On 12/17/20 5:54 PM, Konstantin Boyandin via CentOS wrote:
It's purely a developer's distro.
Has Chris Wright ever recommended CentOS for any purpose other than
development and testing?
Shall I explain difference between a
developer's distro and the one suitable for production servers (a
On 16.12.2020 22:50, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 12/15/20 9:59 PM, Joshua Kramer wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 15, 2020 at 7:41 PM Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>
>>> $250K is not even close. That is one employee, when you also take into
>>> account unemployment insurance, HR, medical insurance etc. now multiply
CentOS Errata and Enhancement Advisory 2020:5450
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHEA-2020:5450
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2020:5462
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:5462
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
Source:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2020:5455
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:5455
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2020:5443 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:5443
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
Bonjour,
Je viens de signer la pétition "CentOS Governing Board: Do not destroy
CentOS by using it as a RHEL upstream" et je souhaitais savoir si vous
voudriez nous aider en ajoutant votre signature.
Notre objectif est d'atteindre 10 000 signatures et nous avons besoin de
plus de soutiens. Pour
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2020:5438
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:5438
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2020:5433
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:5433
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2020:5442
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:5442
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
Source:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2020:5448
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:5448
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2020:5461
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:5461
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2020:5465
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:5465
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2020:5436
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:5436
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2020:5460
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:5460
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2020:5464
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:5464
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2020:5456
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:5456
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2020:5457
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:5457
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2020:5458
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:5458
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2020:5434 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:5434
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2020:5452
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:5452
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2020:5453 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:5453
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2020:5454
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:5454
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2020:5451
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:5451
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2020:5444
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:5444
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2020:5435 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:5435
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2020:5439 Moderate
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:5439
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2020:5432
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:5432
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2020:5459
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:5459
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2020:5440
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:5440
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2020:5447
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:5447
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2020:5566 Important
Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2020:5566
The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently
syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename )
x86_64:
Como lo están pintando en la nota, es algo bueno para todos nosotros,
esperemos este año que viene para las pruebas de todas las opciones que
saldrán.
Lo que nos lleva a la realidad
[image: SGINFO Perú]
Aland Laines Calonge
IT Consultant | SGINFO Perú
phone: +51 959 288 507
email:
Peter Huebner
> Crazy, in Oracle Linux, it cames today as new package together with
> net-snmp-libs in repo AppStream also. Considering Oracle Linux has RHEL
> as upstream (not CentOS), the missing problem must be originated at
> RHEL.
but net-snmp-perl is include in
Am 17.12.20 um 22:30 schrieb Johnny Hughes:
On 12/17/20 3:14 PM, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote:
Am 17.12.20 um 21:13 schrieb Johnny Hughes:
On 12/17/20 12:11 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 03:26:50PM +0300, Andrey wrote:
Consider the scenario: a bug or security issue found
On 2020-12-17 13:30, Johnny Hughes wrote:
Red Hat is going to an open development model for RHEL using CentOS Stream.
will it be something similar hp is doing with clearOS development?
https://www.clearos.com/products/clearos-editions/clearos-7-compare-editions
On 12/17/20 3:14 PM, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote:
> Am 17.12.20 um 21:13 schrieb Johnny Hughes:
>> On 12/17/20 12:11 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
>>> On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 03:26:50PM +0300, Andrey wrote:
Consider the scenario: a bug or security issue found in both Stream
and current
Am 17.12.20 um 21:13 schrieb Johnny Hughes:
On 12/17/20 12:11 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 03:26:50PM +0300, Andrey wrote:
Consider the scenario: a bug or security issue found in both Stream
and current RHEL. It was fixed in RHEL in a few days. How fast it
will be fixed in
On 12/17/20 12:11 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 03:26:50PM +0300, Andrey wrote:
>> Consider the scenario: a bug or security issue found in both Stream
>> and current RHEL. It was fixed in RHEL in a few days. How fast it
>> will be fixed in Stream? Obviously, it needs some
Había otra interesante...
ClearOS
https://www.clearos.com/
Saludos,
David
El mar, 15 dic 2020 a las 2:14, Ing. Ernesto Pérez Estévez, Mg. via
CentOS-es () escribió:
> Les conozco, les uso. Que les vaya bien!
>
>
>
El lun, 14 dic 2020 a las 14:36, Rene L.A. ()
escribió:
> Tal vez debamos, nosotros, los usuarios, reflexionar sobre ciertos temas.
> 1) ¿Habrá algún proyecto que mantenga en el largo plazo sin la
> contribución de la mayoría de los usuarios?
> Pienso que no.
>
Es que esa es la política o
On 12/17/2020 9:29 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
On 12/13/20 3:25 PM, Dave Stevens wrote:
On Sun, 13 Dec 2020 21:05:42 +0100 Rainer Duffner
wrote:
It’s also not often the case that you can split this kind of work
into a thousand work-packages and have everybody just work 1/2 hour
a day on it.
not
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 03:26:50PM +0300, Andrey wrote:
> Consider the scenario: a bug or security issue found in both Stream
> and current RHEL. It was fixed in RHEL in a few days. How fast it
> will be fixed in Stream? Obviously, it needs some time to port the
> fix to newer version of package.
On 12/16/20 5:09 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
Hi Lamar, glad to interact w/ you on the list. We both have been doing
this for a long time.
Yes, indeed. (Xenix V7 on a TRS-80 Model 16 in 1988..., I STILL use my
vi skills from that time i my life!)
I was not thrilled about this decision and it
On 12/14/20 10:52 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote:
...
The main issue against using Fedora in production environments is the
short lifecycle. Forcing an upgrade, and all the associated testing,
auditing, etc. of the base version every year or so is not tenable for
most organizations.
Indeed.
Am Freitag, den 18.12.2020, 00:50 +0800 schrieb d tbsky:
> > On 12/17/20 3:47 AM, Simon Matter wrote:
> > > > Hi:
> > > > just try to install CentOS 8.3. I use two sata disks and
> > > > create
> > > > mdadm raid1 with LVM. Normally when I want to reinstall this
> > > > system,
> > > >
On 12/13/20 3:25 PM, Dave Stevens wrote:
On Sun, 13 Dec 2020 21:05:42 +0100 Rainer Duffner
wrote:
It’s also not often the case that you can split this kind of work
into a thousand work-packages and have everybody just work 1/2 hour a
day on it.
not like Debian for instance
No, not at all
On 12/17/20 11:59 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
The compose takes place on pungi and the process has several config
files, etc. Composing CentOS Linux 8 is significantly differ than other
releases, and it is more complicated. We do fix things as soon as we
see them.
Glad to see net-snmp-perl back
Am 17.12.20 um 17:38 schrieb Nicolas Kovacs:
Le 15/12/2020 à 10:09, Thomas Bendler a écrit :
If you have to deal with proprietary software, OEL is currently the only
cost-free
option you have (if an RHEL clone is wanted). The advantage with OEL is that
most proprietary software supports OEL
On 12/17/20 10:50 AM, d tbsky wrote:
>> On 12/17/20 3:47 AM, Simon Matter wrote:
Hi:
just try to install CentOS 8.3. I use two sata disks and create
mdadm raid1 with LVM. Normally when I want to reinstall this system,
anaconda should recognize the raid1/lvm so I can
> On 12/17/20 3:47 AM, Simon Matter wrote:
> >> Hi:
> >> just try to install CentOS 8.3. I use two sata disks and create
> >> mdadm raid1 with LVM. Normally when I want to reinstall this system,
> >> anaconda should recognize the raid1/lvm so I can reformat it.
> >> anaconda at CentOS 8.3
Le 15/12/2020 à 10:09, Thomas Bendler a écrit :
> If you have to deal with proprietary software, OEL is currently the only
> cost-free
> option you have (if an RHEL clone is wanted). The advantage with OEL is that
> most proprietary software supports OEL out-of-the-box, you don't have to do
>
On 12/16/20 6:07 PM, Peter Eckel wrote:
> Hi Johnny,
>
>> $250K is not even close. That is one employee, when you also take into
>> account unemployment insurance, HR, medical insurance etc. now multiply
>> that by 8. Now, outfit those 8 employees to work from home .. all over
>> the world,
On 12/17/20 6:26 AM, Andrey wrote:
>
> OK, we realized that the changes are final, and must somehow deal with
> it. Before making final decisions we need some answers.
>
> 1. What about bugs and security issues? The FAQ says: "Security issues
> will be updated in CentOS Stream after they are
On 12/17/20 3:47 AM, Simon Matter wrote:
>> Hi:
>> just try to install CentOS 8.3. I use two sata disks and create
>> mdadm raid1 with LVM. Normally when I want to reinstall this system,
>> anaconda should recognize the raid1/lvm so I can reformat it.
>> anaconda at CentOS 8.3 failed to do the
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 05:25:16PM -0800, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> ... snip ...
> Today, CentOS is a release stage after Stage 5 described above. The CentOS
> maintainers begin work on a minor release after that release is available to
> RHEL consumers, and the process of rebuilding those packages
seems so
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
> On Dec 17, 2020, at 3:35 AM, Thomas Bendler wrote:
>
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 1:42 AM Nate Duehr wrote:
>
>> -- Original Message --
>> From: "Matti Pulkkinen"
>>> As someone who is considering moving to OL, I wonder if you could
>> elaborate clearly on what specific concerns you
OK, we realized that the changes are final, and must somehow deal with
it. Before making final decisions we need some answers.
1. What about bugs and security issues? The FAQ says: "Security issues
will be updated in CentOS Stream after they are solved in the current
RHEL release."
interesting...i thought rhel 8.3 and centos 8.3 were identical and
should functionthe same? unless i'm misreading.
On 2020-12-17 01:00, d tbsky wrote:ld
Hi:
just try to install CentOS 8.3. I use two sata disks and create
mdadm raid1 with LVM. Normally when I want to reinstall this system,
> Hi:
> just try to install CentOS 8.3. I use two sata disks and create
> mdadm raid1 with LVM. Normally when I want to reinstall this system,
> anaconda should recognize the raid1/lvm so I can reformat it.
> anaconda at CentOS 8.3 failed to do the job. I tried Scientific Linux
> 7.9 and RHEL
On Thu, Dec 17, 2020 at 1:42 AM Nate Duehr wrote:
> -- Original Message --
> From: "Matti Pulkkinen"
> >As someone who is considering moving to OL, I wonder if you could
> elaborate clearly on what specific concerns you have, without the
> insinuation and analogy? Oracle's proposition
Hi:
just try to install CentOS 8.3. I use two sata disks and create
mdadm raid1 with LVM. Normally when I want to reinstall this system,
anaconda should recognize the raid1/lvm so I can reformat it.
anaconda at CentOS 8.3 failed to do the job. I tried Scientific Linux
7.9 and RHEL 8.3, both
63 matches
Mail list logo
