Peter Kjellstrom wrote:
On Thursday 12 August 2010, Hywel Richards wrote:
Hi all,
Is anyone using oprofile?
I'm getting segfaults from opreport at the moment, and I'm not sure if
it is opreport, or just me.
I've tried the steps you outline below and it works for me (updated C5.5
Hi all,
Is anyone using oprofile?
I'm getting segfaults from opreport at the moment, and I'm not sure if
it is opreport, or just me.
In case it is something just plain daft I am doing, here is how it goes:
opcontrol --reset
opcontrol --setup --no-vmlinux
opcontrol --start
... now I run my
Paul Heinlein wrote:
On Thu, 2 Apr 2009, R P Herrold wrote:
It seems Paul and I are the last two users of NFS mounted /home
left.
Say it ain't so!
It ain't so.
I've got 7 machines here with NFSed /home (and the same problem with the
filesystem rpm).
Should I implement the
Florin Andrei wrote:
The options are: L2TP, PPTP and IPSec. If you were to install a VPN
endpoint on CentOS, which protocol would you prefer?
I know this doesn't answer your question as put, but it may be worth
taking a different tack and supplying whatever services wrapped with
Phil Schaffner wrote:
Looks a lot like
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=458861
that is marked Status: RELEASE_PENDING, so one might expect a fix in 5.3.
Added a note to the CentOS BZ and a link to CentOS to the upstream BZ.
Thanks Phil, that is good news indeed!
Hywel.
I'm a little confused about what you are supposed to do when you
discover a bug with CentOS (and by implication RHEL).
Is there some policy as to what to do and where to report the bug?
It doesn't seem appropriate to report it to http://bugs.centos.org
because CentOS is kept in-sync with the
Can't resist posting the parallel version of this:
#!/bin/bash
if [ $# == 1 ]
then
ping -c2 $1 /dev/null
if [ $? = 0 ] ; then
printf %-30s is alive \n $1
else
printf %-30s is not alive \n $1
fi
else
for n in $*
do
$0 $n
done
wait
fi
This does the same thing as the parent
Tom Browder wrote:
I asked one of my team mates to evaluate centos 5.2 as a more stable
distro for our business use than Fedora which we have used for years.
His main objection so far has been the lack of a neat feature of
recent Fedoras (at least since 7) that allows a user to login as
himself
Hywel Richards wrote:
No matter how I try, I can't seem to get a library profile from sprof
on CentOS5.
Does anyone know if sprof actually works on CentOS5? I'd be very
interested to hear if anyone is using it successfully.
At the moment I'm trying something like this to get the dump
Tru Huynh wrote:
where did you generate your libmy.so? On a C3/4/5 box?
What gives (on c4 and c5):
ldd libmy.so
You may miss some compat libs.
Tru
For the c4 test, I built it on c4, and for the c5 test I built it on c5.
Here are the outputs from ldd on the c4 and c5 boxes respectively:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
http://lists4.suse.de/opensuse-bugs/2007-09/msg10980.html
This looks like it might well be the same problem.
I guess the fact that this is in an OpenSUSE list suggests that it is a
problem originating in glibc.
It's a little bit discouraging that the bug was entered
Tru Huynh wrote:
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 04:29:19PM +0100, Hywel Richards wrote:
Johnny Hughes wrote:
http://lists4.suse.de/opensuse-bugs/2007-09/msg10980.html
This looks like it might well be the same problem.
yes
http://lists.opensuse.org/opensuse-factory/2007-09
First, many thanks to Paul and Spiro for your help with this.
Spiro Harvey, Knossos Networks Ltd wrote:
Ideally I would like a link to a webpage entitled How I learnt to
stop worrying and run spamass-milter as root.
We've got a few boxen running spamd as non-privileged user, but
spamassassin
I've just set up a new mailserver using Centos5.2
(sendmail+clamav-milter+spamass-milter).
I'm using the spamass-milter package from rpmforge
(spamass-milter-0.3.1-1.el5.rf).
I notice that the default setup is to run it as root. I set up my
previous mailserver on Centos4, and I can't
I think you just need to change the capital K at the end to a small k.
Try:
yum install ImageMagick
It looks like it is in the base repository:
=
Package Arch Version Repository
Filipe Brandenburger wrote:
Acutally I have no idea of what sprof is or does, but from the error
Let me tell you about sprof, then, because it is fantastic!
Of course, it would be even better if it worked.
It is a statistical profiler for shared object libraries that
(presumably) works by
No matter how I try, I can't seem to get a library profile from sprof on
CentOS5.
Does anyone know if sprof actually works on CentOS5? I'd be very
interested to hear if anyone is using it successfully.
At the moment I'm trying something like this to get the dump:
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=.
17 matches
Mail list logo
