Bueno ya resolví. En realidad todo estaba bien. Excepto que cambien el
MASQUERADE lo había hecho al eth0:1 y era solo al eth0.
Después en los clientes había que definir los DNS del Proveedor;
aunque esto es algo que puedo eliminar con un dnsmasq.
Saludos,
David
El día 14 de marzo de 2016, 8:53,
El día 13 de marzo de 2016, 3:19, Oscar Osta Pueyo
escribió:
> Hola,
> Si no entendí mal, usas bind, por que no usas el dns incluido en el modo ad
> de samba 4. Te puede evitar problemas.
>
estoy usando los que recomienda samba4 BIND9_DLZ .
>> > igual te interesa
>> >
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 12:47 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 3/14/2016 9:35 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
>> But packages aside, as Linux is UNIX-like system, you can always install
>> it UNIX way: download tarball from perl site, compile and install it. You
>> will have to do
On 3/14/2016 9:35 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
But packages aside, as Linux is UNIX-like system, you can always install
it UNIX way: download tarball from perl site, compile and install it. You
will have to do your own work maintaining it whenever updates are
necessary.
just don't replace the
On Mon, March 14, 2016 11:26 am, Paul Heinlein wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Mar 2016, John R Pierce wrote:
>
>> On 3/14/2016 8:57 AM, Boris Epstein wrote:
>>> What are the proven/tested version of Perl for CentOS 6 and 7? Is Perl
>>> 6
>>> operational on either?
>>
>> C6 comes with perl 5.10.1
>> C7
On Mon, 14 Mar 2016, John R Pierce wrote:
On 3/14/2016 8:57 AM, Boris Epstein wrote:
What are the proven/tested version of Perl for CentOS 6 and 7? Is Perl 6
operational on either?
C6 comes with perl 5.10.1
C7 comes with perl 5.16.3
Additionally, there are software collections available
On 3/14/2016 8:57 AM, Boris Epstein wrote:
What are the proven/tested version of Perl for CentOS 6 and 7? Is Perl 6
operational on either?
C6 comes with perl 5.10.1
C7 comes with perl 5.16.3
--
john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz
___
Hello listmates,
What are the proven/tested version of Perl for CentOS 6 and 7? Is Perl 6
operational on either?
Thanks.
Boris.
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 11:28:23PM -0600, Lokesh Mandvekar wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 08:33:31PM +, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> > Let me look through the bits and see where we are and get this process
> > started up. We'd need to get some basic testing done, and then we can
> > promote it a
On 03/11/2016 12:41 PM, Alessandro Baggi wrote:
> Hi list, I know that there are automatic update with yum-cron but never
> tried.
> In my experiences I never did automatic backup because if update was broken
> my installation will be broken and I wait some time before apply update.
> Today seems
On 03/10/2016 08:47 AM, Leonardo Oliveira Ortiz wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I think Centos are affected, right?
>
> Some update from Centos?
> ___
> CentOS mailing list
> CentOS@centos.org
> https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
>
If / When Red
Hola Lista:
Tengo un pequeño server Cento6.x temporal que quiero montar para hacer
un simple NAT de la red. Este server tiene solo 1 interfaz de red
"eth0"
eth0 tiene la configuración IP del proveedor que me permite la salida
a internet. Y yo le creo una interfaz de red virtual eth0:1 con la
*Jose Maria Terry Jimenez*
No creo que el problema sea de puerta de enlace, ya que al estar en la
misma subred no debería "ir" al router (la puerta de enlace solo se usa
cuando el destino es una subred distinta). Si podría ser en cambio un
problema de DNS, que tus equipos intenten resolver el
> -Original Message-
> From: centos-boun...@centos.org [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On
> Behalf Of Chris Beattie
> Sent: den 11 mars 2016 16:53
> To: 'CentOS mailing list'
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Openshot 2.x (beta) on C7??
>
> On 3/11/2016 2:02 AM, Sorin Srbu wrote:
> >>> Looks
14 matches
Mail list logo