Re: [CentOS] How to configure sendmail

2012-12-03 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 03.12.2012 20:13, schrieb Joseph Spenner: > I agree. When first trying to configure sendmail years ago, I remember how > painful it was. "Giving birth to a flaming porcupine", comes to mind. > Postfix is about as easy as I was always thinking sendmail should be. > > Now if only they'd do s

Re: [CentOS] what percent of time are there unpatched exploits against default config?

2011-12-29 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 29.12.2011 15:24, schrieb m.r...@5-cent.us: > Reindl Harald wrote: >> Am 29.12.2011 14:21, schrieb Marko Vojinovic: >>>> so explain me why discuss to use or not to use the best >>>> currently availbale method in context of security? >>> >>>

Re: [CentOS] what percent of time are there unpatched exploits against default config?

2011-12-29 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 29.12.2011 14:59, schrieb Johnny Hughes: > That flaw as absolutely no "access" component. It allows a DDOS attack, > not provide remote access to a machine. > > From the bug: > > A flaw was found in the way the Apache HTTP Server handled Range HTTP > headers. A remote attacker could use thi

Re: [CentOS] what percent of time are there unpatched exploits against default config?

2011-12-29 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 29.12.2011 14:21, schrieb Marko Vojinovic: >> so explain me why discuss to use or not to use the best >> currently availbale method in context of security? > > Using the ssh key can be problematic because it is too long and too random to > be memorized --- you have to carry it on a usb stick

Re: [CentOS] what percent of time are there unpatched exploits against default config?

2011-12-29 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 29.12.2011 12:56, schrieb Leonard den Ottolander: > Hello Reindl, > > On Thu, 2011-12-29 at 12:29 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: >> Am 29.12.2011 09:17, schrieb Bennett Haselton: >>> Even though the ssh key is more >>> random, they're both sufficien

Re: [CentOS] what percent of time are there unpatched exploits against default config?

2011-12-29 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 29.12.2011 09:17, schrieb Bennett Haselton: > 2. Why have password logins at all? Using a secure ssh key only for >> logins makes the most sense. >> > Well that's something that I'm curious about the reasoning behind -- if > you're already using a completely random 12-character password, why

Re: [CentOS] Is Biarch with 6.x now dead?

2011-12-28 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 29.12.2011 00:01, schrieb John R Pierce: > On 12/28/11 2:54 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> do what you believe and let us look where you end in 5-6 years >> after doing a couple of updates with "./configure&& make&& make install) >> >> it IS

Re: [CentOS] Is Biarch with 6.x now dead?

2011-12-28 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 28.12.2011 23:54, schrieb Michael Lampe: > They update with everything else, there's no bandwidth limitation for > these machines and the discs are big enough. (The 'everything' I > described shortly elsewhere + a lot of extras totals to ~16 GB of disc > space. That's nothing.) and becaus

Re: [CentOS] Is Biarch with 6.x now dead?

2011-12-28 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 28.12.2011 23:54, schrieb Michael Lampe: > Three examples I have already given. To repeat one: a user has a code > base that is not 64-bit clean? What am I to do? Tell him to f***, > fix it myself for him, or what? YES damend force him to cleanup hsi crap or chain him in a virtual mach

Re: [CentOS] Is Biarch with 6.x now dead?

2011-12-28 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 28.12.2011 23:32, schrieb Michael Lampe: > Reindl Harald wrote: > >> you need not to build a distribution to build clean packages >> in a clean build-envirnonment - this is simply in your own >> interest over the long and any quick& dirty solution >> wi

Re: [CentOS] Is Biarch with 6.x now dead?

2011-12-28 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 28.12.2011 23:19, schrieb Michael Lampe: > Maybe we're talking about different things here. I'm definitely not > talking about how to build a distribution. That's why I'm using your's > on not running my own. you need not to build a distribution to build clean packages in a clean build-envi

Re: [CentOS] Is Biarch with 6.x now dead?

2011-12-28 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 28.12.2011 18:13, schrieb Michael Lampe: > Reindl Harald wrote: > >> compilers and devel-packages should usually be seperated from >> working-computers and the compiled software packed as RPM >> in a dedicated vritual machine > > I'm using CentOS not only

Re: [CentOS] Is Biarch with 6.x now dead?

2011-12-28 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 28.12.2011 17:48, schrieb Les Mikesell: > On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Michael Lampe > wrote: >> >>> Biarch is actually only needed for libraries and support packages. >>> Running native i386 application on x86_64 does not make much sense >>> (third-party apps are another thing). >> >> I

Re: [CentOS] 6.2 and login.defs

2011-12-22 Thread Reindl Harald
On 22.12.2011 12:54, John Doe wrote: > From: Reindl Harald > >>> are they automatically "converted" (rehashed) to SHA512? >> this is technically impossible on any system and in any context >> the definition of a hash is NOT INVERTABLE and you would need

Re: [CentOS] 6.2 and login.defs

2011-12-22 Thread Reindl Harald
On 22.12.2011 12:30, John Doe wrote: > Hi, > > After the 6.2 upgrade, the new /etc/login.defs has: > ENCRYPT_METHOD SHA512 instead of MD5Is it safe to just apply the change? > Will my current MD5 passwords in /etc/passwd still work and only new > passwords will be SHA512? > Or are they automati

Re: [CentOS] Atheros ar9485 Wireless drivers??

2011-12-18 Thread Reindl Harald
currently nowhere http://linuxwireless.org/en/users/Drivers/ath9k/todo#AR9485_support Being worked on AR9485 support Am 18.12.2011 20:35, schrieb Phil Savoie: > Hi All, > > Anyone know of where I can find drivers for this interface? I thought > elrepo but I don't think so after looking. sign

Re: [CentOS] iSCSI best practices

2011-12-12 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 12.12.2011 23:25, schrieb m.r...@5-cent.us: > Reindl Harald wrote: >> >> >> Am 12.12.2011 22:37, schrieb m.r...@5-cent.us: >>> Reindl Harald wrote: >>>> get the right hardware and you do not have this problem >>>> http://h10010.www1.hp.com

Re: [CentOS] iSCSI best practices

2011-12-12 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 12.12.2011 22:37, schrieb m.r...@5-cent.us: > Reindl Harald wrote: >> get the right hardware and you do not have this problem >> http://h10010.www1.hp.com/wwpc/us/en/sm/WF04a/12169-304616-241493-241493-241493.html >> >> you have TWO of all components with hotplug

Re: [CentOS] auto-creating a local yum cache?

2011-12-12 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 12.12.2011 21:49, schrieb Alan McKay: > Hey folks, > > I just did an update on a system that is taking the better part of a day ( > 5.3 ---> 5.7 ) mainly due to file download times. > > And I have 4 or 5 more systems to do. > > I know I can create my own repository and then point them at it

Re: [CentOS] iSCSI best practices

2011-12-12 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 12.12.2011 19:17, schrieb John R Pierce: > On 12/12/11 6:43 AM, Digimer wrote: >> I handle this by setting up two servers running DRBD in active/active >> with a simple two-node red hat cluster managing a floating IP address. >> The storage network link uses a simple Active/Passive (mode=1) bo

Re: [CentOS] dd disk will not boot - can't find /dev/root

2011-12-12 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 12.12.2011 17:01, schrieb Joseph Spenner: > > > From: Joseph Spenner > To: "centos@centos.org" > Sent: Monday, December 12, 2011 8:51 AM > Subject: [CentOS] dd disk will not boot - can't find /dev/root > > OS= CentOS 5.4, 64bit. > > I've always had grea

Re: [CentOS] iSCSI best practices

2011-12-12 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 12.12.2011 15:13, schrieb Rudi Ahlers: > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 3:52 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> >> >> Am 12.12.2011 14:49, schrieb lheck...@users.sourceforge.net: >>> >>>> Outage is one thing, but having the disk volumes disappear mid-transaction

Re: [CentOS] iSCSI best practices

2011-12-12 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 12.12.2011 14:49, schrieb lheck...@users.sourceforge.net: > >> Outage is one thing, but having the disk volumes disappear mid-transaction >> can be detrimental to a file system's health. > > To get this back on-topic and closer to the OP's requests, are there any > particular iscsi setti

Re: [CentOS] Latest yum update cr (6.1?)

2011-12-11 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 11.12.2011 13:59, schrieb John Austin: > On Sun, 2011-12-11 at 13:28 +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: >> yum clean all && yum upgrade > > This was all that was needed > > Thanks > John this is generally the first thing to try if anything seemes to be messed u

Re: [CentOS] Latest yum update cr (6.1?)

2011-12-11 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 11.12.2011 13:22, schrieb John Austin: > > Is anyone else seeing this ? > > John > > [root@maui ~]# yum update > > > Loaded plugins: refresh-packagekit

Re: [CentOS] /etc/cron.d

2011-12-09 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 09.12.2011 11:42, schrieb John R. Dennison: > On Fri, Dec 09, 2011 at 10:38:08AM +, John Hodrien wrote: >> >> If you're going to act like an all knowing authority, be one. > > Perhaps not feeding the troll would also help? all people have not your opinion are trolls? laughable attitude!

Re: [CentOS] UC /etc/cron.d

2011-12-09 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 09.12.2011 09:59, schrieb Alexander Dalloz: > Am 09.12.2011 01:03, schrieb Reindl Harald: > >> why are radnom people try to tell me how i have to do my job >> without knowing anyting about how i work? >> >> no there is no need on the production machine becuase

Re: [CentOS] UC /etc/cron.d

2011-12-08 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 09.12.2011 00:53, schrieb Cliff Pratt: > On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 10:07 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> >> >> Am 08.12.2011 22:04, schrieb Les Mikesell: >>> On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Reindl Harald >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Am 08.12

Re: [CentOS] UC /etc/cron.d

2011-12-08 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 08.12.2011 22:04, schrieb Les Mikesell: > On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> >> Am 08.12.2011 21:08, schrieb Cliff Pratt: >>> It's a good idea NOT to put stuff in /etc/crontab and NOT to change >>> the existing members of /etc/c

Re: [CentOS] UC /etc/cron.d

2011-12-08 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 08.12.2011 21:08, schrieb Cliff Pratt: > It's a good idea NOT to put stuff in /etc/crontab and NOT to change > the existing members of /etc/cron.d. It is a good idea NOT to change > root's crontab. Any of these may get overwritten by maintenance. /etc/crontab will NEVER get overwritten to mak

Re: [CentOS] /etc/cron.d

2011-12-08 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 08.12.2011 09:30, schrieb Fajar Priyanto: > On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Cliff Pratt wrote: >> You can put a crontab file in there. Just don't alter any of the >> others. Crond automatically runs everything in /etc/cron.d, in >> /etc/crontab, and in user crontabs. >> > That's what I though

Re: [CentOS] /dev/sda

2011-12-06 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 06.12.2011 20:21, schrieb m.r...@5-cent.us: > Reindl Harald wrote: >> >> >> Am 06.12.2011 19:28, schrieb m.r...@5-cent.us: >>> We're just using Linux software RAID for the first time - RAID1, and the >>> other day, a drive failed. We have a clon

Re: [CentOS] /dev/sda

2011-12-06 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 06.12.2011 19:28, schrieb m.r...@5-cent.us: > We're just using Linux software RAID for the first time - RAID1, and the > other day, a drive failed. We have a clone machine to play with, so it's > not that critical, but > > I partitioned a replacement drive. On the clone, I marked the RAID

Re: [CentOS] How to preserve iptables when running the GUI tool ?

2011-12-05 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 05.12.2011 22:00, schrieb Les Mikesell: > Not sure what the GUI tool does (I'd assume it clears iptables if you > tell it to disable the firewall...) but 'service iptables save' writes > a file named iptables in /etc/sysconfig that you should be able to > back up somewhere. However, a normal

Re: [CentOS] remote syslog question

2011-12-02 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 03.12.2011 01:05, schrieb fred smith: > On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 12:36:48AM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: >> >> >> Am 03.12.2011 00:04, schrieb fred smith: >>> Hi all! >>> >>> I'm still googling for this, but after quite a while I'm no c

Re: [CentOS] remote syslog question

2011-12-02 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 03.12.2011 00:04, schrieb fred smith: > Hi all! > > I'm still googling for this, but after quite a while I'm no closer, so > I figured I'd ask you guys: > > I've got my router using syslog on my centos box to log the router's > system events. Works fine. > > however, it mixes 'em into /var/

Re: [CentOS] Moving server

2011-11-30 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 30.11.2011 13:45, schrieb Johnny Hughes: > On 11/30/2011 06:18 AM, ken wrote: >> On 11/30/2011 06:36 AM Timothy Murphy wrote: >>> I want to move my home server over to a new machine, >>> both running CentOS. >>> (The present server is running CentOS-5.7, the new one 6.0.) >>> I'm thinking of m

Re: [CentOS] OT: good free DNS tools?

2011-11-28 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 28.11.2011 22:58, schrieb Alan McKay: >> man dig >> man nslookup >> man whois >> man traceroute > > Clearly you've never used DNSstuff.com yes becuase no need > Yeah, I can do all that, but the above tool does a full diagnosis for > you and makes debugging problems really quick and painless

Re: [CentOS] OT: good free DNS tools?

2011-11-28 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 28.11.2011 22:52, schrieb Alan McKay: > Hey guys and gals, > > Anyone know of a half decent tool like DNSstuff.com only free? > > I need to run some diag on a few domains but it is basically a 1 shot > deal and hard to justify buying. man dig man nslookup man whois man traceroute signatu

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6 x64 - Changing /var folder to raid 1 disk after install

2011-11-21 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 21.11.2011 12:50, schrieb Adil BOYUN: > Hello, > > I have fresh install CentOS 6 x64 running on my server. I have a raid > 1 drive 3 tb ready to be mounted. I want to mount this as var folder, > could achive this but after reboot, server didn't start, maybe i had > problem with command cp -rf

Re: [CentOS] Setting up a Virtual Machine

2011-11-21 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 21.11.2011 11:11, schrieb John Hodrien: > On Mon, 21 Nov 2011, John J. Boyer wrote: > >> On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 02:32:18AM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: >>> >>> "yum install kernel-headers kernel-devel" >>> such software needs usually to co

Re: [CentOS] Setting up a Virtual Machine

2011-11-20 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 21.11.2011 02:29, schrieb John J. Boyer: > On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 02:54:34PM -0800, John R Pierce wrote: > >> imho, the easiest way to do this would be to install VirtualBox. > > So I tried to install the latest version of VirtualBox from > virtualbox.org It turned out that it deleted a pr

Re: [CentOS] External HDD query

2011-11-18 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 18.11.2011 15:49, schrieb Rajagopal Swaminathan: > BTW, how may persondays it would require on a Centos 5.7 box to > master? I have squandered away about 75% of available time (of about 2 > person days). Amanda, IMHO, requires about 1 person week to deploy > initially and about 2 person weeks

Re: [CentOS] not using LVM for Linux VM guests?

2011-11-17 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 17.11.2011 22:36, schrieb Smithies, Russell: > Tried that, as well as rescanning the scsi bus, > Everything I've tried returns a warning about kernel unable to reread > partition > table and requiring a reboot to see any modifications. gparted does tell you this since years after modify bu

Re: [CentOS] the majority will NEVER use smartphones

2011-11-17 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 17.11.2011 17:02, schrieb Craig White: > As for the majority... more than 50% of all phones sold now are smart phones. > Soon everyone, everywhere will have one. and for you this does mean they have ONLY a smartphone jesus christ i have a smartphone too and i like optimized interfaces for i

Re: [CentOS] the majority will NEVER use smartphones

2011-11-17 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 17.11.2011 15:10, schrieb Les Mikesell: > On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 7:55 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> >>> I think we are only a few years away from fully usable voice controls >>> which will eliminate any size requirements for your end point device. >>> Ke

Re: [CentOS] the majority will NEVER use smartphones

2011-11-17 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 17.11.2011 14:44, schrieb Les Mikesell: > Not sure I understand - a soft keyboard only takes screen space when > needed. And a very popular device is making news about its voice > input app that is sort-of usable. i do not speak about soft-keyboard i speak about wasting braindead space with

Re: [CentOS] the majority will NEVER use smartphones

2011-11-17 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 17.11.2011 03:23, schrieb Craig White: > Consider the upcoming Asus Transformer Prime tablet which has more > horsepower than my desktop computer (by far) though less RAM and less > storage. The cloud can be your storage... heck all of my music is > already on Google Music. uninteresting beca

Re: [CentOS] the majority will NEVER use smartphones

2011-11-16 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 17.11.2011 02:32, schrieb fred smith: > Well, I'm happy with my "stupid phone". I don't especially want a > pocket-sized computer (at least not one that's tightly chained inside > a walled garden, whether it be Apple's, or Microsoft's, or any one > else's garden). As long as it reliably makes

Re: [CentOS] the majority will NEVER use smartphones

2011-11-16 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 17.11.2011 01:42, schrieb Timothy Murphy: > Ljubomir Ljubojevic wrote: > >> If no smartphones gets broken and/or replaced, they could reach number >> of PC users (50%) in one year. Realistically it will take them 2-3 years >> to reach those numbers. >> >> BUT, I have 2 phones (one of them is

Re: [CentOS] What happened to 6.1

2011-11-15 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 15.11.2011 23:43, schrieb John R. Dennison: >> >> I was wondering if it would be safe to just stay with the 'standard' >> repo for centos and wait for 6.1 that way or do you suggest adding the >> CR repo as a necessary event? > > Depends on if you feel that security updates are important to y

Re: [CentOS] Changes at Red Hat confouding CentOS

2011-11-15 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 15.11.2011 15:52, schrieb Timothy Murphy: > Reindl Harald wrote: > >>> But isn't everyone today using laptops for everyday use? >> >> this is what some braindead developers seems to think >> but it is not true nor will it never get true! >> >

Re: [CentOS] Changes at Red Hat confouding CentOS

2011-11-15 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 15.11.2011 14:56, schrieb Timothy Murphy: > But isn't everyone today using laptops for everyday use? this is what some braindead developers seems to think but it is not true nor will it never get true! why in the world should i use a laptop in my office if i can have a Core i7 Quad combined w

Re: [CentOS] binding additional IP addresses to centos6 on one interface

2011-11-14 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 14.11.2011 12:03, schrieb n...@li.nux.ro: > Jonathan Vomacka writes: > >> Reindl, >> >> A block of 10 IPV4 is not a lot, and they will all eventually be used. >> My question is, my server IP is 66.80.x.x and my additional IPS are in >> the 50.7.x.x range using a netmask of 255.255.255.248. >

Re: [CentOS] binding additional IP addresses to centos6 on one interface

2011-11-13 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 14.11.2011 00:28, schrieb Jonathan Vomacka: > I know this was discussed before, and I have seen a million ways of > doing this via online docs. I have a quick question that hopefully the > community can help me out with > > I am trying to add a block of 10 IP addresses. Rather then create 10

Re: [CentOS] Trouble with Mailman

2011-11-13 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 13.11.2011 14:32, schrieb John J. Boyer: > On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 09:45:04AM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote: > >> Linux puts things in cache using extra (unused) memory. It is >> absolutely normal to have "Free Memory" go down to a fairly small level >> and have Buffers and Cache grow > Why do

Re: [CentOS] Postfix mail server procedure

2011-11-12 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 12.11.2011 14:53, schrieb Christopher Chan: > Oh, so Cyrus is another 'use a database as a mail store'? The other one > that I know of but cannot remember the name of uses postgresql for its > mailstore. the only REAl db-driven mailservr is dbmail and in combination with postfix-mysql-confi

Re: [CentOS] Redhat vs centos vs ubuntu

2011-11-11 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 11.11.2011 14:01, schrieb John Hodrien: > On Fri, 11 Nov 2011, Reindl Harald wrote: > >> so tell me why i do not need GRUB2 for this more than a year? >> >> 2.6.40.8-4.fc15.x86_64 #1 SMP Tue Nov 1 18:17:12 UTC 2011 >> >> /dev/md1 ext4 29G 8,0

Re: [CentOS] Redhat vs centos vs ubuntu

2011-11-11 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 11.11.2011 13:38, schrieb Craig White: > On Fri, 2011-11-11 at 01:05 +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote: >> James A. Peltier wrote: >> >>> Fedora 16 moved to GRUB 2 as well. It will be in RHEL/CentOS in the next >>> release. Get used to it. ;) >> >> Grub2 really seems extraordinarily verbose. >> On

Re: [CentOS] Linux hosts file /etc/hosts

2011-11-08 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 08.11.2011 18:53, schrieb Jonathan Vomacka: > Reindl, > > To my knowledge, all that needs to be configured is A records, MX > records, and SPF records (along with correlating PTR's). This is a whole > other subject and I feel I will have this correctly configured. My fear > is that someone

Re: [CentOS] Linux hosts file /etc/hosts

2011-11-08 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 08.11.2011 18:23, schrieb Jonathan Vomacka: > Good afternoon Gentlemen, > > I have a question regarding /etc/hosts for CentOS 6 x64. I already have > a hostname set on my server, however there are 10 additional IP aliases > assigned to the box, one which I plan to use as a mail server. The ma

Re: [CentOS] redhat vs centos

2011-11-07 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 07.11.2011 22:50, schrieb Marko Vojinovic: > Typically, you have no way of knowing the physical structure of the "cloud > machine" where your virtual machine is being hosted. Also, this structure may > even change over time due to upgrades of the cloud hardware (by the cloud > provider). Yo

Re: [CentOS] redhat vs centos

2011-11-07 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 07.11.2011 20:38, schrieb Rajagopal Swaminathan: > Greetings, > > On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 12:42 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> >> >> Am 07.11.2011 20:09, schrieb Rajagopal Swaminathan: >> because you can use VMware-Machines on Workstation and ESXi/vSphere and no

Re: [CentOS] redhat vs centos

2011-11-07 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 07.11.2011 20:09, schrieb Rajagopal Swaminathan: > Greetins, > > On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 12:31 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> >> >> Am 07.11.2011 19:57, schrieb John R Pierce: >>> On 11/07/11 9:36 AM, John Beranek wrote: >>>> Still doesn't an

Re: [CentOS] redhat vs centos

2011-11-07 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 07.11.2011 19:57, schrieb John R Pierce: > On 11/07/11 9:36 AM, John Beranek wrote: >> Still doesn't answer how many sockets you're using if you have a RHEL >> 5/6 guest VM with 2 (or 4) virtual VMware processors... > > can you even run another VM hypervisor under vmware?!? > never mind, WHY?

Re: [CentOS] redhat vs centos

2011-11-07 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 07.11.2011 18:36, schrieb John Beranek: > On 07/11/2011 16:45, Reindl Harald wrote: >> in newer VMware versions (Workstation 7/8) you can assign virtual CPUs >> and cores per virtual CPU, i guess VMware ESXi 5 will have this feature >> too, but not my nested vm is curr

Re: [CentOS] redhat vs centos

2011-11-07 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 07.11.2011 17:42, schrieb John Beranek: > On 02/11/2011 10:31, Patrick Lists wrote: >> On 11/02/2011 11:02 AM, Tony Mountifield wrote: >>> What is a "socket" in their pricing model? The word can mean so many >>> different things... >> >> Afaik it refers to a physical cpu socket. So they count

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6: php-eaccelerator

2011-11-06 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 06.11.2011 20:40, schrieb Rainer Duffner: > > Am 06.11.2011 um 05:01 schrieb Reindl Harald: > >> has anybody ever got eaccelerator working with open_basedir on CentOS? >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=751569 >> >> i wonder that the last build i

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6: php-eaccelerator

2011-11-06 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 06.11.2011 18:35, schrieb Dennis Jacobfeuerborn: >> so as long as i use eaccelerator on> 20 production servers since >> years and the only CentOS test-system is broken i see no reason >> to play with apc around because i do not like to switch for >> one single customer to a extension we are n

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6: php-eaccelerator

2011-11-06 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 06.11.2011 14:27, schrieb Dennis Jacobfeuerborn: > On 11/06/2011 05:01 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> has anybody ever got eaccelerator working with open_basedir on CentOS? >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=751569 >> >> i wonder that the last build is more

Re: [CentOS] CentOS 6: /etc/init/start-ttys.conf ignored

2011-11-05 Thread Reindl Harald
Am 06.11.2011 05:27, schrieb John R. Dennison: > On Sun, Nov 06, 2011 at 04:55:53AM +0100, Reindl Harald wrote: >> hi >> >> why are tty3-tty6 started after this config change? > > The script is sourcing in /etc/sysconfig/init which has ACTIVE_CONSOLES > define

[CentOS] CentOS 6: php-eaccelerator

2011-11-05 Thread Reindl Harald
has anybody ever got eaccelerator working with open_basedir on CentOS? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=751569 i wonder that the last build is more than a yaer ago and nobody hitted until now or nobody is secring his vhsost and so did not take notice about it http://koji.fedoraproject.o

[CentOS] CentOS 6: /etc/init/start-ttys.conf ignored

2011-11-05 Thread Reindl Harald
hi why are tty3-tty6 started after this config change? i would like to have only tty1 finally becasue on a virtual machine there is no need for the other processes since CTRL+ALT+Fx is caught by the own system and remote console mostly not needed at all [root@centos ~]# cat /etc/init/start-ttys.