 to: unconfined_u:object_r:postfix_etc_t:s0 The contents of the file have been verified as unchanged. There was a yum update applied