SoftEther VPN all-in-one solution and cross platform.
On Monday, April 4, 2016, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> On 04/04/2016 12:11 PM, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
>
>> This made me google around a little, and I found some good info here.
>> They, too, kind of recommend openvpn.
>>
>>
On 04/04/2016 12:11 PM, Jussi Hirvi wrote:
This made me google around a little, and I found some good info here.
They, too, kind of recommend openvpn.
http://www.howtogeek.com/211329/which-is-the-best-vpn-protocol-pptp-vs.-openvpn-vs.-l2tpipsec-vs.-sstp/
This is not good information.
In
Am 04.04.2016 um 19:57 schrieb david:
Folks
I would like to have my windows 7 laptop communicate with my home server
via a VPN, in such a way that it appears to be "inside" my home
network. It should not only let me appear to be at home for any
external query, but also let me access my
On 04/04/2016 10:57 AM, david wrote:
I have seen discussions of OpenVPN, OpenSwan, LibreVPN, StrongSwan
(and probably others I haven't noted). I'd be interested in hearing
from anyone who wishes to comment about which to use, with the
following requirements:
I recommend l2tp/ipsec. It's
On Mon, 4 Apr 2016, david wrote:
I have seen discussions of OpenVPN, OpenSwan, LibreVPN, StrongSwan
(and probably others I haven't noted). I'd be interested in hearing
from anyone who wishes to comment about which to use, with the
following requirements:
1) As noted, it should be secure
On 4.4.2016 22.01, Eero Volotinen wrote:
And openvpn. Avoid ipsec as it's too complex and pptp is unsecure.
This made me google around a little, and I found some good info here.
They, too, kind of recommend openvpn.
My partner has been using Openvpn extensively. It looks very reasonable
and has been quite trustworthy.
It is configured via commandline. The server seems to work on Windows,
too ("Vista and later"). There are good tutorials for CentOs, for example
And openvpn. Avoid ipsec as it's too complex and pptp is unsecure.
Eero
4.4.2016 9.55 ip. "Richard Zimmerman"
kirjoitti:
> SoftEther VPN
>
> Once setup, it just works
>
> Regards,
>
> Richard
>
>
> ---
> Richard Zimmerman
> Systems / Network Administrator
>
SoftEther VPN
Once setup, it just works
Regards,
Richard
---
Richard Zimmerman
Systems / Network Administrator
River Bend Hose Specialty, Inc.
S Main Street
South Bend, IN 46601-3337
(574) 233-1133
(574) 280-7284 Fax
-Original Message-
From: centos-boun...@centos.org
On 4/4/2016 7:22 AM, Eero Volotinen wrote:
Yes, this helps at least "single" developers and people that are training
for rhce / rhcsa exam..
it also helps development groups in big corporate environments as they
won't have to budget and pay annual subscription fees to maintain their
Folks
I would like to have my windows 7 laptop communicate with my home
server via a VPN, in such a way that it appears to be "inside" my
home network. It should not only let me appear to be at home for any
external query, but also let me access my computers inside my home.
I already have
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 7:16 AM, Mohammed Zeeshan
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> As things stand, you can signup for a Red Hat Developer Subscription for
> free to get full access
> to all Red Hat products as a developer. Yes, you cannot deploy Red Hat
> products in production
>
Just to inform you that we'll move some services to a new node, and so
there will be a small impact for the following services :
- https://www.centos.org (no real downtime, as it will just be
redirected automatically)
- https://www.centos.org/forums (see below)
During that migration we'll also
On Mon, April 4, 2016 9:25 am, Digimer wrote:
> On 04/04/16 10:06 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, April 4, 2016 8:53 am, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>> On 04/04/2016 08:39 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
I read that Redhat was offering their Linux free,
and downloaded the ISO, though I
And (big) commercial vendors/users always prefer RHEL as it commercially
supported platform.
--
Eero
2016-04-04 17:25 GMT+03:00 Digimer :
> On 04/04/16 10:06 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, April 4, 2016 8:53 am, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> >> On 04/04/2016 08:39 AM,
On 04/04/16 10:06 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
> On Mon, April 4, 2016 8:53 am, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>> On 04/04/2016 08:39 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>>> I read that Redhat was offering their Linux free,
>>> and downloaded the ISO, though I haven't run it.
>>>
>>> What do CentOS users think of
On 4 April 2016 at 15:22, Eero Volotinen wrote:
> Yes, this helps at least "single" developers and people that are training
> for rhce / rhcsa exam..
>
>
Note that this also gives access to the Red Hat Knowledgebase and to beta
downloads both of which can be useful for any
On 4/4/2016 2:16 AM, Ned Slider wrote:
On 03/04/16 22:10, Ireneusz Piasecki wrote:
W dniu 03.04.2016 o 04:39, Rob Kampen pisze:
EPEL maintainers?
I note messages in the log about updated version 0.99.1 of CLAMAV
being available since Mar 5th.
for CentOS 6 no update is available yet.
I used
Yes, this helps at least "single" developers and people that are training
for rhce / rhcsa exam..
br,
--
Eero
2016-04-04 17:16 GMT+03:00 Mohammed Zeeshan :
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 7:36 PM, Valeri Galtsev
> wrote:
>
> >
> > On Mon, April
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 7:36 PM, Valeri Galtsev
wrote:
>
> On Mon, April 4, 2016 8:53 am, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> > On 04/04/2016 08:39 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> >> I read that Redhat was offering their Linux free,
> >> and downloaded the ISO, though I haven't run it.
On Mon, April 4, 2016 8:53 am, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 04/04/2016 08:39 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>> I read that Redhat was offering their Linux free,
>> and downloaded the ISO, though I haven't run it.
>>
>> What do CentOS users think of Redhat's offer?
>>
>> The registration with Redhat
Yes, but this is not still (very) big change as redhat partner companies
get rhel linsences for developer / internal use for free.
--
Eero
2016-04-04 16:55 GMT+03:00 Johnny Hughes :
> On 04/04/2016 08:53 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> > On 04/04/2016 08:39 AM, Timothy Murphy
On 04/04/2016 08:53 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 04/04/2016 08:39 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
>> I read that Redhat was offering their Linux free,
>> and downloaded the ISO, though I haven't run it.
>>
>> What do CentOS users think of Redhat's offer?
>>
>> The registration with Redhat seemed very
On 04/04/2016 08:39 AM, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> I read that Redhat was offering their Linux free,
> and downloaded the ISO, though I haven't run it.
>
> What do CentOS users think of Redhat's offer?
>
> The registration with Redhat seemed very bureaucratic to me,
> and I'm not sure if I have
Hello Timothy,
On Mon, 04 Apr 2016 14:39:54 +0100 Timothy Murphy wrote:
> I read that Redhat was offering their Linux free,
> and downloaded the ISO, though I haven't run it.
>
> What do CentOS users think of Redhat's offer?
>
> The registration with Redhat seemed very
Yes, they are providing free version only for "developer use".
--
Eero
2016-04-04 16:39 GMT+03:00 Timothy Murphy :
> I read that Redhat was offering their Linux free,
> and downloaded the ISO, though I haven't run it.
>
> What do CentOS users think of Redhat's offer?
>
> The
Hi,
I think you miss understood or the authors of the article about 'Redhat
offering their Linux free'. Can you please provide your source?
First of all it's the distro that has been offered for 'free', but only
for developers. Please read the original press release:
I read that Redhat was offering their Linux free,
and downloaded the ISO, though I haven't run it.
What do CentOS users think of Redhat's offer?
The registration with Redhat seemed very bureaucratic to me,
and I'm not sure if I have carried it out properly.
Also, I didn't see if it was possible
On 03/04/16 22:10, Ireneusz Piasecki wrote:
W dniu 03.04.2016 o 04:39, Rob Kampen pisze:
EPEL maintainers?
I note messages in the log about updated version 0.99.1 of CLAMAV
being available since Mar 5th.
for CentOS 6 no update is available yet.
I used to use rpmforge for this package but that
29 matches
Mail list logo