[CentOS] network not accessible through bridged interface but traffic visible

2013-01-09 Thread Doug Coats
I had a major HD failure and need to rebuild my host server and the virtual servers that resided on it. I am moving from CentOS 5.6 to CentOS 6.3. I am using the same configuration, as best as I can tell, that was working only hours ago on 5.6 but does not work on 6.3. My guest server can see ne

Re: [CentOS] School cloud solution

2011-11-06 Thread Doug Coats
That is exactly the search criteria i needed! I had never seen the term before or at least didnt remember it. Thanks! Sent from my ASUS Eee Pad Toby Bluhm wrote: >On 11/5/2011 10:43 PM, Doug Coats wrote: >> I understand what google docs offers but it comes with the need for

Re: [CentOS] School cloud solution

2011-11-06 Thread Doug Coats
I did look at alfresco but, like moodle, it has way more going on then I need. Sent from my ASUS Eee Pad Rajagopal Swaminathan wrote: >Greetings, > >On Sun, Nov 6, 2011 at 8:13 AM, Doug Coats wrote: > >Your own instance of liferay/alfresco community edition exposed to >inter

Re: [CentOS] School cloud solution

2011-11-05 Thread Doug Coats
to worry about. They will not use a solution that is more difficult then what we already use. Any solution has to be a clear upgrade with advantages for it to be adopted. Sent from my ASUS Eee Pad John R Pierce wrote: >On 11/05/11 6:29 PM, Doug Coats wrote: >> Thanks for all of your

Re: [CentOS] School cloud solution

2011-11-05 Thread Doug Coats
Thanks for all of your thoughts. I will look into gollem. The clients at school are windows 7. At home the clients might be any number of OS's. Eventually we might be using some sort of tablet devise probably Android based. Have any of you used Gollem? On Nov 5, 2011 8:16 PM, "Barry Brimer" wr

[CentOS] School cloud solution

2011-11-05 Thread Doug Coats
This really isn't a CentOS specific queation but that is our server OS of choice. I manage a student file server and i would like to add cloud access to it. Basically i would like our students to have access to the same files at home that they have at school. This would allow them to start an

Re: [CentOS] DNS problem while trying to join windows 7 to samba3x pdc

2010-07-08 Thread Doug Coats
After a little bit of research I feel a little vindicated. It seems that Samba3x seporated out nmb. On Samba 3.0 the nmb service does not show up in the chkconfig. It simply starts and stops with smb. On Samba3x it seporates out nmb and it does not start by itself. So based on my experience I

Re: [CentOS] DNS problem while trying to join windows 7 to samba3x pdc

2010-07-08 Thread Doug Coats
> > Netbios can use multiple network transports, some of which only have > broadcasts to support name resolution. Each subnet will elect a master > browser to collect the names and respond to queries. As an extension > for the IP protocol which is routeable, the WINS service accepts the > lists

Re: [CentOS] DNS problem while trying to join windows 7 to samba3x pdc

2010-07-08 Thread Doug Coats
> > How 'bout with the server that's supposed to be the master, above the two > other PDCs? > >mark > It is set up to NTP to the same external servers so they should all be in sync. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org

Re: [CentOS] DNS problem while trying to join windows 7 to samba3x pdc

2010-07-08 Thread Doug Coats
I just did a checkconfig on the PDC in question 192.168.6.1. And I noticed something that might be nothing but it puzzles me. The nmb service is set to "off" at all run levels. If I check the nmb status it says that it is stopped. Doesn't Samba need that for net-bios support? I am probably sho

Re: [CentOS] DNS problem while trying to join windows 7 to samba3x pdc

2010-07-08 Thread Doug Coats
> --- > Ok since you say the interdomain networking is functioning (triangle > routing) have a read at this: > > http://www.samba.org/samba/docs/man/Samba-HOWTO-Collection/domain-member.html#id2573732 > > > John > > all else that fails put that machine on another known working Subnet and > have a g

Re: [CentOS] DNS problem while trying to join windows 7 to samba3x pdc

2010-07-08 Thread Doug Coats
> > > Um, does a timing issue come into play here? If the local clock is not > within a few seconds, we can't connect to AD (we are going through > kerborous). Is there time data in the cache? > >mark Both the XP box and the Windows 7 use the PDC server as their time server so they are se

Re: [CentOS] DNS problem while trying to join windows 7 to samba3x pdc

2010-07-08 Thread Doug Coats
With the WINS data cleared. for the past 20 min. (I did it before I wrote about it) Neither PDC has reported to WINS. So no wonder my PC's can't find their domain. So how do I make sure that 192.168.6.1 is added to wins.dat. I could do it manually but I would rather it communicate the way that

Re: [CentOS] DNS problem while trying to join windows 7 to samba3x pdc

2010-07-08 Thread Doug Coats
> > > I do think that I have hit upon an issue. The WINS data for samba is kept > in /var/cache/samba.dat but it is updated dynamically with nmdb. It has > dated data. When I moved the server I changed the server name slightly and > so the WINS data points to the old name at the current IP. In

Re: [CentOS] DNS problem while trying to join windows 7 to samba3x pdc

2010-07-08 Thread Doug Coats
a 'network' is 192.168.x assuming that you are using class C subnet > masks (255.255.255.0) and so you should have a WINS server on EACH > network (192.168.4, 192.168.5, 192.168.6, etc.) > > Cross network browsing is somewhat of a hit or miss and not reliable... > for a number of reasons such as t

Re: [CentOS] DNS problem while trying to join windows 7 to samba3x pdc

2010-07-08 Thread Doug Coats
> > > His problem is WINS resolution doesn't tell the workstations which > computer is the domain controller and that is what he needs to fix > (first by designating a domain controller and then by making sure that > WINS is functioning well). > > Craig > Thanks for all the help. I agree that WINS

Re: [CentOS] DNS problem while trying to join windows 7 to samba3x pdc

2010-07-08 Thread Doug Coats
> > I think you are being vague (similar error). > > What is the exact error? > > What is the output of 'testparm -sv' ? > > Craig > Sorry for being to vague. Here is the XP Pro error I get when I try to join the domain. A domian controller for the domain admin could not be contacted. Esure that

Re: [CentOS] DNS problem while trying to join windows 7 to samba3x pdc

2010-07-08 Thread Doug Coats
> > > I think as long as persist in chasing pointless ends, you will continue > to fail. > > DNS & AD are not at issue here. Samba 3 cannot provide AD services. > > If resolution is a problem, it may be that you don't have nmb running on > your Samba server and you probably want it to be a wins ser

Re: [CentOS] DNS problem while trying to join windows 7 to samba3x pdc

2010-07-08 Thread Doug Coats
I am not using Samba 3.x. I am using Samba3x-3.3.8. As I understand it, RHEL provided this branch so that Windows 7 could join a Samba domain. That aside, It does not seems to me that the error message indicates that it cannot resolve where the PDC is. What method is Windows 7 trying to use tha

[CentOS] DNS problem while trying to join windows 7 to samba3x pdc

2010-07-07 Thread Doug Coats
I am running centos 5.5 using samba3x as a pdc. I migrated to samba3x so that I could join Windows 7 machines to the domain. It is a new setup using a tried and true configuration from a different box. I have used this configuration in the past to joing Windows XP Pro machines. And I havn't fou

Re: [CentOS] KVM virtual guest can not use serial port

2010-07-07 Thread Doug Coats
That was exactly what I needed...Thanks a ton! Doug ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] KVM virtual guest can not use serial port

2010-07-07 Thread Doug Coats
Thanks - Markus. I'll check it out. > The following link describes how to configure libvirt for serial port > pass through. > http://empegbbs.com/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=314827 > > - -- > Regards, Markus > ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@cent

Re: [CentOS] KVM virtual guest can not use serial port

2010-07-06 Thread Doug Coats
> I would expect it to be guest os independent, that means it has to be > configured in the host ? > > Regards, Markus > > So does anyone know how to configure a serial port properly in CentOS 5.5? Thanks again ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org h

[CentOS] KVM virtual guest can not use serial port

2010-07-06 Thread Doug Coats
I hope this is not to far off topic. I have a Windows 2003 guest on a CentOS 5.5 KVM host. I need to use the serial port on the win2003 guest for the application it is serving. I have no idea what needs to be done but it looks like the linux host is trying to use the serial port as the priamary

Re: [CentOS] Routing issue - Revisited

2009-07-22 Thread Doug Coats
You were exactly correct. This resolved my issue. Thanks so much!!! As you can tell I am new to using iproute2. Thanks again!!! > I believe what you need to fix this issue is: > > # ip route add 192.168.6.0/24 via 192.168.4.3 dev eth0 table Cable > # ip route add 192.168.6.0/24 via 192.168.4.

[CentOS] Routing issue - Revisited

2009-07-21 Thread Doug Coats
A number of weeks ago I had huge help from many of you configuring routing on a server with multiple Internet facing nics. Thanks for all of your help I am still having a routing issue that I am hoping someone can help me tweek. This server, besides acting as our gateway to the internet, is

Re: [CentOS] Multiple Internet facing Nics - Gateway issue

2009-07-03 Thread Doug Coats
So for those of you following this thread. This is what I ended up with that seems to be working. /etc/iproute2/rt_tables # # reserved values # 255 local 254 main 253 default 0 unspec # # local # #1 inr.ruhep 1 Cable 2 T1 /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/rule-eth2 # Create

Re: [CentOS] Multiple Internet facing Nics - Gateway issue

2009-07-03 Thread Doug Coats
Bob you are so right! I made the mistake of not removing "ip rule add" and "ip route add" from each of the lines. Which caused the script, which wanted to add those itself, get confused. Now I have removed those and it brings up my routes on reboot and network restart. >You will have to show th

Re: [CentOS] Multiple Internet facing Nics - Gateway issue

2009-07-03 Thread Doug Coats
Adding the routes and rules to the appropriate files in network-scripts did not work. It gave me a number of errors and did not create the rules after reboot or/and network restart. On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 11:12 AM, Chan Chung Hang Christopher < christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk> wrote: > > >> in

Re: [CentOS] Multiple Internet facing Nics - Gateway issue

2009-07-02 Thread Doug Coats
Christopher - you have been a great help! My internal network ip is 192.168.4.1 and I need it to access the aa.bb.166.2 interface or eth3. What would the rule look like that I need to add? On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 6:51 PM, Christopher Chan < christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk> wrote: > > > As a

Re: [CentOS] Multiple Internet facing Nics - Gateway issue

2009-07-02 Thread Doug Coats
AM, Chan Chung Hang Christopher < christopher.c...@bradbury.edu.hk> wrote: > Doug Coats wrote: > > I am ecstatically confused. > > > > After I entered the last two commands my routing is working the way that > I > > need it to. > > > > ip rule add fr

Re: [CentOS] Multiple Internet facing Nics - Gateway issue

2009-07-01 Thread Doug Coats
I am ecstatically confused. After I entered the last two commands my routing is working the way that I need it to. ip rule add from 173.11.51.46 table Cable ip rule add from 67.152.166.2 table T1 The problem is I don't know which actual commands worked. I had just rebooted. The other ip comman

Re: [CentOS] Multiple Internet facing Nics - Gateway issue

2009-07-01 Thread Doug Coats
So if I run the following two commands the rules show up in the list. ip rule add from 173.11.51.46 table Cable ip rule add from 67.152.166.2 table T1 # ip rule list 0: from all lookup 255 32764: from 67.152.166.2 lookup T1 32765: from 173.11.51.46 lookup Cable 32766: from all lookup main

Re: [CentOS] Multiple Internet facing Nics - Gateway issue

2009-07-01 Thread Doug Coats
I am convinced that my iproute2 tables are all messed upIn fact I found some errors in my initial post. # ip rule list 0: from all lookup 255 32766: from all lookup main 32767: from all lookup default /etc/iproute2/rt_tables # # reserved values # 255 local 254 main 253 defa

Re: [CentOS] Multiple Internet facing Nics - Gateway issue

2009-07-01 Thread Doug Coats
I am not understanding somethings very fundamental to me troubleshooting this issue. How do I clear the iproute2's that I have created? How do I tell if they are in affect? What should they look like when listed if they are configured properly? Thanks for holding my hand in this! __

Re: [CentOS] Multiple Internet facing Nics - Gateway issue

2009-07-01 Thread Doug Coats
Thanks for your responce! If I open up Iptables to accept everything on eth3 and eth2 or turn it off all together I get the same results. I will have to look through your iproute2 commands to see how they match up to mine. Do you see anything different in mine that would indicate the issue? On

Re: [CentOS] Multiple Internet facing Nics - Gateway issue

2009-07-01 Thread Doug Coats
I changed those two rules to no affect. I have also done the above mentioned things. My tcpdump shows connections comming in on eth3 but there is no outbound communication. Example: tcpdump: verbose output suppressed, use -v or -vv for full protocol decode listening on eth3, link-type EN10MB (E

Re: [CentOS] Multiple Internet facing Nics - Gateway issue

2009-07-01 Thread Doug Coats
at 3:07 PM, Alexander Dalloz > wrote: > Doug Coats schrieb: > > I have a server with 4 nics. Two are using different internet > connections, > > both with static IP's, and two are connected to our private network. > > > > The two internet facing nic

[CentOS] Multiple Internet facing Nics - Gateway issue

2009-07-01 Thread Doug Coats
I have a server with 4 nics. Two are using different internet connections, both with static IP's, and two are connected to our private network. The two internet facing nics seem to be battling over the gateway designation. Which ever I designate as the gateway the other stops responding to incom

Re: [CentOS] Forcing ifcfg-eth0 to use the same nic in multi nic machine

2007-08-13 Thread Doug Coats
> Could you show us the the contents > of /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 > and /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth1? ifcfg-eth0 DEVICE=eth0 BOOTPROTO=none BROADCAST=xx.xx.xx.xx IPADDR=xx.xx.xx.xx NETMASK=xx.xx.xx.xx NETWORK=xx.xx.xx.xx GATEWAY=xx.xx.xx.xx ONBOOT=yes TYPE=Ethernet

Re: [CentOS] Forcing ifcfg-eth0 to use the same nic in multi nic machine

2007-08-13 Thread Doug Coats
> As far as I understand networking, if you only have 1 MAC, you only > have 1 NIC. You might have 2 connectors, but that seems really > strange. It seems like this is some sort of undefined behavior. I > think that having only 1 MAC really *IS* an issue. I have used these boards(I have 6 of th

Re: [CentOS] Re: Forcing ifcfg-eth0 to use the same nic in multi nic machine

2007-08-13 Thread Doug Coats
> Is the boards bios up to date? Yes > Do you have the proper alias entries in /etc/modprobe.conf? These are the relevent listings in the modprobe.conf alias eth0 r8169 alias eth1 forcedeth ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.cento

[CentOS] Forcing ifcfg-eth0 to use the same nic in multi nic machine

2007-08-13 Thread Doug Coats
y use different drivers. One is a Realtek and other is a Marvell. I have turned off Kudzu or they reconfigured every time a booted the machine. It only happens every once in a while but I need it to be consistent. Any suggestions or pushes in the right direction would be most appreciated. Doug