[CentOS] Replacing custom kernel with another - with same identifier

2008-07-17 Thread Antti J. Huhtala
Hi list, I just finished building a custom kernel from 2.6.18-53.1.21 source rpm - this time with ISA bus and ISAPNP support which I accidentally left out of my previous attempt. Unfortunately, this time I forgot to change my identifier in kernel-2.6.spec file. Thus I now have one *installed*

Re: [CentOS] Replacing custom kernel with another - with same identifier

2008-07-17 Thread Antti J. Huhtala
to, 2008-07-17 kello 09:16 +0100, ne.. kirjoitti: On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 08:05, Antti J. Huhtala [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi list, I just finished building a custom kernel from 2.6.18-53.1.21 source rpm - this time with ISA bus and ISAPNP support which I accidentally left out of my

Re: [CentOS] Replacing custom kernel with another - with same identifier

2008-07-17 Thread Antti J. Huhtala
to, 2008-07-17 kello 09:16 +0100, ne.. kirjoitti: On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 08:05, Antti J. Huhtala [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What is the safe way to remove the previous installed kernel version without taking out the uninstalled new version? Is the latter safe in ~/rpmbuild/RPMS if I use

Re: [CentOS] Replacing custom kernel with another - with same identifier

2008-07-17 Thread Antti J. Huhtala
to, 2008-07-17 kello 05:26 -0500, Johnny Hughes kirjoitti: Antti J. Huhtala wrote: to, 2008-07-17 kello 09:16 +0100, ne.. kirjoitti: On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 08:05, Antti J. Huhtala [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What is the safe way to remove the previous installed kernel version without taking

Re: [CentOS] Replacing custom kernel with another - with same identifier

2008-07-17 Thread Antti J. Huhtala
to, 2008-07-17 kello 17:58 +0100, ne.. kirjoitti: On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 10:19, Antti J. Huhtala [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: to, 2008-07-17 kello 09:16 +0100, ne.. kirjoitti: On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 08:05, Antti J. Huhtala [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What is the safe way to remove

Re: [CentOS-docs] Suggestions on I Need the Kernel Source Wiki pages

2008-07-14 Thread Antti J. Huhtala
ma, 2008-07-14 kello 06:07 -0700, Akemi Yagi kirjoitti: This is most likely because you missed the step of adding the # i386 (or #x86_64) line. Could you check this out? Akemi That was it, indeed. Looks like Custom Kernel HowTo survived the idiot test by me. One question though: when

Re: [CentOS-docs] Suggestions on I Need the Kernel Source Wiki pages

2008-07-13 Thread Antti J. Huhtala
su, 2008-07-13 kello 08:32 -0700, Akemi Yagi kirjoitti: On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 11:24 PM, Antti J. Huhtala [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: la, 2008-07-12 kello 22:02 -0700, Akemi Yagi kirjoitti: On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 9:31 PM, Scott Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: If there is a certain level

Re: [CentOS-docs] Suggestions on I Need the Kernel Source Wiki pages

2008-07-13 Thread Antti J. Huhtala
su, 2008-07-13 kello 08:14 -0700, Akemi Yagi kirjoitti: But before my posting, I had already added a back ticks note in parenthesis on that wiki page. Then Alan woke up (for people who don't know he is in the UK) and made it much nicer. Akemi I just looked at the updated I Need the Kernel

[CentOS-docs] Suggestions on I Need the Kernel Source Wiki pages

2008-07-12 Thread Antti J. Huhtala
Hi all, I am a newcomer to CentOS but slightly less so to Linux in general (FC4-F9). In short, I am trying to make an old SB Vibra 16C (ISA) sound card work in Centos 5. To achieve this, support for ISA bus and ISA PnP is apparently needed in kernel. Therefore, a custom kernel needs to be built.