Re: [CentOS] Giving full administrator privileges through sudo on production systems

2019-08-15 Thread Nicolas Kovacs
Le 16/08/2019 à 07:04, Bagas Sanjaya a écrit : > Based on above cases, is it OK to give group of random users full > administrator privileges using sudo, by adding them to sudoers with ALL > privileges? Short answer : this is VERY wrong. Cheers, Niki -- Microlinux - Solutions informatiques dur

[CentOS] Giving full administrator privileges through sudo on production systems

2019-08-15 Thread Bagas Sanjaya
Hello, Consider two following cases: 1. On production systems on television stations, a sysadmin give teens (remaja group, age 13 and older) full administrator privileges by adding this line to sudoers: %remaja ALL=(ALL:ALL) ALL Rationale: Almost all programs on the system can only be run b

Re: [CentOS] 389 Directory Server broken on CentOS 7

2019-08-15 Thread Nicolas Kovacs
Le 15/08/2019 à 15:20, Nicolas Kovacs a écrit : > I have to investigate this further. I found the culprit, after a few unnerving hours of trial and error. Turns out I'm using a hardcoded EPEL mirror in France to bypass my filtering proxy. Unfortunately this mirror is not quite in sync, and there's

Re: [CentOS] 389 Directory Server broken on CentOS 7

2019-08-15 Thread Nicolas Kovacs
Le 15/08/2019 à 14:51, Ulf Volmer a écrit : > Could you post the output of > > yum info 389-adminutil I just installed a vanilla CentOS 7.6 on a sandbox machine. Left configuration as is. Upgraded system : yum update. Configured EPEL without customizing anything. And all the 389-related packa

Re: [CentOS] 389 Directory Server broken on CentOS 7

2019-08-15 Thread Ulf Volmer
On 15.08.19 14:31, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: > Le 15/08/2019 à 13:49, Ulf Volmer a écrit : >> No issues here. libadmsslutil.so.0 comes from 389-adminutil. >> Do you have a recently updated system? > > I'm using yum-cron on all my CentOS servers, so yes. Could you post the output of yum info 389-admi

Re: [CentOS] Availability of rsyslog-8.24.0-41.el7_7.x86_64

2019-08-15 Thread Alexander Dalloz
Am 2019-08-15 14:38, schrieb Dennis Well: Hey there, RedHat released the new version 8.24.0-41 of rsyslog on 2019-08-06. We need some fixes of this version and would like to know about which time this version will be available for CentOS. http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/os/x86_64/Packages/ stil

[CentOS] Availability of rsyslog-8.24.0-41.el7_7.x86_64

2019-08-15 Thread Dennis Well
Hey there, RedHat released the new version 8.24.0-41 of rsyslog on 2019-08-06. We need some fixes of this version and would like to know about which time this version will be available for CentOS. http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/os/x86_64/Packages/ still lists rsyslog-8.24.0-34 ( 2018-11-12)

Re: [CentOS] 389 Directory Server broken on CentOS 7

2019-08-15 Thread Nicolas Kovacs
Le 15/08/2019 à 13:49, Ulf Volmer a écrit : > No issues here. libadmsslutil.so.0 comes from 389-adminutil. > Do you have a recently updated system? I'm using yum-cron on all my CentOS servers, so yes. -- Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables 7, place de l'église - 30730 Montpezat Site :

Re: [CentOS] 389 Directory Server broken on CentOS 7

2019-08-15 Thread Ulf Volmer
On 15.08.19 13:27, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: > Error: Package: 389-admin-1.1.46-1.el7.x86_64 (epel) >Requires: libadminutil.so.0()(64bit) No issues here. libadmsslutil.so.0 comes from 389-adminutil. Do you have a recently updated system? Best regards Ulf _

[CentOS] 389 Directory Server broken on CentOS 7

2019-08-15 Thread Nicolas Kovacs
Hi, I'm currently trying to install 389 Directory Server on CentOS, but it looks like related packages are broken. Here's what I get: # yum install 389-* ... --> Processing Dependency: libadminutil.so.0()(64bit) for package: 389-dsgw-1.1.11-5.el7.x86_64 --> Processing Dependency: libadmsslutil.so