Re: [CentOS] RHEL changes

2021-01-25 Thread Marc Balmer via CentOS
> Am 25.01.2021 um 17:04 schrieb Johnny Hughes : > > On 1/22/21 5:12 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: >> On 1/22/21 9:29 AM, Marc Balmer via CentOS wrote: >>>> Hence it is as good as dead in my mind when looking into the future, I >>>> am looking for fut

Re: [CentOS] RHEL changes

2021-01-22 Thread Marc Balmer via CentOS
> Am 22.01.2021 um 21:36 schrieb Jamie Burchell : > > Can RH put a stop to projects like Rocky Linux? No. > >>> On 22 Jan 2021, at 18:04, Matthew Miller wrote: >>> >>> On Fri, Jan 22, 2021 at 07:25:04AM -0500, Konstantin Boyandin via CentOS >>> wrote: >>> I wonder whether RH plan to

Re: [CentOS] RHEL changes

2021-01-22 Thread Marc Balmer via CentOS
> Am 22.01.2021 um 08:40 schrieb Ljubomir Ljubojevic : > > On 1/21/21 11:40 PM, John R. Dennison wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 21, 2021 at 11:36:44PM +0100, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: >>> On 1/21/21 8:53 PM, Alfredo Perez wrote: Is this good news for the "Centos" family? >>> >>> There is

Re: [CentOS] I'm looking forward to the future of CentOS Stream

2020-12-13 Thread Marc Balmer via CentOS
> Am 13.12.2020 um 19:53 schrieb Phelps, Matthew : > > On Sat, Dec 12, 2020 at 11:48 PM Gordon Messmer > wrote: > >>> On 12/11/20 9:56 AM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: >>> And I will repeat that millions of CentOS users found free clone of RHEL >>> trustworthy enough to use it for production,

Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-devel] https://blog.centos.org/2020/12/future-is-centos-stream/

2020-12-09 Thread Marc Balmer via CentOS
> Am 09.12.2020 um 17:15 schrieb Neil Thompson : > > On Wed, 9 Dec 2020 at 18:06, Phelps, Matthew > wrote: > >> >> >> Hear! HEAR! >> >> NOBODY asked. >> >> >> > OK. We get it. We all get it loud and clear. You're pissed off. > > There's two things you can do about that - > 1)

Re: [CentOS] https://blog.centos.org/2020/12/future-is-centos-stream/

2020-12-09 Thread Marc Balmer via CentOS
Good Morning > Am 08.12.2020 um 15:06 schrieb Rich Bowen : > > The future of the CentOS Project is CentOS Stream, and over the next year > we’ll be shifting focus from CentOS Linux, the rebuild of Red Hat Enterprise > Linux (RHEL), to CentOS Stream, which tracks just ahead of a current RHEL

Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-devel] https://blog.centos.org/2020/12/future-is-centos-stream/

2020-12-08 Thread Marc Balmer via CentOS
Am I the only one to perceive CentOS/RedHat team members responses as quite arrogant? > Am 08.12.2020 um 18:11 schrieb Johnny Hughes : > > On 12/8/20 11:02 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: >>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 11:59 AM Rich Bowen wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On 12/8/20 11:29 AM, Jonathan

Re: [CentOS] [CentOS-devel] https://blog.centos.org/2020/12/future-is-centos-stream/

2020-12-08 Thread Marc Balmer via CentOS
> Am 08.12.2020 um 17:15 schrieb Rich Bowen : > > > > On 12/8/20 10:41 AM, Phelps, Matthew wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 10:39 AM Jonathan Billings >> wrote: >>> On Tue, Dec 08, 2020 at 10:28:30AM -0500, Phelps, Matthew wrote: You have published a CentOS Lifecycle that states the

Re: [CentOS] https://blog.centos.org/2020/12/future-is-centos-stream/

2020-12-08 Thread Marc Balmer via CentOS
This really pisses me off. You published CentOS 8 with a promise to support it until May 2029. Now you betray all users that took you by the mouth by stating it's EOL december 31. 2021. Do you really think that was a smart move? > Am 08.12.2020 um 15:06 schrieb Rich Bowen : > > The future

Re: [CentOS] selinux policy (& engine) broken in C7

2020-11-20 Thread Marc Balmer via CentOS
> Am 20.11.2020 um 19:50 schrieb lejeczek via CentOS : > > hi guys > > I've just gotten a bunch of updates via yum and something > weird seems to be going on after the update. > System has: > > selinux-policy-3.13.1-268.el7_9.2.noarch > selinux-policy-targeted-3.13.1-268.el7_9.2.noarch > >

Re: [CentOS] Where can CentOS7 yum-cron logs be found?

2020-08-19 Thread Marc Balmer via CentOS
> Am 19.08.2020 um 11:03 schrieb Gunnar Niels : > > On 8/18/20 1:00 AM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: >> Le 18/08/2020 à 03:00, Gunnar Niels a écrit : >>> I'm asking where the results of the yum-cron job are actually written to so >>> I can see what it did. >> Well, that's your answer. Here's the

Re: [CentOS] Safe to do yum update now?

2020-08-04 Thread Marc Balmer via CentOS
 > Am 04.08.2020 um 17:59 schrieb Jerome Lille : > > Hello > > Luckily I was not afflicted by this boot hole problem. I haven't done > yum update in a week or so. I just want to make sure that now it is > safe to do yum update? It is. > > /Jerome > >

Re: [CentOS] Fixing grub/shim issue Centos 7

2020-08-04 Thread Marc Balmer via CentOS
> Am 04.08.2020 um 08:31 schrieb lpeci : > > Hi all, > > I had the same problem with my UEFI bios machine and I fixed it so for Centos > 7: > > 1) Boot from an rescue linux usb > > 2) When the rescue system is running: > > 2.1) #chroot /mnt/sysimage > > 3) Config network: > >

Re: [CentOS] Boot failed on latest CentOS 7 update

2020-08-02 Thread Marc Balmer via CentOS
> Is the latest update : > shim-x64 x86_64 15-7.el7_9 No. 15-8 is. ___ CentOS mailing list CentOS@centos.org https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Re: [CentOS] 8.2.2004 Latest yum update renders machine unbootable

2020-08-02 Thread Marc Balmer via CentOS
>> >> Please report both positive and negative results. > > A previously afftected Aures nino POS-terminal boots just fine with CentOS 7 > and shim 15.8. > > Now I will test an affected machine (Aures Twist POS terminal) that runs > CentOS 8 (well, usually runs CentOS 8, but not now, since it

Re: [CentOS] 8.2.2004 Latest yum update renders machine unbootable

2020-08-02 Thread Marc Balmer via CentOS
> Am 02.08.2020 um 14:34 schrieb Johnny Hughes : > > On 8/2/20 6:59 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> On 8/2/20 2:04 AM, Alessandro Baggi wrote: >>> >>> Il 01/08/20 22:03, Greg Bailey ha scritto: On 8/1/20 6:56 AM, david wrote: > At 02:54 AM 8/1/2020, Alessandro Baggi wrote: >> Hi

Re: [CentOS] Boot failed on latest CentOS 7 update

2020-08-01 Thread Marc Balmer via CentOS
> Am 01.08.2020 um 23:52 schrieb Leon Fauster via CentOS : > > Am 01.08.20 um 23:41 schrieb Kay Schenk: >> Well misery loves company but still...just truly unfathomable! >> Time for a change. > > > I can only express my incomprehension for such statements! > > Stay and help. Instead running