[CentOS-docs] CentOSguest page

Hi, I am JamesLownie, I want to work on the page https://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Virtualization/VirtualBox/CentOSguest. The information here is out of date, I am currently working out how to do this and when I am successful I want to document the procedure on the wiki. Thanks, James Lownie

[CentOS-es] [ISPConfig] No guarda las Zonas DNS en named !

Instale mi server CentOS desde cero, instale todos los servicios: bind, dhcpd, pure-ftpd, fail2ban, samba, httpd, php, mysql, postgresql, spamassasin, amavis, opendkim, opendmarc, squirrelmail, mailman y [b]finalmente[/b] ISPConfig. Tras instalar ISPConfig no tuve ningun mensaje de error. Depues

Re: [CentOS-docs] Write access for MarcusFurlong

On 18 February 2016 at 05:15, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 3:18 AM, Marcus Furlong wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> As per >> https://wiki.centos.org/Contribute#head-42b3d8e26400a106851a61aebe5c2cca54dd79e5 >> , I would like to request write access to

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.7 Drivers for Compaq Storageworks TL891 Minilibrary

On 2/17/2016 4:56 PM, Chris Adams wrote: Once upon a time, Mustafa Mohammed said: >I am trying to setup a backup system using Bacula on CentOS 6.7 installed on eserver x345 but cannot find the drivers I set one of those up many years ago, probably RHEL 3 timeframe. No

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.7 Drivers for Compaq Storageworks TL891 Minilibrary

Once upon a time, Mustafa Mohammed said: > I am trying to setup a backup system using Bacula on CentOS 6.7 installed on > eserver x345 but cannot find the drivers I set one of those up many years ago, probably RHEL 3 timeframe. No drivers are necessary for the library,

Re: [CentOS] Systemd persistent change to service file

On 17 February 2016 at 16:50, Michael H wrote: > Hi All, > > I had my database fall over earlier, Initially I thought it was due to a > change in the OS but the postgresql update overwrote my systemd service > file. > > How can I create a file for my postgresql service that

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.7 Drivers for Compaq Storageworks TL891 Minilibrary

On 2/17/2016 3:54 PM, Mustafa Mohammed wrote: I am trying to setup a backup system using Bacula on CentOS 6.7 installed on eserver x345 but cannot find the drivers thats a /really/ old tape library, like 18 or 20 years old, was originally a DEC product before the Compaq+DEC+HP

[CentOS] CentOS 6.7 Drivers for Compaq Storageworks TL891 Minilibrary

Hello all I am trying to setup a backup system using Bacula on CentOS 6.7 installed on eserver x345 but cannot find the drivers Any help in finding the drivers will be much appreciated Regards Mustafa ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] slightly off-topic, RAID program for on-board SAS 2308-4i ?

On 2/17/2016 11:49 AM, Zube wrote: Any further clues appreciated. I've only ever used 2008/2308 SAS controllers in IT 'hba' mode. -- john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org

Re: [CentOS] Kernel parameters ignored -

On 2/17/2016 6:39 AM, Michael H wrote: Some additional information; sysctl -a | grep kernel.shm kernel.shmall = 8650752 kernel.shmmax = 35433480192 kernel.shmmni = 4096 which corresponds to my /etc/sysctl.conf kernel.shmmax=35433480192 kernel.shmall=8650752 but contradicts; ulimit -a [...]

Re: [CentOS] slightly off-topic, RAID program for on-board SAS 2308-4i ?

On Tue Feb 16 03:35:06 PM, John R Pierce wrote: Thanks to both you and Mark Roth for chiming in and thank you for the lsi-raidinfo script. > On 2/16/2016 3:23 PM, Zube wrote: > >Does anyone know what program can be used to query the RAID status > >from the OS for an on-board LSI SAS 2308-4i? >

[CentOS] centos7 :: ks.cfg :: customisation of sshd

Hi! I want to change the sshd port at install for centos7 but i am not sure if i am on the good track (and it is time expensive to make many try-outs).. So, i would be grateful if someone with experience can spot if i have problems with my planning.. (the actual purpose is that after installation

Re: [CentOS-docs] Write access for MarcusFurlong

On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 3:18 AM, Marcus Furlong wrote: > Hi, > > As per > https://wiki.centos.org/Contribute#head-42b3d8e26400a106851a61aebe5c2cca54dd79e5 > , I would like to request write access to > https://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Custom_Kernel for myself (user >

Re: [CentOS-virt] XSAs 170 and 154, repository layouts, and centos-release-xen 8-1

On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 01:04:08PM +, George Dunlap wrote: > On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 12:30 PM, George Dunlap wrote: > > I have the following packages going through the CBS: > > * A CentOS 7 xen-4.6.1-2, with XSAs 170 and 154 > > * A CentOS 6 xen-4.6.1-2, with XSAs 170 and

Re: [CentOS] Openswan <-> VyOS

On 02/17/2016 06:38 AM, John Cenile wrote: I'm having a bit of trouble connecting our current CentOS Openswan server with a Vyos server via IPSec. Almost all of the openswan developers left the project and created a fork named libreswan. You should switch in order to use an actively

Re: [CentOS] Systemd persistent change to service file

On 02/17/2016 08:50 AM, Michael H wrote: How can I create a file for my postgresql service that will not be overwritten when updates are applied? Use "systemctl edit " to edit a drop-in snippet. This will create a file in /etc/systemd/system/.d/ that overrides settings in the unit file

[CentOS] Systemd persistent change to service file

Hi All, I had my database fall over earlier, Initially I thought it was due to a change in the OS but the postgresql update overwrote my systemd service file. How can I create a file for my postgresql service that will not be overwritten when updates are applied? Am I correct in thinking it

Re: [CentOS] Openswan <-> VyOS

Maybe the other end is not supporting needed ciphers? Try other selections? Eero 2016-02-17 16:38 GMT+02:00 John Cenile : > Hello, > > > I'm having a bit of trouble connecting our current CentOS Openswan server > with a Vyos server via IPSec. > > I've posted this on the

Re: [CentOS] New glibc for CentOS-6 and CentOS-7 and CVE-2015-7547

> Should my output from ulimit -a not correspond to my sysctl.conf > parameters? > > This server was tested heavily and rebooted tens of times before it > moved into production, I can't understand what has changed other than > now I get inconsistent output from > > sysctl -a and ulimit -a. I am

Re: [CentOS] New glibc for CentOS-6 and CentOS-7 and CVE-2015-7547

On Wed, 17 Feb 2016, Michael H wrote: ulimit -s is definitely not showing the correct parameter that I specified in /etc/sysctl.conf. Are you not confusing two unrelated things? man systemd.exec / LimitSTACK no? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=750923 may point you further. jh

Re: [CentOS] New glibc for CentOS-6 and CentOS-7 and CVE-2015-7547

On 17/02/16 14:44, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 02/17/2016 08:39 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 02/17/2016 08:10 AM, Michael H wrote: The easy answer is yes .. glibc requires so many things to be restarted, that is the best bet. Or certainly the easiest. Note: in CentOS 7, there

Re: [CentOS] dhcpd frequent renewals

On 16/02/16 16:59, david wrote: Folks This might be the wrong place to ask, but I don't know where to turn. My internal home network, including wireless, is controlled by a Centos6 server, which provides dhcpd services, along with NAT. I have DHCPD configured with the addresses

Re: [CentOS] New glibc for CentOS-6 and CentOS-7 and CVE-2015-7547

On 17/02/16 14:39, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 02/17/2016 08:10 AM, Michael H wrote: >>> The easy answer is yes .. glibc requires so many things to be >>> restarted, that is the best bet. Or certainly the easiest. >>> >>> Note: in CentOS 7, there is also a kernel update which is rated >>> as

Re: [CentOS] New glibc for CentOS-6 and CentOS-7 and CVE-2015-7547

On 02/17/2016 08:39 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 02/17/2016 08:10 AM, Michael H wrote: >>> The easy answer is yes .. glibc requires so many things to be restarted, >>> that is the best bet. Or certainly the easiest. >>> >>> Note: in CentOS 7, there is also a kernel update which is rated as >>>

Re: [CentOS] Kernel parameters ignored -

On 17/02/16 14:32, Michael H wrote: > Hi, re-posting this with a more appropriate subject for my reply; > >> The easy answer is yes .. glibc requires so many things to be restarted, >> that is the best bet. Or certainly the easiest. >> >> Note: in CentOS 7, there is also a kernel update which is

[CentOS] Openswan <-> VyOS

Hello, I'm having a bit of trouble connecting our current CentOS Openswan server with a Vyos server via IPSec. I've posted this on the VyOS forums, but haven't had many helpful responses, so I thought I would ask here. http://forum.vyos.net/showthread.php?tid=26504=29703#pid29703 Basically

Re: [CentOS] New glibc for CentOS-6 and CentOS-7 and CVE-2015-7547

On 02/17/2016 08:10 AM, Michael H wrote: >> The easy answer is yes .. glibc requires so many things to be restarted, >> that is the best bet. Or certainly the easiest. >> >> Note: in CentOS 7, there is also a kernel update which is rated as >> Important .. so you should boot to that anyway: >>

[CentOS] Kernel parameters ignored -

Hi, re-posting this with a more appropriate subject for my reply; > The easy answer is yes .. glibc requires so many things to be restarted, > that is the best bet. Or certainly the easiest. > > Note: in CentOS 7, there is also a kernel update which is rated as > Important .. so you should boot

Re: [CentOS] New glibc for CentOS-6 and CentOS-7 and CVE-2015-7547

> The easy answer is yes .. glibc requires so many things to be restarted, > that is the best bet. Or certainly the easiest. > > Note: in CentOS 7, there is also a kernel update which is rated as > Important .. so you should boot to that anyway: >

Re: [CentOS] New glibc for CentOS-6 and CentOS-7 and CVE-2015-7547

On 02/17/2016 07:40 AM, Corey Johnson wrote: > > On 2/17/2016 8:01 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> I normally just let the daily announce post to this list show what is >> available for updates, but there is a CVE (CVE-2015-7547) that needs a >> bit more attention which will be on today's announce

Re: [CentOS] New glibc for CentOS-6 and CentOS-7 and CVE-2015-7547

On 02/17/2016 07:08 AM, Michael H wrote: > On 17/02/16 13:01, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> I normally just let the daily announce post to this list show what >> is available for updates, but there is a CVE (CVE-2015-7547) that >> needs a bit more attention which will be on today's announce list >> of

Re: [CentOS] New glibc for CentOS-6 and CentOS-7 and CVE-2015-7547

On 2/17/2016 8:01 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > I normally just let the daily announce post to this list show what is > available for updates, but there is a CVE (CVE-2015-7547) that needs a > bit more attention which will be on today's announce list of updates. > > We released a new glibc yesterday

Re: [CentOS] New glibc for CentOS-6 and CentOS-7 and CVE-2015-7547

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 17/02/16 14:08, Michael H wrote: > On 17/02/16 13:01, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> I normally just let the daily announce post to this list show >> what is available for updates, but there is a CVE (CVE-2015-7547) >> that needs a bit more attention

Re: [CentOS] New glibc for CentOS-6 and CentOS-7 and CVE-2015-7547

On 17/02/16 13:01, Johnny Hughes wrote: > I normally just let the daily announce post to this list show what > is available for updates, but there is a CVE (CVE-2015-7547) that > needs a bit more attention which will be on today's announce list > of updates. > > We released a new glibc yesterday

Re: [CentOS-virt] XSAs 170 and 154, repository layouts, and centos-release-xen 8-1

On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 12:30 PM, George Dunlap wrote: > I have the following packages going through the CBS: > * A CentOS 7 xen-4.6.1-2, with XSAs 170 and 154 > * A CentOS 6 xen-4.6.1-2, with XSAs 170 and 154 > * A CentOS 6 xen-4.4.3-11, with XSAs 170 > > All these should show

[CentOS] New glibc for CentOS-6 and CentOS-7 and CVE-2015-7547

I normally just let the daily announce post to this list show what is available for updates, but there is a CVE (CVE-2015-7547) that needs a bit more attention which will be on today's announce list of updates. We released a new glibc yesterday for CentOS-6 and CentOS-7 .. it is VERY important

Re: [CentOS-es] named : checkhints view internal h.root-servers.net

Chequeaste que te haya actualizado el archivo del DNS, y no lo haya dejado con el nombre *.rpmnew?? Saludos, David El día 17 de febrero de 2016, 9:34, James Dean escribió: > jeje... > es lo primero que aplique... pero aún siguen los mensajes... > Gracias !!! > > > >

Re: [CentOS-es] named : checkhints view internal h.root-servers.net

jeje... es lo primero que aplique... pero aún siguen los mensajes... Gracias !!! 2016-02-17 7:52 GMT-03:00 David González Romero : > yum update??? > > El día 16 de febrero de 2016, 8:50, James Dean > escribió: > > Holas... > > > > Buen día a todos... >

[CentOS-virt] XSAs 170 and 154, repository layouts, and centos-release-xen 8-1

I have the following packages going through the CBS: * A CentOS 7 xen-4.6.1-2, with XSAs 170 and 154 * A CentOS 6 xen-4.6.1-2, with XSAs 170 and 154 * A CentOS 6 xen-4.4.3-11, with XSAs 170 All these should show up in mirrors hopefully sometime later today. As usual, please report any problems

[CentOS] Nearly Instant Karma

Our smallest network has just three systems permanently attached to a 100/1000 router.  There is one additional port available to temporarily plug in a laptop.  The largest systems are both Dells, one running Windows 7 and one running CentOS 6.7.  The Windows 7 system supports three flavors of

[CentOS-docs] Write access for MarcusFurlong

Hi, As per https://wiki.centos.org/Contribute#head-42b3d8e26400a106851a61aebe5c2cca54dd79e5 , I would like to request write access to https://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Custom_Kernel for myself (user MarcusFurlong). The page is out of date and I can update it. Regards, Marcus. -- Marcus Furlong

Re: [CentOS-es] named : checkhints view internal h.root-servers.net

yum update??? El día 16 de febrero de 2016, 8:50, James Dean escribió: > Holas... > > Buen día a todos... > entiendo que el servidor 'h' cambio de IP y es por ello que estoy > recibiendo estos mensajes : > > Feb 15 11:16:02 localhost named[3263]: checkhints: view internal: >

Re: [CentOS] Alternative IP addresses

On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 7:57 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote: > My CentOS-7 home server has a static IP address. > > Is there a simple way of organizing the hpptd server > so that it is accessible through this address at a remote host, > but is accessed at its 192.168 address by a