On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 9:13 AM, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> Am 25.11.2016 um 15:03 schrieb Staazul:
>>
>> I try to create own patch for kernel, and I look in process of
>> generation binary rpm file.
>> As I can see, for creation binary package, rpmbuild doesn't uses any set
>> of patches and doesn
Hi,
I am running thruk (version is thruk-2.12-1.x86_64) which is a web
interface for nagios 4.2.3 and running httpd-2.4.6-40.el7.centos.4.x86_64
on CentOS Linux release 7.2.1511 (Core)
While accessing thruk web interface http://thruk.mydomain.com/thruk/cgi-bin/
status.cgi?host=all&_=1480078344275
Am 25.11.2016 um 15:03 schrieb Staazul:
I try to create own patch for kernel, and I look in process of
generation binary rpm file.
As I can see, for creation binary package, rpmbuild doesn't uses any set
of patches and doesn't uses file of original (vanilla) version of
kernel. Instead it, I see s
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 8:55 AM, Albert McCann wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Johnny Hughes
>> Sent: Friday, November 25, 2016 10:13 AM
>> To: centos@centos.org
>> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Recent updates for CentOS7?
>
>
>> Then we
On Fri, Nov 25, 2016 at 6:03 AM, Staazul wrote:
> I try to create own patch for kernel, and I look in process of
> generation binary rpm file.
> As I can see, for creation binary package, rpmbuild doesn't uses any set
> of patches and doesn't uses file of original (vanilla) version of
> kernel. In
> -Original Message-
> From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Johnny Hughes
> Sent: Friday, November 25, 2016 10:13 AM
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Recent updates for CentOS7?
> Then we will commence work on the OS tree and ISOs. Historically, thi
On 11/25/2016 04:30 AM, Andreas Haumer wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I think I stumbled on at least two bugs in the CentOS 7.2 pacemaker package,
> though I'm not quite sure if or where to report it.
>
> I'm using the following package to set up a 2-node active/passive cluster:
>
> [root@clnode1 ~]# rpm -q p
On 11/25/2016 07:04 AM, Albert McCann wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Alice Wonder
>> Sent: Friday, November 25, 2016 6:59 AM
>> To: centos@centos.org
>> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Recent updates for CentOS7?
>>
>> On 11/25/2016 03:49
On 11/25/2016 02:54 PM, James B. Byrne wrote:
On Thu, November 24, 2016 12:28, H wrote:
You are right, I had forgotten about needing two WiFi adapters... If
there is an Ethernet jack in the hotel room I would go with that but
that is, of course, far from assured and two WiFi nets would be
neede
I try to create own patch for kernel, and I look in process of
generation binary rpm file.
As I can see, for creation binary package, rpmbuild doesn't uses any set
of patches and doesn't uses file of original (vanilla) version of
kernel. Instead it, I see some xz archive of compressed tree of kerne
On Thu, November 24, 2016 12:28, H wrote:
> You are right, I had forgotten about needing two WiFi adapters... If
> there is an Ethernet jack in the hotel room I would go with that but
> that is, of course, far from assured and two WiFi nets would be
> needed.
I have found Ethernet RJ45 ports in
> -Original Message-
> From: CentOS [mailto:centos-boun...@centos.org] On Behalf Of Alice Wonder
> Sent: Friday, November 25, 2016 6:59 AM
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Recent updates for CentOS7?
>
> On 11/25/2016 03:49 AM, Robbert Eggermont wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I noti
On 11/25/2016 03:49 AM, Robbert Eggermont wrote:
Hi,
I noticed there have not been any new updates for CentOS 7 for four
weeks now (at least not under
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/updates/x86_64/). For Centos 6 updates
have been released more recently (i.e. the Firefox-45.5.0 update).
I wa
Hi,
I noticed there have not been any new updates for CentOS 7 for four
weeks now (at least not under
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/updates/x86_64/). For Centos 6 updates
have been released more recently (i.e. the Firefox-45.5.0 update).
I was not able to find any information about this
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
I think I stumbled on at least two bugs in the CentOS 7.2 pacemaker package,
though I'm not quite sure if or where to report it.
I'm using the following package to set up a 2-node active/passive cluster:
[root@clnode1 ~]# rpm -q pacemaker
pacema
15 matches
Mail list logo
