CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2020:1524 Important
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:1524
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2020:1506 Important
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:1506
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2020:1508 Important
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:1508
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2020:1403 Important
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:1403
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2020:1429 Important
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:1429
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2020:1488 Important
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:1488
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
i386:
Am 27.04.20 um 17:31 schrieb Simon Matter via CentOS:
On 4/27/20 8:27 AM, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote:
Hi,
I've read the Fedora modularity docs but am still missing the big
picture
somehow. Hope someone can clarify things for me.
What I'm most wondering: does modularity have any influence
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
rbowen pushed a change to branch master
in repository centos/centos.org.
from 6752aa5 Adding licensing policy for the project.
add 6809212 fixing broken hlink syntax
No new revisions were added by this update.
> On 4/27/20 8:27 AM, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've read the Fedora modularity docs but am still missing the big
>> picture
>> somehow. Hope someone can clarify things for me.
>>
>> What I'm most wondering: does modularity have any influence on the RPM
>> packages at all. I
On 4/27/20 8:27 AM, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've read the Fedora modularity docs but am still missing the big picture
> somehow. Hope someone can clarify things for me.
>
> What I'm most wondering: does modularity have any influence on the RPM
> packages at all. I mean, is there
I am pleased to announce the general availability of CentOS Linux 7
(2003) for across our alternative architectures. Effectively
immediately, this is the current release for CentOS Linux 7 and is
tagged as 2003, derived from Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7.8.
As always, read through the Release
Release for CentOS Linux 7 (2003) on the x86_64 Architecture
We are pleased to announce the general availability of CentOS Linux 7
(1908) for the x86_64 architecture. Effectively immediately, this
is the current release for CentOS Linux 7 and is tagged as 1908, derived
from Red Hat Enterprise
Hi,
I've read the Fedora modularity docs but am still missing the big picture
somehow. Hope someone can clarify things for me.
What I'm most wondering: does modularity have any influence on the RPM
packages at all. I mean, is there anything inside a RPM package which says
it belongs to a module
Hi,
Not sure where to look for my issue. I hope someone can point me in the
correct place.
I have been working on a bespoke server package for more than twenty
years. It was originally developed on Solaris (Unix), was ported to
windows and now ported to Linux for the last five years. This
This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script.
arrfab pushed a change to branch master
in repository centos/centos.org.
from 2c53ffa Merge #28 `Clean up the stream landing page`
add 92346eb fixing formatting error where the downloadbutton may be split
across lines
15 matches
Mail list logo