On Thu, Dec 28, 2017, 8:50 AM wrote:
> Matt wrote:
> > I am setting up a new test server. Doing a fresh install from CD onto
> > a couple 4TB drives. Would like to try btrfs in a RAID 1 format. Are
> > there any how to's on how to do that?
>
> I was under the impression that upstream was depre
>
>
>
I don't recommend it for roots. First there are udev, systems, and Btrfs
limitations that prevent automatic degraded boot. Second, any bugs you find
have a really good chance of already being fixed in upstream kernels. Btrfs
has has hundreds of thousands of line changes from a CentOS 3.10 wha
On 28.12.2017 16:50, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Matt wrote:
>> I am setting up a new test server. Doing a fresh install from CD onto
>> a couple 4TB drives. Would like to try btrfs in a RAID 1 format. Are
>> there any how to's on how to do that?
>
> I was under the impression that upstream was d
Jonathan Billings wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 06:09:21PM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
>> Sure. I think I'm closer, but I'm also at the point where I'm just
>> trying things. My current issue, that I keep falling back to, is the
>> install *INSISTS* that it has to add a - after version.
>>
>>
Matt wrote:
> I am setting up a new test server. Doing a fresh install from CD onto
> a couple 4TB drives. Would like to try btrfs in a RAID 1 format. Are
> there any how to's on how to do that?
I was under the impression that upstream was deprecating BTRFS.
mark
___
I am setting up a new test server. Doing a fresh install from CD onto
a couple 4TB drives. Would like to try btrfs in a RAID 1 format. Are
there any how to's on how to do that?
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/
On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 06:09:21PM -0500, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> Sure. I think I'm closer, but I'm also at the point where I'm just trying
> things. My current issue, that I keep falling back to, is the install
> *INSISTS* that it has to add a - after version.
>
> %prep
>
> %install
> mkdir $R
On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 07:49:12AM -0500, mark wrote:
> I understood that... but I don't *want* a release number. Unless you're
> suggesting that I *must* do something like change my package name and
> directory to 1.27-0.
Every package has a name, version and release (as well as other
metadata li
On 12/27/17 17:29, Jonathan Billings wrote:
On Dec 27, 2017, at 15:40, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
I'm trying to build a package to create a directory and install some
files. My rpmbuild keeps failing, unable to cd into the directory, "no
such". Now, in the tmpfile, I *see* it cd'ing into BUILD/o
On 12/27/17 18:36, Kenneth Porter wrote:
On 12/27/2017 3:09 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
My current issue, that I keep falling back to, is the install
*INSISTS* that it has to add a - after version.
You're missing the spec file header that includes lots of meta information.
The dash is to sep
10 matches
Mail list logo
