On 3/3/21 6:53 AM, Jerry Geis wrote:
When I "tar" up an archive the files have an owner bob,
when I extract that to another machine bob is there also but user number is
different.
So when I extract bob is no longer the owner of the files but someone else.
Is there a good way to account for this
Am 03.03.21 um 18:48 schrieb Stephen John Smoogen:
On Wed, 3 Mar 2021 at 12:40, Frederick wrote:
Thank you!
I am specifically looking for the dlm package that seems to be missing
from the repos in 8. I went to https://git.centos.org/rpms/dlm but I
cannot find the source. Is there anywhere
Thank you!
On Wed, Mar 3, 2021 at 12:49 PM Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
> On Wed, 3 Mar 2021 at 12:40, Frederick wrote:
>
> > Thank you!
> >
> > I am specifically looking for the dlm package that seems to be missing
> > from the repos in 8. I went to https://git.centos.org/rpms/dlm but I
> >
On Wed, 3 Mar 2021 at 12:40, Frederick wrote:
> Thank you!
>
> I am specifically looking for the dlm package that seems to be missing
> from the repos in 8. I went to https://git.centos.org/rpms/dlm but I
> cannot find the source. Is there anywhere I can get the source to
> build this package?
Thank you!
I am specifically looking for the dlm package that seems to be missing
from the repos in 8. I went to https://git.centos.org/rpms/dlm but I
cannot find the source. Is there anywhere I can get the source to
build this package? Without it I cannot set up a gfs2 cluster on
centos8.
On Wed, 3 Mar 2021 at 09:54, Jerry Geis wrote:
> When I "tar" up an archive the files have an owner bob,
> when I extract that to another machine bob is there also but user number is
> different.
> So when I extract bob is no longer the owner of the files but someone else.
>
> Is there a good
I think on linux (most systems I ran into actually), UIDs and GIDs are
numerical with just a "human friendly" translation (from passwd/group.
If you extract a tar file, for example, and the owner/group
(numerically) does not exist on the target system, you get to see the
'old' uid/gid from
Regular users don't have the ability to change file ownership (only group,
assuming they're a member of the target group and own the file), so this is
mainly a consideration if you're running tar as root. By default, if you're
running as root, GNU tar assumes the --same-owner switch, which
Does anyone understand why there exists a "--numeric-owner" flag? I replied
off-list with the same information as others posted here, but the existence and
docs for that flag at least imply that the default is usernames, not UIDs.
Noam
On 3/3/21 8:53 AM, Jerry Geis wrote:
When I "tar" up an archive the files have an owner bob,
when I extract that to another machine bob is there also but user number is
different.
If you pack and extract as root, then numeric UID will be the same. But
on different systems there may be
either assign the same UID/GIDs on both boxes to the same user, or do a
chown -R after you untar-ed it.
(also, it helps to have users use the same 'moniker' cross platforms.)
On 3/3/21 7:53 AM, Jerry Geis wrote:
When I "tar" up an archive the files have an owner bob,
when I extract that to
When I "tar" up an archive the files have an owner bob,
when I extract that to another machine bob is there also but user number is
different.
So when I extract bob is no longer the owner of the files but someone else.
Is there a good way to account for this ?
User ID on one box being different
Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to
centos-annou...@centos.org
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
Hello
I saw that qemu-kvm-rhev has fixed the issue, but CentOS community
hasn't updated the repaired version of qemu-kvm-ev;
will it be fixed in the future?
thanks
___
CentOS-virt mailing list
CentOS-virt@centos.org
14 matches
Mail list logo
