Re: [CentOS] Does e2fsck.conf contain "broken_system_clock = 1" per default on CentOS7?

On Sun, 31 Jul 2016 15:17:19 +0200 Gabriele Pohl wrote: > On Wed, 27 Jul 2016 09:46:02 +0100 (BST) > John Hodrien wrote: > > > On Tue, 26 Jul 2016, Gabriele Pohl wrote: > > > I now changed the value to 0 and rebooted. > > > > > > After tha

Re: [CentOS] Does e2fsck.conf contain "broken_system_clock = 1" per default on CentOS7?

On Wed, 27 Jul 2016 09:46:02 +0100 (BST) John Hodrien <j.h.hodr...@leeds.ac.uk> wrote: > On Tue, 26 Jul 2016, Gabriele Pohl wrote: > > I now changed the value to 0 and rebooted. > > > > After that fsck based on Interval setting were done. > > > > Unfo

Re: [CentOS] Does e2fsck.conf contain "broken_system_clock = 1" per default on CentOS7?

On Tue, 26 Jul 2016 16:21:00 +0100 (BST) John Hodrien <j.h.hodr...@leeds.ac.uk> wrote: > On Tue, 26 Jul 2016, Gabriele Pohl wrote: > > > on all of my CentOS7 VMs on different hypervisors > > the config file e2fsck.conf contains the line > > > > broken_system_c

Re: [CentOS] Does e2fsck.conf contain "broken_system_clock = 1" per default on CentOS7?

On Tue, 26 Jul 2016 17:03:52 +0200 Gabriele Pohl <g...@dipohl.de> wrote: > on all of my CentOS7 VMs on different hypervisors > the config file e2fsck.conf contains the line > > broken_system_clock = 1 > > I found this because on all of them, the > root partitio

[CentOS] Does e2fsck.conf contain "broken_system_clock = 1" per default on CentOS7?

Hi, on all of my CentOS7 VMs on different hypervisors the config file e2fsck.conf contains the line broken_system_clock = 1 I found this because on all of them, the root partition was not checked triggered by interval setting with tune2fs. Do you see similiar /default/ settings on your

Re: [CentOS] output of "ls" (was: Re: Postgrey on CentOS 6)

On Fri, 22 Apr 2016 16:05:52 + Richard Mann wrote: > > What does the "." at the right side > > of the attributes list mean? > > > > Following the file mode bits is a single character that specifies > whether an alternate access method such as an access control

[CentOS] output of "ls" (was: Re: Postgrey on CentOS 6)

On Sat, 23 Apr 2016 02:23:28 +1200 Peter <pe...@pajamian.dhs.org> wrote: > On 23/04/16 02:13, Gabriele Pohl wrote: > > I administer a postfix mail server on CentOS 6. > > Now I want to setup another with similar configuration. > > > > But the postgrey packa

[CentOS] Postgrey on CentOS 6

Hi, I administer a postfix mail server on CentOS 6. Now I want to setup another with similar configuration. But the postgrey package is no longer available in Epel for this CentOS release as I have seen now: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/postgrey/ 1. Will I have to make an

Re: [CentOS] lunar notation in crontab

On Sun, 6 Dec 2015 02:25:53 -0800 Alice Wonder wrote: > On 12/06/2015 02:23 AM, ken wrote: > > Crontab offers many refined facilities for Western calendaring, but none > > for traditional Eastern-- lunar-- designations. > > This could be very useful in biology where a lot

Re: [CentOS] Bacula backup system

Hi Allessandro and all Bacula users and especially to (potential) Bacula contributors, On Mon, 11 May 2015 20:49:08 +0200 Alessandro Baggi alessandro.ba...@gmail.com wrote: In my last request I have asked info about backuppc and other backup solutions. After some test I have choosen bacula.

[CentOS] yum-plugin-security

Hi all, I have difficulties to understand the output of yum-plugin-security. I am on a X86_64 machine and when I query for security updates, yum lists i686 packages, that I don't have installed. # yum check-update --security Loaded plugins: changelog, fastestmirror,

Re: [CentOS] yum-plugin-security

On Sat, 22 Nov 2014 12:44:57 + (GMT) Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote: This plugin does not work on CentOS, at least not yet, there were previous discussions. e.g. http://centos-devel.1051824.n5.nabble.com/CentOS-devel-yum-plugin-security-and-shellshock-td5710031.html HTH yes it helped

Re: [CentOS] yum-plugin-security

On Sat, 22 Nov 2014 08:00:50 -0600 Johnny Hughes joh...@centos.org wrote: On 11/22/2014 05:49 AM, Gabriele Pohl wrote: I have difficulties to understand the output of yum-plugin-security. # yum check-update --security CentOS only tests that things work when doing all updates

Re: [CentOS] yum-plugin-security

On Sat, 22 Nov 2014 12:07:00 -0600 Frank Cox thea...@melvilletheatre.com wrote: On Sat, 22 Nov 2014 15:32:32 +0100 Gabriele Pohl wrote: As written in my other mail, the intention is to get triggered when security updates are pending. why not set up something to watch the centos

Re: [CentOS] yum-plugin-security

On Sat, 22 Nov 2014 13:17:59 -0600 Frank Cox thea...@melvilletheatre.com wrote: On Sat, 22 Nov 2014 19:52:30 +0100 Gabriele Pohl wrote: because I want the alert for my individual machines. So the proposed method is no solution for an automagical trigger :) You still can do

Re: [CentOS] yum-plugin-security

On Sat, 22 Nov 2014 17:10:40 -0600 John R. Dennison j...@gerdesas.com wrote: On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 11:41:17PM +0100, Gabriele Pohl wrote: I don't like to spend time in creating ugly workarounds.. and therefore would highly appreciate if the CentOS-Developers will add the data