Re: [CentOS] was, Backups solution from WinDoze to linux, is, looking at bareos [SOLVED]

2015-07-16 Thread Michael Mol
No ongoing lawsuit, AFAIK. I use their upstream repos just fine. Oh, and I don't use tape. I use the File and GlusterFile storage types, which work great. Gluster's a great fit, because of how easy it is to expand your storage dedicated to backups. Just add another brick or two... On Thu, Jul

Re: [CentOS] Backups solution from WinDoze to linux

2015-07-15 Thread Michael Mol
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015, 8:22 PM Valeri Galtsev galt...@kicp.uchicago.edu wrote: On Wed, July 15, 2015 7:05 pm, Michael Mol wrote: On Tue, Jul 14, 2015, 10:37 AM m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: My manager just tasked me at looking at this, for one team we're supporting. Now, he'd been thinking

Re: [CentOS] Backups solution from WinDoze to linux

2015-07-15 Thread Michael Mol
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015, 10:37 AM m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: My manager just tasked me at looking at this, for one team we're supporting. Now, he'd been thinking of bacula, but I see their Windows binaries are now not-free, so I'm looking around. IIRC, Les thinks highly of backuppc; comments on that,

[CentOS] Disable DHCPv6 on Cent7

2015-02-25 Thread Michael Mol
So, I'm seeing a bunch of DHCPv6 traffic coming from my CentOS7 machines. Basically, the machines are trying to send router solicitations, the packets are blocked at their egress firewalls, and I get to see the logs. I don't wish to disable IPv6. I don't wish to statically configure IPv6 at this

Re: [CentOS] Disable DHCPv6 on Cent7

2015-02-25 Thread Michael Mol
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 10:27 AM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote: So, I'm seeing a bunch of DHCPv6 traffic coming from my CentOS7 machines. Basically, the machines are trying to send router solicitations, the packets are blocked at their egress firewalls, and I get to see the logs. I

[CentOS] Upgrading Perl (modules) / RequestTracker

2014-02-04 Thread Michael Mol
I'm attempting to install RequestTracker on CentOS 6.5. Running make testdeps as recommended by RT's installation guide, I'm presented with lists of missing Perl modules. One of these lines reads: Encode = 2.39 ...MISSING Now, yum whatprovides '*/Encode.pm' informs me that that module

Re: [CentOS] Frustrated. Java on Centos 6 doesn't give an error message when downloading from a Samsung Galaxy S3

2013-05-24 Thread Michael Mol
On 05/24/2013 11:12 AM, Rock wrote: [snip] Rant Why the Android dev team removed USB file transfer for Linux users is beyond me! /Rant The reason is pretty straightforward...FAT sucks. USB Mass Storage serves up a block device in a linear layout over USB. This shows up under Linux as a

Re: [CentOS] unprivileged users rebooting at console

2013-05-05 Thread Michael Mol
On May 5, 2013 6:39 AM, Joseph Spenner joseph85...@yahoo.com wrote: I'm curious why any user logged in at the console can issue the 'reboot' command and reboot the system. I've tested/verified this to work, and read some older posts about this. If it were a bug, I suspect it would be fixed by

Re: [CentOS] Configuring source-specific routing

2013-05-03 Thread Michael Mol
On 05/03/2013 03:24 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote: On Wed, 2013-05-01 at 17:52 -0400, Michael Mol wrote: [snip] Curiously, at least one guy has reported success: http://sysadminsjourney.com/content/2009/04/15/doing-simple-source-policy-routing-centos/ Now, the only thing different

Re: [CentOS] Configuring source-specific routing

2013-05-03 Thread Michael Mol
On 05/03/2013 05:06 PM, Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: On 05/02/2013 08:48 PM, Michael Mol wrote: [snip] Alternate source routing, firewall and netfilter marking of packets: iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -s 172.24.5.0/24 -j MARK --set-mark 100 # iptables -t mangle -A PREROUTING -s

Re: [CentOS] Configuring source-specific routing

2013-05-03 Thread Michael Mol
On 05/03/2013 06:05 PM, Rob Townley wrote: Michael, very frustrating that so much noise for a very simple request. I set up multi source routing in 5.3 or so and was astounded at all the negativity on this list and that it could not be done. It will take forever to read the noise in this

Re: [CentOS] Configuring source-specific routing

2013-05-02 Thread Michael Mol
On 05/02/2013 08:57 AM, Les Mikesell wrote: On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 4:52 PM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote: Intent is to maintain the old, slow (but has an SLA) connection as a fallback, and migrate services to the new connection piecemeal. Meanwhile, the same DNS server on the new

Re: [CentOS] Configuring source-specific routing

2013-05-02 Thread Michael Mol
On 05/02/2013 01:01 AM, anax wrote: On 2013-05-01 22:05, Michael Mol wrote: I'm attempting to configure source-specific routing so that my servers can exist on multiple subnets from multiple upstream providers. A rough diagram of the network layout: ISP1 router (blackbox, routes subnet

Re: [CentOS] Configuring source-specific routing

2013-05-02 Thread Michael Mol
On 05/02/2013 05:13 AM, James Hogarth wrote: Yeah, I've gone that deep. And a tad deeper. I had almost *everything* working by hand, and went to figure out how to convert it to idomatic CentOS network configuration scripts. And took my network down *three times* because of the

Re: [CentOS] Configuring source-specific routing

2013-05-02 Thread Michael Mol
On 05/02/2013 01:05 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 8:14 AM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote: Ultimately, for this to work cleanly, anything which requires a public IP (be it a raw authoritative DNS server or a load balancer) will require an IP on both public subnets

Re: [CentOS] Configuring source-specific routing

2013-05-02 Thread Michael Mol
On 05/02/2013 02:02 PM, Les Mikesell wrote: On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote: with its default gateway pointing toward the ISP handling it. DNS service is simple enough to have standalone servers for each instance you need. This would also require either

Re: [CentOS] repeat command

2013-05-02 Thread Michael Mol
On 05/02/2013 05:05 PM, Matt wrote: There is a unix command called repeat. repeat 10 some_command Basically repeats some command ten times. Is it available on Centos 6 and what package provides it? # yum whatprovides *bin/repeat [snip] No Matches found HTH signature.asc Description:

Re: [CentOS] I Know It's A Stupid Question......

2013-05-02 Thread Michael Mol
On 05/02/2013 07:26 PM, Eddie G. O'Connor Jr. wrote: But I'm trying to give my son a cool-yet-kind-of-geeky 13th Birthday Present..he hinted he liked the CentOS logo, but where would I find things that are branded with it?searching the web doesn't really help me much, only

[CentOS] Configuring source-specific routing

2013-05-01 Thread Michael Mol
I'm attempting to configure source-specific routing so that my servers can exist on multiple subnets from multiple upstream providers. A rough diagram of the network layout: ISP1 router (blackbox, routes subnet A, address on subnet A) \ ---eth0(firewall)eth1---((servers)) / ISP2

Re: [CentOS] Configuring source-specific routing

2013-05-01 Thread Michael Mol
On 05/01/2013 05:15 PM, Michael H. Warfield wrote: On Wed, 2013-05-01 at 16:05 -0400, Michael Mol wrote: I'm attempting to configure source-specific routing so that my servers can exist on multiple subnets from multiple upstream providers. Kinda curious why you are attempting this without

Re: [CentOS] IPv6

2013-04-24 Thread Michael Mol
On 04/24/2013 12:46 PM, Matt wrote: I have setup a CentOS 6.3 VPS with ONLY IPv6 access simply for testing at this point. It browses the Internet with lynx fine on most major sites that are IPv6 enabled. Yum does not seem to work though. Always tries to connect to an IPv4 mirror and gives an

Re: [CentOS] Problem getting mysqldump on Centos 5.x server

2013-04-23 Thread Michael Mol
On 04/23/2013 09:42 PM, Clint Dilks wrote: Hi Bruce From your message I am assuming that either you installed MySQL yourself or had some do it for you? Is the mysql database currently running? If not it should be. Are you able to access the database using the command line tools ? From

Re: [CentOS] Writing to a symlink on a read-only file system that land on a read-write file system

2013-04-22 Thread Michael Mol
On 04/22/2013 08:42 AM, James Pearson wrote: We've come across a problem with 6.4 kernels that we didn't have with 6.2 kernels - which involves writing to a symlink that is on a read-only file system - but the symlink lands on a read-write file system The following shows the issue:

Re: [CentOS] 2nd NIC troubles

2013-04-16 Thread Michael Mol
On 04/16/2013 01:37 PM, Jason T. Slack-Moehrle wrote: Hi All, I have 2 NICS in this system. CentOS 6.4 eth0 is the virtual IP from PFSense mapping connected to the router, works fine. eth1 is a second NIC that I have assigned a private IP to and connected it to a switch on the private

[CentOS] How to patch a CentOS6 kernel

2013-04-10 Thread Michael Mol
So I have a couple patches supplied to me by upstream in relation to a kernel bug[1], but I can't figure out how to patch the kernel. The CentOS wiki page discusses retrieving the kernel source[2], but doesn't describe how to apply patches. Instructions I've found apply to CentOS5, and RH has

Re: [CentOS] How to patch a CentOS6 kernel

2013-04-10 Thread Michael Mol
On 04/10/2013 09:45 AM, Akemi Yagi wrote: On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 6:38 AM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote: So I have a couple patches supplied to me by upstream in relation to a kernel bug[1], but I can't figure out how to patch the kernel. The CentOS wiki page discusses retrieving

Re: [CentOS] How to patch a CentOS6 kernel

2013-04-10 Thread Michael Mol
On 04/10/2013 10:00 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Michael Mol wrote: So I have a couple patches supplied to me by upstream in relation to a kernel bug[1], but I can't figure out how to patch the kernel. The CentOS wiki page discusses retrieving the kernel source[2], but doesn't describe how

Re: [CentOS] How to patch a CentOS6 kernel

2013-04-10 Thread Michael Mol
On 04/10/2013 10:15 AM, Michael Mol wrote: On 04/10/2013 10:00 AM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Michael Mol wrote: So I have a couple patches supplied to me by upstream in relation to a kernel bug[1], but I can't figure out how to patch the kernel. The CentOS wiki page discusses retrieving

Re: [CentOS] How to determine 64 vs 32 bit processor

2013-04-10 Thread Michael Mol
On 04/10/2013 09:58 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: I have been tied up with other work and Holidays. Now back to some server work that is long overdue. I lost an old server yesterday so it is crunch time. I believe my new platform is suppose to be an x86_64. The order form says 64 bit.