Re: [CentOS] SOT: Can Fedora be installed from Live images?

On 3/8/16, reynie...@gmail.com wrote: > Maybe world has changed I am not aware and I am still the old fashion way > where I download a DVD image and install from there like in CentOS but has > Fedora changed something? I mean I am trying to find the proper image for > download it put on USB flash

Re: [CentOS] Native ZFS on Linux

On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Chris Adams wrote: > > All that matters for CentOS is: > > 1: Red Hat doesn't ship ZFS because of Red Hat's lawyers' interpretation >of GPL+CDDL > 2: Arguing about it here will not change #1 > 3: CentOS ships a clone of Red Hat Enterprise Linux and so won't ha

Re: [CentOS] mysql can't connect from localhost -strange behavior

On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 3:16 AM, Fernando Cassia wrote: > You should keep in mind the security-related changes coming in MySQL 5..7, > if you ever choose to upgrade. Sorry, I erased this link by mistake while composing my reply. Here it goes. http://mysqlopt.blogspot.com/2015/02/mysql-5

Re: [CentOS] mysql can't connect from localhost -strange behavior

On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 12:27 AM, Tim Dunphy wrote: > I've been having some trouble creating a mysql user that can connect to > the database from localhost. It's always been a straight forward thing to > do in the past, so its time for a sanity check, if you guys don't mind. > Hi Tim, You shou

Re: [CentOS] Network throughput testing software available for CentOS/Linux

On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 5:29 PM, Gilbert Sebenste < seben...@weather.admin.niu.edu> wrote: > A network engineer buddy of mine brought up for discussion with me > that he'd like to do some throughput testing, but he's new to > Linux/RedHat. Is there any software I can recommend to him that > any of

Re: [CentOS] Java SSLv3 status on CentOS-6.6

On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 1:03 PM, James B. Byrne wrote: > Can anyone inform me as to whether or not Java on CentOS-6.6 still has > SSLv3 enabled? And if it does then how is it disabled? > If you're using Oracle JRE / JDK previous to 8u31 here are instructions on how to disable SSLv3 http://www.o

Re: [CentOS] OpenJDK 8 on CentOS 7

On Mon, Dec 1, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote: > Two ideas: > > 1. OpenJDK 8 is available as a "technology preview" for CentOS 6.6, or so > this article claims > > http://news.softpedia.com/news/CentOS-6-6-Features-OpenJDK-8-Support-463730.shtml > >

Re: [CentOS] OpenJDK 8 on CentOS 7

On Sat, Nov 29, 2014 at 12:11 PM, Arun Gupta wrote: > Do you know the timelines by which it will be included in CentOS 7.0 ? > > Any place where a binary build can be downloaded ? > Two ideas: 1. OpenJDK 8 is available as a "technology preview" for CentOS 6.6, or so this article claims http://n

Re: [CentOS] ZFS

On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 3:18 AM, Miguel Medalha wrote: > Zfsonlinux does not work in user space, it is a kernel module. Just try > it. There´s a copy-on-write file system in the GPL Linux kernel, merged into the mainline Linux kernel in January 2009. http://www.phoronix.com/forums/showthread.p

Re: [CentOS] ZFS

On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Chris wrote: > Isn't fuse / zfs (partly?) in userspace? I believe there´s two separate efforts to run ZFS on Linux. One uses FUSE, the other reimplemented ZFS as a loadable kernel module. FC ___ CentOS mailing list Ce

Re: [CentOS] ZFS

On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 3:20 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > Ummm, like you've walked on the moon LOL. I will begin saying that "the US government backs JavaFX" then, just because NASA uses it in some projects. https://weblogs.java.net/blog/seanmiphillips/archive/2013/11/20/visualizing-nasa-groun

Re: [CentOS] ZFS

On Mon, Sep 15, 2014 at 4:37 AM, Andrew Holway wrote: > > ZFS on Linux is backed by the US government as ZFS will be used as the > primary filesystem to back the parallel distributed filesystem 'Lustre'. wow, the US government!!. *sarcasm implied* FC -- During times of Universal Deceit, telli

Re: [CentOS] Opera is slow on CentOS

On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 4:06 AM, Gergely Buday wrote: > For your information I > send cpuinfo, some people on #centos said that this could be the > problem -- but then why Firefox flies? 64-bit x86 was invented by AMD (AMD64) and then adopted by Intel (EM64T). I've used more AMD CPUs than Intel o

Re: [CentOS] Old HP Xeon server blade with only SCSI HDD ports & CentOS

On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 8:30 PM, Russell Miller wrote: > > How much current do you need? I bet I could find you one (if it's not a > ridiculous amount). There's a surplus place here in the Portland area that > has all manner of marginally useful power supplies. I'm a bit far from Portland I'm

Re: [CentOS] Old HP Xeon server blade with only SCSI HDD ports & CentOS

On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 7:33 PM, eoconno...@gmail.com wrote: > Why would it uhh ave been tossed in the first place?... I imagine it was something like: UW SCSI devices are nowhere to be found on the local market -which I've been able to confirm by doing a simple search on local auctions site and

Re: [CentOS] Old HP Xeon server blade with only SCSI HDD ports & CentOS

On Sat, Apr 12, 2014 at 11:46 AM, Lamar Owen wrote: > Now, if you're in the 'experimenting' mood you might look at what it > would take to adapt something like > > http://shop.codesrc.com/index.php?route=product/product&path=59&product_id=50 > (a 50-pin narrow SCSI to SD flash card board) to LVD

Re: [CentOS] Old HP Xeon server blade with only SCSI HDD ports & CentOS

On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 3:35 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > looked up that ISP2312 QLogic chip on the FC HBA, its is > PCI-X, not PCI-E, and again, its on a proprietary mezzenaine form factor. > I come from the Amiga world where tiny firms designed all sorts of mezzanine adapter boards to add functi

Re: [CentOS] Old HP Xeon server blade with only SCSI HDD ports & CentOS

On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 3:49 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > Unless you need the space-heater functionality it is hard to beat a VM > for the experimental stages of anything. Generally you can just > download an iso image to the host, map the file as the guest DVD, and > boot into whatever you want. >

Re: [CentOS] Old HP Xeon server blade with only SCSI HDD ports & CentOS

On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 3:41 PM, wrote: > Aren't those wonderful - and *so* much safer and better than the radiant > ones? > Yes, that's why I bought 'em. Mines are 15 yrs old and still running. :o) But then down here @ BA City we don't have such strong winters like most of the USA http://www.w

Re: [CentOS] Old HP Xeon server blade with only SCSI HDD ports & CentOS

On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 3:25 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > So... wouldn't it be a lot more practical to run a VM or 2 there than > whatever you were planning for that power-sucking chassis even if you > did have the right power supply? > I'm still in the pipe dream phase. :) I'm sure eventually I'll

Re: [CentOS] Old HP Xeon server blade with only SCSI HDD ports & CentOS

On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 3:07 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > and they support HP > 361426-B21 2Gbps Fiberchannel Host Bus Adapters. > I know what it is for (SAN) but I've never worked with fiberchannel. Can I get SATA ports out of this though some adapter? Like http://www.ebay.com/itm/LOT-OF-10-Emule

Re: [CentOS] Old HP Xeon server blade with only SCSI HDD ports & CentOS

On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 3:15 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > 4 large healthy car car batteries in serial will run it for a few hours > on a charge. 48VDC is telco power, which is positive ground, negative > 'juice' > Or two large diesel truck 24VDC batts. Don't you have those up there? Down here I'

Re: [CentOS] Old HP Xeon server blade with only SCSI HDD ports & CentOS

On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 3:07 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > a modern Intel 'Core' processor has 2-3 times the bang per Ghz per > core. > Keep in mind I'm not running any benchmarks and that I've got this kit from the street for $0. Even if I spend $45 on it to make it work, it'd be faster than a Ras

Re: [CentOS] Old HP Xeon server blade with only SCSI HDD ports & CentOS

On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 2:54 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > thats 3000 watts each. Just like my oil-filled radiator heaters... http://goo.gl/mO9Rzo btw: found the CPU inside the blades are 380632-B21: (1) Intel® Xeon™ 3.0GHz standard (up to 2 supported) http://h10010.www1.hp.com/wwpc/id/en/un/WF0

Re: [CentOS] Old HP Xeon server blade with only SCSI HDD ports & CentOS

On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Richer, Mark (CIV) wrote: > Are you in the US? I have a place in New York state that I *just* > discovered a couple weeks ago, to my (and several users and their > managers) joy: FrozenPC.com, who will *make* custom > cables, and they're > *ver

Re: [CentOS] Old HP Xeon server blade with only SCSI HDD ports & CentOS

On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 2:09 PM, wrote: > >> lmao ;-) You mean like 141W peak consumption, while his toaster needs > >> 2200W? > > You think that's all the one blade, with support and h/d etc will need? > Don´t fight guys, please. :)) I´ve found more info, I only had to read the sticker on the

Re: [CentOS] Old HP Xeon server blade with only SCSI HDD ports & CentOS

On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Rainer Duffner wrote: > If you have no budget, blades are the worst to work with ;-) I'm beginning to realize that. ;-). But think about it, if I can get it to work (even with no HDD and over the network booting) that'd be a fun weekend project. FC

Re: [CentOS] Old HP Xeon server blade with only SCSI HDD ports & CentOS

On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 12:21 PM, Christian Freund wrote: > > lmao ;-) You mean like 141W peak consumption, while his toaster needs > 2200W? Maybe he was thinking of a rack enclosure full of blades. I forgot to say that the enclosure can fit eight blades, the enclosure only had two. The rest ar

Re: [CentOS] Old HP Xeon server blade with only SCSI HDD ports & CentOS

On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Rainer Duffner wrote: > What about networking? > > They either have "shared" networking (AFAIK) or there needs to be a > module the lets you connect the blades to a switch... > Each of the two blades has its own riser board with 3 Broadcom Gigabit Ethernet chips.

Re: [CentOS] Old HP Xeon server blade with only SCSI HDD ports & CentOS

On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 12:13 PM, wrote: > I think you misunderstood me: this suckers gonna draw a LOT of watts. Your > home house wiring may not carry enough current per circuit breaker to run > it. > How many watts? You mean this thing (a single blade) eats more than 1000 watts? I can procure

Re: [CentOS] Old HP Xeon server blade with only SCSI HDD ports & CentOS

On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 11:48 AM, wrote: > Oh, right - um, the obvious question (once I thought about it): can you > actually plug this thing in at home, or is it going to pop the breaker > when it tries to draw more current than the breaker's designed for? > I don't have no 48V DC power supply

Re: [CentOS] Old HP Xeon server blade with only SCSI HDD ports & CentOS

On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 11:38 AM, wrote: > It could have been tossed because it was old... but I'd wonder if it was > tossed because either the m/b or the CPU failed. > the guy who was throwing it into a dumpster bin when I walked by clearly knew something about servers, but didn't have much ide

Re: [CentOS] Old HP Xeon server blade with only SCSI HDD ports & CentOS

On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 11:38 AM, wrote: > Another thought: *carefully* examine the m/b. Techie friends have talked > at length about capacitors burning out. > It's in mint condition not even too much dust on the blade fans... The caps are all OK as well... That's why I picked up in the fir

Re: [CentOS] Old HP Xeon server blade with only SCSI HDD ports & CentOS

On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 11:28 AM, wrote: > Again, you could hit eBay for a power supply. But all the servers, > including blades, that I ever worked with were 120v or 220V (ok, this is > the US). Is the psu in the box dead? > There's no PSU in the box. I've got the enclosure as well! It's one of

Re: [CentOS] Old HP Xeon server blade with only SCSI HDD ports & CentOS

On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 6:25 AM, Christian Freund wrote: > Hello Fernando, > > This drive-technology was replaced 7 years ago and the cpu's are that old as > well. Yes, I figured that because of the HDD technology. I wasn´t sure of the 7 years or 5 years but I figured it was close to that timefr

[CentOS] Old HP Xeon server blade with only SCSI HDD ports & CentOS

Hi there. I got myself a pair of old Intel Xeon blades, which I plan to repurpose with CentOS. The model is : HP bl20p-g3 server blade Manual http://h18004.www1.hp.com/products/quickspecs/12322_ca/12322_ca.pdf Now, the main problem with this hardware is that LVD UW SCSI HDDs are hard to find and

Re: [CentOS] Does anyone use tcp wrappers (hosts.allow/hosts.deny) anymore?

On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 9:44 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: > Yes, but that reason is generally that someone changed the language > syntax underneath it instead of settling on simple working APIs. > What has actually stayed stable and backwards compatible over the > years other than bourne shell syntax

Re: [CentOS] Does anyone use tcp wrappers (hosts.allow/hosts.deny) anymore?

On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 3:54 PM, James A. Peltier wrote: > > I'd love to hear about the "old and unmaintainable code". It's open > source code. If somethings broken you can fix it right!?! That's the open > source mantra! Either provide a set of reasons why it should be removed > and the alter

Re: [CentOS] Does anyone use tcp wrappers (hosts.allow/hosts.deny) anymore?

On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 11:13 PM, Keith Keller < kkel...@wombat.san-francisco.ca.us> wrote: > The technical problem is that there's no maintainer. Are you > volunteering (and capable)? > Then, for crying out loud... :) this discussion should have been started with a different subject line: "Look

Re: [CentOS] Does anyone use tcp wrappers (hosts.allow/hosts.deny) anymore?

On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 8:36 PM, Steven Tardy wrote: > Political reasons shouldn't prevent removing tcp wrappers, but some > technical reasons still exist. Interesting double negative. Implies that once the "technical barriers" are removed, then it's OK to remove old features for change's sake.

Re: [CentOS] Does anyone use tcp wrappers (hosts.allow/hosts.deny) anymore?

On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 4:48 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > Does anyone use tcp wrappers (hosts.allow/hosts.deny) anymore? And, would > you care strongly if it went away (or would you just migrate to something > else)? > Please don't remove it. Why this sudden idea in software circles that stuff t

Re: [CentOS] Experience with BTRFS?

On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 5:44 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > 3.14 does not matter at all in context of RHEL > 2.6.32-431.3.1.el6.x86_64 is not a pure 2.6.32 kernel > I understand that but since Oracle Linux is a RHEL derivative like CentOS ... I wanted to mention the OL Playground repo... It doesn´t c

Re: [CentOS] Experience with BTRFS?

On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 5:15 PM, Lists wrote: > . It would seem that BTRFS is slightly more flexible than > ZFS, EG the ability to add RAID-levels for improved redundancy after > initial creation without taking the system(s) offline. > Indeed. Check this out A tour of BTRFS http://www.youtube.com

Re: [CentOS] died again

On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 1:54 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > But in general, I always suspect power supplies first for mysterious crashes. +1 power supplies with bad caps. Two weeks ago I had one 2007 Antec EPS12V PS fail on me. Upon inspection, bad caps.. (2 of them) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capa

Re: [CentOS] died again

On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote: > On the other, if it's something else, > my diagnostic skills are clearly not up to the task. Sounds like a job for DTrace http://books.google.com.ar/books?id=jseJ56fUjJgC&printsec=frontcover DTrace Tutorial for Oracle Linux 6: http://do

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.5 VirtualBox

On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Toralf Lund wrote: > > Is anyone here using VirtualBox? I've had it working rather well for > some time, but after some recent upgrade or the other it's started > exiting with a Segmentation fault just after startup, before windows are > opened or anything. I've tri

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6.5 VirtualBox

On Thu, Dec 5, 2013 at 2:50 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > > have you considered using KVM rather than VirtualBox for this? > Configured properly, its much higher performance. Benchmarks? FC ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org

Re: [CentOS] Is Java insecure ?

On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 6:21 PM, Mark LaPierre wrote: > Java, which runs on a Java Virtual Machine (JVM) is know in > the trade as (J)ust (A)nother (V)ulnerability (A)nnouncement > Let's try to be serious here. Theres funny definitions based on acronyms,based on everyone's agendas. Some who oppos

Re: [CentOS] Is Java insecure ?

On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 3:04 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > I suspect you meant to say... > > 5. Applets are on the way out, most of the action these days is on > server-side Java, and on client-side JavaSCRIPT, not browser java. > > client side javascript programming is sometimes called AJAX. Note t

Re: [CentOS] Unattended install of CentOS in a VM with given login/password?

On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 3:06 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > > pxe boot and provide a kickstart file as part of that pxe > installation. Thanks John! Kickstart seems to be the right solution for this job. FC -- During times of Universal Deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act - George

[CentOS] Unattended install of CentOS in a VM with given login/password?

Is there a way to make CentOS install unattended, right from the boot until I can SSH into it?. I'd like being able to boot a new Virtualbox virtual machine right from the CentOS ISO, and then from the Virtualbox host, ssh into the brand new VM client and customize it using SSH shell scripts (SU, y

Re: [CentOS] Is Java insecure ?

On Sat, Oct 5, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Patrick wrote: > However it's in Centos and I trust Centos, are the concerns in the media > blown out of proportion ? 1. In short: Yes, they were blown out of proportion with a high dose of FUD. Read the following analysis specially the last few paragraphs. http:

Re: [CentOS] No more support for chrome/chromium on rhel6

On Tue, Feb 12, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > Well, there are hobby users and there are real users. Google SHOULD > understand the difference. Welcome to the brave new World where Google is the new Microsoft. Do you think if they cared about user feedback they would have left the

Re: [CentOS] hard drive question - WD red

On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 10:49 AM, Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote: > Somebody suggests possibly an issue with 6 drives being spread over 2 > different controllers. I couldn't help wonder if it's just a Windows > driver thing. Surely. A HDD only knows about sectors, reads and writes it knows nothing

Re: [CentOS] New java update?

On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 5:29 PM, wrote: > I've never worked for M$, have stayed away > from WinDoze for many years, and I *loathe* java It´s amazing the Java haters are not content with hating it in silence, they must spread their dislike and insisit that everyone else should hate it too. Just d

Re: [CentOS] New java update?

On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 6:08 PM, Rainer Duffner wrote: > The question is rather: are there days without new "emergency patches" for > Java? Yeah, right, like there are no 0day patches periodically for a multitude of software, including Apache, PHP, and the like. And what are Microsoft´s "Patch Tu

Re: [CentOS] New java update?

On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 5:29 PM, wrote: > What do you mean M$ employees? http://zdnet.sumben.com/?/meet-the-team/us/jason.perlow/ "Jason Perlow, Sr. Technology Editor at ZDNet ..." "... Jason is currently a Technology Solution Professional with Microsoft Corp. " > I've never worked for M$, have

Re: [CentOS] New java update?

On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 4:01 PM, wrote: > I'd found that in googling, but it only mentioned Oracle. Because the new pastime of the mainstream IT press (specially IDG; ZDNet which includes many Microsoft employees that write slamming Java) is slamming Oracle, not educating about OpenJDK and its op

Re: [CentOS] New java update?

On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 3:49 PM, wrote: > trying to figure out if it *only* affects Oracle's java, > or openjdk also. OpenJDK IS Oracle´s java, sans the browser plug-in which was never open sourced by Sun, and which is provided by Icedtea-web. Oracle has made OpenJDK 7 the reference implementati

Re: [CentOS] acrobat reader for x86_64?

On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 1:03 AM, Fred Smith wrote: > Adobe doesn't seem to have acroread for x86_64 linux, or at least I don't > see it anywhere. Ii suggest you download and use Firefox 19, which includes its own internal pdf reader (pdf.js), written in Javascript, no plugins to load!, just File-O

Re: [CentOS] 11TB ext4 filesystem - filesystem alternatives?

On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 5:52 AM, Nux! wrote: > Alternatively you can look at less supported filesystems such as BTRFS. What do you mean by "less suported" ? https://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/linuxcon-japan/bo --- LinuxCon Japan 2012 | Presentations "On The Way to a Healthy Btrfs Towards

Re: [CentOS] Good Anti-virus for Linux desktops and servers

On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 1:25 AM, Gregory Machin wrote: > Is there anything out there that can do this ? for desktops, free http://free.avg.com/us-en/download.prd-alf for severs, not cheap http://www.avg.com/ww-en/avg-linux-email-server-edition not sure if any provides what you call "centralized

Re: [CentOS] compare zfs xfs and jfs o

On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 9:25 PM, SilverTip257 wrote: > Recent and Future Adventures in Filesystem Scalability - Dave Chinner Thanks for that vid! FC ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] compare zfs xfs and jfs o

On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > you seem confused about what a filesystem and volume management is. http://www.funtoo.org/wiki/BTRFS_Fun Btrfs, often compared to ZFS, is offering some interesting features like: (snip) Built-in storage pool capabilities (no need f

Re: [CentOS] compare zfs xfs and jfs o

On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 3:38 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > > I think its safe to assume that OS/2 experience from 1998 is pretty much > irrelevant to the conversation here, and JFS on linux My data loss was in 2002. :-p You are putting words in my mouth. Re-read what I posted before you jump to con

Re: [CentOS] compare zfs xfs and jfs o

On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote: > AIX had a LogicalVolume Manager, sure - but I dont think thats where the > linux LVM came from - the Sistina guys had a fairly independent > implementation. And the Linux LVM looks a lot more like the HP variant > than the IBM one. And all L

Re: [CentOS] compare zfs xfs and jfs o

On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 12:32 AM, John R Pierce wrote: > JFS is the primary file system for AIX on their big Power servers, and > on those, it performs very very well. the utilities are are fully > integrated so growing a file system is a one step process that takes > care of both the LVM and JFS

Re: [CentOS] compare zfs xfs and jfs o

On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 4:48 PM, ashkab rahmani wrote: > thank you very much. what do you think abou jfs?? > is it comparable with others?? I was very pro-JFS... until I lost 10gig of very important data, and back then (2002) there was no way to recover a JFS volume (the data was in RAID, but so

Re: [CentOS] compare zfs xfs and jfs o

On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Joerg Schilling wrote: > > So be careful with BTRFS until it was in wide use for at least 4 years. FUD alert... https://events.linuxfoundation.org/events/linuxcon-japan/bo --- LinuxCon Japan 2012 | Presentations On The Way to a Healthy Btrfs Towards Enterprise Bt

Re: [CentOS] compare zfs xfs and jfs o

On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 4:32 PM, Joerg Schilling wrote: > What is the age of BTRFS? BTRFS presentation, mid-2007 https://oss.oracle.com/projects/btrfs/dist/documentation/btrfs-ukuug.pdf That makes it 6 years in development. Next... FC -- During times of Universal Deceit, telling the truth beco

Re: [CentOS] Oracle tries to capture CentOS users

On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Brian Mathis wrote: > Is any part of this thread related to CentOS anymore? I suggest death by stoning to anyone who dares to engage into light chat about OS history while conversation drifts from the original topic... *sarcasm* FC __

Re: [CentOS] No tengo red despues de instalar

On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 6:19 AM, Giles Coochey wrote: > produce una salida de la interfaz? I´d suggest everyone to stop using Google Translate. ;) Either the OP will come back here in English, or we´d have to use a human translator. Some of the wording is confusing when doing automated translatio

Re: [CentOS] No tengo red despues de instalar

On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:42 PM, Fernando Cassia wrote: > He adds "I've seen other users' reports where they DO find a > ifcfg-eth0 and they end up adding onboot=yes. but he doesn' t get that > file. He says he has CentOS 6.2 and did the minimal install. Ha!, just

Re: [CentOS] No tengo red despues de instalar

On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:38 PM, Digimer wrote: > I tried to translate your question, and I think you're not seeing eth0, > despite /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 existing Human translator here ;) He says he does NOT see ifcfg-eth0 in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ He adds "I've s

Re: [CentOS] system-config-network-tui not part of base install... wtf

On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 12:54 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > My machines usually have 6 interfaces or so, are set up in one > location, then moved to the production location with the final > configuration (including IP's) done by operators that are better at > windows than linux. Sorry if that doesn't

Re: [CentOS] system-config-network-tui not part of base install... wtf

On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 12:39 PM, wrote: > Wonder if I could configure the *best* text editor ever to run under wine: > brief. Brief was nice. Under OS/2 I also used QEdit which could also... mimic the Wordstar keystrokes. ;) FC ___ CentOS mailing lis

Re: [CentOS] system-config-network-tui not part of base install... wtf

On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 12:37 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > So my practical advice is to get a SOHO router that does > DHCP if you don't already have one, and if you do have one, configure > it to give out the IP you want instead of fighting with the Centos > setup. I agree in principle. But my per

Re: [CentOS] system-config-network-tui not part of base install... wtf

On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > there is nothing wrong in CentOS or Fedora Of course, in the grand scheme of things, it's not a "problem". A "problem" is a crashing kernel or buggy drivers. My opinion after this experience is that it'd help for CentOS to include system-c

Re: [CentOS] system-config-network-tui not part of base install... wtf

On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > BOAH do SIMPLY NOT make a base-install if it does not > satisfy you? what is there so complicated? The installer switched to base mode/text install due to 'low memory'. I just used the default recommendation by Virtualbox for Linux-RedHat.

Re: [CentOS] system-config-network-tui not part of base install... wtf

On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 12:20 PM, Stephen Harris wrote: > Remember the "E" in RHEL. Es (in my place we have around 40,000 RHEL > installs) configure networking during the build phase. Our standard > install doesn't include this unnecessary component. OK I'm a SOHO with a single server trying to

Re: [CentOS] system-config-network-tui not part of base install... wtf

On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 12:07 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: > Even what most people call > insert 'mode' is a command that takes an optional repeat count: try > 20i - to get a dashed line. > Maybe being old enough to have used keyboards without arrows or > function keys helps, though... Sorry, I gre

Re: [CentOS] system-config-network-tui not part of base install... wtf

On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Scott Robbins wrote: > Unfortunately, according to folks who have more knowledge than I do > about these things, in later versions of Fedora, and therefore, probably > the next version or so of RH, just manually editing > sysconfig/network-scripts will overlook so

Re: [CentOS] system-config-network-tui not part of base install... wtf

On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 8:49 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > do not install servers if you are refuse to think > really! Why create GUI installers then?. Let's just package a tarball and let users unpack it manually. In fact, are you advocating for the removal of system-config-network-tui ? how about

Re: [CentOS] system-config-network-tui not part of base install... wtf

On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 8:00 AM, Giles Coochey wrote: > echo nameserver e.f.g.h > /etc/resolv.conf > echo nameserver i.j.k.l >> /etc/resolv.conf Yes I know BUT for that I have to THINK. Screens and input fields ie type tab tab tab enter type tab tab tab enter are what is known as "user friendly"

Re: [CentOS] Oracle tries to capture CentOS users

On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 7:08 AM, Stephen Harris wrote: > Sorry, no. The only consulting special code I ever used was X25-uucp > on SunOS 4.1.x Thanks anyway for replying. I lose nothing by asking every former Sun employee I run across. :)) I once built a small mini-ITX AMD x86 box mobo with ris

Re: [CentOS] Oracle tries to capture CentOS users

On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 7:02 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > ext2fs fsck on reboot after a crash when you have dozens of SAN > volumes totaling a few terabytes ? meh. You mention ext2fs and I get cold sweath down my spine... I lost an awful lot of data due to ext2 fsck... FC _

Re: [CentOS] Oracle tries to capture CentOS users

On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 8:47 PM, Stephen Harris wrote: > (In my basement I have Solaris 1.1.1, 2.4, 2.5, 2.5.1, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10; all > but 2.5.1 are original in-box distributions) You're the right man, then, whom I should ask about the elusive Sun Bandwidth Manager (bwmgr) that someone at Sun Micr

Re: [CentOS] Oracle tries to capture CentOS users

On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 3:38 PM, wrote: > I agree. It was a real shame when Sun went on the block. But then, back in > the nineties, I loved Sun 3 and Solaris. Most of this decade, though, > Linux has become even friendlier and more useful to me. Sun JDS Linux was damn good (included Java and St

Re: [CentOS] Oracle tries to capture CentOS users

On Tue, Jul 24, 2012 at 1:37 PM, Gé Weijers wrote: > "One throat to choke", as Scott McNealy used to say. Hehe, never heard that one. Cool guy Scott... too bad Sun had to go up for sale. I have my own version "a single person (or firm) to yell at" FC _

Re: [CentOS] 'localyum' alias...

On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 3:00 AM, Fabien Archambault wrote: > I > believe that using this alias is useless. But the removal of localinstall doesn´t mean an easy to remember alias wouldn´t be of use, it´d just mean that the syntax would change to alias localyum='yum --disablerepo=* ´ ie localyum i

Re: [CentOS] 'localyum' alias...

On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 3:31 AM, Fabien Archambault wrote: > > This option is kept for legacy purpose [1] (or man yum). It works yet > but will be removed in the future releases (years ago) I believe. Thanks. I wasn´t aware of this. Luckily if I read this correctly, the ability to install package

Re: [CentOS] 'localyum' alias...

On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 3:00 AM, Fabien Archambault wrote: > Since the latest version of yum obsolete the localinstall option, I > believe that using this alias is useless. I have used yum's localinstall option on my CenOS 6.3 box... and it worked... FC __

[CentOS] 'localyum' alias...

This alias should be a great default addition to the bashrc... as it helps install packages to a CentOS system from the mounted install CD before you get networking up and running... alias localyum='yum --disablerepo=* localinstall' Does Red Hat care about Requests for Enhancement? or is filing a

[CentOS] system-config-network-tui not part of base install... wtf

Who was the genius that decided that system-config-network-tui should NOT be part of the base CentOS 6.3 install ?? Not to mention it has insane deps like wifi firmware packages... not really if all you want to do is configure eth0 from the command line... FC _

Re: [CentOS] Oracle tries to capture CentOS users

On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Craig White wrote: > >From my experience with Fernando on Fedora-List... Hi there Craig :) FC ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] Oracle tries to capture CentOS users

On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 4:33 PM, John R. Dennison wrote: > So for all your ramblings of commercialism these past few posts you > would rather use something free instead of paying? Really? I said that Oracle Database does not interest me, because MySQL / PostgreSQL is enough for my simple needs.

Re: [CentOS] Oracle tries to capture CentOS users

On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 3:31 PM, wrote: > Don't worry, just as soon as Oracle drives RH under, or buys them, they'll > crank up the prices to higher than RH now - I don' t think that would happen anytime soon. AFAIK if you check distrowatch Oracle Linux ranks #50 and CentOS ranks #8. Also, I re

Re: [CentOS] Oracle tries to capture CentOS users

On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 3:16 PM, Craig White wrote: > they want to sell SLA's which they sell cheaper than Red Hat which has caused > a rather sucky side effect which makes it more difficult to produce > customized kernels which would never have happened had Oracle not chosen to > ride the coat

Re: [CentOS] Oracle tries to capture CentOS users

On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Brian Mathis wrote: > Aren't the SRPMs available for OEL? How about an "Indestructible > CentOS" sub-distro? Yes, the srpms are available. That' s completely possible to do :) FC ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.o

Re: [CentOS] Oracle tries to capture CentOS users

On Fri, Jul 20, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Ken godee wrote: >> Fernando Cassia wrote: > Why don't they just continue to do something more useful > like continue the support for "OpenSolaris"! To be honest, it never had any traction. At least not down here. And it goes back

  1   2   >