[CentOS-docs] about Release Notes 6.8 , word "TLSv1.2" should be changed to "TLS v1.2"

In RelaseNotes 6.8, at the section "Major changes", the word "TlSv1.2" should be changed to "TLS v1.2" . TlSv1.2 -> TLS v1.2 Now, in this ReleaseNotes, not "CentOS6" but "CentOS 6", And now, not "SMBIOS3.0.0 " but "SMBIOS 3.0.0 ". But now, why not "TLS v1.2" but "TlSv1.2" ?

Re: [CentOS] Pulling in broadwell support for cent6u5

On 06/15/2016 10:18 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 06/15/2016 05:10 PM, jsl6uy js16uy wrote: >> Thanks much for the the reply! >> Some sec updates/bug fixes have been applied thru the run of 6u5 and after, >> but yes, still firmly in 6u5 land. Guess will have to test. >> Broadwell cpus do run in

Re: [CentOS] Pulling in broadwell support for cent6u5

On 6/15/2016 8:18 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: I would point out that we provide CentOS-6, which is defined as all the latest updates installed. Point releases are just a mechanism to create installable trees and new installers for new hardware at a point in time. It has never been a tested

Re: [CentOS] Pulling in broadwell support for cent6u5

On 06/15/2016 05:10 PM, jsl6uy js16uy wrote: > Thanks much for the the reply! > Some sec updates/bug fixes have been applied thru the run of 6u5 and after, > but yes, still firmly in 6u5 land. Guess will have to test. > Broadwell cpus do run in the OS, but "6u5" is stated as not supporting >

[CentOS] KVM issue

running centos 6... have had a KVM linux vm (also C6) going for quite awhile that depends on a USB device mapping (a external audio DAC module). I updated the host today (yum update), it had been awhile (was like 6.5 before, now its 6.8+), and rebooted. the VM won't restart. when I try and

[CentOS] Unable to mount a USB DVD drive

I can't seem to get an external DVD drive to show up on an CentOS 7 server. Wondering if it's just missing a driver or if I'm missing something fundamental. It's an external USB device that works fine on my Fedora 21 Laptop, but I never get a /dev/ entry (EG: /dev/sr0) on the server. What

Re: [CentOS] Is there popular multimedia framework supported in centos

On 06/15/2016 09:20 AM, applema...@163.com wrote: I know gstreamer is written in c Language. Is there popular multimedia framework written in c++ supported in centos? Thanks! gstreamermm is the C++ bindings for gstreamer. Otherwise:

Re: [CentOS] Pulling in broadwell support for cent6u5

Thanks much for the the reply! Some sec updates/bug fixes have been applied thru the run of 6u5 and after, but yes, still firmly in 6u5 land. Guess will have to test. Broadwell cpus do run in the OS, but "6u5" is stated as not supporting 26XXv4 chipsets. regards On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 4:56 PM,

Re: [CentOS] Pulling in broadwell support for cent6u5

On 6/15/2016 2:48 PM, jsl6uy js16uy wrote: Hello, all. Hope all is well Is it possible to install kernel and support files from 6u7 into a base 6u5 image to achieve full broadwell support in 6u5? We are "locked", clearly not fully since willing to up jump kernels, on 6u5. "Locked", meaning

[CentOS] Pulling in broadwell support for cent6u5

Hello, all. Hope all is well Is it possible to install kernel and support files from 6u7 into a base 6u5 image to achieve full broadwell support in 6u5? We are "locked", clearly not fully since willing to up jump kernels, on 6u5. Thanks for any and all help

Re: [CentOS-es] Ayuda tarjeta de Red Centos 7

El 14 de junio de 2016, 12:37, César Martinez escribió: > Saludos amigos espero se encuentren bien, estoy empezando a migrar poco a > poco ciertos servidores en especial centos 5 por su fecha límite de soporte, > he configurado el primero y actualmente me esta

Re: [CentOS] https and self signed

On Jun 15, 2016, at 10:40 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > Thanks, that means no need to install CA. There is always someone (Thanks, > Warren!) who looked deeper into things, and can explain them. I claimed that the topic fills books. That wasn’t an exaggeration. Back

Re: [CentOS] https and self signed

John Hodrien wrote: > On Wed, 15 Jun 2016, John R Pierce wrote: > >> On 6/15/2016 6:47 AM, Jerry Geis wrote: >>> How do I get past this? I was looking to just self sign for https. >> >> in my admittedly limited experience with this stuff, you need to create >> your own rootCA, and use that to

Re: [CentOS] https and self signed

On Wed, June 15, 2016 10:31 am, Scott Robbins wrote: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 10:02:57AM -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> >> On Wed, June 15, 2016 9:17 am, Warren Young wrote: >> >> >> >> Nowadays it's quite easy to get normal ssl certificates for free. >> E.g. >> > >> > Today, I would prefer

Re: [CentOS] https and self signed

On Wed, June 15, 2016 10:38 am, Warren Young wrote: > On Jun 15, 2016, at 9:02 AM, Valeri Galtsev > wrote: >> >> I do see WoSign there (though I'd prefer to avoid my US located servers >> have certificates signed by authority located in China, hence located >> sort >>

Re: [CentOS] https and self signed

On Wed, June 15, 2016 10:48 am, Warren Young wrote: > On Jun 15, 2016, at 9:38 AM, Warren Young wrote: >> >> On Jun 15, 2016, at 9:02 AM, Valeri Galtsev >> wrote: >> >>> I do not see neither starttls.com nor letsencrypt.org between >>> Authorities

Re: [CentOS] https and self signed

> -Original Message- > From: Warren Young > Sent: Wednesday, June 15, 2016 10:26 > To: CentOS mailing list > Subject: Re: [CentOS] https and self signed > > On Jun 15, 2016, at 7:47 AM, Jerry Geis wrote: > > > > Yes I can added the --insecure for curl - but - my

[CentOS] Is there popular multimedia framework supported in centos

Hi, I know gstreamer is written in c Language. Is there popular multimedia framework written in c++ supported in centos? Thanks! B.R. Andrew ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] https and self signed

On Jun 15, 2016, at 9:38 AM, Warren Young wrote: > > On Jun 15, 2016, at 9:02 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > >> I do not see neither starttls.com nor letsencrypt.org between Authorities >> certificates. > > That’s because they are not top-tier CAs. I

Re: [CentOS] https and self signed

On Jun 15, 2016, at 9:02 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > I do see WoSign there (though I'd prefer to avoid my US located servers > have certificates signed by authority located in China, hence located sort > of behind "the great firewall of China" - call me

Re: [CentOS] https and self signed

On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 10:02:57AM -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > On Wed, June 15, 2016 9:17 am, Warren Young wrote: > >> > >> Nowadays it's quite easy to get normal ssl certificates for free. E.g. > > > > Today, I would prefer Let’s Encrypt: > > > > https://letsencrypt.org/ > > > > It is

Re: [CentOS] https and self signed

On Wed, 15 Jun 2016, John R Pierce wrote: On 6/15/2016 6:47 AM, Jerry Geis wrote: How do I get past this? I was looking to just self sign for https. in my admittedly limited experience with this stuff, you need to create your own rootCA, and use that to sign your certificates, AND you

Re: [CentOS] https and self signed

On Jun 15, 2016, at 8:02 AM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > I do not see neither starttls.com nor letsencrypt.org > between Authorities > certificates. This means (correct me if I'm wrong) that client has to > import one of

Re: [CentOS] https and self signed

On Wed, 15 Jun 2016, John R Pierce wrote: On 6/15/2016 6:47 AM, Jerry Geis wrote: How do I get past this? I was looking to just self sign for https. in my admittedly limited experience with this stuff, you need to create your own rootCA, and use that to sign your certificates, AND you need

Re: [CentOS] https and self signed

On 6/15/2016 6:47 AM, Jerry Geis wrote: How do I get past this? I was looking to just self sign for https. in my admittedly limited experience with this stuff, you need to create your own rootCA, and use that to sign your certificates, AND you need to take the public key of the rootCA and

Re: [CentOS] https and self signed

On Wed, June 15, 2016 9:17 am, Warren Young wrote: > On Jun 15, 2016, at 7:57 AM, Александр Кириллов > wrote: >> >> Nowadays it's quite easy to get normal ssl certificates for free. E.g. >> >> http://www.startssl.com >> http://buy.wosign.com/free > > Today,

Re: [CentOS] https and self signed

On Jun 15, 2016, at 7:47 AM, Jerry Geis wrote: > > Yes I can added the --insecure for curl - but - my other app doesn't > seem to work either - perhaps getting the same return message instead of > the actual file. Because of all the security holes people have been finding

Re: [CentOS] https and self signed

On Jun 15, 2016, at 7:57 AM, Александр Кириллов wrote: > > Nowadays it's quite easy to get normal ssl certificates for free. E.g. > > http://www.startssl.com > http://buy.wosign.com/free Today, I would prefer Let’s Encrypt: https://letsencrypt.org/ It is

Re: [CentOS] https and self signed

Nowadays it's quite easy to get normal ssl certificates for free. E.g. http://www.startssl.com http://buy.wosign.com/free ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

[CentOS] https and self signed

I followed the instructions here https://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/Https Checking port 80 I get the file... curl http://localhost/file.html Working Checking port 443 I get and error curl https://localhost/file.html curl: (60) Peer's certificate issuer has been marked as not trusted by the