Re: [CentOS] Audacity

Use sox from the command line, look for "rec" http://sox.sourceforge.net/sox.html ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Audacity

On 7/7/21 7:34 PM, mark wrote: I'm trying to record a reading of my just-published novel... and I'm underwhelmed. In KDE, I select multimedia->audacity, and it crashes. I can get it to run from a command line, but if I try to start "new", it crashes. When I was testing, and got the correct

[CentOS] Sending mail from rkhunter

I am having problems getting rkhunter to send the daily report to an outside email account under CentOS 7. I have installed postfix and fail2ban now sends ban messages as expected. I have googled but so far failed to identify the error in my setup: - /etc/aliases contain the correct mail alias

Re: [CentOS] Audacity

I built it from source, once, several years ago. don't recall h aving had any problems. You may try that a last resort, y'know? On Wed, Jul 7, 2021 at 7:35 PM mark wrote: > I'm trying to record a reading of my just-published novel... and I'm > underwhelmed. In KDE, I select

[CentOS] Audacity

I'm trying to record a reading of my just-published novel... and I'm underwhelmed. In KDE, I select multimedia->audacity, and it crashes. I can get it to run from a command line, but if I try to start "new", it crashes. When I was testing, and got the correct mike, then wanted to delete what

[CentOS-announce] CESA-2021:2658 Important CentOS 7 linuxptp Security Update

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2021:2658 Important Upstream details at : https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2021:2658 The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64:

Re: [CentOS] Centos versions in the future?

On Wed, Jul 7, 2021 at 11:04 AM Jon Pruente wrote: > Deleted tweet link: > https://twitter.com/NavyLinux/status/1408429562472677381 > For completeness, here's a WayBackMachine link to the deleted tweet. Luckily it got archived.

Re: [CentOS] Centos versions in the future?

On 7/7/21 12:08 PM, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote: On 07.07.21 18:04, Jon Pruente wrote: On Wed, Jul 7, 2021 at 7:41 AM Leon Fauster via CentOS mailto:centos@centos.org>> wrote:     Here is another one:     https://navylinux.org/ Navy Linux has a bad taste

Re: [CentOS] Centos versions in the future?

On 07.07.21 18:04, Jon Pruente wrote: On Wed, Jul 7, 2021 at 7:41 AM Leon Fauster via CentOS mailto:centos@centos.org>> wrote: Here is another one: https://navylinux.org/ Navy Linux has a bad taste already, for me. They are aiming too big, even trying to

Re: [CentOS] Centos versions in the future?

On Wed, Jul 7, 2021 at 11:14 AM Simon Matter wrote: > > BTW, anyone know who the "Navy Foundation" are? Is this an arm of the > > US government? > > > > Martin > > See https://navylinux.org/news/legal/ That furthers what I wrote earlier. That says: > Date of formation: June 14, 2021 Yet the

Re: [CentOS] Centos versions in the future?

> On 07/07/2021 13:41, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote: >> On 07.07.21 14:31, J Martin Rushton via CentOS wrote: >>> Fashion, and Oracle's past practices.  I evaluated >>> Alma Linux >>> Fedora >>> Mint >>> Open SuSE >>> Oracle Linux >>> Springdale Linux >>> and settled

Re: [CentOS] Centos versions in the future?

On Wed, Jul 7, 2021 at 7:41 AM Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote: > Here is another one: > > https://navylinux.org/ Navy Linux has a bad taste already, for me. They are aiming too big, even trying to replicate EPEL for themselves. And their attitude isn't good. They had a tweet disparaging "new

Re: [CentOS] Centos versions in the future?

Hi What about https://rockylinux.org ? Best regards Pat -Message d'origine- De : CentOS De la part de J Martin Rushton via CentOS Envoyé : mercredi 7 juillet 2021 17:39 À : centos@centos.org Objet : Re: [CentOS] Centos versions in the future? On 07/07/2021 13:41, Leon Fauster via

Re: [CentOS] Centos versions in the future?

On 07/07/2021 13:41, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote: On 07.07.21 14:31, J Martin Rushton via CentOS wrote: Fashion, and Oracle's past practices.  I evaluated Alma Linux Fedora Mint Open SuSE Oracle Linux Springdale Linux and settled on Alma.  Rocky was still

Re: [CentOS] Problems with CentOS 8 kickstart

On Wed, 7 Jul 2021 at 08:29, Hooton, Gerard wrote: > > I put nvme_core.multipath=N in the grub.cfg as follows > linuxefi /Centos8/images/pxeboot/vmlinuz > inst.stage2=hd:LABEL=CentOS-8-x86_64-dvd nvme_core.multipath=N rd.live.check >

Re: [CentOS] Centos versions in the future?

> On Jul 7, 2021, at 5:07 AM, Nikolaos Milas wrote: > > On 7/7/2021 12:47 μ.μ., J Martin Rushton via CentOS wrote: > >> There's also Alma, which is where I've gone after being with CentOS since >> 5.3 > > AlmaLinux is a great project too, IMHO, but things show that the new industry >

Re: [CentOS] CentOS Digest, Vol 198, Issue 6

Hi Leon, Thanks a lot for taking a look at my test and the suggestion. We have tested this suggestion echo never > /sys/kernel/mm/transparent_hugepage/enabled Unfortunately, the Ram usage was the same with this option changed as well. Just to give some additional context to the original

Re: [CentOS] Centos versions in the future?

Agreed re OEL. A few months after the CentOS 8.x deprecation news was released, Oracle Sales reached out to my organisation and reminded us that OEL was free to use, with migration scripts available. We briefly considered migrating from CentOS to OEL, but ultimately decided against it since, as

Re: [CentOS] Centos versions in the future?

On 07.07.21 14:31, J Martin Rushton via CentOS wrote: Fashion, and Oracle's past practices.  I evaluated     Alma Linux     Fedora     Mint     Open SuSE     Oracle Linux     Springdale Linux and settled on Alma.  Rocky was still vapourware when Alma was stable. I've seen how Oracle

Re: [CentOS] Centos versions in the future?

On Wed, Jul 07, 2021 at 02:18:58PM +0200, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: > Le 07/07/2021 à 11:44, Nikolaos Milas a écrit : > > RESF / Rocky Linux is gaining worldwide recognition and sets itself as the > > primary organization / platform to become the CentOS 8 heir / successor in > > the > > future. > >

Re: [CentOS] Centos versions in the future?

Fashion, and Oracle's past practices. I evaluated Alma Linux Fedora Mint Open SuSE Oracle Linux Springdale Linux and settled on Alma. Rocky was still vapourware when Alma was stable. I've seen how Oracle promise no change in the long term, then change their charging

Re: [CentOS] Problems with CentOS 8 kickstart

I put nvme_core.multipath=N in the grub.cfg as follows linuxefi /Centos8/images/pxeboot/vmlinuz inst.stage2=hd:LABEL=CentOS-8-x86_64-dvd nvme_core.multipath=N rd.live.check inst.ks=http://192.168.1.10/kickstart/ks.cfg This did not solve the problem.

Re: [CentOS] Centos versions in the future?

Le 07/07/2021 à 11:44, Nikolaos Milas a écrit : > RESF / Rocky Linux is gaining worldwide recognition and sets itself as the > primary organization / platform to become the CentOS 8 heir / successor in the > future. Rocky Linux is the New Kid On The Block and gets all the attention. Whereas

Re: [CentOS] Centos versions in the future?

Il 2021-07-07 11:44 Nikolaos Milas ha scritto: I re-visit this thread, since it is crucial for CentOS 8 users. RESF / Rocky Linux is gaining worldwide recognition and sets itself as the primary organization / platform to become the CentOS 8 heir / successor in the future. Google and Microsoft

Re: [CentOS] Centos versions in the future?

On 07.07.21 12:07, Nikolaos Milas wrote: On 7/7/2021 12:47 μ.μ., J Martin Rushton via CentOS wrote: There's also Alma, which is where I've gone after being with CentOS since 5.3 AlmaLinux is a great project too, IMHO, but things show that the new industry standard (replacing CentOS) will

Re: [CentOS] Centos versions in the future?

On 7/7/2021 12:47 μ.μ., J Martin Rushton via CentOS wrote: There's also Alma, which is where I've gone after being with CentOS since 5.3 AlmaLinux is a great project too, IMHO, but things show that the new industry standard (replacing CentOS) will probably be Rocky Linux. (Yes, RHEL

Re: [CentOS] Centos versions in the future?

There's also Alma, which is where I've gone after being with CentOS since 5.3 On 07/07/2021 10:44, Nikolaos Milas wrote: On 30/4/2021 7:27 μ.μ., Gionatan Danti wrote: The correct answer is to buy RH: fine. But do not let Stream touch anything which require a kABI compatible modules. As

Re: [CentOS] Centos versions in the future?

On 30/4/2021 7:27 μ.μ., Gionatan Danti wrote: The correct answer is to buy RH: fine. But do not let Stream touch anything which require a kABI compatible modules. As said above, the Stream move is squarely addresses *cloud* vendor requests and needs. Again, fine. But please leave apart the