On 22/06/20 10:13 am, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
There are 2 sets of work.
1. There is the work on the tools which were slapped together as an
emergency from parts before 8.0. Those mbboxx tools are getting a
rewrite and upgrade currently by the CPE team to make them more useful
in the future.
On 6/21/20 5:58 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote:
On Jun 21, 2020, at 16:38, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
This my reply is not intended for the OP, as he stated he will not listen about
End Of Life of of PHP 5. Just in case anybody comes across this thread, please
read what is written on the page
> On Jun 21, 2020, at 16:38, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> This my reply is not intended for the OP, as he stated he will not listen
> about End Of Life of of PHP 5. Just in case anybody comes across this thread,
> please read what is written on the page referred to by Alexander Dalloz:
>
> >> PHP
On Sun, 21 Jun 2020 at 15:10, Peter wrote:
>
> On 22/06/20 7:03 am, John Pierce wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 21, 2020 at 2:01 AM Simon Matter via CentOS
> > wrote:
> >
> > exactly, that was my point.I remember 8.0 was very delayed by how much
> > harder and different the build process was.
>
>
Please take a look at https://www.wireguard.com/quickstart/
we now reduced the attack vector to only the things offered to the public
(https, smtp tls and imaps/s)
On Sun, Jun 21, 2020 at 3:58 PM Pete Biggs wrote:
> On Sun, 2020-06-21 at 16:47 -0400, mailist wrote:
> > On 2020-06-21 15:33,
On Sun, 2020-06-21 at 16:47 -0400, mailist wrote:
> On 2020-06-21 15:33, Chuck Campbell wrote:
> > I'm running Centos 7.8.2003, with firewalld.
> >
> > I was getting huge numbers of ssh attempts per day from a few specific
> > ip blocks.
>
> If you can control the ssh clients, switch your port
On 2020-06-21 15:33, Chuck Campbell wrote:
I'm running Centos 7.8.2003, with firewalld.
I was getting huge numbers of ssh attempts per day from a few specific
ip blocks.
If you can control the ssh clients, switch your port number to a
non-standard
port. Pick one in /etc/services that does
On Sun, 2020-06-21 at 14:33 -0500, Chuck Campbell wrote:
> I'm running Centos 7.8.2003, with firewalld.
>
> I was getting huge numbers of ssh attempts per day from a few specific
> ip blocks.
>
> The offenders are 45.0.0.0/24, 49.0.0.0/24, 51.0.0.0/24, 111.0.0.0/24
> and 118.0.0.0/24, and they
On 6/21/20 1:36 PM, H wrote:
On 06/21/2020 02:34 PM, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
Am 21.06.2020 um 20:30 schrieb H:
I am in the process of moving various apps and data off a CentOS 6 server to a
new server running CentOS 7. As part of the migration process I need to upgrade
an app and
On Sun, Jun 21, 2020 at 12:33 PM Chuck Campbell
wrote:
> I'm running Centos 7.8.2003, with firewalld.
>
> I was getting huge numbers of ssh attempts per day from a few specific
> ip blocks.
>
> The offenders are 45.0.0.0/24, 49.0.0.0/24, 51.0.0.0/24, 111.0.0.0/24
> and 118.0.0.0/24,
>
so just
On 06/21/2020 03:15 PM, Michael Schumacher wrote:
> H,
>
>> I am in the process of moving various apps and data off a CentOS 6
>> server to a new server running CentOS 7. As part of the migration
>> process I need to upgrade an app and corresponding data files which
>> requires php 5.6. [... ]Is
I'm running Centos 7.8.2003, with firewalld.
I was getting huge numbers of ssh attempts per day from a few specific
ip blocks.
The offenders are 45.0.0.0/24, 49.0.0.0/24, 51.0.0.0/24, 111.0.0.0/24
and 118.0.0.0/24, and they amounted to a multiple thousands of attempts
per day. I installed
H,
> I am in the process of moving various apps and data off a CentOS 6
> server to a new server running CentOS 7. As part of the migration
> process I need to upgrade an app and corresponding data files which
> requires php 5.6. [... ]Is this correct and what would the
> recommended procedure
On 22/06/20 7:03 am, John Pierce wrote:
On Sun, Jun 21, 2020 at 2:01 AM Simon Matter via CentOS
wrote:
On 21/06/20 1:23 pm, John Pierce wrote:
but the build process should be the same, no?I can't believe RH
would
use a completely different build process for the release than for the
On Sun, Jun 21, 2020 at 2:01 AM Simon Matter via CentOS
wrote:
> > On 21/06/20 1:23 pm, John Pierce wrote:
> >> but the build process should be the same, no?I can't believe RH
> >> would
> >> use a completely different build process for the release than for the
> >> beta/development stuff.
>
On 06/21/2020 02:34 PM, Alexander Dalloz wrote:
> Am 21.06.2020 um 20:30 schrieb H:
>> I am in the process of moving various apps and data off a CentOS 6 server to
>> a new server running CentOS 7. As part of the migration process I need to
>> upgrade an app and corresponding data files which
Am 21.06.2020 um 20:30 schrieb H:
I am in the process of moving various apps and data off a CentOS 6 server to a
new server running CentOS 7. As part of the migration process I need to upgrade
an app and corresponding data files which requires php 5.6. I do have php 5.5
(and 5.4) installed
I am in the process of moving various apps and data off a CentOS 6 server to a
new server running CentOS 7. As part of the migration process I need to upgrade
an app and corresponding data files which requires php 5.6. I do have php 5.5
(and 5.4) installed since earlier but now tried to install
Am 21.06.2020 um 17:35 schrieb 肖正刚:
Hi, all
We use AMD Rome CPUs, like EPYC 7452.
RHEL said that RHEL 7.6.6 began to support these cpus(detials:
https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/amd)
, but we found that CentOS7.6 with kernel 3.10.0-957.21.3.el7.x86_64 also
works fine.
So, my questions
Hi, all
We use AMD Rome CPUs, like EPYC 7452.
RHEL said that RHEL 7.6.6 began to support these cpus(detials:
https://access.redhat.com/support/policy/amd)
, but we found that CentOS7.6 with kernel 3.10.0-957.21.3.el7.x86_64 also
works fine.
So, my questions are:
1) Is there any place that i can
> On 21/06/20 1:23 pm, John Pierce wrote:
>> but the build process should be the same, no?I can't believe RH
>> would
>> use a completely different build process for the release than for the
>> beta/development stuff.
>
> The packages still have to be built as a whole, they need to go through
Il 21/06/20 03:28, Peter ha scritto:
On 21/06/20 1:23 pm, John Pierce wrote:
but the build process should be the same, no? I can't believe RH
would
use a completely different build process for the release than for the
beta/development stuff.
The packages still have to be built as a
22 matches
Mail list logo
