Re: [CentOS] Kernel downgrade on Centos 8

2020-02-04 Thread John Pierce
> > Kernel 3.10 in C7 is way to old to reliably support the 4.18 based C8 > runtime. > ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Kernel downgrade on Centos 8

2020-02-04 Thread Dimitri Zelenkin via CentOS
Johnny Hughes wrote: > No, CentOS-8 uses different shared libraries and a different version > of the compiler than CentOS-7, so you can not run items compiled for > CentOS-7 on CentOS-8. The kernel does not rely on userspace libraries. -- Dimitri Zelenkin Devexperts, Inc

Re: [CentOS] Kernel downgrade on Centos 8

2020-02-04 Thread Johnny Hughes
On 2/4/20 4:03 AM, Akshar Kanak wrote: > Dear team > Is it possible of downgrade the kernel in Centos 8 to any kernel from > Centos 7 (or even latest kernel from Censto 7 Series) ? > Has this been disabled intensionally or it will not work all together > No, CentOS-8 uses different shared

Re: [CentOS] Relabel /usr directory

2020-02-04 Thread Simon Matter via CentOS
> Hi, > I've done the following: > - Copy usr content with rsync to another partition: > > rsync -av --partial --progress /usr/ /mnt I won't comment on you real question but just want to suggest to really add -H to the rsync here as there are hardlinks in /usr you really want to keep. Simon > >

Re: [CentOS] Relabel /usr directory

2020-02-04 Thread Nataraj
On 2/4/20 9:59 AM, Sergio Belkin wrote: > Hi, > I've done the following: > - Copy usr content with rsync to another partition: > > rsync -av --partial --progress /usr/ /mnt > > Then, unmounted, added to fstab a line for /usr, then deleted /usr/* (not > the directory itself). But I've found that is

Re: [CentOS] Hard disk activity will not die down

2020-02-04 Thread pchris . bci
> Be patient... You are likely correct as the [ext4lazyinput] process is now gone. Probably finished up last night as the drives are quiet now. For completeness: > What did "cat /proc/mdstat" say? # cat /proc/mdstat Personalities : [raid1] md0 : active raid1 sdc1[1] sdb1[0] 3906885440

Re: [CentOS] Relabel /usr directory

2020-02-04 Thread Leon Fauster via CentOS
Am 04.02.20 um 18:59 schrieb Sergio Belkin: Hi, I've done the following: - Copy usr content with rsync to another partition: rsync -av --partial --progress /usr/ /mnt Then, unmounted, added to fstab a line for /usr, then deleted /usr/* (not the directory itself). But I've found that is bad

Re: [CentOS] Switching from lokkit (iptables) to firewalld

2020-02-04 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Stephen John Smoogen said: > It will because it is a linear list that every packet has to be 'judged' > against. Even if you break it down to 2 or 3 trees it will still take a > while. Putting them in ipset would be much better performance (uses hash, so not a linear search).

Re: [CentOS] Switching from lokkit (iptables) to firewalld

2020-02-04 Thread hw
On Tuesday, February 4, 2020 4:13:50 PM CET Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Tue, 4 Feb 2020 at 05:37, Pete Biggs wrote: > > On Mon, 2020-02-03 at 19:04 -0500, Jerry Geis wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > > > Over the last 20 some years I have a file with about 200K worth of > > > > address > > > >

Re: [CentOS] Relabel /usr directory

2020-02-04 Thread Sergio Belkin
nevermind, I think is fixed: ls -Z /usr unconfined_u:object_r:bin_t:s0 bin unconfined_u:object_r:usr_t:s0 local unconfined_u:object_r:usr_t:s0 gamesunconfined_u:object_r:bin_t:s0 sbin unconfined_u:object_r:usr_t:s0 include unconfined_u:object_r:usr_t:s0 share

[CentOS] Relabel /usr directory

2020-02-04 Thread Sergio Belkin
Hi, I've done the following: - Copy usr content with rsync to another partition: rsync -av --partial --progress /usr/ /mnt Then, unmounted, added to fstab a line for /usr, then deleted /usr/* (not the directory itself). But I've found that is bad labeled: ls -Z /usr

Re: [CentOS] Switching from lokkit (iptables) to firewalld

2020-02-04 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Tue, 4 Feb 2020 at 05:37, Pete Biggs wrote: > On Mon, 2020-02-03 at 19:04 -0500, Jerry Geis wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > Over the last 20 some years I have a file with about 200K worth of > address > > that have "wrongly" tried to connect to my boxes running centos. So the > > file has one

[CentOS] CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 180, Issue 1

2020-02-04 Thread centos-announce-request
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-annou...@centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to

Re: [CentOS] Switching from lokkit (iptables) to firewalld

2020-02-04 Thread Pete Biggs
On Mon, 2020-02-03 at 19:04 -0500, Jerry Geis wrote: > Hi All, > > Over the last 20 some years I have a file with about 200K worth of address > that have "wrongly" tried to connect to my boxes running centos. So the > file has one line per address or group of addresses like: > 2.244.112.0/24 >

[CentOS] Kernel downgrade on Centos 8

2020-02-04 Thread Akshar Kanak
Dear team Is it possible of downgrade the kernel in Centos 8 to any kernel from Centos 7 (or even latest kernel from Censto 7 Series) ? Has this been disabled intensionally or it will not work all together Thanks and regards Akshar ___ CentOS

[CentOS] CentOS bookmarks

2020-02-04 Thread Dimitri Zelenkin via CentOS
Hi, A minor thing: in CentOS bookmarks (those are provided by the Firefox package I think) there is a link to CentOS documentation: http://www.centos.org/docs/7/ ; it gives 404. Best regards -- Dimitri Zelenkin Devexperts Inc ___ CentOS mailing list