-- Original Message --
From: "Matti Pulkkinen"
As someone who is considering moving to OL, I wonder if you could elaborate
clearly on what specific concerns you have, without the insinuation and
analogy? Oracle's proposition [1] seems pretty straightforward to me.
That they''
-- Original Message --
From: "Rainer Duffner"
So, you will quickly be back to square one, unless you want to run stuff like
Debian or Ubuntu, which are mainly Linux-kernel+some stuff nowadays, whereas
RHEL + CentOS forms a complete system (with additional software that RedHat has
On Sep 4, 2012, at 5:10 AM, Tony Molloy tony.mol...@ul.ie wrote:
Just remember I'm due to retire at the end of this month so this will
be my last big job for the Dept. And due to financial constraints I
will not be replaced. So I will be handing this machine over to a co-
worker who is
Yes, Java was grumpy.
--
Nate Duehr
denverpi...@me.com
On Aug 2, 2012, at 1:24 AM, Timo Schoeler timo.schoe...@riscworks.net wrote:
Hi list,
just out of curiosity: Was anybody affected by this?
http://lists.ntp.org/pipermail/questions/2012-August/033611.html
Cheers,
Timo
On Jul 9, 2012, at 12:03 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote:
Jerry Geis wrote:
Is there a way in centos to just go ahead and do this automatically?
/dev/sdal: Unexpected Inconsistency; [FAILED]
Run fsck Manually
(ie. Without –a or –p options)
***An error occurred during the File system
On Jun 26, 2012, at 10:29 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
I don't believe there's any more or less need to do so. I would
strongly recommend that you not segregate / and /usr. Fedora and future
versions of RHEL/CentOS will expect a unified / and /usr.
I may be behind, but this is the first
On Jun 20, 2012, at 3:27 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
As for partiality, no way, synaptic, adapted for rpms is by far the best
package manager I've used in the last 5 years since I bailed on fedora at
about 6 or so.
Understand that sentiment, Gene. I like aptitude myself for Debian-based
On Jun 18, 2012, at 5:55 PM, Woodchuck wrote:
[snipped swap/pagefile list of statements]
Thanks to the list for any answers!
Nothing in your list was phrased as a question. What are you trying to
determine? If the list of statements was accurate?
Nate
On Jun 20, 2012, at 1:59 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
I found a yumex, which is not part of the 64 bit install, but it wants a
way older version of python-2.4 whereas we have 2.6.6-something after the
post install upgrade.
1st Question:
Is there anything that can be done about this? Or is
On Jun 4, 2012, at 1:59 PM, Kaushal Shriyan wrote:
Hi,
I have a set of servers whose system time is drifting. I am running ntp
client on CentOS 5.8. My config is here - http://fpaste.org/s55U/
Anything i am missing?
Fire up ntpq, and type peers and see if they're seeing their upstream
On Jun 4, 2012, at 2:42 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 06/04/12 1:27 PM, Nate Duehr wrote:
Additionally, ntp will refuse to sync if it's too far out. Use ntpdate
[server IP] to force the issue first. If the machines have a bad CMOS
battery and won't keep time, ntpdate package can
Apologies if this is a FAQ or it's simply due to a lack of volunteers.
I'm curious why the CentOS Documentation here:
http://www.centos.org/docs/5/
...stops at CentOS 5.5.
And also why there is no:
http://www.centos.org/docs/6/
*** Curiosity killed the cat. ***
Thanks,
Nate
On Apr 11, 2012, at 11:29 PM, allan wrote:
Is your monitor an LED type? It could have dynamic brightness. My tv does the
same thing - also annoying.
I have also seen that feature on an HP monitor with LED backlight. I believe
it was a feature one could turn off in the monitor's built-in OSD
On Apr 8, 2012, at 12:18 PM, Jeff Cen wrote:
Hi,
I found my LCD screen brightness increase when I use firefox and other white
background editors and screen brightness decrease when I use dark background
applications, such as terminals with black background . The change in screen
On Mar 27, 2012, at 2:08 PM, Piero wrote:
Thanks for your hard work and great product,
Agreed, other than that I'm struggling to keep all the machines up! (GRIN!)
Nate
___
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
On Jan 26, 2012, at 4:59 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
On 01/26/12 3:43 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
Yes, the cost for a T1 will seem very high. It is antiquated telco
tech. T1s are generally very reliable, but very very slow.
1.5Mbps is not faster than 40Mbps. There's nothing hidden in the way
Was working on a project tonight to document CVE fixes applied to servers, and
noted that RedHat has completely jacked up their website.
In the past, I've usually just used their website for links to their CVE list,
as well as links to their Errata to look up specifics for CentOS machines.
It
Appears it's back up, just as a follow-up.
On Oct 8, 2011, at 12:01 AM, Nate Duehr wrote:
Was working on a project tonight to document CVE fixes applied to servers,
and noted that RedHat has completely jacked up their website.
In the past, I've usually just used their website for links
18 matches
Mail list logo
