> -Original Message-
> From: CentOS On Behalf Of Steven Tardy
> Sent: den 25 april 2018 02:26
> To: CentOS mailing list
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Vmware - Slightly off topic
>
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 1:27 PM Jerry Geis wrote:
>
> > What is the correct way to provide a CentOS 7 - WMware
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 11:20 PM, Jack Bailey wrote:
>>> What is the correct way to provide a CentOS 7 - WMware image for ESX ?
>>
>>
>> You are probably looking for VMware Converter which can p2v or v2v.
>>
>> IMO: if you are creating a VM image which is a binary blob or image then
>> you are doi
What is the correct way to provide a CentOS 7 - WMware image for ESX ?
You are probably looking for VMware Converter which can p2v or v2v.
IMO: if you are creating a VM image which is a binary blob or image then
you are doing it wrong. Have the VM/server/desktop be a simple
next/next/next insta
Everyone,
A while back I reported problems with the Intell i915 video driver in
an ASUS mother board. I never found a solution, but did find a work
around. It is apparent that when the VGA cable is connected during
boot time the screen becomes blank and does not allow a login, but if
the vga cab
Everyone,
A while back I reported problems with the Intell i915 video driver in
an ASUS mother board. I never found a solution, but did find a work
around. It is apparent that when the VGA cable is connected during
boot time the screen becomes blank and does not allow a login, but if
the vga cab
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 1:27 PM Jerry Geis wrote:
> What is the correct way to provide a CentOS 7 - WMware image for ESX ?
You are probably looking for VMware Converter which can p2v or v2v.
IMO: if you are creating a VM image which is a binary blob or image then
you are doing it wrong. Have t
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 11:47 PM, Sean wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> RH published the advisory 2 weeks ago, according to
> https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0980. The main repo does not
> appear to have the packages noted yet -
> http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/updates/x86_64/Packages/
>
> We'
Hi all,
RH published the advisory 2 weeks ago, according to
https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:0980. The main repo does not
appear to have the packages noted yet -
http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/updates/x86_64/Packages/
We've been waiting on a few of these bugs to be fixed for some ti
On 24 April 2018 at 17:16, wrote:
> Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
>> On Mon, 2017-08-07 at 15:26 +, KM wrote:
>>> All,This happens on all of our CentOS 7 VMs. but as stated in the
>>> email trail, the file softlockup_thresh does not exist. Should it be
>>> added? What is the best way to get r
Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> On Mon, 2017-08-07 at 15:26 +, KM wrote:
>> All,This happens on all of our CentOS 7 VMs. but as stated in the
>> email trail, the file softlockup_thresh does not exist. Should it be
>> added? What is the best way to get rid of this behavior.
>> Thanks in advance
On Mon, 2017-08-07 at 15:26 +, KM wrote:
> All,This happens on all of our CentOS 7 VMs. but as stated in the
> email trail, the file softlockup_thresh does not exist. Should it be
> added? What is the best way to get rid of this behavior.
> Thanks in advance and sorry if I missed something a
On Tue, 2018-04-24 at 14:18 -0400, Adam Tauno Williams wrote:
> I am attempting to setup an IPSec protected GRE tunnel with a Cisco
> router. I believe the IPSec association is up, however I cannot move
> traffic over the tunnel.
> It is not clear how to integrate the tunnel interface (gre1) with
> I am experiencing the same thing getting IPSec protected GRE packets
> to the gre1 interface.
> It works with the firewall disabled; haven't been able to figure out
> how to make it work with the firewall enabled.
> firewall-cmd allows me to add the interface, but then forgets about
> it.
While
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 08:02:19PM +, Tony Mountifield wrote:
> In article
> ,
> Jerry Geis wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > What is the correct way to provide a CentOS 7 - WMware image for ESX ?
> >
> > As an amateur to VMware - I thought - great I can get VMplayer and ESX
> > should be able to
> I tried adding the tun0 interface to the internal zone and firewall-
> cmd told me tun0 was managed by NetworkManager. After that it didn't
> show tun0 as a member of any zone.
> # firewall-cmd --zone=internal --add-interface=tun0
> The interface is under control of NetworkManager, setting zone
In article ,
Jerry Geis wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> What is the correct way to provide a CentOS 7 - WMware image for ESX ?
>
> As an amateur to VMware - I thought - great I can get VMplayer and ESX
> should be able to import my image... Wrong... I even went through the
> trouble of "converting" to VMWa
I am attempting to setup an IPSec protected GRE tunnel with a Cisco
router. I believe the IPSec association is up, however I cannot move
traffic over the tunnel.
It is not clear how to integrate the tunnel interface (gre1) with
firewall-cmd; adding the interface to trusted does not appear to
'sti
Hi All,
What is the correct way to provide a CentOS 7 - WMware image for ESX ?
As an amateur to VMware - I thought - great I can get VMplayer and ESX
should be able to import my image... Wrong... I even went through the
trouble of "converting" to VMWare workstation and thinking ESX could import
t
18 matches
Mail list logo