On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 11:08:26AM -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 08/12/2016 03:38 PM, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> > A friend runs 6.8 but would like to add postscreen
> > to his email server. It is provided with postfix
> > version 2.8 and up. The newest postfix for 6.8
> >
A friend runs 6.8 but would like to add postscreen
to his email server. It is provided with postfix
version 2.8 and up. The newest postfix for 6.8
is 2.6.x. Any likelyhood it will be further
updated? Or is there another source for newer
postfix versions for CentOS 6.8?
Similar query for the
Before firewalld I used to use ipsets to blacklist
several countries. Firewalld added support for ipsets
with version 0.4, a year ago. Centos 7.2 is still at
0.3.9. Anyone know of a newer Centos package?
jon
--
Jon H. LaBadie j...@jgcomp.com
11226 South Shore Rd.
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 11:40:38PM +0100, Sean Brisbane wrote:
> There is a slight performance related reason for exporting disk partitions
> individually, the performance boost is server-side as Paul says. The
> advantage is that the no_subtree_check can be used without any additional
> security
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 10:24:19AM -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
> On Tue, July 19, 2016 10:06 pm, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> > My nightly logwatch report had a never before seen
> > section last night, "barracuda spam firewall".
> >
> > I have not probl
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 10:22:59AM -0500, Johnny Hughes wrote:
> On 07/19/2016 10:06 PM, Jon LaBadie wrote:
> > My nightly logwatch report had a never before seen
> > section last night, "barracuda spam firewall".
> >
> > I have not problem with the
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 04:14:36PM +0100, Always Learning wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2016-07-19 at 23:06 -0400, Jon LaBadie wrote:
>
> > My nightly logwatch report had a never before seen
> > section last night, "barracuda spam firewall".
>
> Is this a C7 issue, as
My nightly logwatch report had a never before seen
section last night, "barracuda spam firewall".
I have not problem with the emails it noted as
being rejected. But I've always thought of "barracuda"
as a commercial product.
I have neither configured nor enabled any barracuda
software and "yum
On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 10:19:04PM +0200, Helmut Drodofsky wrote:
> Helo,
>
> update is in EPEL repository.
>
> on startup, clamd does not further create clamd.sock and clamd.pid
>
> clamd service stops without any message - even in debug mode.
>
> It's a nightmare.
No help to offer. I
On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 11:26:25AM -0500, Michael Hennebry wrote:
> On Mon, 4 Jul 2016, John Hodrien wrote:
> > On Mon, 4 Jul 2016, qw wrote:
> >
> > > centos 6.8 comes with python 2.6. But I want to use python 2.7 to build
> > > gstreamer sdk. I have built python 2.7 and installed it into my
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 03:46:49PM +0800, qw wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I found gstreamer offcial have just announced 1.8.2 version.
> ("gstreamer.freedesktop.org")
>
> But centos 6 only support gstreamer 0.10. When will centos 6 support
> gstreamer 1.8?
>
I've no idea, but my centos7 system has both
On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 08:58:54AM -0400, Fred Smith wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 01:34:30PM +0300, Александр Кириллов wrote:
> > >Can anyone of you provide further hints on what I should be looking
> > >for or at?
> >
> > Is it trying to hibernate?
>
> gosh, I hope not! I was in the middle
On Sat, Jun 04, 2016 at 11:11:21AM +0530, Indunil Jayasooriya wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> Can you look in to this?
>
>
> [root@centos67 loop]# cat file1
> firstname1
> firstname2
>
> [root@centos67 loop]# cat file2
> lastname1
> lastname2
>
> I need a OUTPUT like this
>
>
> *firstname1
On Sun, May 15, 2016 at 02:55:01AM +, Richard wrote:
>
> > Date: Saturday, May 14, 2016 16:20:41 -0700
> > From: Alice Wonder
> >
> > On 05/14/2016 01:22 PM, Walter H. wrote:
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> just curious;
> >> since March 3rd, 2016 everdays logwatch-mail
> >>
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 10:31:51AM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> This is odd, and annoying. CentOS 6, current. Here's my awk script:
>
> {
>room = substr($0, 48, 10);
>arr[$2,room,$1] = $0;
> }
> END {
> for ( i in arr ) {
> for ( j in arr[i] ) {
> for ( k in arr[i][j] )
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 03:32:49PM -0453, William A. Mahaffey III wrote:
>
> From NetBSD 6.1.5:
>
>
> 4256EE1 # man sh
...
> SH(1)
>
> NAME
> sh -- command interpreter (shell)
...
>
> HISTORY
> A sh command appeared in Version 1 AT UNIX. It was, however,
> unmaintainable so we
On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 09:39:10AM -0400, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
> This is weird. As in, *deeply* weird.
>
> I ssh as root from one box to another (there are keys involved), and I go
> to vi a file, such as
> # line 1 #
> # line 2 #
> # line 3
> # line 4
>
> And what I see in vi is
> # line 3
>
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 05:58:39PM -0400, Steven Ford wrote:
> Why bother with */1? Wouldn't that be the same as just *?
> On Apr 22, 2016 5:48 PM, "Marcin Trendota" wrote:
>
I had the same question. Plus, the man page says "'/' specifies
skips of the number's value
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 06:52:47PM +0530, Selvin Durai Masilamani wrote:
> Hi team,
>
> Security patches isn't not showing from Centos 5,6 and 7.
>
> Tried Steps:
>
> First I installed yum install yum-security package
>
> Then I tried yum update --security
>
> But getting these message
>
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 05:47:33PM +0800, Chandran Manikandan wrote:
> Hi Geleem,
> Please have a look below of my result.
>
> For my system shows like below.
> df -h
>
> Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
> /dev/sda2 909G 576G 287G 67% /
> tmpfs 3.9G 0 3.9G
101 - 120 of 120 matches
Mail list logo