There used to be several RHEL clones too, but many (some??) have dropped by
the wayside. I started with TaoLinux, a rebuild of EL6, by basically one
guy at a university, because he wanted his own RHEL clone to run at work.
when he changed jobs he worked with Johnny to come up with a transition for
The recent update of binutils/binutils-devel on aarch64 totally breaks gcc.
When running gcc over a simple program with main - executing it results in a
SIGSEGV, as the _start prologue calls a NULL pointer.
I haven't figured out yet how to build a new build using git.centos.org, but I
noticed
On 04/05/2021 05:55 PM, Albert McCann wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: CentOS On Behalf Of H
>> Sent: Monday, April 5, 2021 4:59 PM
>> To: centos@centos.org
>> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Problem with chromium 89.0.4389.82
>>
>>> One thing remains: I would also like to move my entire
On 04/05/2021 03:42 PM, Frank Cox wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 15:32:04 -0400
> H wrote:
>
>> Is something at Google responsible for this problem?
> In one of your (numerous) previous messages you said that Firefox wasn't
> working properly either, so I'd say it's not a problem with Google unless
> -Original Message-
> From: CentOS On Behalf Of H
> Sent: Monday, April 5, 2021 4:59 PM
> To: centos@centos.org
> Subject: Re: [CentOS] Problem with chromium 89.0.4389.82
>
> > One thing remains: I would also like to move my entire browsing
> history from chromium to chrome but am not
On 04/05/2021 04:44 PM, H wrote:
> On 04/05/2021 02:34 PM, Richard wrote:
>>> Date: Monday, April 05, 2021 18:31:36 +0200
>>> From: Simon Matter
>>>
>>> Some of our users wanted Chrome instead of Firefox so we installed
>>> Chromium from EPEL for them. Over the time, we had several problems
>>>
On 04/05/2021 02:34 PM, Richard wrote:
>> Date: Monday, April 05, 2021 18:31:36 +0200
>> From: Simon Matter
>>
>> Some of our users wanted Chrome instead of Firefox so we installed
>> Chromium from EPEL for them. Over the time, we had several problems
>> where a build didn't work and also updates
On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 15:32:04 -0400
H wrote:
> Is something at Google responsible for this problem?
In one of your (numerous) previous messages you said that Firefox wasn't
working properly either, so I'd say it's not a problem with Google unless
you're using their dns servers or something
On 04/05/2021 01:38 PM, H wrote:
> On 04/05/2021 12:49 PM, H wrote:
>> On 04/05/2021 12:31 PM, Simon Matter wrote:
On 04/05/2021 11:56 AM, H wrote:
> On 04/05/2021 01:38 AM, Frank Cox wrote:
>> On Sun, 4 Apr 2021 21:32:03 -0400
>> H wrote:
>>
>>> Here are two typical
I installed the beta when it came out on a VM running under C7. I
upgrade every day or two and Alma upgrades have so far been seamless.
It's transited from beta to RC and now to stable.
I installed the RC on a USB stick to allow me to run as bare metal on a
laptop (which unfortunately has to
Le 05/04/2021 à 18:20, mark a écrit :
> I was sort of waiting for rocky, but I see from over the weekend on slashdot
> that almalinux stable is released.
Linux.
Reinventing the wheel since 1991.
:o)
--
Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables
7, place de l'église - 30730 Montpezat
Site :
On 4/5/21 12:55 PM, Ruslanas Gžibovskis wrote:
Also maintained by business unit, which might impact later changes when you
tight your prod to it.
A major part of the announcement videocast was about the formation of
the 501c6 non-profit foundation that will back the distro. While it does
Hi Simon,
+1
I expect that to happen sooner or later. Currently Alma has a head start with
Rocky postponed until the end of April, but to me the race is still open.
As is the case with many other colleagues, I'm currently stuck with RHEL clones
because RHEL/CentOS is what my customers are
> Date: Monday, April 05, 2021 18:31:36 +0200
> From: Simon Matter
>
> Some of our users wanted Chrome instead of Firefox so we installed
> Chromium from EPEL for them. Over the time, we had several problems
> where a build didn't work and also updates were not in time. We
> also had problems
> Anyone looked into almalinux? I was sort of waiting for rocky, but I see
> from over the weekend on slashdot that almalinux stable is released.
>
> mark
I hoped they would join forces and produce only one RHEL clone but put
some effort into bringing EPEL to a usable state for EL8 instead.
On 04/05/2021 12:49 PM, H wrote:
> On 04/05/2021 12:31 PM, Simon Matter wrote:
>>> On 04/05/2021 11:56 AM, H wrote:
On 04/05/2021 01:38 AM, Frank Cox wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Apr 2021 21:32:03 -0400
> H wrote:
>
>> Here are two typical examples:
> Javascript is disabled?
>
On 2021-04-05 12:20, mark wrote:
Anyone looked into almalinux? I was sort of waiting for rocky, but I
see from over the weekend on slashdot that almalinux stable is
released.
We are moving it into production as we speak!
Todd Merriman
Software Toolz, Inc.
On Mon, 5 Apr 2021 at 13:05, Warren Young wrote:
> On Apr 5, 2021, at 8:32 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> >
> > wrt private keys .. we don't want any to live on machines we
> > don't physically own.
>
> Yeah, I get that.
>
> What I don’t get is why, if DNF goes to http://foo.centos.org to pull
>
On 4/5/21 11:58 AM, Lamar Owen wrote:
On 4/5/21 12:20 PM, mark wrote:
Anyone looked into almalinux? I was sort of waiting for rocky, but I
see from over the weekend on slashdot that almalinux stable is released.
I've cross-graded two C8 VMs over to AL8 and thus far smooth operation.
I have
On Apr 5, 2021, at 8:32 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>
> wrt private keys .. we don't want any to live on machines we
> don't physically own.
Yeah, I get that.
What I don’t get is why, if DNF goes to http://foo.centos.org to pull metadata,
and it tells DNF to go to https://bar.qux.example.edu to
On 4/5/21 12:20 PM, mark wrote:
Anyone looked into almalinux? I was sort of waiting for rocky, but I
see from over the weekend on slashdot that almalinux stable is released.
I've cross-graded two C8 VMs over to AL8 and thus far smooth operation.
I have NOT done any fresh installs (don't plan
wasn't it present under cloudlinux name with modifications compared to the
original RHEL/CentOS?
Also maintained by business unit, which might impact later changes when you
tight your prod to it. in that case looks like Rgular CentOS8-stream would
seem better idea with local package
Hi Mark,
> Anyone looked into almalinux? I was sort of waiting for rocky, but I see from
> over the weekend on slashdot that almalinux stable is released.
yup.
So far I upgraded a couple of test machines using the conversion tool they
provided on GitHub (works fine, although it seems each
On 04/05/2021 12:31 PM, Simon Matter wrote:
>> On 04/05/2021 11:56 AM, H wrote:
>>> On 04/05/2021 01:38 AM, Frank Cox wrote:
On Sun, 4 Apr 2021 21:32:03 -0400
H wrote:
> Here are two typical examples:
Javascript is disabled?
>>> No, just checked that Javascript is
> On 04/05/2021 11:56 AM, H wrote:
>> On 04/05/2021 01:38 AM, Frank Cox wrote:
>>> On Sun, 4 Apr 2021 21:32:03 -0400
>>> H wrote:
>>>
Here are two typical examples:
>>> Javascript is disabled?
>>>
>> No, just checked that Javascript is allowed in the browser settings.
>> When I load the
Anyone looked into almalinux? I was sort of waiting for rocky, but I see
from over the weekend on slashdot that almalinux stable is released.
mark
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
On 04/05/2021 11:56 AM, H wrote:
> On 04/05/2021 01:38 AM, Frank Cox wrote:
>> On Sun, 4 Apr 2021 21:32:03 -0400
>> H wrote:
>>
>>> Here are two typical examples:
>> Javascript is disabled?
>>
> No, just checked that Javascript is allowed in the browser settings. When I
> load the browser and try
On 04/05/2021 01:38 AM, Frank Cox wrote:
> On Sun, 4 Apr 2021 21:32:03 -0400
> H wrote:
>
>> Here are two typical examples:
> Javascript is disabled?
>
No, just checked that Javascript is allowed in the browser settings. When I
load the browser and try to access eg nytimes.com I see "Establishing
On 4/2/21 4:08 PM, Warren Young wrote:
> On Apr 2, 2021, at 8:46 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:
>>
>> We just can't risk putting private keys for centos.org on
>> machines that are donated.
>
> I guess I don’t understand how the mirror system works, then, because I
> thought DNF/YUM contacted a
29 matches
Mail list logo
