OK, here's where I stand now:
1. I stopped and disabled autofs. (I have 2 SMB filesystems out on the LAN
that have also been automounting with autofs, do I need to do similar
changes in fstab for them?)
2. yes it has.
3. none I can see.
4. nothing that leaps out at me. there are a couple about
On 1/4/21 3:05 AM, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote:
I would expect broken update paths. Also after EOL of CentOS Linux but
not sure if they plan a new "playground" repo:
EPEL-NEXT ... see here:
On Sun, 3 Jan 2021 at 23:05, Mark LaPierre wrote:
> On 1/3/21 8:34 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > On Sun, 3 Jan 2021 at 18:20, Gordon Messmer
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 1/3/21 2:51 PM, Kay Schenk wrote:
> >>> is it still OK to set up EPEL as a repo?
> >>
> >>
> >> Yes. CentOS Stream is
Verify that:
1. Autofs is not running
2. Systemd has created '.mount' and '.automount' units
systemctl status mnt-backup.mount mnt-backup.automount
systemctl cat mnt-backup.mount mnt-backup.automount
3. Verify that there are no errors in local-fs.target
systemctl status local-fs.target
4. Check
Am 03.01.21 um 23:51 schrieb Kay Schenk:
Hello all--
All good in the Stream for me. :)
Because Stream will tend to be more "forward moving" than previous
CentOS releases, is it still OK to set up EPEL as a repo? So far, I've
only installed terminus fonts from CentOS 8 EPEL, but I'm just
On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 6:44 AM Gordon Messmer
wrote:
> On 1/3/21 8:05 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote:
> > So how would one use this shiny bit of information? Is there a way to
> > discover if an EPEL application is going to clobber your system before
> > you install it?
> As long as the upstream
6 matches
Mail list logo
