Re: [CentOS] logical volume is unreadable

On 07/06/2017 10:47 AM, Volker wrote: On 06.07.2017 15:35, Robert Nichols wrote: That looks like a snapshot volume that became invalid because it was filled to capacity. Such a snapshot is lost forever. It si your responsibility to monitor snapshot usage to make sure it does not run out

Re: [CentOS] logical volume is unreadable

On 07/06/2017 04:43 AM, Volker wrote: Hi all, one of my lv has become completely unaccessible. Every read access results in a buffer io error: Buffer I/O error on dev dm-13, logical block 0, async page read this goes for every block in the lv. A ddrescue failed on every single block. $

Re: [CentOS] Markdown editor for CentOS 7?

Is geany available for Centos? It works well for markdown, though I use it for xml and html. On 06/16/2017 07:25 AM, Yamaban wrote: On Fri, 16 Jun 2017 11:27, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: Hi, I recently discovered Markdown, and I'm currently using it to write some documentation for CentOS 7.

Re: [CentOS] OT - lowest power, cheapest python interpreter

On 06/11/2017 01:07 AM, John R Pierce wrote: On 6/10/2017 9:19 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: I recommend the Cubieboards or Linkspirt. The advantage of both of these over a RaspberryPI: Mainline kernel. See what it takes for a special RPi kernel over on the Centos-arm list. Sata interface

Re: [CentOS] OT - lowest power, cheapest python interpreter

On 06/11/2017 03:02 AM, Fabian Arrotin wrote: On 11/06/17 07:07, John R Pierce wrote: On 6/10/2017 9:19 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: I recommend the Cubieboards or Linkspirt. The advantage of both of these over a RaspberryPI: Mainline kernel. See what it takes for a special RPi kernel over

Re: [CentOS] OT - lowest power, cheapest python interpreter

On 06/11/2017 01:16 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: On 06/11/2017 01:07 AM, John R Pierce wrote: On 6/10/2017 9:19 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: I recommend the Cubieboards or Linkspirt. The advantage of both of these over a RaspberryPI: Mainline kernel. See what it takes for a special RPi

Re: [CentOS] OT - lowest power, cheapest python interpreter

On 06/11/2017 01:07 AM, John R Pierce wrote: On 6/10/2017 9:19 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: I recommend the Cubieboards or Linkspirt. The advantage of both of these over a RaspberryPI: Mainline kernel. See what it takes for a special RPi kernel over on the Centos-arm list. Sata interface

Re: [CentOS] OT - lowest power, cheapest python interpreter

On 06/10/2017 02:54 AM, Fabian Arrotin wrote: On 09/06/17 21:00, Andrew Holway wrote: I am searching for the cheapeat *nix SOC device with ethernet and wifi that can run Python 2.7. Ethernet should be 100mbit and hopefully supporting PXE. OT because im doubting you can squeeze our bloaty

Re: [CentOS] OT - lowest power, cheapest python interpreter

I recommend the Cubieboards or Linkspirt. The advantage of both of these over a RaspberryPI: Mainline kernel. See what it takes for a special RPi kernel over on the Centos-arm list. Sata interface. What are you going to run your stuff on? A slow SD card or a slow USB drive? See my

Re: [CentOS] C6 or C7 for an old netbook

On 06/07/2017 12:39 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 06/06/2017 02:53 AM, John Hodrien wrote: On Mon, 5 Jun 2017, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: Mmmm... looks like I may go for C6, then, since unlike that Ubuntu, I will want to do updates at least every time I get ready for a trip (other times, it sits

Re: [CentOS] Crazy thought about upgrading to new major release

On 06/06/2017 03:45 PM, John R Pierce wrote: On 6/6/2017 12:38 PM, Jerry Geis wrote: I have older systems out there that work fine, just for what ever reason would be great to upgrade from a C5 -> C7 (due to no longer supported) or C6 > C7 (for updated packages). Sounds like the upgrade

Re: [CentOS] MySQL on Centos 7 (armv7)

On 06/03/2017 08:52 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: On 06/03/2017 08:19 AM, Leon Vergottini wrote: Dear Community I am trying to install MySQL 5.6 on a Raspberry PI 3B. Using my normal procedure by downloading the yum repo rpm and installing MySQL through that is not working. There is no

Re: [CentOS] Low random entropy

On 05/29/2017 10:18 AM, Leon Fauster wrote: Am 29.05.2017 um 14:41 schrieb Robert Moskowitz <r...@htt-consult.com>: On 05/29/2017 06:46 AM, Leon Fauster wrote: Am 29.05.2017 um 05:46 schrieb Robert Moskowitz <r...@htt-consult.com>: On 05/28/2017 06:57 PM, Rob Kampen wrote:

Re: [CentOS] Low random entropy

On 05/29/2017 10:18 AM, Leon Fauster wrote: Am 29.05.2017 um 14:41 schrieb Robert Moskowitz <r...@htt-consult.com>: On 05/29/2017 06:46 AM, Leon Fauster wrote: Am 29.05.2017 um 05:46 schrieb Robert Moskowitz <r...@htt-consult.com>: On 05/28/2017 06:57 PM, Rob Kampen wrote:

Re: [CentOS] Low random entropy

On 05/29/2017 03:13 AM, Rob Kampen wrote: On 29/05/17 15:46, Robert Moskowitz wrote: On 05/28/2017 06:57 PM, Rob Kampen wrote: On 28/05/17 23:56, Leon Fauster wrote: Am 28.05.2017 um 12:16 schrieb Robert Moskowitz <r...@htt-consult.com>: On 05/28/2017 04:24 AM, Tony Mountifield

Re: [CentOS] Low random entropy

On 05/29/2017 06:46 AM, Leon Fauster wrote: Am 29.05.2017 um 05:46 schrieb Robert Moskowitz <r...@htt-consult.com>: On 05/28/2017 06:57 PM, Rob Kampen wrote: On 28/05/17 23:56, Leon Fauster wrote: Am 28.05.2017 um 12:16 schrieb Robert Moskowitz <r...@htt-consult.com>: On 0

Re: [CentOS] Low random entropy

On 05/28/2017 06:57 PM, Rob Kampen wrote: On 28/05/17 23:56, Leon Fauster wrote: Am 28.05.2017 um 12:16 schrieb Robert Moskowitz <r...@htt-consult.com>: On 05/28/2017 04:24 AM, Tony Mountifield wrote: In article <792718e8-f403-1dea-367d-977b157af...@htt-consult.com>, Robert

Re: [CentOS] Low random entropy

On 05/28/2017 04:24 AM, Tony Mountifield wrote: In article <792718e8-f403-1dea-367d-977b157af...@htt-consult.com>, Robert Moskowitz <r...@htt-consult.com> wrote: On 05/26/2017 08:35 PM, Leon Fauster wrote: Am 27.05.2017 um 01:09 schrieb Robert Moskowitz <r...@htt-consult.

Re: [CentOS] Low random entropy

On 05/26/2017 08:35 PM, Leon Fauster wrote: Am 27.05.2017 um 01:09 schrieb Robert Moskowitz <r...@htt-consult.com>: I am use to low random entropy on my arm boards, not an intel. On my Lenovo x120e, cat /proc/sys/kernel/random/entropy_avail reports 3190 bits of entropy. On my

[CentOS] Low random entropy

I am use to low random entropy on my arm boards, not an intel. On my Lenovo x120e, cat /proc/sys/kernel/random/entropy_avail reports 3190 bits of entropy. On my armv7 with Centos7 I would get 130 unless I installed rng-tools and then I get ~1300. SSH into one and it drops back to 30! for a

Re: [CentOS] Missing rpms - Re: What is in a yum group

On 05/25/2017 03:49 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote: On 5/25/2017 3:43 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: Note that you do not have xfce-utils or leafpad. Do you have themes? What is your background. I have actually gotten Xfce working. Kindof. I am into Xfce via vncserver. It pretty much looks like

Re: [CentOS] Missing rpms - Re: What is in a yum group

On 05/25/2017 12:29 PM, Bowie Bailey wrote: On 5/25/2017 12:07 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: On 05/25/2017 11:22 AM, Bowie Bailey wrote: On 5/25/2017 10:04 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: On 05/25/2017 09:32 AM, Leon Fauster wrote: Am 25.05.2017 um 15:27 schrieb Robert Moskowitz <r...@

[CentOS] startx on console 2

I seem to recall that there is some special option to run X11 on On this ClearOS system, their console sits on the default console. You have to (etc.) to get a text login. Now that I have Xfce kind of installed, I want to see it on the system console, and I thought that just running startx

Re: [CentOS] Centos7 Cant start vncserver

denied /root/.vnc/xstartup: line 5: exec: /etc/xdg/xfce4/xinitrc: cannot execute: Permission denied 2.log has different errors. 3.log actually has connection information (as I am connecting to 5903?) thanks On 05/25/2017 12:37 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: OK, first time configuring vncserver

[CentOS] Centos7 Cant start vncserver

OK, first time configuring vncserver on Centos7. I have read through a bunch of old messages here on vncserver and thought I had it. Obviously not. 1)cp /usr/lib/systemd/system/vncserver@.service /etc/systemd/system/vncserver@.service 2)vi /etc/systemd/system/vncserver@.service I

Re: [CentOS] Missing rpms - Re: What is in a yum group

On 05/25/2017 11:22 AM, Bowie Bailey wrote: On 5/25/2017 10:04 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: On 05/25/2017 09:32 AM, Leon Fauster wrote: Am 25.05.2017 um 15:27 schrieb Robert Moskowitz <r...@htt-consult.com>: Thanks. I followed this to: http://mirror.centos.org/centos/7/os/x86_64/Pa

Re: [CentOS] Missing rpms - Re: What is in a yum group

On 05/25/2017 09:32 AM, Leon Fauster wrote: Am 25.05.2017 um 15:27 schrieb Robert Moskowitz <r...@htt-consult.com>: On 05/25/2017 08:32 AM, Leon Fauster wrote: Am 25.05.2017 um 14:20 schrieb Robert Moskowitz <r...@htt-consult.com>: I seem to be missing some important rpms,

[CentOS] Missing rpms - Re: What is in a yum group

On 05/25/2017 08:32 AM, Leon Fauster wrote: Am 25.05.2017 um 14:20 schrieb Robert Moskowitz <r...@htt-consult.com>: I seem to be missing some important rpms, even when I enable the clearos-centos.repo which is suppose to include all of the centos rpms not customized by clearos. How

Re: [CentOS] What is in a yum group

totally switched to Xfce on all my Fedora platforms. By enabling the clearos-centos.repo I have the option of the Gnome group to install... thanks On 05/24/2017 06:07 PM, Scott Gennari wrote: On 5/24/2017 5:59 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: yum group info Xfce Group: Xfce Group-Id: xfce

Re: [CentOS] What is in a yum group

On 05/24/2017 06:07 PM, Scott Gennari wrote: On 5/24/2017 5:59 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: yum group info Xfce Group: Xfce Group-Id: xfce-desktop Description: A lightweight desktop environment that works well on low end machines. Mandatory Packages: +Thunar +xfce-utils +xfce4

Re: [CentOS] What is in a yum group

On 05/24/2017 06:07 PM, Scott Gennari wrote: On 5/24/2017 5:59 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: yum group info Xfce Group: Xfce Group-Id: xfce-desktop Description: A lightweight desktop environment that works well on low end machines. Mandatory Packages: +Thunar +xfce-utils Thanks

Re: [CentOS] What is in a yum group

/24/2017 10:07 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: On 05/24/2017 12:03 AM, John R Pierce wrote: On 5/23/2017 3:52 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: I want to install Xfce on a ClearOS server. They have not defined any desktop groups (actually no groups other than minimal). But lots of Xfce rpms

Re: [CentOS] System Time Source

On 05/24/2017 11:37 AM, Tate Belden wrote: Warren, one slight correction on an other wise nicely written bit of info: The time transmitted from WWV is not Mountain Time. Even though the WWV transmitter farm is located in the Mountain time zone, the signals are transmitted as "Coordinated

Re: [CentOS] System Time Source

On 05/24/2017 09:53 AM, Chris Olson wrote: One of our STEM interns recently observed that there are inexpensive clocks that sync via radio to standard time services. This begged a question about why every computer would not have a radio module to receive time. Our senior staff did not have a

Re: [CentOS] What is in a yum group

On 05/24/2017 12:03 AM, John R Pierce wrote: On 5/23/2017 3:52 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: I want to install Xfce on a ClearOS server. They have not defined any desktop groups (actually no groups other than minimal). But lots of Xfce rpms are in their repos. How can I see what rpms

Re: [CentOS] What is in a yum group

On 05/23/2017 10:52 PM, Ian Mortimer wrote: On Tue, 2017-05-23 at 18:52 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote: How can I see what rpms Centos would install with a 'yum group install'? yum group info Xfce Ah, I had tried yum groupinfo "Xfce Desktop" And got the listing of groups, no

[CentOS] What is in a yum group

I want to install Xfce on a ClearOS server. They have not defined any desktop groups (actually no groups other than minimal). But lots of Xfce rpms are in their repos. How can I see what rpms Centos would install with a 'yum group install'? Then I get to install vnc server and set up the

Re: [CentOS] Mini PCs

On 05/17/2017 09:53 AM, Walter H. wrote: On 17.05.2017 11:58, Robert Moskowitz wrote: http://www.ebay.com/itm/ZOTAC-ZBOX-NANO-Plus-Mini-PC-ZBOXNANO-AD12-PLUS-2GB-320GB-with-Power-Supply-56/382042194064?_trksid=p2045573.c100033.m2042&_trkparms=aid%3D111001%26algo%3DREC.SEED%26ao%3D1%2

Re: [CentOS] Mini PCs

/nuc-kit-dn2820fykh.html -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: "Robert Moskowitz" <r...@htt-consult.com> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos@centos.org> Sent: Friday, 12 May, 2017 23:29:41 Subjec

Re: [CentOS] Mini PCs

On 05/17/2017 09:53 AM, Walter H. wrote: On 17.05.2017 11:58, Robert Moskowitz wrote: http://www.ebay.com/itm/ZOTAC-ZBOX-NANO-Plus-Mini-PC-ZBOXNANO-AD12-PLUS-2GB-320GB-with-Power-Supply-56/382042194064?_trksid=p2045573.c100033.m2042&_trkparms=aid%3D111001%26algo%3DREC.SEED%26ao%3D1%2

Re: [CentOS] Best practices for copying lots of files machine-to-machine

On 05/17/2017 04:31 PM, Vanhorn, Mike wrote: On 5/17/17, 12:03 PM, "CentOS on behalf of ken" wrote: An entire filesystem (~180g) needs to be copied from one local linux machine to another. Since both systems are on the same local

Re: [CentOS] Best practices for copying lots of files machine-to-machine

On 05/17/2017 12:03 PM, ken wrote: An entire filesystem (~180g) needs to be copied from one local linux machine to another. Since both systems are on the same local subnet, there's no need for encryption. I've done this sort of thing before a few times in the past in different ways, but

Re: [CentOS] Mini PCs

have this and happy with it, I believe it ticks all your boxes (+ built-in IR port). http://www.intel.co.uk/content/www/uk/en/nuc/nuc-kit-dn2820fykh.html -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro - Original Message - From: "Robert Moskowitz" <r..

[CentOS] Mini PCs

I have been working, for the past few years, with armv7 SOCs and have a number of servers working. Intel, etal are catching up with ARM and I have seen ones like: https://www.aliexpress.com/item/NEW-Mini-pc-X86-4-Lan-Qotom-Q190G4N-with-celeron-J1900-quad-core-4-usb-VGA/32785346279.html I am

Re: [CentOS] cannot access file: Input/output error

> I have a file on a backup usb drive that I get the following error: > > # ls -ls P* > ls: cannot access Power usage.xls: Input/output error > > How can I delete this file so that the nightly backup will write out the > current version to the backup drive? > > I tried: > > # rm -f Power\

[CentOS] cannot access file: Input/output error

I have a file on a backup usb drive that I get the following error: # ls -ls P* ls: cannot access Power usage.xls: Input/output error How can I delete this file so that the nightly backup will write out the current version to the backup drive? I tried: # rm -f Power\ usage.xls rm: cannot

Re: [CentOS] tabs ignored in here document

the sections where I have blocks with here documents with tabs, but better to turn it off and on each time, that assume it is in the right state. Again, thanks. Robbert On 05-05-17 20:16, Robert Moskowitz wrote: I thought this worked. Many web pages tell you it works. But bash is ignoring tabs in my

Re: [CentOS] tabs ignored in here document

On 05/05/2017 04:46 PM, John R Pierce wrote: On 5/5/2017 1:41 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: I just did a test where I created a file, xit, with the here document in it and ran it with ./xit This way, the tabs remained. So the 'problem' is when I am pasting the same lines (with tabs

Re: [CentOS] tabs ignored in here document

More research... On 05/05/2017 04:35 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: On 05/05/2017 03:33 PM, Bill Campbell wrote: On Fri, May 05, 2017, Robert Moskowitz wrote: I thought this worked. Many web pages tell you it works. But bash is ignoring tabs in my here docs. Worst, where there are two tabs

Re: [CentOS] tabs ignored in here document

On 05/05/2017 03:33 PM, Bill Campbell wrote: On Fri, May 05, 2017, Robert Moskowitz wrote: I thought this worked. Many web pages tell you it works. But bash is ignoring tabs in my here docs. Worst, where there are two tabs, it is functioning as a command expand in bash, where all files

Re: [CentOS] tabs ignored in here document

On 05/05/2017 02:40 PM, John R Pierce wrote: On 5/5/2017 11:16 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: But bash is ignoring tabs in my here docs. tab in bash is indeed filename expansion. what are 'my here' docs ? not familiar with that phrase. A *here document* is a special-purpose code

[CentOS] tabs ignored in here document

I thought this worked. Many web pages tell you it works. But bash is ignoring tabs in my here docs. Worst, where there are two tabs, it is functioning as a command expand in bash, where all files in the current directory are listed to complete the command. The following is the here doc I

[CentOS] Samba active domain controller guide for Centos 7

Is there a good guide for setting up a Samba active domain controller? I am currently running ClearOS, but it does more than what I want, even that I had to modify to suit my needs. Only a few systems. Currently still XP, but I will migrate to Win7 with this move. Of course I will be doing

Re: [CentOS] NOT Solved - Re: SELinux policy to allow Dovecot to connect to Mysql

On 04/28/2017 06:36 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: On 04/28/2017 12:06 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: Here are the messages I got: type=AVC msg=audit(1493361695.041:49205): avc: denied { rlimitinh } for pid=3047 comm="cleanup" scontext=system_u:system_r:postfix_master_t:s0

Re: [CentOS] NOT Solved - Re: SELinux policy to allow Dovecot to connect to Mysql

On 04/28/2017 08:07 PM, m...@tdiehl.org wrote: On Fri, 28 Apr 2017, Gordon Messmer wrote: On 04/28/2017 12:06 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: Here are the messages I got: type=AVC msg=audit(1493361695.041:49205): avc: denied { rlimitinh } for pid=3047 comm="cleanup"

Re: [CentOS] NOT Solved - Re: SELinux policy to allow Dovecot to connect to Mysql

Gordon, Thank you for your help on this. Still not working... On 04/26/2017 06:27 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: On 04/26/2017 12:29 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: But the policy generates errors. I will have to submit a bug report, it seems A bug report would probably be helpful. I'm looking

Re: [CentOS] NOT Solved - Re: SELinux policy to allow Dovecot to connect to Mysql

Thanks for the advice. Will see what I can get done this evening. On 04/26/2017 06:27 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: On 04/26/2017 12:29 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: But the policy generates errors. I will have to submit a bug report, it seems A bug report would probably be helpful. I'm

Re: [CentOS] NOT Solved - Re: SELinux policy to allow Dovecot to connect to Mysql

thanks. On 04/26/2017 08:55 AM, Phoenix, Merka wrote: Robert, in regards to your Postfix and Dovecot issue with MySQL and SELinux, Apr 26 01:25:45 z9m9z dovecot: dict: Error: mysql(/var/lib/mysql/mysql.sock): Connect failed to database (postfix): Can't connect to local MySQL server through

Re: [CentOS] NOT Solved - Re: SELinux policy to allow Dovecot to connect to Mysql

On 04/26/2017 08:21 AM, Rob Kampen wrote: On 26/04/17 17:29, Robert Moskowitz wrote: On 04/26/2017 04:22 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote: On 04/25/2017 03:25 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: This made the same content as before that caused problems: I still don't understand, exactly. Are you

Re: [CentOS] NOT Solved - Re: SELinux policy to allow Dovecot to connect to Mysql

On 04/26/2017 08:04 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote: On 04/25/2017 10:29 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: did not work. it was set off, so I turned it on and tried it out. Got the same errors: Apr 26 01:25:45 z9m9z dovecot: dict: Error: mysql(/var/lib/mysql/mysql.sock): Connect failed to database

Re: [CentOS] NOT Solved - Re: SELinux policy to allow Dovecot to connect to Mysql

On 04/26/2017 07:29 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: On 04/26/2017 04:22 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote: On 04/25/2017 03:25 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: This made the same content as before that caused problems: I still don't understand, exactly. Are you seeing *new* problems after installing

Re: [CentOS] NOT Solved - Re: SELinux policy to allow Dovecot to connect to Mysql

On 04/26/2017 04:22 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote: On 04/25/2017 03:25 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: This made the same content as before that caused problems: I still don't understand, exactly. Are you seeing *new* problems after installing a policy? What are the problems? # The file

Re: [CentOS] NOT Solved - Re: SELinux policy to allow Dovecot to connect to Mysql

On 04/25/2017 06:45 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: On 04/25/2017 01:58 AM, Laurent Wandrebeck wrote: Quick’n’(really) dirty SELinux howto: Alternate process: 1: setenforce permissive 2: tail -f /var/log/audit/audit.log | grep AVC 3: use the service, exercise each function that's constrained by

Re: [CentOS] NOT Solved - Re: SELinux policy to allow Dovecot to connect to Mysql

On 04/25/2017 09:34 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: On 04/25/2017 12:05 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: How do I undo the damage the last attempt caused? I'm not sure what damage you mean. If you installed a custom selinux module already and want to remove it, look at the files in /etc/selinux

Re: [CentOS] NOT Solved - Re: SELinux policy to allow Dovecot to connect to Mysql

On 04/25/2017 09:34 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: On 04/25/2017 12:05 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: How do I undo the damage the last attempt caused? I'm not sure what damage you mean. If you installed a custom selinux module already and want to remove it, look at the files in /etc/selinux

Re: [CentOS] NOT Solved - Re: SELinux policy to allow Dovecot to connect to Mysql

On 04/25/2017 06:45 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: On 04/25/2017 01:58 AM, Laurent Wandrebeck wrote: Quick’n’(really) dirty SELinux howto: Alternate process: 1: setenforce permissive 2: tail -f /var/log/audit/audit.log | grep AVC 3: use the service, exercise each function that's constrained by

Re: [CentOS] sha256sum a dvd

On 04/24/2017 12:39 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote: On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 12:53:36PM -0400, James B. Byrne wrote: CentOS-6.9 I am trying to verify a locally created dvd. I am using sha256sum in this fashion: sha256sum /dev/sr0 Which gave this result: sha256sum: /dev/sr0: Input/output error

Re: [CentOS] Bonding mode balance-alb (6): How to control the assigned MAC address?

On 04/25/2017 12:32 PM, Frank Thommen wrote: Hi, we are trying to switch our bonding modes from 1 (active-backup) to 6 (balance-alb). However it seems, that these bond devices are not always getting the MAC address from the same slave. Sometimes the device gets the MAC address of the

Re: [CentOS] NOT Solved - Re: SELinux policy to allow Dovecot to connect to Mysql

On 04/25/2017 11:41 AM, Laurent Wandrebeck wrote: Le mardi 25 avril 2017 à 11:36 +0200, Robert Moskowitz a écrit : On 04/25/2017 11:29 AM, Laurent Wandrebeck wrote: Le mardi 25 avril 2017 à 11:19 +0200, Robert Moskowitz a écrit : /usr/lib/ld-2.17.so This file is not part of CentOS 7, nor

Re: [CentOS] NOT Solved - Re: SELinux policy to allow Dovecot to connect to Mysql

On 04/25/2017 11:29 AM, Laurent Wandrebeck wrote: Le mardi 25 avril 2017 à 11:19 +0200, Robert Moskowitz a écrit : /usr/lib/ld-2.17.so This file is not part of CentOS 7, nor CentOS 6 ? I am running Centos 7 armv7hl So it IS possible that I am missing something that did not get built

Re: [CentOS] NOT Solved - Re: SELinux policy to allow Dovecot to connect to Mysql

On 04/25/2017 11:12 AM, Laurent Wandrebeck wrote: Le mardi 25 avril 2017 à 11:07 +0200, Robert Moskowitz a écrit : On 04/25/2017 10:58 AM, Laurent Wandrebeck wrote: Le mardi 25 avril 2017 à 10:39 +0200, Robert Moskowitz a écrit : Thanks Laurent. You obviously know a LOT more about SELinux

Re: [CentOS] NOT Solved - Re: SELinux policy to allow Dovecot to connect to Mysql

On 04/25/2017 10:58 AM, Laurent Wandrebeck wrote: Le mardi 25 avril 2017 à 10:39 +0200, Robert Moskowitz a écrit : Thanks Laurent. You obviously know a LOT more about SELinux than I. I pretty much just use commands and not build policies. So I need some more information here. From what

Re: [CentOS] NOT Solved - Re: SELinux policy to allow Dovecot to connect to Mysql

with mysql, nat.) thanks On 04/25/2017 10:26 AM, Laurent Wandrebeck wrote: Le mardi 25 avril 2017 à 10:04 +0200, Robert Moskowitz a écrit : I thought I had this fixed, but I do not. I was away from this problem working on other matters, and came back (after a reboot) and it is still there, so I

[CentOS] NOT Solved - Re: SELinux policy to allow Dovecot to connect to Mysql

dovecot dict connecting to mysql when enforcing? Googling is not finding any real help. On 04/07/2017 04:37 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: I have been getting the following on my new mailserver: Apr 7 10:17:27 z9m9z dovecot: dict: Error: mysql(localhost): Connect failed to database (postfix

Re: [CentOS] systemd override.conf question

On 04/24/2017 07:37 PM, Jonathan Billings wrote: On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 06:35:38PM +0200, Robert Moskowitz wrote: Does the override.conf file need the section headers? For example: # cat /etc/systemd/system/postfix.service.d/override.conf [Unit] After=syslog.target network.target time

[CentOS] systemd override.conf question

Does the override.conf file need the section headers? For example: # cat /etc/systemd/system/postfix.service.d/override.conf [Unit] After=syslog.target network.target time-sync.target Will it work with just the After line, or is the [Unit] line needed to control the merge function. thanks

Re: [CentOS] What besides Postfix should not start until system time set?

Thanks. Good to know, and I will add this as a footnote to my howto. I am currently, not tackling Samba. I tried a year ago without success. My current domain server is ClearOS. On 04/21/2017 11:38 AM, Kenneth Porter wrote: Samba. Authentication won't work if the client and server have

Re: [CentOS] What besides Postfix should not start until system time set?

On 04/21/2017 09:25 AM, Denniston, Todd A CIV NAVSURFWARCENDIV Crane, JXVS wrote: From: Robert Moskowitz [r...@htt-consult.com] Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2017 5:00 PM To: CentOS mailing list Subject: [CentOS] What besides Postfix should not start until

Re: [CentOS] What besides Postfix should not start until system time set?

On 04/20/2017 06:17 PM, Warren Young wrote: On Apr 20, 2017, at 3:39 PM, Robert Moskowitz <r...@htt-consult.com> wrote: On 04/20/2017 05:16 PM, Warren Young wrote: On Apr 20, 2017, at 3:00 PM, Robert Moskowitz <r...@htt-consult.com> wrote: So I have learned that Postfix should

Re: [CentOS] What besides Postfix should not start until system time set?

On 04/20/2017 06:17 PM, Warren Young wrote: On Apr 20, 2017, at 3:39 PM, Robert Moskowitz <r...@htt-consult.com> wrote: On 04/20/2017 05:16 PM, Warren Young wrote: On Apr 20, 2017, at 3:00 PM, Robert Moskowitz <r...@htt-consult.com> wrote: So I have learned that Postfix should

Re: [CentOS] What besides Postfix should not start until system time set?

On 04/20/2017 05:16 PM, Warren Young wrote: On Apr 20, 2017, at 3:00 PM, Robert Moskowitz <r...@htt-consult.com> wrote: So I have learned that Postfix should delay until Chronyd has moved the system time from 0 to current. I think it’s more the case that CentOS is w

[CentOS] What besides Postfix should not start until system time set?

So I have learned that Postfix should delay until Chronyd has moved the system time from 0 to current. What other services need to be delayed? Apache? Bind? Of course if this is a nameserver, Chronyd will probably not be able to resolve the NTP server addresses until Bind is running!

[CentOS] Solved - Re: startup process that rebuilds aliases.db?

Got what I needed from the chronyd list On 04/20/2017 10:00 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: My Centos7 system does not have a battery for the clock (like most armv7 SOCs), thus I rely on that at some point in boot time, chronyd sets the time. If a file is updated prior to chronyd accomplishing

[CentOS] startup process that rebuilds aliases.db?

My Centos7 system does not have a battery for the clock (like most armv7 SOCs), thus I rely on that at some point in boot time, chronyd sets the time. If a file is updated prior to chronyd accomplishing its task (or network connectivity is down), the file ends up with a timestamp of "Dec 31

Re: [CentOS] humor (was Re: OT: systemd Poll)

On 04/16/2017 04:37 PM, Always Learning wrote: On Thu, 2017-04-13 at 10:39 -0400, Robert Moskowitz wrote: On 04/12/2017 02:08 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: mark "my web pages proudly built in vi!" And mine on medon.htt-consult.com done with Geany. Gedit works for me - web

Re: [CentOS] Simple OCSP server ??

What about the pki package that comes with Centos? pki-server and pki-ca? On 04/16/2017 11:54 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: Oh I don't know, their github works. However it seems that it isn't able to deal with more than one ocsp signing key. On 04/16/2017 08:40 AM, Robert Moskowitz wrote

Re: [CentOS] Simple OCSP server ??

On 04/14/2017 10:41 PM, Alice Wonder wrote: https://www.openca.org/ might fit my needs. their Centos repo does not exist, it seems? On 04/14/2017 06:29 PM, Alice Wonder wrote: Hello list, I'm contemplating running my own CA to implement the new proposed ISP for validation of S/MIME

Re: [CentOS] humor (was Re: OT: systemd Poll)

On 04/13/2017 03:01 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: On Thu, April 13, 2017 1:38 pm, Mauricio Tavares wrote: On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 2:06 PM, <m.r...@5-cent.us> wrote: Robert Moskowitz wrote: On 04/12/2017 02:08 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: d) And then there stuff that I'm not sure of the p

Re: [CentOS] bind vs. bind-chroot

On 04/13/2017 12:11 PM, Leon Fauster wrote: Am 13.04.2017 um 17:40 schrieb Valeri Galtsev <galt...@kicp.uchicago.edu>: On Thu, April 13, 2017 3:05 am, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: Le 13/04/2017 à 04:27, Robert Moskowitz a écrit : But make sure to have SELinux enabled if you do not run it ch

Re: [CentOS] humor (was Re: OT: systemd Poll)

On 04/12/2017 02:08 PM, m.r...@5-cent.us wrote: d) And then there stuff that I'm not sure of the purpose... like eclipse, that needs 2GB to run... for an editor. mark "my web pages proudly built in vi!" And mine on medon.htt-consult.com done with Geany. Using a editor that

Re: [CentOS] bind vs. bind-chroot

On 04/13/2017 04:23 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: On 04/13/2017 01:05 AM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: Le 13/04/2017 à 04:27, Robert Moskowitz a écrit : But make sure to have SELinux enabled if you do not run it chrooted. I have mine running that way. I bluntly admit not using SELinux, because until

Re: [CentOS] bind vs. bind-chroot

On 04/13/2017 04:05 AM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: Le 13/04/2017 à 04:27, Robert Moskowitz a écrit : But make sure to have SELinux enabled if you do not run it chrooted. I have mine running that way. I bluntly admit not using SELinux, because until now, I mainly used more bone-headed systems

Re: [CentOS] Primary DNS server with BIND on a public machine running CentOS 7

Yep, I messed up, copying from the wrong window. On 04/13/2017 01:22 AM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: Le 13/04/2017 à 04:25, Robert Moskowitz a écrit : I am writing my howto on BIND for Centos7. Mine is running on Centos7-arm. You can see some of the basics I have done at: file:///home/rgm/data

Re: [CentOS] Primary DNS server with BIND on a public machine running CentOS 7

ARGH! That was the local copy I am editing. On 04/13/2017 01:11 AM, John R Pierce wrote: On 4/12/2017 7:25 PM, Robert Moskowitz wrote: I am writing my howto on BIND for Centos7. Mine is running on Centos7-arm. You can see some of the basics I have done at: file:///home/rgm/data/htt/httnet

Re: [CentOS] bind vs. bind-chroot

On 04/12/2017 06:18 PM, John R Pierce wrote: On 4/12/2017 3:11 PM, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: On my public servers, I usually run BIND for DNS. I see CentOS offers a preconfigured (sort of) bind-chroot package. I wonder what's the effective benefit of this vs. a "normal" BIND setup without chroot.

Re: [CentOS] Primary DNS server with BIND on a public machine running CentOS 7

I am writing my howto on BIND for Centos7. Mine is running on Centos7-arm. You can see some of the basics I have done at: file:///home/rgm/data/htt/httnet/homepage/Centos7-armv7.html I have a caveat I learned with dealing with SELinux and BIND there. On 04/11/2017 01:05 PM, Nicolas Kovacs

Re: [CentOS] Fwd: Obsolete NSA exploit for Postfix 2.0 - 2.2

Too busy getting ready for Passover, and not looking carefully enough at the numbers. I better get back to what I should be doing right now. See you all Thursday. On 04/09/2017 08:13 PM, Peter wrote: On 10/04/17 12:08, Robert Moskowitz wrote: This was just posted on the Postfix list

[CentOS] Fwd: Obsolete NSA exploit for Postfix 2.0 - 2.2

This was just posted on the Postfix list. Centos 7 ships with: postfix-2.10.1-6.el7 Has this cert advisory been applied to the Centos build of Postfix? thank you Forwarded Message Subject:Obsolete NSA exploit for Postfix 2.0 - 2.2 Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2017 16:18:06

Re: [CentOS] logwatch customization question

On 04/09/2017 09:42 AM, Richard wrote: Date: Sunday, April 09, 2017 08:36:17 -0400 From: Robert Moskowitz <r...@htt-consult.com> Logwatch is installed, and I am assuming by how empty /etc/logwatch is that it is running from defaults, which I find in /usr/share/logwatch/default.conf/se

[CentOS] logwatch customization question

Logwatch is installed, and I am assuming by how empty /etc/logwatch is that it is running from defaults, which I find in /usr/share/logwatch/default.conf/services I want to customize ONE service. dovecot. Do I copy /usr/share/logwatch/default.conf/services/dovecot.conf to

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >