format it is in and
which authentication mechanisms you want to support.
See: http://www.postfix.org/SASL_README.html
http://wiki.dovecot.org/Authentication discusses the various formats of
the dovecot password database and the types of authentication supported
by each.
Nataraj
Regards
Michael
, Tyan, Asus,
Supermicro and/or brands of systems, i.e. Dell, HP that are known to
work well with CentOS and support power management properly?
Nataraj
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
and my_drop_forward, change the message in each and call the correct one
from each chain. Then you would at least know where the problem was.
Nataraj
I am not sure why I schould add input and output rules if I want to
forward packages through a device but I can give it a try.
Btw. I am
for ssh looks like this:
Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address
State
tcp0 0 *:ssh *:*
LISTEN
Nataraj
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS
On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 12:14 +0800, Fajar Priyanto wrote:
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 11:58 AM, Nataraj incoming-cen...@rjl.com wrote:
Are you specifying the ListenAddress in /etc/sshd/sshd_config? The
default is to bind using a wild card which should pick up any interface.
What does your
Does software raid 1 compare checksums or otherwise verify that the same
bits are coming from both disks during reads? What I'm interested in,
is whether bit errors that were somehow undetected by the hardware would
be detected by the raid 1 software.
Thanks,
Nataraj
On Sun, 2008-09-21 at 11:12 -0700, John R Pierce wrote:
Nataraj wrote:
Does software raid 1 compare checksums or otherwise verify that the same
bits are coming from both disks during reads? What I'm interested in,
is whether bit errors that were somehow undetected by the hardware would
On Sun, 2008-09-21 at 21:01 +0200, Kay Diederichs wrote:
Nataraj wrote:
Does software raid 1 compare checksums or otherwise verify that the same
bits are coming from both disks during reads? What I'm interested in,
is whether bit errors that were somehow undetected by the hardware would
bonnie++ or iozone showed faster reads with raid1 than with a
single drive. I would think that if the drives are on seperate
controllers (and depending upon the performance/capacity of the drives
and controllers), there could be notable improvements.
Nataraj
The doc says you must have kernel 2.6.18 or later. It looks like there
are some iptables features that you can use that will not allow this to
work. Are you in compliance with all of the dependencies listed in
http://conntrack-tools.netfilter.org/conntrackd.html ?
Nataraj
Example:
udp
CONFIG_NO_HZ=y CONFIG_HIGH_RES_TIMERS=y
CONFIG_PARAVIRT_GUEST=y (paravirtuailized Guest/VMU Guest support)
CONFIG_PARAVIRT=y CONFIG_VMI=y CONFIG_HIBERNATION=y
Nataraj
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
with 4gb of memory.
Thanks,
Nataraj
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos
201 - 212 of 212 matches
Mail list logo
